Ford reigns in GTD PRO, AWA Corvette wins GTD at Daytona
Two years ago, Ford announced the birth of the Mustang GT3 customer racing program. Last year, the car made its debut to lackluster results, grabbing more headlines for shedding its bodywork than for running at the front of the field at any point.
What a difference a year makes — the 63rd Rolex 24 At Daytona was the stage for the Blue Oval's fresh start. Ford Multimatic Motorsports' new-look trio of Christopher Mies, Frederic Vervisch, and Dennis Olsen finally gave the Mustang GT3 its first win — anywhere in the world — after a fruitless first season across IMSA, FIA WEC, and GT World Challenge America.
Ford's veteran stalwart Mike Rockenfeller expressed concerns that his pole lap in qualifying wouldn't translate to real results come race time, yet at the end of a rough and tumble race, the factory-backed Mustangs were on the podium.
Olsen and Mies kept their heads cool near the end, as Olsen overtook the No. 4 Corvette of Nico Varrone on the race's final restart and withstood pressure from the likes of Laurin Heinrich and Alexander Sims to secure that precious first win for Ford.
'It's simply amazing,' Mies said of Ford's dramatic turnaround. 'When I saw the car for the first time online, I immediately got into contact with Ford and with Multimatic. I said, 'I want to be part of it.' I wanted the change, let's say, after a long stint with another brand (Audi).
'We came here exactly a year ago, leading the race back then, which was fantastic for a new car. But like everyone, we had some little issues. We solved them over the year. Coming back one year later together with Ford Performance and Multimatic Motorsports is incredible.'
The No. 64 Ford of Rockenfeller, Sebastian Priaulx, and super-sub Austin Cindric sandwiched the No. 3 Corvette of Antonio Garcia, Alexander Sims, and Daniel Juncadella which finished a highly-spirited second.
And that should bring us to the biggest flashpoint of the race: Paul Miller's two cars, versus the No. 4 Corvette. Tommy Milner and the No. 4 crew lost out on a real chance at the win after an ill-mannered exchange between the No. 48 car — which was no longer in contention after Max Hesse was swept up in the 'big one' late Saturday night — became a pain in a battle for the lead between Milner and the No. 1 BMW of Connor De Phillippi.
Augusto Farfus was the direct target of Milner's ire. To borrow a famous Murray Walker quote, the Corvette ace told his BMW counterpart he was going for first place — and he was — but the BMW would be an impediment to Milner and it escalated into Milner and De Phillippi colliding at the exit of the International Horseshoe.
'The situation with the Corvette and our sister car was very difficult. My intention was to support my teammate in the sister car in the fight for victory. I was aware that it was hard racing. The situation that led to the collision between the Corvette and Connor De Phillippi behind me was very unfortunate, but I had nothing to do with it directly. I stayed on my inside line,' Farfus said.
In the last 15 minutes, with Kelvin van der Linde now fighting for a podium, Nico Varrone in the No. 4 Corvette ran into the No. 1 BMW and sent the South African spinning out, eventually consolidating fourth place for the new M4 GT3 EVO in its American debut.
A partnership between Bartone Bros. Racing, RealTime Racing, and Germany's GetSpeed produced a solid first IMSA result — fifth for the black No. 69 Mercedes-AMG GT3. The quasi-defending champions at DragonSpeed would finish sixth with the No. 81 Ferrari 296 GT3.
Rexy made a stirring comeback and fought for the lead up until the final hour, but the No. 77 AO Racing Porsche 911 GT3 R suffered front-end damage in all the skirmishes, had to make an unscheduled stop, and sunk to eighth behind the No. 4 Corvette.
Trackhouse and TF Sport's all-star effort finished ninth, but, up until the cool Connor Zilisch was spun after contact with an LMP2 car with an hour left, it looked for a moment like the No. 91 WeatherTech Corvette would reach the podium.
For the No. 9 Pfaff Motorsports Lamborghini it was a race of unfulfilled potential, ending in the second part of that big Saturday night crash when Jordan Pepper ran into Hesse. The new partnership showed strength and resilience up to that point.
Corvette's early customer program had issues, AWA in particular. A year later, they're another story of overcoming teething trouble and coming out triumphant at Daytona. Jake Galstad/Lumen
Corvette may not have gotten the GTD PRO win with the works cars, but Canadian team AWA delivered in a big way as Matt Bell and Marvin Kirchhofer carried the black and yellow No. 13 Z06 GT3.R to its first GTD win, joined by Orey Fidani — the reigning Bob Akin Award winner — and Lars Kern.
Bell had to fight back after being jostled in the final restart — he was down to fourth at one stage but he eventually caught and passed Heart of Racing's Mattia Drudi with about 16 minutes left to give AWA its second Daytona class win in three years (2023, LMP3).
'The restarts were intense as we always are in IMSA WeatherTech racing. Honestly, my brain is fried,' said a jubilant Bell after the race. 'I can't even remember what happened. It was awesome racing, I have to say. All the competitors that we were going toe to toe with today were really hard, really fair.
'I can't remember where [Drudi] overtook me. He got us in the pits. I just had to get my head down. If I saw a GTD car ahead of me I just tried to overtake it. I remember vaguely getting a little bit of a nose up the side coming out of Turn 5.
'We were good in the infield; we were strong in the infield. Just managed to squeeze on past and get my head down after that and try to build a gap. It was definitely fun.'
The No. 120 Wright Motorsports Porsche may not have been connected to the new F1 motion picture like last year, but the quartet of Elliott Skeer, Ayhancan Guven, Tom Sargent, and Adam Adelson were box-office for most of the race, culminating in Guven sprinting from fifth to second by the end.
Heart of Racing's No. 27 Aston Martin Vantage GT3 completed the GTD podium in third, followed very closely by Winward Racing's No. 57 Mercedes-AMG GT3 in fourth
When you consider what Winward Racing had to overcome — losing seven laps in the garage to fix a stuck throttle pedal — to get back to the lead lap and then the class lead, only to have to dig out of a hole from a pit work penalty? That is the sort of performance that made this Texas team the GTD Champions in 2024.
Turner Motorsport snuck into fifth place with the No. 96 BMW M4 GT3 EVO towards the end, putting five different makes in the top five in GTD.
Disappointments happened, of course. Quick Lamborghinis from Wayne Taylor Racing and Forte Racing were knocked out due to damage. Only one of the seven Ferrari 296 GT3s ran a clean race with no major hiccups, and, of course, a catastrophic engine failure wasn't how anyone wanted Andy Lally to bow out of professional sports car racing as a driver.
AWA's win was a great story in itself, given how wretched the start of their customer Corvette Racing program was last year. Early season retirements, Anthony Mantella's infamous sale of his Corvette just two races into the year … it wasn't ideal to say the least — and yet, look where they are now.
If there were any whispers that Ford and GM's first customer racing efforts at this level were doomed to failure after a tough start in year one, Daytona proved them wrong this weekend.
RESULTS
Story originally appeared on Racer
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Car and Driver
6 minutes ago
- Car and Driver
Tested: 2025 Mini Countryman EV Doesn't Give a Reason to Go Electric
Mini started selling electric versions of its small hatchbacks quite a while ago, but the latest Cooper Electric is in limbo due to global trade issues, as it's built in China. But that doesn't mean Mini is without an EV entirely. The larger Countryman SUV has entered the crowded electric-utility space with a new-for-2025 model that uses the same SE name that was previously applied to the Countryman's plug-in hybrid variant in its prior generation. The new Countryman SE ALL4 shares its modern-looking design with the third-gen gas model, and it's mechanically similar to the BMW iX1, an electric variant of Bimmer's smallest SUV that isn't sold in the U.S. We only get one version of the SE, and it's a dual-motor, all-wheel-drive setup with 308 horsepower. That puts it right in line with the gas-powered Countryman's JCW performance variant, which has 312 horsepower and all-wheel drive. The two are also priced similarly, with the EV starting at $46,375 and the JCW at $48,075. (The base 241-hp Countryman S gas model starts at $40,075.) View Exterior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver Of course, as is typical with EVs, the Countryman's 65-kWh battery pack means it's quite a bit heavier than its gas counterpart. The SE weighs in at 4606 pounds, versus 3792 for the Countryman JCW we tested. That means the electric version doesn't perform as well despite its similar power output. We got it to 60 mph in a respectable 4.8 seconds, while the gas model did it in 4.6. Within the Mini's competitive set of other electrics, the similarly priced Volvo EX30 is the speed demon, getting to 60 mph in a scant 3.3 seconds in our testing. HIGHS: Cute interior design, pleasant driving demeanor, reasonably priced compared with gas model. Though the Countryman SE feels nimble and quick for a small crossover, it doesn't give the impression of being an overtly sporting machine. The ride is firm, the steering is direct, and the powertrain is responsive, but it's a bit too big and heavy to change direction eagerly enough to live up to the promise of the sporty and boldly named Go Kart driving mode. Around the skidpad, our test car managed a so-so 0.85 g of grip, riding on 19-inch Continental ProContact GX all-season tires. The gas-powered JCW's more aggressive summer rubber helped it earn an 0.95-g result, and it also beat the SE's 70-mph stopping distance by a significant margin, at 158 feet to 171 feet. View Interior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver Mini's typical kitsch is on full display inside the Countryman SE, as its dashboard incorporates a mix of textiles, ambient lighting, and other flourishes to create a fun atmosphere. Those who like this sort of thing will get enjoyment out of details like the quirky air vents and the fabric strap replacing one of the traditional steering-wheel spokes. The circular central infotainment screen is nice to look at, though it doesn't quite use its full real estate effectively for smartphone mirroring. We also felt that some of the menu structures were too complicated, as you have to dive into various settings to adjust things like the regenerative braking level. A button would have been easier. LOWS: Limited driving range, doesn't accelerate as quickly as the JCW model, quirky styling isn't for everyone. With the regen level at its highest setting and the transmission in B mode, the Countryman SE is capable of one-pedal driving. We enjoyed driving in this mode in the city, and the gas pedal has a long enough travel to make it easy to modulate your speed. But the Countryman SE's other EV specs aren't so impressive. The EPA estimates a driving range of just over 200 miles on a charge, with the version on 18-inch wheels earning a rating of 212 miles and the version with 19-inch wheels rated at 204 miles. Our test car and its 19-inchers achieved a real-world 75-mph highway range of only 180 miles. View Interior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver Though that isn't too far off the EPA estimate, it's simply not very much range. Yes, the aforementioned Volvo EX30 fared even worse in this test, achieving just 160 miles, but the less expensive Hyundai Kona Electric managed 230 miles in this same test. At least the Mini's fast-charging capabilities are competitive, with a peak charging rate of 129 kilowatts in our fast-charging test and an average of 84 kilowatts overall. VERDICT: The electric Countryman doesn't give up much to its gas siblings, but it doesn't gain much either. The problem with the Countryman SE is that it simply doesn't offer any particular characteristics to entice buyers away from the gas models. It costs about the same as the JCW but doesn't perform as well, and its relatively small battery pack means it can't go far on a charge. If EV buyers are forced to make sacrifices like this, they should at least benefit from extra features, better acceleration, or increased versatility via a front cargo area. The Countryman SE doesn't have any of these upsides, and as a result it fails to make a compelling argument for itself. View Interior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver Specifications Specifications 2025 Mini Countryman SE ALL4 Vehicle Type: front- and rear-motor, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door wagon PRICE Base/As Tested: $46,375/$51,325 Options: Iconic trim (Harman/Kardon audio system, interior camera, power fronts seats, privacy glass), $3200; Comfort Package Max (auto-dimming mirrors, augmented-reality navigation, adaptive cruise control, Parking Assistant Plus, active driving assistant), $900; trailer hitch, $600; Parking Assistant Professional, $250; Favored Style (Anthracite headliner, John Cooper Works sport seats, silver roof and mirror caps, 19-inch Kaleido Spoke two-tone wheels, $0 POWERTRAIN Front Motor: current-excited synchronous AC, 188 hp, 182 lb-ft Rear Motor: current-excited synchronous AC, 188 hp, 182 lb-ft Combined Power: 308 hp Combined Torque: 364 lb-ft Battery Pack: liquid-cooled lithium-ion, 65 kWh Onboard Charger: 9.6 kW Peak DC Fast-Charge Rate: 130 kW Transmissions, F/R: direct-drive CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: struts/multilink Tires: Continental ProContact GX 245/45R-19 102H M+S ★ DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 106.0 in Length: 175.0 in Width: 72.6 in Height: 64.6 in Passenger Volume, F/R: 53/42 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/R: 56/25 ft3 Curb Weight: 4606 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 4.8 sec 100 mph: 13.1 sec 1/4-Mile: 13.6 sec @ 101 mph Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec. Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 5.0 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.2 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 3.5 sec Top Speed (gov ltd): 112 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 171 ft Braking, 100–0 mph: 343 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.85 g C/D FUEL ECONOMY AND CHARGING Observed: 75 MPGe 75-mph Highway Range: 180 mi Average DC Fast-Charge Rate, 10–90%: 84 kW DC Fast-Charge Time, 10–90%: 39 min EPA FUEL ECONOMY Combined/City/Highway: 91/94/88 MPGe Range: 204 mi C/D TESTING EXPLAINED Reviewed by Joey Capparella Deputy Editor, Rankings Content Despite being raised on a steady diet of base-model Hondas and Toyotas—or perhaps because of it—Joey Capparella nonetheless cultivated an obsession for the automotive industry throughout his childhood in Nashville, Tennessee. He found a way to write about cars for the school newspaper during his college years at Rice University, which eventually led him to move to Ann Arbor, Michigan, for his first professional auto-writing gig at Automobile Magazine. He has been part of the Car and Driver team since 2016 and now lives in New York City. Read full bio


Motor 1
36 minutes ago
- Motor 1
Woman Walks Up to a Brand-New Ford Lariat. Then She Learns it has a New 'Luxury' Feature
Dealerships always highlight the new features and perks of car models to lure people into buying. Sometimes these features don't necessarily improve the car's performance so much as its aesthetic or vibe. Still, they're packaged as something you can't miss out on. Often these features are described as a 'luxury.' Car manufacturers toss around the word luxury like a football on a Sunday. It may irritate some, but many buyers want a luxurious car, so it's also just good marketing. Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . That doesn't mean you won't get called out for calling something standard a luxury feature. In a TikTok with nearly 6,000 views, Madi (@surpriseforddeals) claims the new Ford F-150 Lariat's way of greeting drivers is an example of its 'luxury.' But is this a new feature or has this been around? Is your truck excited to see you? Trending Now 'Do People Not Read the Owner's Manual Anymore?': Woman Buys New Honda. Then She Tries Filling It Up With Gas 'This Should Be Illegal': Customer Gets Approved for 2024 Jeep Wrangler. Then An Expert Exposes the Reality of Financing In her post, Madi showcases how the new Ford F-150 Lariat automatically turns on its headlights when you approach the truck. She begins by asking viewers, 'Have you ever been greeted by your truck?' Madi then proceeds to hype how the Ford Lariat automatically lights up when its key gets close to the vehicle, suggesting this is a reason you should buy one—from her. According to her profile, Madi works for a Ford dealership. 'Welcome back to your truck. That's the luxury of Lariat,' Madi concludes. Luxury or standard? While the F-150 Lariat's light-up greeting is arguably aesthetically pleasing and potentially promotes safety, many people who commented on Madi's post disagree with the suggestion that it's remarkable. 'Literally most manufacturers do this,' one TikTok commenter said. 'Oh, a 2004 Lexus LS does the same thing, nothing new here,' another added. A third shared, 'Luxury of Lariat? My $40k outback from 2020 does this.' The skeptics are correct: this isn't a new feature. Ford F-150s have even reportedly had this feature since at least 2021. It used to be called 'approach lighting'; now it's known as 'welcome lighting.' So why is it being highlighted as a selling point? Wouldn't it make more sense to simply focus on the F-150's reliability, towing capacity, or perhaps its warranty? This dives into the bigger conversation about how consumers have become increasingly driven to buy vehicles based on their technology. There's something of a tech race going on in vehicle manufacturing. Every brand wants to have the newest, most desirable tech under the hood and inside the passenger compartment. Critics say these features are used to distract from the fact that making dependable and reliable cars is slowly becoming a lost art. They claim manufacturers don't build them like they used—and there may be truth to that. But cars didn't used to have backup cameras , either, and that tech has unquestionably saved lives (and bumpers). If consumers want a vehicle that lights up when they approach, why not give it to them? Motor1 has contacted Madi over Instagram and TikTok direct messenger. We also reached out to Ford via email. We'll update this story if we hear back. More from Motor1 Here's the 2026 Ford F-150 Lobo Totally Undisguised NHTSA Investigating 1.3 Million F-150s Over Unexpected Downshifts Only Two of America's 10 Best-Selling Vehicles Earn IIHS Safety Award Tesla Just Released a Much Cheaper Cybertruck Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )


News24
an hour ago
- News24
A Dark Art: New Ford Territory flagship SUV arrives in SA
The new Ford Territory Dark Edition has the same turbocharged 1.8-litre petrol engine producing 138kW and 318Nm. It's available in Lustrous Crystal White, Grey, Panther Black, and Ruby Red. Unique to the Territory Dark Edition is a new 360-degree camera. A year after its launch, Ford South Africa has introduced its first update to the Territory range with the new Dark Edition, replacing the outgoing and former flagship Territory Titanium. The Dark Edition is a relatively mild update, altering the vehicle's main cosmetic focal points but not going beyond skin deep. As the name suggests, anything formerly chrome or mirror-finish has been replaced with high-gloss black. These include its satin black grille, high-gloss black treatment for the skid plate, fog light accents and mirror caps. It looks particularly striking in Crystal White but is available in other colours, such as Lustrous Grey, Panther Black, and Ruby Red. Inside, the polarising blue and black leather combination in the Titanium makes way for conventional black leather to match the Territory Dark Edition's charcoal black headliner, pillars, door trims, and instrument panel with Cyber Orange stitching. As the new flagship in the range, it inherits the Titanium's technological full house. Nice-to-haves such as the eight-speaker sound system, wireless charging and the 12.3-inch high-definition digital instrument cluster in combination with the 12.3-inch landscape infotainment touchscreen are all standard. Safety features are equally weighty and include Blind Spot Information System (BLIS) with Cross-Traffic Alert, Adaptive Cruise Control with Stop and Go, Pre-Collision Assist with Automatic Emergency Braking, Lane Keep Assist, Lane Departure Warning and Lane Change Assist. Unique to the Territory Dark Edition is a new 360-degree camera that provides all-round visibility. With 138kW of power and 318Nm sent to the front wheels via a seven-speed DCT automatic gearbox, the Dark Edition can't use its bolder looks to race ahead of its siblings. The 1.8-litre turbocharged engine is unchanged, as are the four driving modes: Eco, Normal, Sport, and Mountain. In a fiercely competitive segment that seems to gain new, mostly Chinese, competitors almost weekly, the new Dark Edition will hope to shed a lot more light on the avalanche of SUVs. Pricing Territory Dark Edition 1.8L EcoBoost 7AT – R733 000 Pricing includes a six-year or 90 000km Ford Optional Service Plan, four-year or 120 000km Ford warranty, four-year or unlimited-distance Roadside Assistance, and a five-year or unlimited-distance corrosion warranty. In addition, over-the-counter (OTC) parts and service parts warranty (SPW) are covered for two years or unlimited distance. The recommended service interval is 15 000km or annually, whichever occurs first.