Perplexity Would Also Consider Buying Google's Chrome, Raises Concerns About OpenAI's Bid
On the second day of Google's landmark antitrust search trial, AI startup Perplexity told the court it would consider buying Chrome-but would rather Google retain the open-source browser over seeing it fall into the hands of a company like OpenAI. Although it's unclear how Perplexity would be able to afford the browser.
When asked whether Perplexity believes any company other than Google could run Chrome at scale-without sacrificing quality or charging people, Perplexity's chief business officer Dmitry Shevelenko said "I think we could do it."Shevelenko raised red flags about the future of Chromium, Google's open-source browser base, if OpenAI were to snap up Chrome in a court-ordered divestiture, (OpenAI exec Nick Turnely, who testified earlier in the week, said the company would be interested in Chrome in the event of a spin off).
In the event of a forced sell off, Perplexity is working on its own workaround. The company plans to launch Comet, a Chromium-based browser it's building in-house.
Shevelenko said that Google makes strong products that others can iterate on, and Perplexity doesn't want a remedy that "cripples Google's ability to keep doing that." However, he also didn't hold back on sharing his complaints of the tech giant having exclusive agreements with mobile carriers.
"There's all the self-serving incentive to be here today and shout about how evil Google is, and I think we want to be reasonable," Shevelenko said, per The Verge.
DOJ Accuses Google of Using Search Monopoly Tactics To Push AI Product Gemini
This isn't the first time Perplexity has thrown its hat in the ring for a big tech castoff. The AI startup has also floated the idea of buying TikTok, the social giant currently staring down a potential U.S. ban over its ties to China-based ByteDance.
Perplexity isn't just worrying about Chrome. Shevelenko testified that Google's ironclad distribution deals with phone makers and carriers have boxed his company out of similar partnerships. Meanwhile, The Justice Department is urging the court to unwind those deals as part of its remedies to break up Google's illegal search monopoly.
Perplexity's Next Bet? An AI-Driven Browser Called Comet
Shevelenko-who had initially hesitated to testify due to concerns about potential repercussions from Google-didn't shy away from detailing his complaints. He walked the court through the cumbersome process of setting Perplexity as the default AI assistant on Android, admitting he even needed help from a colleague. He added that even after completing the process, Perplexity's assistant still doesn't operate on equal footing with Google's-requiring people to manually activate it, per The Verge.
Shevelenko also said that Perplexity had engaged with a list of anonymized phone makers in an attempt to strike a deal to have its AI search preloaded as the default in the U.S. However, he said, the company was unable to reach any agreements. The phone makers, he explained, were wary of jeopardizing their share of Google's revenue by breaking existing deals.
Apple's Search Deal Is Critical to Google. The Courts May Rule It Illegal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's business empire was built on government help. How badly could Donald Trump hurt him?
Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the U.S. political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the U.S. government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalization". Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by U.S. states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. So far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the U.S. while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a U.S. citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI Search Engine Perplexity Gains Traction vs. Google
Perplexity keeps breaking records, clocking 780 million searches in Maya 20% jump from Aprilas CEO Aravind Srinivas told Bloomberg Tech Summit attendees that people are tired of legacy browsers like Chrome. If Perplexity can keep this momentum, Srinivas believes it could hit 1 billion weekly queries soon, thanks to everything happening in its search bar, new-tab page and sidecar interface that drives extra engagement. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Sign with PYPL. The startup, backed by Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Jeff Bezos, is also gearing up to launch Comet within three to five weeks. Comet is Perplexitys new agentic search service that does things for youlike record your virtual meetings, transcribe them and let you search what was said. Srinivas admitted building those features has been harder than anticipated, but he says reliability and speed have improved, and everyones working super hard to get the browser out in your hands. Perplexity just added a way to buy products directly in chat via PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) or Venmo, hinting at future revenue beyond ads. That matters because Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) still owns about 90% of search trafficand even though Bing sits in second with around 4%, Perplexitys off-the-charts growth and $14 billion valuation (up from $9 billion in December) show investors are betting that a browser-native, AI-first experience could steal user time and queries. Investors should keep an eye on whether Perplexity can sustain these gains once Comet goes live; this summers traffic pick-up and early feedback on Comet will be key gauges. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Hamilton Spectator
22 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Michaels completes acquisition of Joann's intellectual property and fan-favorite labels
NEW YORK (AP) — Craft labels from the now-shuttered fabrics seller Joann are making their way to a new home: Michaels. The Michaels Companies announced on Thursday that it had completed its purchase of Joann's intellectual property and private label brands — in an acquisition that arrives as the Texas-based arts and crafting chain works to expand its own fabric, sewing and yarn offerings. 'We're honored to have the opportunity to welcome JOANN customers into our creative community and are committed to delivering the selection, value, and inspiration they are looking for at Michaels,' Michaels CEO David Boone said in a statement. The deal, he added, allows the company to better 'respond to rising demand' among both new and existing customers. Financial terms of the acquisition were not disclosed. The Associated Press reached out to Michaels for further information on Friday. With roots dating back to a single Ohio storefront in 1943 , Joann had grown into a destination for generations of sewers, quilters, knitters and lovers of other crafts for more than 80 years. But more recently, operational challenges continued to pile up — with the retailer pointing to sluggish consumer demand, inventory shortages and rising competition. Joann announced it would be going out of business back in February, just one month after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for the second time within a year. At the time, the company said financial services company GA Group, together with Joann's term lenders, had been selected as the winning bidder to 'acquire substantially all of Joann's assets' and conduct going-out-of-business sales at all store locations. Michaels on Thursday said that its purchase of Joann's IP and private brands included the acquisition of 'Big Twist' yarns, which had become a staple in Joann stores over the years. Those 'Big Twist' labels are now being developed as part of Michaels' portfolio — and will be available in-stores and online later this year, the company said. In the meantime, Michaels has also dedicated a landing page to welcome former Joann customers online. And as part of its overall expansion into fabrics, Michaels said on Thursday that its adding more than 600 new products from new and existing brands — including quilting supplies and fabrics, specialty threads, sewing machines and more. Michaels, founded in 1973, currently operates 1,300 stores across 49 U.S. states and Canada. Its parent company also owns Artistree, a framing merchandise manufacturer.
