Iran's retaliation against US strikes could come in next 48 hours: Report
Iran could launch retaliatory attacks against US forces in the Middle East within the next 48 hours, further escalating the conflict in the region following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend.While the Trump administration is continuing diplomatic efforts to prevent further conflict, two US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to news agency Reuters, said intelligence assessments point to a heightened threat window in the next day or two.Tehran has vowed to defend itself after the US struck multiple targets, including components of its nuclear infrastructure, in what Washington described as a preemptive move to prevent an "unacceptable escalation" in the region. The strikes have prompted fears of a broader military conflict between the long-time adversaries.US President Donald Trump, who authorised the mission dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, warned that any Iranian retaliation would be met with "a force far greater than that used in the weekend US attacks".In preemptive moves, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the US military has heightened protection measures for its troops in the region, including those stationed in Iraq and Syria.The US maintains around 40,000 troops across the Middle East, many of whom operate high-value assets including air defence systems, fighter aircraft, and warships—all of which could be vulnerable in the event of a coordinated Iranian strike.Last week, the Pentagon began repositioning some of those assets to reduce exposure. Among the moves was the moving out of aircraft from the sprawling Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which houses around 10,000 US personnel and serves as a strategic hub for operations across the region.Despite its vows to retaliate, Tehran has so far refrained from attacking US positions or attempting to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway through which roughly a quarter of the world's oil shipments pass.advertisementAbd al-Rahim Mousavi, Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, said the country will respond appropriately to the American aggression."Regardless of the damage caused to the three nuclear facilities, we will respond against the US simply because it attacked our country," Mousavi said.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
By bombing Iran, Trump made a mockery of his own call for talks: Congress
Congress on Monday said the US bombing of Iran's nuclear sites made a mockery of President Trump's calls for continuation of talks with the Islamic republic, speaking on the issue after maintaining silence on it on the previous day. "President Trump's decision to unleash US airpower on Iran makes a mockery of his own calls for the continuation of talks with Iran. The Indian National Congress reiterates the absolute essentiality of immediate diplomacy and dialogue with Iran," said party spokesman Jairam Ramesh. Speaking to media persons in Karnataka, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said, "We want peace in the world. Iran is our neighbour and always stands with us in tough times. We have trade relations with Iran, and we import crude oil from them. When the question of J&K was raised in the UN, Iran took our side. We want Iran not to suffer. He further said, "We don't want any country to attack any sovereign, democratic country... Be it Israel, Iran, or the US, they shouldn't attack any sovereign, independent country... India has always been with those who want to be at peace." Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
The Hindu
43 minutes ago
- The Hindu
The sorry state of South Asian economic integration
In the year so far there were two major incidents that shook India's economic and national security landscape: the reciprocal tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and the terror attack in Pahalgam. While these events may seem unrelated, their underlying causes and consequences are deeply interlinked, highlighting the urgent need for a comprehensive regional approach to security and economic stability. Economic and national security are often discussed separately, but they are deeply intertwined. Border disputes among South Asian nations significantly hamper trade and economic cooperation, preventing the region from achieving its full potential. Economic instability fuels unrest, while security threats disrupt trade and investment. No country can achieve lasting security without economic prosperity, and vice versa. One of the least integrated The South Asian region is one of the least economically integrated regions in the world. Intraregional trade of South Asia (South Asian Free Trade Area or SAFTA) accounts for barely 5% to 7% of its total international trade, which is the lowest when compared to other trading blocs. In contrast, intraregional trade accounts for approximately 45% of total international trade within the European Union (EU), 22% within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and around 25% within the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Current trade among South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries is just around $23 billion, far below the estimated $67 billion. According to a United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) study, South Asia's potential trade could have reached $172 billion by 2020, which means over 86% of its capacity remains unexploited. Even if we consider this assessment to be optimistic, the immense potential for significantly increasing intra-SAARC trade can never be denied. South Asia, the most populous region of the world (25% of the world's population), represents a combined market of only $5 trillion in GDP. On the other side, the EU, with 5.8% of the world's population, accounts for $18 trillion in GDP, and NAFTA has a GDP of $24.8 trillion. This clearly shows the underexploited capacity of the South Asian region. There is much potential As estimated by the UNESCAP South Asia Gravity Model of intraregional trade, in spite of trade liberalisation under SAFTA, intraregional trade in South Asia is less than a third of its potential. Bangladesh has the highest unexploited proportion, at 93%, followed by the Maldives (88%), Pakistan (86%), Afghanistan (83%), and Nepal (76%). Because of terror insurgencies and border disputes, trade between India and Pakistan has seen a significant decline over the years. Bilateral trade between India and Pakistan fell from $2.41 billion in 2018 to $1.2 billion in 2024. Further, Pakistani exports to India fell from $547.5 million in 2019 to just $480,000 in 2024. South Asia's trade-to-GDP ratio decreased from 47.30% in 2022 to 42.94% in 2024. Additionally, the World Bank reported a softened growth forecast of 5.8% for 2025, down from 6% in 2024. As imports have grown faster than exports for all South Asian countries, the trade deficit of the subregion has widened from $204.1 billion in 2015 to $339 billion in 2022. However, the value of overall trade, covering both exports and imports, increased significantly between 2015-22 to approximately $1,335 billion. Despite SAFTA, trading with neighbours is not 'free'. The inefficient trade governing mechanism and an unpromising political environment increase the cost of intraregional trade, which is one of the major reasons for significantly smaller intra-regional trade. Costs of trading within South Asia remain high at 114% of the value of the goods being exported, making trading with neighbouring nations more expensive or less competitive, compared to trading with distant partners. For instance, South Asia's bilateral trade cost with the U.S. is only 109% despite the vastly greater distance. It is about 20% more costly for a company in India to trade with Pakistan than with Brazil, which is 22 times farther away. This discourages the formation of regional value chains despite the geographic contiguity. In contrast, intraregional trade costs for ASEAN are some 40% lower than intra-SAARC trade costs, at 76%, creating high incentives for interdependence in that bloc. The main hurdles The low level of intraregional trade in South Asia demonstrates the absence of strategic policies. SAFTA and other regional agreements have the potential to create greater economic linkages. Besides, over two-thirds of the potential of intraregional trade in goods, the potential of trade in services, and investments in South Asia remain untapped. To this end, greater regional cooperation could facilitate the development of complementary and mutually beneficial export sectors by focusing on lowering trade barriers. SAARC had the aim of ending distrust and tension, but trust deficits and regional conflicts hinder the full implementation of agreements such as SAFTA. Political diversity, regional disputes, minority issues and terrorism are major obstacles to regional cooperation. Most SAARC countries are in conflict with each other, preventing effective regional integration. Lesser trade opportunity means lesser capacity for innovation, production and investment in the people of the country. Therefore, to exploit the full potential of the South Asian region, members must work actively to enhance intra-regional trade, keeping aside their bilateral conflicts. Shashank Patel is a scholar of international trade law at the South Asian University (SAU), New Delhi
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
What we know about Al Udeid Air Base; and what makes it a prime target in US-Iran tensions
Iran fired multiple missiles at American military bases across the Middle East on Monday, June 23, including a direct strike on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, in response to the US bombing of its nuclear facilities over the weekend. At least 10 missiles targeted Qatar, and one was aimed at Iraq, according to an Israeli official. Iran's Supreme National Security Council said the number of missiles fired matched the number of bombs used by the US, calling the attack 'devastating and powerful.' The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) declared Al Udeid 'the largest strategic asset of the US terrorist army in West Asia.' Qatari air defenses reportedly intercepted the missiles, and no casualties or major damage were reported. Qatar condemned the attack and urged all sides to de-escalate and resume diplomacy. What is Al Udeid Air Base? Located southwest of Doha near Al-Rayyan, Al Udeid Air Base is a central pillar of US military strategy in the Middle East. Built in 1996 with US cooperation, it rose to prominence after 2001, serving as a critical launchpad for American operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and later the campaign against ISIS. Live Events The base is home to approximately 10,000 US troops and serves as the forward headquarters for both US Central Command (CENTCOM) and US Air Forces Central Command (AFCENT). It also hosts the Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC), a facility responsible for coordinating air missions across the entire CENTCOM area of responsibility. It also houses the Qatar Emiri Air Force , the Royal Air Force of the UK, and other foreign forces. Al Udeid spans around 24 hectares and is equipped with twin 3,750-meter runways, advanced hangars, command and control infrastructure, and extensive logistics and maintenance systems. Its operational capabilities include a diverse mix of aircraft, from F-15QAs and C-130/C-17 transports to KC-135 and KC-46 refueling tankers, as well as ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) platforms. The base's core combat unit, the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, plays a critical role in rapid deployment, aerial refueling, and precision strike operations. Its assets enable the US to maintain a forward presence and respond quickly to crises throughout the region, from the Red Sea to Central Asia. Why Al Udeid Air Base Matters Now Strategically located just across the Persian Gulf from Iran, Al Udeid has long served as both a deterrent and a potential flashpoint. Monday's strike marks the first time the base has come under direct attack from a hostile nation-state. With tensions mounting, US officials have warned of the risk of further retaliation from cyberattacks to proxy militia action across the region.
