2025 NBA Draft Lottery: Date, time, No. 1 odds and what to know for the Cooper Flagg sweepstakes
Which teams have the best odds to land the No. 1 pick in the NBA Draft Lottery, aka The Cooper Flagg Sweepstakes? Here's everything you need to know about Monday's event.
Date: Monday, May 12
Time: 7 p.m. ET
Channel: ESPN
Location: Chicago, Illinois
The 14 teams that didn't make the playoffs have a chance to land the No. 1 pick. The teams that finished with the three-worst records — Utah, Washington and Charlotte — each have the highest odds (14%) of winning the No. 1 pick.
Here are the odds for every team in the draft lottery, based on team records at the end of the regular season. Teams that finished the season with identical records had their draft order determined by a random drawing.
1. Utah Jazz: 14%
2. Washington Wizards: 14%
3. Charlotte Hornets: 14%
4. New Orleans Pelicans: 12.5%
5. Philadelphia 76ers: 10.5%The Sixers' first-round pick is top-6 protected; if it falls between 7-14, it will go to Oklahoma City.
6. Brooklyn Nets: 9%
7. Toronto Raptors: 7.5%
8. San Antonio Spurs: 6%
9. Phoenix Suns: 3.8%The Suns' first-round pick will go to the Houston Rockets.
10. Portland Trail Blazers: 3.7%
11. Dallas Mavericks: 1.8%
12. Chicago Bulls: 1.7%
13. Sacramento Kings: 0.8% The Kings' first-round pick is top-12 protected; if it falls out of that range, it goes to Atlanta.
14. Atlanta Hawks: 0.7%The Hawks' first-round pick will go to San Antonio.
The draft lottery determines the order of the first 14 picks. It takes place in a private room with NBA officials, representatives of participating teams, select media and the accounting firm Ernst & Young, which oversees the drawings, in attendance.
For the drawings, 14 ping-pong balls (numbered 1 through 14) are dropped in a lottery machine. Before the lottery, 1,000 of a possible 1,001 combinations are assigned to the 14 participating lottery teams. A league representative randomly selects four balls, revealing a four-number combination.
From the NBA:
The drawing process occurs in the following manner: All 14 balls are placed in the lottery machine and they are mixed for 20 seconds, and then the first ball is removed. The remaining balls are mixed in the lottery machine for another 10 seconds, and then the second ball is drawn. There is a 10-second mix, and then the third ball is drawn. There is a 10-second mix, and then the fourth ball is drawn. The team that has been assigned that combination will receive the No. 1 pick. The same process is repeated with the same ping-pong balls and lottery machine for the second through fourth picks.
If the same team comes up more than once, the result is discarded and another four-ball combination is selected. Also, if the one unassigned combination is drawn, the result is discarded and the balls are drawn again.
After the first four picks are determined, the remaining picks are based on regular-season records, in reverse order.
FIRST ROUND NOS. 15-30
15. Miami (to Oklahoma City via the LA Clippers)
16. Orlando
17. Detroit (to Minnesota via New York, Oklahoma City, and Houston)
18. Memphis (to Washington)
19. Milwaukee (to Brooklyn via New York, Detroit, Portland, and New Orleans)
20. Golden State (to Miami)
21. Minnesota (to Utah)
22. Los Angeles Lakers (to Atlanta via New Orleans)
23. Indiana
24. LA Clippers (to Oklahoma City)
25. Denver (to Orlando)
26. New York (to Brooklyn)
27. Houston (to Brooklyn)
28. Boston
29. Cleveland (to Phoenix via Utah)
30. Oklahoma City (to the LA Clippers)
Check out Kevin O'Connor's latest mock draft, and read up on scouting reports for every single prospect in the 2025 NBA Draft Guide.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
NBA Finals TV ratings don't reflect complete picture of fan reach
INDIANAPOLIS — The NBA Finals TV ratings discussion is a classic struggle between the optimist and the pessimist. One headline: "NBA Finals have been most-watched programs since first week of May.' Another headline: 'NBA Finals ratings down 24%.' Two things can be true in this season's Finals between 'small-market' Indiana and Oklahoma City. Yes, ratings are down from last season's Finals between Boston and Dallas, and yes, the Thunder-Pacers Finals have brought in millions of viewers, including a peak of 11.54 million at 11 p.m. ET of Game 3 on Wednesday, June 11. Of the top 10 TV shows June 2-8, four were NBA-related for ABC: Games 1 and 2 of the Finals, postgame coverage of Game 2, and the Game 1 pregame show. Those four totaled 25.6 million viewers, including 8.9 million for Game 1 and 8.7 million for Game 2, according to Nielsen. The topic of NBA TV ratings is shaped by the teams playing; the lack of household names driving the competition even though OKC's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is this season's MVP and Tyrese Haliburton is a two-time All-Star, 2024 Paris Olympics gold medalist and cold-blooded, game-winning shooter; a new era in which different teams are playing the Finals each season; and stars not named LeBron James, Steph Curry and Kevin Durant getting to the Finals. The league and its TV partners need to navigate those issues, and they are focused on attracting more viewers, especially casual sports fans. But, if you were to ask the league and Disney/ABC/ESPN if they are unhappy with the numbers, their answer is no. Would they like more viewers? Of course. However, winning the night and winning with key demographics is exactly what they and corporate/partners advertisers want. In today's world of viewing consumption – streaming, multiple devices, YouTube highlights – nuance is required. Nielsen numbers are important but no longer the only factor. 'Ratings have changed from what they used to be,' NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said before Game 1 of the Finals. 'Netflix is the most valuable pure play media company out there. Nobody in this room knows what their ratings are. We don't even think in terms of ratings. We think maybe in terms of popularity, buzz around a program. We're going through a transition, and we're going to work through that.' Silver and his business operations staff have given considerable thought to the topic. Don't fret too much for the league. The NBA's nine-year, $24 billion TV deal expires after the Finals, and the new 11-year, $76 billion pact with ESPN/ABC, NBC and Amazon starts next season. That's almost triple the previous deal. Before that deal was secured, there was skepticism that the NBA could net a deal that averaged $7 billion annually. But Silver got it done. That amount does not include the league's media deals with international broadcast partners. For the TV partners, the amount they agreed to pay the NBA was not arbitrarily snagged from the ether. High-paid executives analyzed the data and the financials and settled on a figure that allows their network to make money. There is extreme value in the NBA, and that's also reflected in the value of franchises. The Boston Celtics are expected to sell for at least a valuation of $6.1 billion, and if the NBA decides to expand, those expansion teams will go for at least $6 billion. Live sports on TV remain desirable to traditional and modern means of consumption. The NBA's YouTube channel has more than 20 million followers, its X account has 48 million followers, its Instagram account has 90.8 million followers and its Facebook account has 50 million followers. In February, Disney CEO and chairman Bob Iger said, 'We obviously believe in the NBA long term. We think it's a growth sport. We don't really look at ratings year-to-year that carefully. … We're not distracted in any sense by what's happening ratings-wise this season. We're happy to have this now for 11 more years, including the Finals in 10 of those years. It is and will continue to be a marquee part of ESPN's offering.' Also in February, this time at All-Star Weekend in San Francisco, Silver addressed the topic with a five-minute answer when asked by USA TODAY Sports how the NBA views TV ratings and what is considered success. It's clearly a topic that is front of mind for Silver. 'I like the challenge, frankly, because I think for the league, and together with our partners, we have to up our game at the same time,' Silver said. 'There's a lot more competition for attention than there used to be. Just think of all of your habits in the room for people who grew up watching more traditional television. … 'I don't think that kind of engagement through social media is necessarily a substitute for watching live games because that comes up all the time. Some suggesting, 'Well, isn't that bad you're training the next generation of fans who might never watch live games but only watching highlights?' I actually think it's additive. We have a much better chance of moving young fans, in particular, to live games if they become engaged with various forms of our content, whether it's things that our players are doing off the floor, music they love, fashion or highlights.' TV ratings for the NBA's 2024-25 season were down 2% which mirrors the NFL's 2.2% decline for its 2024 season. Through the NBA's conference finals, playoff ratings were up 3%, and viewership for Games 1 and 2 was 50% higher than the next three highest-rated shows ('The Tony Awards,' '60 Minutes,' 'America's Got Talent') for the week of June 2-8. Thunder-Pacers has turned into a compelling series of talented, well-coached teams whose offensive and defensive efforts make every possession matter. This Finals is going at least six games, and any Finals series that goes more than five games is a financial success for the league's TV partners. Follow NBA reporter Jeff Zillgitt on social media@JeffZillgitt
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Will anybody coach the New York Knicks? It's a fair question.
The Pulse Newsletter 📣 | This is The Athletic's daily sports newsletter. Sign up here to receive The Pulse directly in your inbox. Good morning! Win your own personal national championship today. It's like the old saying goes: Four strikes, and you've still got to hire a coach. The Knicks had a wonderful energy about them as recently as a few weeks ago. That dimmed a bit with an Eastern Conference Finals loss to the Pacers. It faded more with the defensible but pretty aggressive firingof coach Tom Thibodeau on June 3. And now it's completely gone, as the Knicks have sputtered in their search for a replacement. They have tried to talk to at least four sitting head coaches and come up empty each time. Current whiffs: It's all been so public. The Knicks got the search they wanted, as Sam Amick writes, but they're in danger of winding up with a coach who was no better than their fifth choice. Or worse! Or, of course, they could manage to work something out with one of the teams above. For now, the Knicks are set to interview a couple of recent head coaches, Taylor Jenkins and Mike Brown. Advertisement Just how big a deal is this spectacle? I asked James L. Edwards III, who covers the Knicks for The Athletic. He offered this balanced response: 💬 What New York is doing — trying to pry employed coaches away from their teams — opens the franchise up for criticism and jokes, but it's not that uncommon. New York doesn't care to win the headlines and tabloids. If it did, team president Leon Rose and/or owner James Dolan would come out of the shadows and explain the Thibodeau firing and hiring of the next coach. Neither will do that. They haven't spoken to media covering the team in years. The Knicks have and will continue to spin this as them doing their due diligence. And in their defense, New York is the home of the lone coaching vacancy in the NBA. The Knicks' need to rush isn't like other teams in this position. Now, to me, this all comes back to this: Will New York, without question, get a coach who can propel the team to the next level? I have a tough time seeing it. The Knicks' biggest problem is not the process. It's the likely end result. All fair. We can rubberneck in the meantime. I asked Zach Harper, author of The Bounce, to rate the mess here on a scale of 1 ('chill out') to 10 ('unmitigated disaster'): 💬 I'm going with an 8.5, which essentially works out to: 'Guys, this is getting weird and maybe you should just take a walk and clear your heads. Possibly throw on a guided meditation and figure out what you want in life.' You might get one request to a team with a sitting head coach. To be throwing darts blindly at the NBA rolodex at this point has to be concerning to Knicks fans. Perhaps someone reading this newsletter would like to throw their hat into the ring. Marchand, Panthers dominate Game 5 Florida is one win away from back-to-back Stanley Cup titles. As they have done consistently in this Stanley Cup Final, the Panthers jumped on the Oilers in the first period last night. Brad Marchand scored first before Sam Bennett made it 2-0 late in the period. Marchand's second was somehow prettier than the first, a dagger early in the third period. Our NHL staff has more takeaways from Game 5 as Florida inches closer. My takeaway: Marchand was unstoppable last night. This goal literally made an Oilers fan swap allegiances: KD narrows preferred trade destinations Phoenix Suns forward Kevin Durant has narrowed his preferred trade destinations to two teams: the Houston Rockets and the San Antonio Spurs. The Athletic's Sam Amick, Jon Krawczynski and Kelly Iko dove into the full list of potential destinations, explaining why a deal with the Rockets or Spurs looks unlikely and which other teams have reportedly shown interest. Read the latest on Durant's suitors here. Advertisement A first-time major champion? Of the five golfers at or below par entering the final round of the U.S. Open today, only one has won a major championship. Scottie Scheffler is eight strokes back. Rory McIlroy is making more headlines off the coursethan on. Instead, your leader is 28-year-old Sam Burns, who has one career top 10 in a major. Right behind him: 44-year-old Adam Scott, who would be the second-oldest champion in U.S. Open history. Who will prevail? Our golf reporters made their picks ahead of today's final round. More news: 📺 Formula One: Canadian Grand Prix | 2 p.m. ET on ESPN Montreal's Circuit Gilles-Villeneuve is one of the most fun tracks in F1, in my opinion, and this is a nice breakdown of the circuit from Madeline Coleman. Meanwhile, Lewis Hamilton and Ferrari are still searching for podiums and answers, and Max Verstappen is on the brink of suspension. 📺 CWS: Coastal Carolina vs. Oregon State | 7 p.m. ET on ESPN2 The Chanticleers and the Beavers are in the winners' bracket in Omaha. OSU played a thrilling opener against Louisville, coughing up a two-run lead with some disastrous defense in the top of the ninth but then promptly walking it off in the bottom half. The Beavs are eternally a chaos team, no matter which sport we're talking about. With just over two weeks until NHL free agency opens, our staff picked one player each team should target. Attending the U.S. Open with my dad, him working as a hole marshal and me reporting for The Pulse. A cool memory! — Alex Kirshner Although chocolate morsels are plenty fun to use in recipes, one fun tweak can be to chop up a Baker's chocolate bar instead. Why? Chocolate chips often contain emulsifiers that maintain their shape during baking, but chopped chocolate has a lower melting point, thus making it easier to get pockets of chocolate in every bite of, say, your favorite cookie. — James Jackson Advertisement Daniel Taylor looked at the significance of David Beckham's knighthood. Season 2 of 'Tires' on Netflix is a pleasant surprise. Only halfway done and it's steadily rising in my workplace sitcom rankings. — Torrey Hart Teaching really little kids baseball is HARD in part because of all the ouches on grounders, pop-ups, etc. This video – yes, that's Wells! Actual Lol. – reminded me you can start with them throwing to themselves. It helped! — Chris Sprow If you missed it Wednesday, The Athletic FC had a great primer on the 2026 World Cup with one year to go. Diego Luna and Javier Bardem's 'Actors on Actors' interview was excellent. They fluidly switched between Spanish and English, which led to a deep, vulnerable conversation about the experience of performing, working in and living with a second language. — Patrick Iversen Most-clicked in the newsletter yesterday: Our newser on Antonio Brown facing an attempted murder charge. Most-read on the website yesterday: It can't be contained. Rustin Dodd's deep dive on Roger Federer's commencement speech is back. Ticketing links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
"Isiah has to own up to his own problem" - Magic Johnson said Isiah Thomas needs to look in the mirror over Dream Team snub
"Isiah has to own up to his own problem" - Magic Johnson said Isiah Thomas needs to look in the mirror over Dream Team snub originally appeared on Basketball Network. Speculation has followed Isiah Thomas for decades — specifically, the shadow of the 1992 Dream Team and his absence. He was, after all, one of the greatest point guards in NBA history, won two NBA championships and had 12 NBA All-Star appearances. Advertisement He had the credentials. But he never made the cut. Various reasons have been put forward from politics, personality and fractured relationships. The story has never been short on theories. The prevailing narrative points to Michael Jordan in a rumored power move in response to a long-running feud with Thomas that dated back to the late '80s. Thomas' pill to swallow Magic Johnson, a close friend of Thomas, sees the story through a wider lens. He insisted on accountability on the Detroit Pistons legend for his absence from the Dream Team. "That doesn't take away from Isiah's career or who he is as a man," Johnson said. "But at the same time, Isiah has to own up to his own problem and say, 'Hey, you know what, I had a hand in that, in that situation." Advertisement Thomas' rivalry with Jordan became infamous, not only on the court but in the psyche of the NBA, fueled by bruising playoff matchups and the bitter physicality of Detroit's Bad Boys era. The Eastern Conference battles between Detroit and Chicago were turf wars and Thomas stood at the center of it all, a general on a team that made it their mission to rattle and reject Jordan at every turn. While the spotlight has often fallen on Jordan's role, Johnson's comments redirect the focus. He points to Thomas himself, suggesting the point guard's own actions and strained relationships across the league contributed as much as any behind-the-scenes veto. Thomas had tensions with several Dream Team members, including Scottie Pippen and Larry Bird. The Pistons' unapologetically aggressive style, particularly during their peak from 1988 to 1990, drew resentment from rivals who saw their success as coming at the cost of sportsmanship. Advertisement In 1991, they famously walked off the court without shaking hands after being swept by the Bulls in the Eastern Conference finals — a move that, though not orchestrated by Thomas alone, was closely associated with his leadership. That moment wasn't forgotten. In the politically charged selection process for the Dream Team, every grudge mattered. Chemistry was paramount and if too many stars had reservations about one player, that player wasn't technically going. Related: "Yeah, they'll probably have to do something" - Bird says the NBA will be forced to move the 3-point line back if high volume continues Magic's part Johnson, who had once shared a brotherhood with Thomas before their relationship soured in the early '90s, also took a moment to clarify his role, or lack thereof, in the Dream Team controversy. The Los Angeles Lakers legend didn't have a part to play in Thomas not making the cut despite a leadership role in the selection process. Advertisement "The only thing David Stern and Rod Thorn asked me to do was to call Larry Bird and Michael Jordan and tell them they should play on the Dream Team," Johnson recalled. "Because Michael Jordan was on the fence on whether he wanted to play or not. Larry Bird was on the fence only because of his back." Johnson, a central figure in the NBA's golden age, wasn't involved in gatekeeping. Instead, he was a recruiter, called upon to ensure the league's top stars bought into the Olympic experiment. Amid the web of stories and finger-pointing, Thomas might benefit from acknowledging the dynamics that made his inclusion a hard sell. For a player of his stature, being kept off the most iconic team in basketball history was a statement about the NBA's ecosystem at the time and how the game's best had come to view one of their own. Even now, the debate endures. But as Johnson pointed out, careers like Thomas' don't get erased by a single omission. They are marked by rings, records, moments and the respect of those who played the game at its highest level. The Dream Team lives in legend, but Thomas' legacy still stands. Advertisement With or without the Dream Team. Related: 'We are too old for this right now' - Magic Johnson pleads with Michael Jordan and Isiah Thomas to talk out their beef This story was originally reported by Basketball Network on Jun 15, 2025, where it first appeared.
