Malta's ‘golden passport' scheme ruled to be illegal by EU's top court
The European court of justice has ruled that Malta's 'golden passport' scheme is illegal, meaning its cash-for-citizenship programme must be scrapped.
In a long-awaited ruling on Tuesday, the EU's top court concluded that Malta's investor citizenship scheme was contrary to EU law. Judges said the scheme represented a 'commercialisation of the grant of the nationality of a member state' and by extension EU citizenship, which was at odds with European law. Malta had jeopardised the mutual trust between EU member states necessary to create an area without internal borders, the court argued.
The judges examined a 2020 scheme that allowed people who had given up to €750,000 to Malta and – in theory – spent 12 months in the country to gain citizenship. With a Maltese passport, the person gained EU citizenship and the freedom to live and work anywhere in the union.
The scheme, which had its origins in a 2013 law, has long been criticised by transparency campaigners, who said it opened the door to money laundering, corruption and security risks. In 2021 a Guardian investigation found that multimillionaires with minimal genuine links to Malta were being granted citizenship, sometimes spending only three weeks in the country. A cache of emails from the Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation shared with international media revealed that many people claiming to be residents left their Maltese rental properties empty.
The European Commission launched legal proceedings against Malta and Cyprus in October 2020 for selling 'EU citizenship'. Cyprus announced it was closing its scheme shortly before the case was launched, but Malta's government was defiant. In submissions to the court it argued it had exclusive competence to grant nationality, so was entitled to run the scheme.
Responding to the ruling, Malta's government said it was studying the legal implications, 'so that the regulatory framework on citizenship can then be brought in line with the principles outlined in the judgment'.
But it also touted the benefits of the scheme, saying it had generated more than €1.4bn in revenues for the government since 2015.
In a Facebook post, the former prime minister Joseph Muscat claimed the verdict was a political judgment. Muscat was the prime minister when the golden passport scheme was introduced. He resigned in 2020 in response to widespread anger over his perceived attempts – which he denies – to protect allies from an investigation into the 2017 murder of the journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia.
Golden passport schemes sprang up across Europe as cash-strapped governments looked to raise money after the financial crisis. The British government announced in February 2022 that it was scrapping the UK's 'tier 1 investor visa' amid corruption and national security concerns and worsening relations with Russia.
In contrast, Donald Trump announced in February he planned to launch a 'gold card' visa, a $5m residency permit for wealthy foreigners.
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
Matthew Caruana Galizia, the director of the foundation that works to secure his mother's public interest legacy, described the court judgment as 'a win for the people of Malta and for all EU residents who have been unfairly exposed to the whims of money launderers and corrupt criminals buying their way into the EU'. He urged the government 'to abolish its citizenship-by-investment programme without delay'.
A European Commission spokesperson welcomed the court decision and called on Malta to implement the judgment: 'European citizenship is not for sale,' the spokesperson said. 'Investor citizenship schemes breach EU law and as such should be abolished by all member states.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
37 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Nexus Packaging expands Glasgow site with fresh investment
Nexus Packaging has announced the second phase of expansion at its advanced blow moulding site, which is part of its broader mission to innovate, boost energy efficiency, and nurture new talent within the UK's blow moulding industry. The 57,000 sq ft site, which opened in 2024, boasts nine all-electric Magic blow moulding machines, alongside state-of-the-art compressors, chillers, blending systems, and solar panels. (Image: Supplied) Chris Wagner, the director, said: "We're now moving into the next phase of development, with plans to build an additional 20,000 sq ft of storage and install four new machines. "These will be largely dedicated to custom tool designs, giving us greater flexibility and speed in servicing our clients. Read more: Further man arrested in Glasgow amid suspected 'gang war' Eddie Lyons Jnr on holiday with golf club from near Glasgow when killed in Spain Police staff could strike in row over 'huge cuts' "The West of Scotland has a proud legacy of skilled engineering. "We've been able to recruit a strong team of young technicians and machine operators, many of whom are working alongside experienced moulders from our original 1990s plant who've returned to support this new chapter." Nexus believes this blend of fresh talent and seasoned expertise provides a distinct advantage in an industry where many competitors rely on dated operations and infrastructure. Mr Wagner said: "Modern blow moulding machinery now runs via touch screen interfaces. "To get the best out of this technology, you need fresh minds and modern thinking." He remains committed to revitalising the UK's manufacturing base. Mr Wagner said: "Over the last 25 years, a lack of investment in people and machinery has shifted much industrial blow moulding production overseas. "We're working hard to reverse that trend to bring jobs, innovation, and pride back to British manufacturing."
Spectator
40 minutes ago
- Spectator
The truth about the 1984 miners' strike
On 6 March 1984, I found myself smack-bang in the middle of the largest industrial dispute in post-war history. As the son of a fifth-generation miner whose bedroom window looked out onto Pye Hill Pit in Selston – the remote Nottinghamshire mining village I called home – I couldn't help but be caught up in the miners' strike. And over its 363 days, I watched with bemused anger as a series of nods, winks, slights of hand and outright lies were fashioned into a hard and fast history. On one side we had the National Union of Mineworkers' (NUM) principled president Arthur Scargill and the striking miners, fighting to save British mining. On the other side, Nottinghamshire's moneygrubbing scabs, intent on murdering Old King Coal – aided by Margaret Thatcher and the rozzers. Admittedly, the media didn't spell it out quite so plainly, but there were enough headlines and emotion-heavy images to make sure we all got the message.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Mainstreaming of far-right ideas in UK politics shows why John Swinney was right to raise alarm
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Received wisdom at Westminster has it that the far-right has never made it into UK politics. Coupled with that theory is then the debate by the same commentators around what constitutes the 'far-right'. However using the measurement of policies pursued, which is, after all, the very essence of a political movement or party, the far-right has most certainly arrived in UK politics. UK parties, across the political spectrum, now embrace the hardest of hard Brexit, unthinkable even in the aftermath of the referendum in June 2016, and a policy that has done untold damage to the economy and our rights. We also had a government that promoted the sending of asylum seekers to Rwanda and MPs who openly campaign on leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which has underpinned our rights since the end of the Second World War. Were the UK to leave, it would be joining Russia and Belarus in doing so, hardly polite company. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Brexit, leaving the ECHR, and the Rwanda scheme are or were mainstream policy proposals in the UK yet they are policies that far-right parties elsewhere in Europe would baulk at. Even the hardest of hard-right parties in other parts of Europe such as the National Rally in France, the Vlaams Belaang in Belgium or Alternative fur Deutschland in Germany have abandoned plans to leave the EU, given the UK's Brexit debacle. John Swinney's stances on the EU, Donald Trump and migration, among others, have won plaudits (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images An attack on justice Yet despite these policy failures, the mainstreaming of the far-right has become all too common in our politics along with their tactics. Over the past few days alone, Conservative Shadow Justice Secretary, Robert Jenrick, attacked the Labour Attorney General for doing his job and defending his clients. His remarks were described by former Conservative Attorney General Dominic Grieve 'as a direct attack on our principles of justice'. As we saw in this week's Hamilton by-election, we in Scotland are certainly not immune. Nigel Farage's attack on Anas Sarwar, which he doubled down on when challenged by the press, should act as a warning to us all. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Such remarks are unacceptable and whereas I may have legitimate policy differences with the Scottish Labour leader, they should have no place in our political discourse. For all the heat of the campaign in the run-up to what was a hard-fought by-election, it was good to see SNP and Labour leaders call out these disgraceful comments. Zia Yusuf's resignation as chair of Reform on Thursday and his concerns around Reform in the Commons should also act as a warning. Calling out bigotry That is why the First Minister was right to bring together colleagues from across the political spectrum in a summit seeking to 'lock out' Reform from Holyrood earlier this year. John Swinney is right to call out their policies and the 'bigotry' that they represent and to call out Farage as 'an accomplice of the Russian agenda'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Fair play to the politicians and representatives of civil society who put any political differences aside and joined the First Minister. That meeting was criticised at the time by the Conservatives and a range of commentators. Given Reform's tactics and language over the course of the by-election campaign, we have seen just how badly needed that stance was and remains. Labour will be pleased with Thursday's win, and I congratulate them on it, however, no party can afford to be complacent about Reform. One of the lessons from Hamilton must be that the key to taking on the far-right is to challenge them on their ideas. Nigel Farage's track record is not a particularly good one. He has been a driving force campaigning to leave the EU for decades. That was a decision that has exacerbated the cost-of-living crisis, removed rights from UK citizens, damaged business, especially small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) and ultimately made us all poorer. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He backed Donald Trump whose presidency has destabilised the world, seen tariffs introduced that have damaged the global economy, and undermined efforts to support Ukraine against Russian aggression. 'Island of Strangers' The Reform policy platform is weak. For their opponents, that should provide ample targets. Yet, in the Westminster bubble their policies are given far too much credibility. There is an omertà around discussing the glaring failure of the Brexit experiment and the less said about Keir Starmer's 'Island of Strangers' speech on migration frankly the better. John Swinney would be the first to admit that the Scottish Government haven't got everything right. However, on the big calls around our relationship with the EU, the impact of Donald Trump's presidency, migration, child poverty and the rights we should enjoy as citizens, the SNP leader has maintained credibility for his stances, winning plaudits at Westminster and further afield. Politics is about ideas and Reform's are simply not good ones. The Conservatives and Reform are increasingly aligning on a range of policies and a pact or even merger is not out of the question. This is to be expected, given that Reform draws its politicians and many voters from the Conservatives. They have, in turn, turned their backs on One Nation conservatism, and instead the party is dominated by the Johnson/Truss populist wing, which is not so different from Farage and Reform. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This week's by-election and the preceding campaign must act as a wake-up call. During the run-up to the Holyrood elections, there is an opportunity for all parties to set out their vision for Scotland. On the one hand, there is an inclusive, outward-looking and internationalist vision represented by John Swinney, on the other is Reform's inward and exclusive offering. I know which one I'm backing.
