Letters to the editor, May 15: ‘Did anyone think Mark Carney was going to fill his cabinet with Conservatives?'
Re 'An old Liberal front bench bolted to a new Carney mission' (May 14): It is incredible to me that a government that says it will represent all Canadians did not appoint a cabinet minister from Calgary, an economic powerhouse and one of the largest and fastest growing cities in Canada, when the opportunity was available.
I can't even imagine what the reaction would be if Toronto, Montreal or Vancouver were left out of cabinet. Same ol', same ol'.
C. Bryce Code Calgary
Those who whinge about a lot of old faces in the new Carney cabinet seem to forget that those old faces were re-elected. Their constituents must have thought they were doing a reasonable job.
Prime ministers have to build a cabinet from the MPs given to them by voters. The majority of Liberal MPs are from the previous government.
Did anyone think Mark Carney was going to fill his cabinet with Conservatives?
Tom MacDonald Ottawa
The Carney cabinet includes some capable people. But will they function as a cabinet – or will they still answer to political staffers?
Paul Edwards Calgary
The federal election was framed to be about change.
Earlier in the year, this meant Pierre Poilievre would likely replace Justin Trudeau. However, as it turned out, we got change of another kind: driven, experienced and mature leadership with Mark Carney.
The cabinet announcement brought another degree of change in capable new ministers who will be held accountable for results in key portfolios. These changes, I believe, are exactly what the country needs in the current situation.
One change we voted for, but doesn't look like we will get, is a new opposition leader. We still have to listen to the petty, negative and divisive attacks from Pierre Poilievre like we got in his blow-by-blow description of the cabinet.
One would think the Conservatives would hear voters and do themselves a favour: Move on to someone who can truly lead the country, not just tear it apart.
Dale McSween Cornwall, Ont.
Re 'Trump says new order will lower U.S. drug prices and increase them everywhere else' (Report on Business, May 13): If Donald Trump wants to ensure that there continues to be enough money for medicine research and development, there is a simple answer: Cut down on the amount of money that Big Pharma spends on share buybacks and dividends.
It has been reported that between 2012 and 2021, the 14 largest drug companies listed on the S&P 500 spent $747-billion on buybacks and dividends versus $660-billion on R&D.
Joel Lexchin Toronto
Re 'Ontario's Darlington SMR project to cost nearly $21-billion, significantly higher than expected' (Report on Business, May 9): This project can put Canada at the forefront of small modular reactors. These provide a resilient clean-energy solution to meet the projected significant increase in electrical demand.
Further, with globalization, it is important that Canada focuses on areas where we can be world class as we reindustrialize. I trust Ontario Power Generation will largely ignore criticism of the cost increases and keep going fast.
Growing expertise needs vision and takes time.
Julian Kenney Mississauga
Re 'Doug Ford is running roughshod over the environment and the law. Sound familiar?' (Opinion, May 10): I write with urgency for the withdrawal of Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, 2025. I believe it sets very dangerous precedents.
It does not offer protection; it removes protections. Developers could focus solely on profit when planning. Existing laws protecting the environment, current inhabitants and Indigenous rights could be bulldozed over. Abandoning these protections in one place could put them under threat everywhere.
This bill would not unleash our economy; it would unleash a series of bad practices with long-term effects. It does not look at what changes would help small businesses or entrepreneurs prosper.
Instead, it takes away hard-won protections for our citizens and environment to rush through development. It takes weak arguments used to justify selling land in Ontario's Greenbelt and puts them on steroids.
What was wrong-headed then should still be wrong-headed now.
Diane DiMonte-Mohan Toronto
Re 'Opening the opaque window around pot rules' (Editorial, May 12): We commend The Globe and Mail for highlighting the inconsistencies in Canada's regulatory frameworks for cannabis, alcohol and gambling. However, we disagree with the premise that a coherent regulatory approach should focus on fairness across the commercial sphere of store operators.
Instead, such an approach should centre on health risks, preventing youth exposure and reducing societal harms associated with substance use and gambling. It should restrict marketing practices that target vulnerable populations and ensure revenue generation does not overshadow health considerations.
It is imperative to ensure that developing coherent regulation remains independent of industry influence. The policy process should be transparent, evidence-based and free from conflicts of interest.
By centering public health in developing coherent regulation for cannabis, alcohol and gambling (as well as tobacco), Canada can set a precedent for responsible governance that prioritizes the health and safety of its citizens over commerce.
Natalie Brender, Director of policy, Canadian Public Health Association; Ottawa
Re 'Carney wants big government to get into housing – a major risk to taxpayers" (Report on Business, May 13): Of course it would cost us – if there was money to be made solving the housing crisis, the private sector would be on it.
Craig Sims Kingston
Re 'By letting public spaces and services fail, our cities are breaking a fundamental promise to the people who live there' (Opinion, May 10): I'm fortunate to live in North Vancouver, recently ranked as the most livable city in Canada ('Canada's Most Livable Cities' – Dec. 14, 2024).
The city has clearly invested plenty of dollars to make density livable. Politicians and planners have obviously understood the concept that 'livable' means enjoyable.
Today we have beautifully constructed and maintained public spaces that are accessible by a large network of public transit systems. Our trails and parks draw hundreds of walkers, runners and cyclists every day. New shops line some streets cheek to cheek, creating a lively market hubbub.
The old Shipyards has been transformed into a huge family-friendly gathering place, with a myriad of possibilities to connect with neighbours and friends. It's easy to get caught up in the happy activity and chatter of the place.
I come away feeling alive and immensely grateful to have all this at my disposal. North Vancouver has most definitely done the right thing.
Marlies Newton North Vancouver
Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@globeandmail.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Alberta teachers vote overwhelmingly in favour of strike action
The union representing Alberta teachers says members have voted 95 per cent in favour of strike action and they could hit the picket lines in the next four months. Alberta Teachers' Association president Jason Schilling says teachers are sending a message that they are united and will no longer prop up an underfunded public education system. Finance Minister Nate Horner says a mediator's recommendation rejected by teachers included the same 12 per cent pay increase over four years that has already been accepted by other unions. Horner says the recommendation also included more than $400- million in classroom improvements. Schilling says in order to bring Alberta in line with Canadian funding averages per student, the education budget needed to see a 13.5 per cent increase. Nearly 39,000 Alberta teachers voted on the latest deal, and both sides are scheduled to go back to the bargaining table this month.


CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
Some P.E.I. lobster fishers want 'moderate livelihood' defined, after DFO seizes more traps
Social Sharing Lennox Island First Nation says more lobster traps belonging to its moderate-livelihood fishery were removed from the waters along P.E.I.'s North Shore over the weekend. Chief Darlene Bernard said one fisherman had 58 traps seized by federal Fisheries and Oceans Canada enforcement officers on Sunday. The move comes after DFO removed what it said were 100 unauthorized traps from Malpeque Bay back in late May. Bernard is once again calling the removal illegal, though some non-Indigenous fishers in the area told CBC News they were pleased that DFO is taking action. Timothy Wall, a third-generation fisherman in the area, said there's too much pressure on Malpeque Bay's lobster stocks. "It's nice to see DFO… taking a stance in the name of conservation," Wall told CBC News. "There's been a lot of extra pressure on the resource, and you can only split the pie so many ways sometimes before your slices start to get smaller and smaller and smaller." First Nation's fishery protected by treaty The Mi'kmaq have a right to fish for a "moderate livelihood" outside of the commercial fishery that's rigorously regulated by the federal government, a right that was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada's Marshall decision in 1999. Bernard said the traps seized Sunday belong to Lennox Island's self-governed, treaty-protected fishery that began in 2022. The First Nation set 1,500 moderate-livelihood lobster traps this year — 100 traps each for 15 fishermen from the community — but DFO has said it approved only up to 1,000. Calling DFO's latest seizure "extremely disappointing" and "despicable," Bernard said 58 traps have been placed back in the water. "If there's an issue with these traps, then give me the reason other than 'we didn't authorize them,'" she told CBC News on Tuesday. "Well, guess what? [DFO doesn't] have the ability or the authority to authorize anything when it comes to the treaty-protected fishery. It's a self-regulated fishery that is protected by the Constitution." As well as that fishery, the Lennox Island First Nation also operates a communal commercial fishery. Down the road, the community to hopes to expand that fishery by using a new program, the Community Based Access Acquisition Fund, to buy existing commercial licences from people from outside the First Nation who are getting out of the business. If that approach works, Bernard said Lennox Island will not have to expand its moderate-livelihood fishery. Defining 'moderate livelihood'? Fishers like Wall say part of the problem is that DFO hasn't defined what a "moderate livelihood" means. He said non-Indigenous fishers should have some kind of say in the future of the treaty-protected fishery, given that their own livelihood is at stake. "It's impossible to have real, true reconciliation 'til we can all move forward, and this is one of the biggest things that's stopping everybody from moving forward," Wall said. "Everybody would be better off and happier if we could just figure out what moderate livelihood means. It is time to define it." WATCH | Lennox Island First Nation says it will replace hundreds of lobster traps removed by DFO officials: Lennox Island First Nation says it will replace hundreds of lobster traps removed by DFO officials 21 days ago Duration 2:30 Lennox Island First Nation says 300 lobster traps set by people from the community off P.E.I.'s North Shore have been removed from Malpeque Bay by Department of Fisheries and Oceans staff. The chief calls the move illegal, but DFO says the First Nation put in more traps than it was allowed. CBC's Connor Lamont has more. DFO said it has no plans to do that in the near future. Connor Robinson, the department's acting director-general of Indigenous affairs, said DFO is "committed to reconciliation and working with partners to implement their rights in the fishery in a sustainable way that's mindful of conservation and pressure on fish stocks" About defining the moderate-livelihood fishery, he added: "While I understand the desire from many to define it and put parameters around it, what the court basically said is what's required to implement moderate livelihood will vary over time as fish stocks and communities change and grow and evolve." We are going to continue to fish 1,500 traps in this community. — Chief Darlene Bernard, Lennox Island First Nation In the meantime, Lennox Island is considering legal action over the traps seized Sunday. Bernard said the 15 moderate-livelihood fishers from her community are only taking what they need — and it's far less than what the commercial fishery is hauling in. "We are going to continue to protect that right, and we are going to continue to fish 1,500 traps in this community," she said. "We've done our due diligence on it, we've done our engagements with the community, we've looked to see if there was any issues with regards to the stocks…. Right now, we are less than one per cent of the total allowable catch."


CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
Why you'll be hearing a lot more about shopping at P.E.I. businesses in the coming weeks
The Chambers of Commerce across Prince Edward Island have come together to deliver a province-wide Shop Local P.E.I. campaign. It's aimed at encouraging people to help sustain the Island's economy during uncertain times. CBC's Louise Martin spoke to Julie Corbett, the executive director at the Kensington and Area Chamber of Commerce.