Mahmoud Khalil reunites with family after more than 100 days in Ice detention
Mahmoud Khalil – the Palestinian rights activist, Columbia University graduate and legal permanent resident of the US who had been held by federal immigration authorities for more than three months – has been reunited with his wife and infant son.
Khalil, the most high-profile student to be targeted by the Trump administration for speaking out against Israel's war on Gaza, arrived in New Jersey on Saturday at about 1pm – two hours later than expected after his flight was first rerouted to Philadelphia. Khalil greeted reporters and cheering supporters as he emerged from security at Newark airport accompanied by his wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, and son in a stroller, as well as his legal team and the New York Democratic representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
'If they threaten me with detention, even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine,' he said at a brief press conference after landing. 'I just want to go back and continue the work I was already doing, advocating for Palestinian rights, a speech that should actually be celebrated rather than punished.'
Khalil was released from a Louisiana immigration detention facility on Friday evening after a federal judge ruled that punishing someone over a civil immigration matter was unconstitutional and ordered his immediate release on bail.
Khalil was sent to Jena, Louisiana, shortly after being seized by plainclothes US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agents in the lobby of his university residence in front of his heavily pregnant wife, who is a US citizen, in early March.
The 30-year-old, who has not been charged with a crime, was forced to miss the birth of his first child, Deen, by the Trump administration. Khalil had been permitted to see his wife and son briefly – and only once – earlier in June.
In ordering Khalil's immediate release on Friday, federal judge Michael Farbiarz of Newark, New Jersey, found that the government had failed to provide evidence that the graduate was a flight risk or danger to the public. '[He] is not a danger to the community,' Farbiarz ruled. 'Period, full stop.'
The judge also ruled that punishing someone over a civil immigration matter by detaining them was unconstitutional.
Speaking to reporters outside the detention facility where an estimated 1,000 men are being held, Khalil said: 'Trump and his administration, they chose the wrong person for this. That doesn't mean there is a right person for this. There is no right person who should be detained for actually protesting a genocide.'
'No one is illegal – no human is illegal,' he said. 'Justice will prevail no matter what this administration may try.'
The Trump administration immediately filed a notice of appeal, NBC reported.
Khalil was ordered to surrender his passport and green card to Ice officials in Jena, Louisiana, as part of his conditional release. The order also limits Khalil's travel to a handful of US states, including New York and Michigan to visit family, for court hearings in Louisiana and New Jersey, and for lobbying in Washington DC.
Khalil's detention was widely condemned as a dangerous escalation in the Trump administration's assault on speech, which is ostensibly protected by the first amendment to the US constitution. His detention was the first in a series of high-profile arrests of international students who had spoken out about Israel's siege of Gaza, its occupation of Palestinian territories and their university's financial ties to companies that profit from Israeli military strikes.
Khalil's release marks the latest setback for the Trump administration, which had pledged to deport pro-Palestinian international students en masse, claiming without evidence that speaking out against the Israeli state amounts to antisemitism.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
In Khalili's case, multiple Jewish students and faculty had submitted court documents in his support. Khalil was a lead negotiator between the Jewish-led, pro-Palestinian campus protests at Columbia in 2024. And during an appearance on CNN, he said, 'The liberation of the Palestinian people and the Jewish people are intertwined and go hand-by-hand, and you cannot achieve one without the other.'
In addition to missing the birth of his son, Khalil was kept from his family's first Mother's Day and Father's Day, and his graduation from Columbia while held in custody from 8 March to 20 June.
Trump's crackdown on free speech, pro-Palestinian activists and immigrants has triggered widespread protests and condemnation, as Ice agents ramp up operations to detain tens of thousands of people monthly for deportation while seeking – and in many instances succeeding – to avoid due process.
Three other students detained on similar grounds to Khalil – Rümeysa Öztürk, Badar Khan Suri and Mohsen Mahdawi – were previously released while their immigration cases are pending. Others voluntarily left the country after deportation proceedings against them were opened. Another is in hiding as she fights her case.
On Sunday, a rally to celebrate Khalil's release – and protest against the ongoing detention by thousands of other immigrants in the US and Palestinians held without trial in Israel – will be held at 5.30pm ET at the steps of the Cathedral of St John the Divine in upper Manhattan. Khalil is expected to address supporters, alongside his legal representatives.
'Mahmoud's release reignites our determination to continue fighting until all our prisoners are released – whether in Palestine or the United States, until we see the end of the genocide and the siege on Gaza, and until we enforce an arms embargo on the Israel,' said Miriam Osman of the Palestinian Youth Movement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
New Diddy texts reveal escort's 'instructions' for getting to multi-day freak-offs where they'd have sex 'like rabbits'
New evidence in Sean ' Diddy ' Combs' trial has unearthed text messages between an escort and the rapper's associate, giving him detailed instructions on how to get to and from one of the marathon freak-offs. Combs' sex-trafficking trial began last month and the latest bombshell is that a male escort named Jules was texting with a Diddy associate to arrange his travel, according to documents shared as part of the court record. It's not known who the Diddy associate is, as the screenshots of the text conversation only identifies the person as 'device owner.' In messages dated on August 26, 2009, 'device owner' asked Jules if he wanted to fly from Los Angeles to New York City for the freak-off. Jules was promised a 'tip' since the request was so last minute, according to the documents. A mere two minutes later, Jules replies back accepting the offer. The 'device owner' then texts the travel information to Jules, giving him the information about the Virgin America flight from LAX to John F. Kennedy International Airport. The mysterious Diddy scheduler also tells Jules to reach out when he's ready to book his return flight. In messages dated on August 26, 2009, the Diddy associate known only as 'device owner' asked Jules if he wanted to fly from Los Angeles to New York City for the freak-off. In this batch of messages, Jules says the people presumably involved in the freak-off are 'rabbits' In subsequent text messages between Jules and 'device owner' in December 2009, Jules appears to be trying to set up an alibi for himself so his girlfriend wouldn't find out about his alleged activities with Diddy Once Jules got to New York early the next morning on August 27, he texted the 'device owner' that he arrived and would be headed to his hotel room to shower and clean up. About an hour after that, the 'device owner' texted Jules to come to room 4901 and Jules responded 'OK.' Presumably after the freak-off, Jules texted around 2:45pm on August 27 that he wanted a flight to be arranged back to Los Angeles. The 'device owner' said that would be done, but not before Jules came back up to the room. He was wanted back in an hour. Jules responded that he need a little more rest than one hour and asked if that would be okay. He joked that hadn't slept in two days and added that 'u guys r rabbits lol.' 'Lol, Ok hit me when you wake. Sorry bro. No stress. U let me know,' the 'device owner' replied back. Almost four hours later at 7:45pm, Jules texted that he was coming to the room. Fifteen minutes after that, he writes that he was 'at the door knocking' and to let him know 'if u are there.' At 8:10pm, Jules assumes that occupants of the hotel room 'stepped out.' The 'device owner' finally gets back to him at 8:21pm and says, 'OK come up.' In subsequent text messages between Jules and 'device owner' in December 2009, Jules appears to be trying to set up an alibi for himself so his girlfriend wouldn't find out about his alleged activities with Diddy. 'Can u shoot me a text just saying you guys will be somewhere else this weekend so i can show her?' Jules asks on December 8. After some further correspondence, Jules tells 'device owner' that 'it worked.' He then offered which days he was available. In the texts, they don't call what's going on a freak-off, rather they call it a 'party.' Combs has been charged with racketeering conspiracy, two charges of sex trafficking and two charges of transportation to engage in prostitution. Prosecutors claim Diddy coerced victims into drug-fueled sex parties using sex and violence. The rapper has denied all the accusations, saying all the sex acts were consensual. The new text evidence against the former music mogul came after a damning day in court on Thursday, when prosecutors introduced a tranche of photos from the March 2024 raid on Diddy's in the Holmby Hills area of Los Angeles. Jurors saw pictures of high-powered rifles, drugs and hundreds of bottles of baby oil. Investigators also found bags containing ketamine, which were also photographed as evidence. The pictures show bottles of baby oil neatly lined in display cabinets, while dozen of boxes of the lubricant were also found stacked in the home. Defense Attorney Marc Agnifilo has said the star likes to 'buy in bulk like any other American' and claimed Combs participated in consensual sex.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Furious summer vacationers want to shake off $100k 'Taylor Swift tax' headed their way
Rhode Island has approved a controversial bill, dubbed the ' Taylor Swift Tax', on million-dollar second homes people use for summer breaks. The tax will target the second homes of all the residents in the state who don't use their home full time. The Rhode Island House of Representatives has already greenlit a proposed $13.9 billion state budget that includes the sweeping new real estate tax. This means the pop star will face her own six-figure tax on her $17 million Watch Hill estate if the bill goes into law. The measure passed by a 66 to 9 vote on June 18 and now moves to the state Senate. Swift has famously owned the mansion in the upmarket beach town since 2013 and spends July 4th there every year. Under the guise of helping Rhode Island's affordability crisis, those who have 'non-primary residences valued over $1 million' will be taxed under the proposal. Overall, homeowners would face an annual surcharge of $2.50 per $500 of assessed value above the first $1 million — meaning a $3 million second home would see a $10,000 yearly fee. Swift and her beachfront estate neighbors would likely get taxed $100,000 and up based on the size of their mansions. The budget also proposes a 63 percent hike in the real estate conveyance tax, which sellers pay upon transferring property. The state says revenue from both tax hikes would go toward affordable housing projects, including the construction of low-income units and expansion of housing tax credits. But Watch Hill realtor Larry Burns warns there will be economic backlash. Burns specializes in coastal and luxury properties, and says the impact of the tax will trickle down to longtime residents who are not wealthy, and to local economies. He said the state has not been specific about how exactly the money is going to be spent — and the tax will unfairly penalize those who own inherited or family properties. Watch Hill famously passes homes on for generations. 'Rhode Island economy for the most part is driven by tourism, especially in all in New England especially coastal state like Rhode Island,' he told the Daily Mail. 'And it's really going to discourage people from buying second homes here because of the added expense.' Burns warns that neighboring states like Massachusetts, Maine, or Connecticut could become more attractive to buyers and Rhode Island will take a massive hit. 'You squeeze them here they're going to go somewhere else,' he warned. He continued: 'There's people like Taylor Swift — people will look at her and think, "Well, she has so much money she'll never even notice an increase like this." 'But it's not like the residents here have inexhaustible resources. '$100,000 here might be college education for the year for a kid, or two kids.' Burns added the tax could force many to part with cherished family homes. 'There's a lot of older folks or multigenerational properties where the siblings have inherited the property, and if you keep adding expenses people end up selling because they can't keep up with the cost,' he said. Part-time residents are also crucial to the local economy, Burns said. 'They spend an enormous amount of money in those six to eight weeks that they're here,' Burns said. 'And they don't impose a lot of demand on municipal resources like schools, police, or the hospital.' Local businesses are bracing for the fallout. 'I hear from people in the construction business, landscaping, any kind of service work, restaurants — everybody's going to be really negatively affected if this goes into effect,' Burns said. 'You're creating a welfare state at that point for service workers.' Burns stressed that tourism and the summer season is what gives the state its money. 'They're worried about funding low income housing, but the problem is you've got to give people jobs before you worry about the housing,' he said. 'If your economy runs on tourism and you do this to it, you're really negatively impacting those people's ability to earn a living.' Whether the tax becomes law remains uncertain, but it now awaits Senate approval and the Governor Dan McKee's signature. Burns says it could go either way. 'I don't know if they're posturing for political reasons, but this is really killing the goose that lays the golden egg,' he said. If the tax does pass, the tax would take effect in July 2026.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Map reveals your nearest nuclear fallout shelter if major US cities are bombed
The fear of a nuclear apocalypse has reached a level not seen in decades as leaders in the US, Israel, Iran, and Russia continue to warn about the start of 'all-out war.' The world has been waiting to see if President Donald Trump will deploy US forces to strike Iran, which has refused to give up its development of a nuclear weapon, a move that could ignite World War III. For everyday Americans, the only question that may matter in the minutes and seconds before a nuclear weapon strikes the US is where are the nearest fallout shelters. A nuclear fallout shelter is designed to shield people from radioactive particles, known as fallout, that spread after a nuclear explosion. Although they're not built to withstand the initial blast, extreme heat, and shockwaves of a nuclear explosion, they can act as a safe room for anyone who lives to see the aftermath. Using tools like Google Maps and historical records from the Cold War, when most of these shelters were built, doomsday preppers have been able to find where thousands of them may still be standing. Even after several decades, records show that states like New York, Maryland, Michigan, Texas, and Wisconsin all still have hundreds and possibly thousands of underground facilities labeled as emergency fallout shelters. A new map has now revealed where Americans can find safety during a nuclear attack, unearthing the locations still listed as fallout shelters throughout the country. The new fallout shelter map reveals that the vast majority of these radiation bunkers are scattered throughout America's largest cities. This includes dozens (and possibly hundreds) of basement shelters in cities like Boston, Baltimore, Dallas, Detroit, Memphis, Milwaukee, New York, Oklahoma City, Sacramento, and Washington DC. Sean Gold, an Air Force veteran and founder of the survival guide website TruePrepper, is one of the experts trying to find all of the fallout shelters that are still viable for Americans to use in the event of a nuclear attack. He noted that the canned food and medical supplies that were originally put in these bunkers decades ago are likely not there anymore, making it harder for people in 2025 to survive without bringing their own food and water. As for what makes a good fallout shelter, Gold said that shielding is the most important factor. Thick walls and a roof made of concrete or steel are necessary to block out the radiation produced by a nuclear explosion. 'The thicker the shielding, the better the protection. Alternatively, several yards of dirt will work, so many shelters are below ground,' Gold explained in an April report. Fallout shelters also need good ventilation with proper filters to trap radioactive particles in the air. Those inside will need enough food and clean water to last for weeks or months, an area for waste disposal so you don't contaminate clean supplies, and a comfortable place to sit or sleep. Additionally, Gold noted that the location of a fallout shelter should be in an area that isn't likely to take a direct hit from a nuclear bomb, and it should also be within a short distance of the people planning to use it. The US began building fallout shelters at a rapid pace during the 1950s and 1960s, with efforts intensifying around 1961 through the National Fallout Shelter Survey, a project to identify public buildings, including schools, libraries, and basements, as potential shelters. Bradley Garrett, a cultural geographer and author of the book Bunker: What It Takes to Survive the Apocalypse, has studied the history of how these bunkers have been designed through the years and how well they'd protect you in an emergency. 'They would not be able to take a direct hit,' Garrett told Newsweek in 2022. 'But you could shelter in them for the 14 days that would be necessary after a nuclear attack until the radiation levels fall to a point where it's relatively safe to emerge from the bunker,' he continued. To this day, residents in large metropolitan areas like New York will still see the fallout shelter symbol (three yellow triangles) on building plaques throughout the city. This lets the public know there's a nuclear fallout shelter down in the basement and may even provide directions on how to get there and how many people can fit inside. Thousands of these bunkers were built all around the US during the Cold War. In New York alone, there were reportedly more than 18,000 during the height of nuclear tensions with Russia. However, they were largely forgotten as the threat of nuclear war faded in the 1980s. Many Cold War-era shelters have been repurposed for storage, parking, or other uses, especially in major cities. Since the 9/11 terror attacks and Russia's invasion into Ukraine, however, doomsday preppers have been feverishly trying to track down all of these hidden shelters as the threat of global destruction has returned. Unfortunately, actually accessing a fallout shelter in your community may be harder than it sounds. There is currently no public list of active shelters available for everyday Americans, since most are now defunct or privately owned by homeowners who built one for themselves in their basements and backyards. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) now advises the public to shelter in place instead of looking for an old fallout shelter. Federal officials have recommended basements or inner rooms with thick walls to block radiation. In FEMA's 2023 Nuclear Detonation Planning Guide, they explained that the change in their reasoning focused on practicality, claiming that modern nuclear threats are unpredictable. FEMA also claimed that maintaining a nationwide shelter network was logistically and financially impossible for the US government. The agency recommended staying indoors for at least 24 to 48 hours, even though it could take much longer for the fallout to completely clear the area.
