
'The hype is real' this supplement is transforming women's skin in just two weeks - the results are 'astounding'
Are you ready to take your skin to the next level? Up-and-coming brand Equi London is shocking shoppers with its daily Beauty Formula supplements, which users keep saying have 'saved their skin.'
The powerful daily oral capsules bring beauty from the inside to the outside with skin-clarifying results, hormonal balancing, and undeniable collagen repair.
Your skincare solution is here! These daily supplements support hormonal balance and bring skin back to life in just a few months
The female-focused supplement is able to combat a plethora of skin concerns and is flying off the shelves. Don't believe us? Keep reading because the before and after photos will shock you!
Equi London was founded by two powerful women: a financial professional and a nutritional therapist. Since its launch in 20216, the brand has continued to be a revolutionary destination for skin care specifically geared towards women and their hormonal needs.
Whether you are going through menopause, are pregnant, or just dealing with everyday hormonal fluctuations — the brand's powerfully formulated Beauty Formula Capsules are no joke.
Designed to be an all-in-one solution, the daily pills combine 48 essential ingredients, including Acerola Cherry, collagen, Vitamin B6, Glutamine, and even a doctor-approved probiotic blend. But the real hero behind the method is the brand's one-of-a-kind proprietary GlowCutis® blend!
This formula is unlike any other, and using a blend of trusted skincare components, such as Hyaluronic Acid and Type 1 Marine Collagen peptides, it deeply nourishes the skin, promoting skin cell regeneration.
Users attest to the Beauty Formula Capsule difference, with one saying: 'I was skeptical because I have tried a lot of supplements, but this one is different. My skin looks brighter and more even... I feel more balanced. I would recommend it!
What sets Equi London apart is its approach to wellness, not just skin. Unlike most skin supplements, theirs promotes women's health from a 360 point of view. While actively targeting skin concerns such as hyperpigmentation, the pills simultaneously support hormonal balance, energy, and even stress levels.
Praised for their therapeutic quality and precise dosage, Equi London's Beauty Formula is one of the only holistic supplements on the market that supports both internal and external well-being for women.
One of our own Daily Mail expert beauty editors, Emily Knott, even tried the coveted Beauty Formula for herself and said, 'The hype is real — visibly calmer, clearer, more even skin in just two weeks. The difference is astounding.'
With hundreds of 5-star reviews and photo evidence, it is safe to say that Equi London's Beauty Formula supplements are the real deal. Shop them now to see the skin transformation everyone can not stop talking about!
What sets Beauty Formula apart from other skin supplements?
Pictured: Co-Founder Alice Mackintosh (left), a Nutritional Therapist specializing in women's health and skin, and Rosie Speight (right), Co-Founder and MD of Equi London. Rosie's decision to stop taking the pill to start a family triggered skin reactions, sparking anxiety and frustration. She set out to find a solution to support her skin and overall health
'Unlike most beauty supplements that focus only on collagen or a handful of vitamins, Beauty Formula is a complete, clinical-grade blend of 48 nutrients,' explained Rosie Speight Co-Founder and MD of Equi London.
'It's designed to address the real, internal causes of skin dullness or skin problems, giving you glowing, beautiful makeup-free skin. At Equi, we recognise that skin is the body's largest organ and true beauty can only be achieved by supporting overall health.
'Beauty Formula removes the confusion of what supplements to take by replacing a full shelf of supplements with one powerful solution - supporting gut health, hormones, energy, brain, stress, immunity and skin renewal…. in a single daily dose.
She added: 'We wanted to empower women to take control of their health in an effective, easy and trustworthy way - Beauty Formula gives real results that can been seen and felt, we like to think of it as the ultimate female supplement.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Midwife struck off over claim vaccines ‘attacked babies in the womb'
A midwife has been removed from the register after she shared posts on social media claiming that vaccinations harm babies in the womb. Seana Mary Kerr, from Newry in Northern Ireland, also told a pregnant woman in a shop that she should not be wearing a face mask during the Covid-19 pandemic, according to a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) tribunal panel. Ms Kerr, who had been a registered midwife since 2007, was found by a panel to have placed the woman at 'significant risk of harm' with her views, while she had 'risked seriously undermining the public confidence' in her profession at a crucial time with her posts. In the first of three social media posts in September 2020, Ms Kerr said that babies were being attacked in the womb through vaccination of mothers during pregnancy. Then, in March 2021, she claimed healthcare professionals were being 'complicit' in the national response to Covid-19, and that the health crisis was 'a Trojan horse intend[ed] to introduce a new era for humanity'. A further post in December that year made reference to how a group of people, described as 'they', had been 'planting the seeds' about Covid-19 over Christmas 2020 by referring to 'some bat in China'. Ms Kerr's advice and social media comments were given when she had identified herself as a midwife and was 'promoting her opinion on matters of clinical importance', the panel found. 'The panel considered that the actions of Ms Kerr took place during an exceptionally unusual time, where the entirety of the NHS was mobilised to protect the public from the international Covid-19 pandemic,' they said. 'Therefore, by expressing the view that other healthcare professionals, who Ms Kerr was working with in the Trust, were acting in ways which may cause harm, a view Ms Kerr held which was against the recognised guidance at the time, Ms Kerr risked seriously undermining the public confidence in the profession. 'It further noted that by making these accusations that Ms Kerr's colleagues may have suffered harm while working in an unprecedented and challenging situation.' The midwife approached the pregnant woman in the shop, which was her place of work, during the other allegation in question in August 2020. She identified herself as a midwife before advising the woman that she should not be wearing the face mask as it reduced the amount of oxygen her baby was receiving. Ms Kerr went on to tell the woman that she should not receive a flu vaccination as this would increase the risk of her baby being stillborn. The panel found the pregnant woman and her family were caused 'significant emotional harm' as a result of Ms Kerr's behaviour. 'The panel noted that it is a reasonable expectation of everyone working in a public environment, such as a shop, that they will not be approached and given personal, clinical advice and that such advice would normally only be given during a private clinical appointment or at an antenatal class,' they said. 'Therefore, by approaching Patient A in her place of work, outside a clinical relationship, unsolicited, Ms Kerr placed her at significant risk of harm.' The panel found Ms Kerr's fitness to practise was still impaired and that there was a risk of the individual repeating her behaviour. Ms Kerr did not show any remorse for her misconduct or demonstrate any insight into her previous actions, and had not engaged with the NMC since June 2022, the panel said. It made an order to strike Ms Kerr's name from the register, after a 12-month suspension order had previously been imposed last year.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Midwife struck off after claiming vaccines ‘attacked babies' on social media
A midwife has been struck off the register after posting claims on social media that vaccinations attacked babies while in their mother's womb during pregnancy. Seana Mary Kerr, of Newry, Northern Ireland, also told a pregnant woman in a shop that she should not be wearing a face mask during the Covid-19 pandemic, according to a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) tribunal panel judgment. Ms Kerr, who had been a registered midwife since 2007, was found by a panel to have placed the woman at 'significant risk of harm' with her views, while she had 'risked seriously undermining the public confidence' in her profession at a crucial time with her posts. In the first of three social media posts in September 2020, Ms Kerr said that babies were being attacked in the womb through vaccination of mothers during pregnancy. Then, in March 2021, she claimed healthcare professionals were being 'complicit' in the national response to Covid-19, and that the health crisis was 'a Trojan horse intend[ed] to introduce a new era for humanity'. A further post in December that year made reference to how a group of people, described as 'they', had been 'planting the seeds' about Covid-19 over Christmas 2020 by referring to 'some bat in China'. Ms Kerr's advice and social media comments were given when she had identified herself as a midwife and was 'promoting her opinion on matters of clinical importance', the panel found. 'The panel considered that the actions of Ms Kerr took place during an exceptionally unusual time, where the entirety of the NHS was mobilised to protect the public from the international Covid-19 pandemic,' they said. 'Therefore, by expressing the view that other healthcare professionals, who Ms Kerr was working with in the Trust, were acting in ways which may cause harm, a view Ms Kerr held which was against the recognised guidance at the time, Ms Kerr risked seriously undermining the public confidence in the profession. 'It further noted that by making these accusations that Ms Kerr's colleagues may have suffered harm while working in an unprecedented and challenging situation.' The midwife approached the pregnant woman in the shop, which was her place of work, during the other allegation in question in August 2020. She identified herself as a midwife before advising the woman that she should not be wearing the face mask as it reduced the amount of oxygen her baby was receiving. Ms Kerr went on to tell the woman that she should not receive a flu vaccination as this would increase the risk of her baby being stillborn. The panel found the pregnant woman and her family were caused 'significant emotional harm' as a result of Ms Kerr's behaviour. 'The panel noted that it is a reasonable expectation of everyone working in a public environment, such as a shop, that they will not be approached and given personal, clinical advice and that such advice would normally only be given during a private clinical appointment or at an antenatal class,' they said. 'Therefore, by approaching Patient A in her place of work, outside a clinical relationship, unsolicited, Ms Kerr placed her at significant risk of harm.' The panel found Ms Kerr's fitness to practise was still impaired and that there was a risk of the individual repeating her behaviour. Ms Kerr did not show any remorse for her misconduct or demonstrate any insight into her previous actions, and had not engaged with the NMC since June 2022, the panel said. It made an order to strike Ms Kerr's name from the register, after a 12-month suspension order had previously been imposed last year.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Top public health experts in England say more doctor strikes would be futile
Six senior figures in England's medical profession have criticised potential strikes by resident doctors as 'a futile gesture' that will harm patients and help those who oppose the NHS. The move is the first public evidence of the significant unease many senior doctors feel about the possibility of their junior colleagues staging a new campaign of industrial action in England. In a letter to the Guardian the six medics and former medics say resident – formerly junior – doctors' demand for a 29% pay rise is unaffordable, given the government has 'no spare money'. The signatories include Sir John Oldham, a health adviser to several governments, Dr Clare Gerada, a former chair of the Royal College of GPs who also served on the BMA's ruling council, and the public health expert Prof John Ashton. Their letter comes as the British Medical Association (BMA) ballots resident doctors in England about striking again, as they did in 2023 and 2024. The co-chairs of the BMA's resident doctors committee (RDC) have urged their estimated 55,000 members to vote for the action. The six experts say there was a genuine case for resident doctors to receive a big salary increase after years of erosion in the value of their pay, but that it had largely been addressed by the 22% they received last year for 2023/24 and 2024/25 and the average 5.4% they were given last month for 2025/26. They also say the RDC leaders' call for resident doctors to back a fresh six-month campaign of walkouts is mistaken. 'A strike now would harm patients and diminish the cause of these doctors. The calls for strike misjudge the mood in the country. There is no spare money. This is a futile gesture guiding people into a maze without a thread', they write in their letter. 'In our view the NHS is at a more perilous state than at any time in our careers. A doctors strike would further diminish the ability of the NHS to deliver, and play into the hands of those who don't believe in an NHS – publicly funded [and] based on need not want. 'We urge resident doctors to keep to the spirit of the Hippocratic oath – vote for the NHS and vote No to strike action.' The other signatories are David Colin-Thome, the Department of Health's national clinical director for primary care under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown; Dr James Kingsland, a GP and former ministerial adviser; and Dr Fiona Cornish, a senior GP in Cambridge and former member of the BMA's GP committee. The health secretary, Wes Streeting, appointed Oldham, who worked for the previous Labour and coalition governments, as a senior adviser in March on his plans to create more 'neighbourhood health' services as part of the government's forthcoming 10-year plan for the NHS. Responding to the letter, Streeting urged resident doctors to reject industrial action in their ballot, which ends on 7 July. 'Strikes should only ever be a last resort. Resident doctors have had a 28.9% pay rise [since 2022/23], and they have a government working with them to improve their career progression and conditions. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'I say to the BMA: the government has changed, our policies have changed, your tactics need to change too. Instead of cutting the NHS recovery off at its knees, work with us to turn the health service around', he said. However, RDC co-chairs Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, said this year's 5.4% pay award – the biggest in the public sector – was too little to help them restore the lost value of their earnings since 2008. 'Resident doctors are currently paid 23% less than they were in 2008. Even after this year's pay award it would still need a rise of 26% to bring pay back to that level. 'We don't believe any of the doctors in this letter are worth 23% less than they were in 2008, and neither presumably do they. The question, then, is how we restore the value of this profession, how quickly, and how we work with government to get there. 'At the rate Wes Streeting is suggesting it would take more than a decade to restore our pay. The NHS does not have that time,' they said.