A bargain outlet store, a Texas-themed barbecue restaurant and a farm store are now open in Milwaukee's north suburbs
Three new businesses have recently opened in Milwaukee's northern suburbs and West Bend: a discount chain, a Texas-themed barbecue restaurant and a farm store.
Here's more about the businesses that opened their doors in February:
Ollie's Bargain Outlet has opened in the former Big Lots location at 1690 S. Main St. in West Bend.
Ollie's opened its first store July 28, 1982, in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania and currently has 571 stores across the U.S., according to Ollie's website. Ollie's Bargain Outlet has a plethora of departments, including food and snacks, books, flooring and rugs, electronics, pet supplies, home décor and products, clothing and accessories, and furniture.
Its hours are 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Saturday and 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Sunday.
For more information on Ollie's Bargain Outlet, visit www.ollies.us.
This Texas-style barbecue restaurant, in Germantown's former Barley Pop Pub's restaurant, features items such as loaded tater tots, briskets, pulled pork, smoked sausage and pulled chicken.
Trible B's Backyard BBQ is located at N116 W16137 Main St. in Germantown.
For more information about Trible B's Backyard BBQ, visit triblebsbbq.com or facebook.com/Triblebsbackyardbbq.
At Schmidt Century Farm in West Bend, 5485 St. Anthony Road, a new farm store opened Feb. 27. The store sells freshly-hatched eggs, Black Angus beef, Berkshire pork and poultry.
Its hours are 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Thursday and Friday and 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturday.
For more information, visit facebook.com/SchmidtCenturyFarm.
More: Pie anyone? Here are places in the Milwaukee area to grab a slice of pie on Pi Day March 14
More: Here are restaurants and other places to celebrate 2025 Mardi Gras in the Milwaukee area
Cathy Kozlowicz can be reached at 262-361-9132 or cathy.kozlowicz@jrn.com. Follow her on X at @kozlowicz_cathy.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: These three new businesses just opened in Germantown and West Bend
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's conservative allies warn Congress faces critical 'test' with $9.4B spending cut proposal
Some of the White House's conservative House allies say they're interpreting the upcoming vote on President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut proposal as a "test" of what Congress can achieve in terms of rolling back federal funding. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said he would not speak for members of the Trump administration but added, "I do think it is a test." "And I think this is going to demonstrate whether Congress has the fortitude to do what they always say they'll do," Roy said. "Cut the minimal amount of spending – $9 billion, NPR, PBS, things you complain about for a long time, or are they going to go back into their parochial politics?" House GOP leaders unveiled legislation seeking to codify Trump's spending cut request, known as a rescissions package, on Friday. It's expected to get a House-wide vote sometime next week. Meet The Trump-picked Lawmakers Giving Speaker Johnson A Full House Gop Conference "The rescissions request sent to Congress by the Trump Administration takes the federal government in a new direction where we actually cut waste, fraud, and abuse and hold agencies accountable to the American people," House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said in a statement introducing the bill. Read On The Fox News App The legislation would claw back funding that Congress already appropriated to PBS, NPR, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) – cuts outlined by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) earlier this year. And while several Republican leaders and officials have already said they expect to see more rescissions requests down the line, some people who spoke with Fox News Digital believe the White House is watching how Congress handles this first package before deciding on next steps. "You're dead right," Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., told Fox News Digital when asked if the rescissions package was a test. "I think that it's a test case – if we can't get that…then we're not serious about cutting the budget." A rescissions package only needs simple majorities in the House and Senate to pass. But Republicans in both chambers have perilously slim majorities that afford them few defections. Republicans are also racing the clock – a rescissions package has 45 days to be considered otherwise it is considered rejected and the funding reinstated. Mike Johnson, Donald Trump Get 'Big, 'Beautiful' Win As Budget Passes House Rep. Lance Gooden, R-Texas, did not directly say whether he viewed the spending cuts as a test but dismissed any potential concerns. "This is very low-hanging fruit, and I don't anticipate any problems," Gooden told Fox News Digital. "I've heard a few comments in the media, but I don't think they're serious comments. If someone on the Republican side can make a case for PBS, but they won't take a tough vote against illegal immigration, then we've got a lot of problems." Paul Winfree, president and CEO of the Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC), told Fox News Digital last week, "This first rescissions package from President Trump is a test as to whether Congress has the ability to deliver on his mandate by canceling wasteful spending through a filibuster-proof process." "If they can't then it's a signal for the president to turn up the dial with other tools at his disposal," Winfree, who served as Director of Budget Policy in the first Trump administration, said. Both Roy and Norman suggested a process known as "pocket rescissions" could be at least one backup plan – and one that Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought has floated himself. "Pocket rescissions" essentially would mean the White House introduces its spending cut proposal less than 45 days before the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30. In theory, it would run out the clock on those funds and allow them to expire whether Congress acted or not. Vought told reporters after meeting with Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Monday that he wanted to "see if it passes" but was "open" to further rescissions packages. "We want to send up general rescissions bills, to use the process if it's appropriate, to get them through the House and the Senate," Vought said. "We also have pocket rescissions, which you've begun to hear me talk a lot about, to be able to use the end of the fiscal year to send up a similar rescissions, and have the funds expire. So there's a lot of things that we're looking at." Still, some moderate Republicans may chafe at the conservative spending cuts. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., refused to comment on whether he'd support the legislation before seeing the details but alluded to some concerns. "Certainly I'm giving you a non-answer right now until I read the details," Bacon said. "It does bother me because I have a great rapport with Nebraska Public Radio and TV. I think they've been great to work with, and so that would be one I hope they don't put in." He also raised concerns about some specific USAID programs, including critical investments to fight Ebola and HIV in Africa. The legislation is expected to come before the House Rules Committee, the final gatekeeper before most legislation sees a House-wide vote, on Tuesday afternoon. It's separate from Trump's "one big, beautiful bill," a broad piece of legislation advancing the president's tax, energy, and immigration agenda through the budget reconciliation article source: Trump's conservative allies warn Congress faces critical 'test' with $9.4B spending cut proposal
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Did Mark Cuban Get Rich by ‘Scamming' Other Billionaires?
Mark Cuban has offered business advice to millions of people through his 'Shark Tank' appearances and has a partial stake in the Dallas Mavericks. However, some people — especially on Reddit — questioned his path to wealth, accusing the billionaire of scamming people to achieve his fortune. Cuban's initial riches didn't come from 'Shark Tank' or owning a basketball team. You need a lot of money to have those types of opportunities. The entrepreneur's big payday came in 1999 when Yahoo acquired his internet radio startup for $5.7 billion. Read Next: Check Out: The startup went out of business in just three years, but Cuban already made his money. It's regarded as one of the worst internet acquisitions during the dot-com bubble and some people view it as Cuban scamming people on the way to success. Although didn't live up to its price tag, it's hard to call it a scam — below is some important context to keep in mind. Also here's more on how Cuban became a billionaire. Cuban knew that his startup and most of the dot-com companies were overpriced. That's part of the reason he was eager to sell his company to Yahoo for $5.7 billion. Yahoo was making acquisitions left and right and lost a lot of money on a lot of deals. just happens to be a stand-out that is connected with Cuban. It's similar to when an investor sells a stock before it drops by 80%. It's not a scam, but the investor wanted to part ways with an asset before it lost significant value. Cuban knew this risk and used options to hedge his position in Yahoo stock. He received $1.4 billion in shares that he couldn't sell right away, so he bought Yahoo stock puts and sold calls leading up to the crash. See Next: Furthermore, was only started in 1995, so a $5.7 billion selling price is phenomenal after just two years of work. Financial markets rarely present those types of opportunities and Cuban was quick to pounce on it. It's not like Cuban forced Yahoo to buy his company for $5.7 billion. The company's executives had plenty of time to conduct due diligence and if they rushed the process, then that's on them. Not every business investment pans out and doing some due diligence can minimize the chances of making a mistake. Yahoo made several acquisitions during the dot-com bubble. It was a period of great irrationality that hurt many investors, but a few investors made out of that environment with a lot of money, including Cuban. It's well known that Yahoo executives also had the opportunity to buy Google for $1 million in 1998 but turned it down. They also had another chance to acquire Google for $5 billion in 2002. You can't miss out on more money than Yahoo did, even if you tried. The same management team that refused to buy Google at $5 billion in 2022 gave Cuban and his team $5.7 billion to acquire It's hard to call Cuban a scammer when the executives didn't do sufficient due diligence. There's nothing wrong with Cuban accepting a favorable deal if a company provided it to him after doing their research. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 7 Luxury SUVs That Will Become Affordable in 2025 I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money This article originally appeared on Did Mark Cuban Get Rich by 'Scamming' Other Billionaires? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
47.7% of Warren Buffett's $282 Billion Portfolio Is Invested in 3 Stocks That Could Net Berkshire Hathaway $1.6 Billion in Dividends This Year
Warren Buffett's simple investing strategy propeled Berkshire Hathaway to market-beating returns since 1965. Buffett likes investing in companies that return money to shareholders through dividends, because they compound his returns more quickly. Three of Berkshire's holdings, which represent almost half of the value of its portfolio, could deliver $1.6 billion in dividend payments this year. 10 stocks we like better than Apple › Warren Buffett has been the CEO of the Berkshire Hathaway holding company since 1965. He plans to step down at the end of this year, but he will continue serving as chairman of the board. Even without the Oracle of Omaha at the helm, Buffett's successful brand of long-term investing is expected to continue. Buffett typically invests in growing companies with reliable profits and strong management teams. He especially likes companies with shareholder-friendly initiatives like dividend schemes and stock buyback programs, because they compound his returns much faster. Buffett's strategy has been so successful that a $1,000 investment in Berkshire stock in 1965 would have been worth a staggering $44.7 million at the end of 2024. The same investment in the S&P 500 would have grown to just $342,906. Berkshire holds a number of dividend-paying stocks, but three of them represent 47.7% of the total value of its $282 billion portfolio of publicly traded securities. Assuming Buffett and his team don't sell a single share in those companies, they could net the conglomerate a whopping $1.6 billion in dividends this year alone. Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) is the $3 trillion juggernaut responsible for some of the world's most popular consumer devices including the iPhone, iPad, and Mac line of computers. Buffett and his team spent around $38 billion buying Apple shares between 2016 and 2023, and the value of that position grew to an eye-popping $170 billion heading into 2024. It accounted for more than half of the value of Berkshire's entire portfolio at that point, so Buffett and his team sold half the position last year to reduce some of the concentration risk. Apple is still Berkshire's largest holding with a 21.7% weighting in its portfolio, but the conglomerate's performance is now less susceptible to the fate of one single stock. So far this year, Berkshire earned a quarterly dividend payment of $0.25 per share from Apple on Feb. 13, and a second payment of $0.26 per share on May 15. It's likely to receive two more payments of $0.26 per share this year, bringing its total per-share payments to $1.03 in 2025. The conglomerate currently holds 300 million Apple shares, so that would translate to $309 million in dividends this calendar year. But the value of Berkshire's Apple position is currently $61 billion, so its dividend yield is just 0.5%. Cash in the bank pays a better return than that right now, but it's still a nice bonus on top of the incredible capital growth Berkshire earned in its time as an Apple shareholder. American Express (NYSE: AXP) is a global payments giant with a presence in over 200 countries. Unlike its competitors, the company operates a closed-loop ecosystem, which means it runs its own payments network, issues its own cards to consumers and businesses, and also funds the underlying lines of credit. The result is multiple revenue streams and significantly more control over its operating performance. Berkshire spent around $1.3 billion accumulating a stake in American Express during the 1990s, and it has been a cornerstone of the conglomerate's portfolio ever since. Berkshire currently owns one-fifth of the entire company, and its 151.6 million shares are currently worth $44.9 billion, which accounts for 15.9% of the value of its portfolio. So far in 2025, Berkshire has earned two quarterly dividend payments from American Express. The first was for $0.70 per share on Feb. 10, and the second was for $0.82 per share on May 9. There will likely be two more quarterly payments of $0.82 per share this year, translating to total per-share payments of $3.16 in 2025. Assuming Berkshire doesn't sell any of its 151.6 million shares, it stands to earn $479 million in dividends this year alone. That equals a yield of around 1.1%. Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) is the world's largest beverage company. It's home to over 200 individual brands including its namesake, Schweppes, Powerade, Vitamin Water, Sprite, and Fanta, which it sells in more than 200 countries. Coca-Cola has built an incredible distribution network, which includes popular fast-food chains like McDonald's, to ensure its products are constantly in front of consumers. Buffett accumulated 400 million shares in Coca-Cola on Berkshire's behalf between 1988 and 1994, spending around $1.3 billion in total. He has never sold a share, and the position is now worth a whopping $28.5 billion, which accounts for 10.1% of the conglomerate's portfolio. Coca-Cola also paid Berkshire $776 million in dividends last year, so the investing powerhouse basically recoups its initial $1.3 billion outlay every two years on top of the incredible capital growth. Coca-Cola increased its dividend at the start of 2025, paying $0.51 per share during the first quarter. It's likely to remain at that level for the rest of the year if history is any guide, placing Berkshire on track to earn $2.04 in dividends per share in 2025. Assuming it doesn't sell any of its 400 million shares, that means the conglomerate stands to earn $816 million in payments (a yield of 2.8%). Berkshire's Coca-Cola position is one of the best examples of Buffett's investing strategy in action, as he relies on time and the magic of compounding to do the heavy lifting for him. Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 American Express is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Anthony Di Pizio has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 47.7% of Warren Buffett's $282 Billion Portfolio Is Invested in 3 Stocks That Could Net Berkshire Hathaway $1.6 Billion in Dividends This Year was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
