Reform UK formally takes control in Derbyshire
The new Reform UK leader of Derbyshire County Council has been formally approved at a meeting at the council's headquarters.Alan Graves was voted in by councillors as leader with a term of four years, having been elected by Reform's new cluster of Derbyshire councillors to lead the authority at a party meeting last week.Sutton councillor Robert Reaney will serve as deputy.Nine cabinet positions were also announced, the same figure as the previous Conservative cabinet.
Several cabinet roles have also been renamed and a new leadership role has been created for "Council Efficiency (DOGE)"."DOGE" is a reference to the newly-created "Department of Government Efficiency" in Donald Trump's US administration, with a pledge to cut waste forming a central part of Reform's election campaign.A role overseeing the council's net zero agenda has also been maintained, despite the decision to scrap the authority's climate change committee.
The new chairman of the council will be Reform councillor Nick Adams.Adams said he was "deeply humbled" and "astonished" to be in the position.He will also take up the role of civic chairman, though Adams said he did not intend to take allowances for both roles.
Speaking after the formal vote approving his leadership, Alan Graves encouraged "those to the left" to "join in and help us run this council"."Never before has Derbyshire seen such wholesale changes to the political landscape," he said."As the first Reform leader of the council I'm rightly proud to hold that title."We will be focusing on the overall efficiency of the council, something I believe the previous administration took their eye off."He said Reform councillors would not be "bogged down by the old political dogma"."Not one of our councillors are career politicians and every single one has real life experience," he said.He also said the union flag, the St George's flag and the county flag would be the only flags flown outside County Hall going forward, when asked whether the Ukrainian flag would be permitted.
The leader of the Derbyshire Conservatives Alex Dale, who are now the opposition group on the council having lost control at the local elections, congratulated Graves on his election.The Conservatives "absolutely respect the outcome of the election", he said, adding: "Whatever party we're in it's in all our interests that we deliver for Derbyshire."Our group will offer very constructive opposition...we may be small but we are perfectly formed."Also speaking on the new leader's elections, the leader of the Liberal Democrats Ed Fordham said the past four years under the previous Conservative administration had been "disappointing", "hopeless" and "arrogant", accusing them of "dragging this authority into the realms of bankruptcy". The leader of the Greens Giz Kensella also criticised the previous administration for "overseeing deep cuts" in areas like social care and special educational needs.He also said he had "major" concerns about Reform's decision to scrap Derbyshire's climate change committee.
The new Reform leadership will also be appointed to a handful of leadership positions on the East Midlands County Combined Authority.Reform UK won 42 seats at the local elections. 33 were needed for majority control of the council.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
UK proposes wider ban on destructive bottom trawling
A ban on a "destructive" type of fishing that drags large nets along the seafloor could be extended across English waters, the government has proposal would expand the the prohibition of bottom trawling fishing to a further 30,000 km2 (around 11,500 sq miles) across 41 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). The plan is subject to a 12-week industry announcement comes as a UN Ocean Conference begins on Monday in France, and amid warnings from Sir David Attenborough that bottom trawling is destroying areas of the seabed and marine Secretary Steve Reed said "without urgent action our oceans will be irreversibly destroyed". Speaking before the summit, Sir David told Prince William he was "appalled" by the fishing method. The naturalist's latest documentary Ocean With David Attenborough showed new footage of a bottom trawling net bulldozing through silt on the seafloor and scooping up species week, MPs on the Environmental Audit Committee renewed calls to ban bottom trawling, dredging and mining for aggregates, on the seabed in offshore government says the proposed measures would protect rare marine animals and the delicate seabeds they rely upon. It says it has carried out detailed assessments into the harms caused to habitats and species.A 12-week consultation will run until 1 September and will seek the views of the marine and fishing industry. Ariana Densham, head of oceans at Greenpeace UK, said the consultation was "ultimately a long-overdue completion of a process started by the previous government".The Wildlife Trust said it hoped the extended ban would be put in place "rapidly". It would be a "win-win for both nature and the climate," added the trust's director of policy and public affairs, Joan Edwards. Pressure is also building for more countries to ratify the High Seas Treaty at the Ocean Conference in Nice. The treaty was agreed by 193 countries two years ago to put 30% of the ocean into protected areas. The treaty will not come into force until it is ratified by 60 countries, with the current number standing at 28. The UK is among those countries that has yet to ratify.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Tariffs: US and China set to meet for trade talks in London
A new round of talks aimed at resolving a trade war between the US and China is set take place in London on President Donald Trump announced on Friday that a senior US delegation would meet Chinese representatives. Over weekend, Beijing's Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed that Vice Premier He Lifeng will attend the announcements came after Trump and China's leader Xi Jinping had a phone conversation last week, which the US president described as a "very good talk".Last month, the world's two biggest economies agreed a temporary truce to lower import taxes on goods being traded between them, but since then both countries have accused the other of breaching the deal. Writing on his Truth Social platform on Friday, Trump said US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would meet Chinese officials in London on Saturday, China's foreign ministry said Vice Premier He would be in the UK between 8 and 13 June, and that a meeting of the "China-US economic and trade mechanism" would take new round of negotiations came after Trump said his phone conversation with Xi on Thursday mainly focused on trade and had "resulted in a very positive conclusion for both countries".According to Chinese state news agency Xinhua, Xi told Trump that the US should "withdraw the negative measures it has taken against China".The call was the first time the two leaders had spoken since the trade war erupted in Trump announced sweeping tariffs on imports from a number of countries earlier this year, China was the hardest hit. Beijing responded with its own higher rates on US imports, and this triggered tit-for-tat increases that peaked at 145%.In May, talks held in Switzerland led to a temporary truce that Trump called a "total reset".It brought US tariffs on Chinese products down to 30%, while Beijing slashed levies on US imports to 10% and promised to lift barriers on critical mineral agreement gave both sides a 90-day deadline to try to reach a trade deal. But since then, relations appeared to have soured. Last month, Trump said China had "totally violated its agreement with us", and then a few days later China said the US had "severely violated" the US accused China of failing to restart shipments of critical minerals and rare earth magnets vital to car and computer Saturday, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said it had approved some applications for rare earth export licences, although it did not provide details of which countries announcement came after Trump said on Friday that Xi had agreed to restart trade in rare earth speaking on Sunday, White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told CBS News that "those exports of critical minerals have been getting released at a rate that is, you know, higher than it was, but not as high as we believe we agreed to in Geneva".
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
'It's simply not safe': A thousand doctors write to MPs urging them to vote against assisted dying bill
More than 1,000 doctors have written to MPs urging them to vote against the assisted dying bill, calling it a "real threat to both patients and the medical workforce". The bill - which is due to be voted on by MPs for a final time on 20 June - would allow terminally ill patients from England and Wales to end their lives "on their own terms", providing they have a life expectancy of six months or less. A separate bill is currently passing through the Scottish parliament. But doctors from across the NHS have written to MPs, warning them of their "serious concerns". Notable signatories include Sir John Burn, a geneticist who has led decades of cancer research, Sir Shakeel Qureshi, who was knighted for his work in paediatric cardiology, Professor Aileen Keel, the former deputy chief medical officer for Scotland, and Baroness Finlay, a Welsh doctor, professor of palliative medicine and member of the House of Lords. The letter is signed by four doctors who hold OBEs, two who have MBEs, and one CBE. The letter says that while a debate is needed on end of life care, "this bill is not the answer". It raises concerns that not enough evidence has been heard from doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. "This bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe," it goes on to say, calling it a "deeply flawed bill". 1:40 Professor Colin Rees, a member of the Royal College of Physicians working group on assisted dying, said it was the "single most important piece of healthcare legislation in 50 or 60 years". "It will have very profound consequences for the future and many doctors are really concerned that members of parliament are not hearing the views of the medical profession." He said many doctors who remain neutral, or who even support the principle of assisted dying, remain concerned about the bill. "We don't think it's a bill that is safe, that protects patients, protects families, and protects the medical workforce." What stage are the two assisted dying bills at now? The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill passed the House of Commons with a majority of 55 in November. Scotland's Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland Bill) pass with a 14 majority in May. But the legislation has not been without controversy, with 150 amendments made to get it through the first stage. The bill will return to the House of Commons for a third reading this Friday. If voted through by MPs it will then proceed to the House of Lords. 'No safeguards against coercion' One of the areas of concern raised by the medics was the inability to properly identify patients at risk of coercive control. "Vulnerable patients are at risk of coercion with women, victims of domestic abuse, and the elderly at particular risk," the letter says. It also warned it would widen social inequalities, with patients who do not have the resources for a comfortable death more likely to opt for assisted dying. "People who struggle to pay for heating or care or wish to preserve their assets for their children are at high risk of choosing to die if the option is available and the alternative is more difficult." Data from the Annual Report of Dying With Dignity from Oregon in 2024 found 9.3% of those people who choose assisted deaths do so for financial reasons. Concerns have also been raised around the inaccuracies of medical prognosis. "Research demonstrates that doctors get prognosis wrong around 40% of the time," the letter says. "As such, patients may end up choosing an assisted death and losing what could have been happy and fulfilling months or years of life." 1:50 The bill is also a risk to families, the letter says, as it does not require doctors to speak with family members. "A close relative may know nothing until they get a call to arrange collection of their relative's body," it says, adding that there is no mechanism for a family member to raise concerns about a request. The letter also addressed the potential impact on the medical workforce. Evidence from the Netherlands suggests "doctors feel pressurised when dealing with patient requests for assisted deaths, meaning that doctors may end up having involvement despite it being against their principles, because they want to help their patients".
