
Could cannabis be decriminalised in the UK?
The cannabis debate has resumed in full force after the Mayor of London renewed his call for decriminalisation.
The controversial topic has made headlines again after Sadiq Khan backed calls for possession of small amounts of natural cannabis to be decriminalised after a new report made a 'compelling' case for it.
Campaigners fear that countless lives could be ruined for a minor possession for personal use if the law is not changed, which they say disproportionately targets marginalised communities.
The London Drugs Commission study, led by Lord Falconer and backed by more than 200 experts and academics, urged the government to change how cannabis possession is policed.
Lord Falconer, the chair of the report, said: 'This is the most extensive consideration of what is the correct public policy response to cannabis in recent times.
'It is clear that a fundamental reset is required. Legalisation is not the answer. The criminal justice system response needs to focus only on the dealers and not the users.
'Those who suffer from the adverse effects of cannabis – which may be a small percentage of users but it is a high number of people – need reliable, consistent medical and other support.'
But, is there a change on the way, and is cannabis use in the UK already decriminalised anyway?
Cannabis has never been officially decriminalised, but there is already a 'de facto decriminalisation' in some areas, Steve Rolles, a senior policy analyst with Transform Drug Policy Foundation told Metro.
Currently, cannabis is a Class B drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act, meaning possession can lead to a fine, imprisonment and a criminal record.
Decriminalised – Decriminalisation of a drug like cannabis, or some aspects of use or possession, is about removing criminal sanctions for the offence, and there would be no criminal record
– Decriminalisation of a drug like cannabis, or some aspects of use or possession, is about removing criminal sanctions for the offence, and there would be no criminal record Legalisation – This would allow a regulated and taxed cannabis market to exist in some form. In a legalised system, which exists in many US states, cannabis could be sold through commercial pharmacies or shops, or, like in Malta and Germany, through cooperative-owned associations
The report is proposing that cannabis be regulated under the Psychoactive Substances Act instead, which would mean there would no longer be a criminal punishment like a fine or caution that leavers a criminal record, potentially forever.
Steve said: 'A lot of people have their lives blighted by criminal records. It can impact your work, your ability to travel, to get housing and finance, and affect relationships, and it can be very stigmatising.
'Criminal record from cannabis use is affecting marginalised communities, in particular young black men. And those records can blight their lives forever.
'If you can't get a job or housing, you are more likely to get into crime. And those are the things we are trying to stop.
'And it is a huge drain on police resources, and every time police focuses on that, it is away from something else.'
A full-scale decriminalisation could reduce stop and searches for cannabis which 'many do not consider worse than a pint,' he said.
Users would be diverted to other services away from the criminal justice system, which is already under pressure.
Steve said: 'We already have these schemes in a number of police forces, but not all of them. They are called diversion schemes, and it happens in some London boroughs too.'
He said the diversion approach is 'decriminalisation in practice.'
The Met Police – the UK's biggest force – has not warmed up to the thought of decriminalising even small-scale possession.
Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said that while drug use is a 'big issue' for communities, a change in the law is 'not something we're calling for.'
Steve accused the Met Police being 'behind the curve,' saying that the College of Policing has 'advocated for diversion as a best practice.'
He said that decriminalising possession is 'not the same as legalising anti-social behaviour in public or proposing to legalise anti-social behaviour while driving.'
'Legalising does not mean legalising everything, like giving cannabis to children or flying a plane when out of your mind. No one is talking about that,' he said.
People can access medical cannabis legally when it is prescribed by a specialist doctor.
This became possible in 2018.
The expert said that diversion is 'kind of the same' as decriminalisation, which many police forces do in practice.
'There are 14-15 forces, including the whole of Scotland, where possession is treated as a diversion, where you will not get arrested and a criminal record for small-scale possession of any drug,' he said.
'Durham was one of the first to do it, and Bristol, where we are based, is very good for diversion.'
Germany partially decriminalised small amounts of cannabis possession from July 2024.
Brazil has also decriminalised personal use of cannabis, the largest country to do so.
Malta went a step further when it became the first European country to legalise the cultivation and possession for personal use, followed by Luxembourg.
Canada allowed the recreational cultivation, possession, acquisition and consumption of cannabis in 2018, the second country after Uruguay to do so.
In the US, Recreational cannabis use is allowed in 24 out of 50 states, while medical use is allowed in 39 states. At a federal state, possession and distribution is technically illegal, but the law is generally not enforced, and there are plans for a review in the pipeline.
It appears that the government has no intention to change to law anytime soon.
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We will continue to work with partners across health, policing and wider public services to drive down drug use, ensure more people receive timely treatment and support, and make our streets and communities safer.
'The government has no intention of reclassifying cannabis from a Class B substance under the Misuse of Drugs Act.'
And Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is unlikely to push for this to change either.
He told Politico in 2023, when he was still in opposition, that his party has 'no intention' to change drug laws, and their approach is 'settled.' More Trending
Steve told Metro the government is dragging its feet on drug reform, saying it is likely to change eventually.
'We are on the cusp of change.
'Either public opinion continues to tilt towards reform, or it will be economic priorities.
'We would generate about 1 billion in revenue and save about half a billion in the criminal justice system. We are hosing a lot of money into a failing policy, and those realities could come back to bite the government.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Urgent warning after two die in London taking 'blue pills'
MORE: British couple arrested in Spain after '33kg of cannabis found in suitcases'
MORE: Man jailed for killing girl, 3, after taking '20 lines' of cocaine
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
English mayors push for visitor levy to boost income from tourism
A coalition of mayors from across England are urging the government to allow local authorities to bring in a Barcelona-style visitor levy to generate income from tourism. The group, led by the Liverpool city region mayor, Steve Rotheram, argues that a visitor levy would unlock vital funding for tourism and cultural infrastructure, empower regional growth and reduce dependence on central government funding. The letter to the culture secretary, Lisa Nandy, and the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has been co-signed by the Greater Manchester mayor, Andy Burnham; the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan; the north-east mayor, Kim McGuinness; Richard Parker, the mayor of the West Midlands; and the West Yorkshire mayor, Tracy Brabin. They say provisions could be made in the forthcoming English devolution bill, or in a specific finance bill, to give local authorities the freedom to design and introduce a locally administered visitor levy. It would mean cities they represent, including Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle, Birmingham and London, could introduce charges to reap direct benefits from tourism. Many European cities have similar levies in place, including Venice, Lisbon and Amsterdam, as do Spain's Balearic Islands. In the Liverpool city region, which hosts more than 60 million visitors annually, a visitor levy could raise nearly £11m a year, the mayors said. The city hosted Eurovision in 2023, which generated £54m in direct economic impact. If a £1- to £5-a-night levy were introduced in Greater Manchester, it could raise between £8m and £40m a year, which could go towards infrastructure projects such as the regeneration of Old Trafford or airport development, the mayors said. The mayors said funds raised through a visitor levy would be ringfenced for local reinvestment, and said the government needed to act urgently, as devolved governments in Scotland and Wales are moving ahead with their own tourism levies, leaving English regions at risk of falling behind. 'The Liverpool city region is a global icon of creativity, culture and character – attracting more than 60 million visitors every year and supporting a £6.25bn visitor economy,' Rotheram said. 'That's something to be incredibly proud of – but it also comes with pressures on our infrastructure and services. 'A small charge on overnight stays – the kind most of us wouldn't think twice about when travelling abroad – would give us the power to reinvest directly into the things that make our area so special.' Burnham added: 'At a time when national resources are under real pressure, a modest visitor levy – something we all pay in other parts of Europe – offers a fair and sustainable way to support our local services.' McGuinness said: 'A local tourism tax is so mainstream across the rest of the world you barely notice it, so it should not be a big step here in the UK.' Last year, a report from the landscape charity Friends of the Lake District made a similar call. The organisation's chief executive, Mike Hill, said: 'In most of the places around the world that we've looked at that have brought in some sort of tourism levy, tourism numbers have actually increased, because the place gets better.'


BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Mayor calls on Transport for London to cancel abortion advert ban
The mayor of London is calling on Transport for London (TfL) to lift its ban on adverts that campaign for the decriminalisation of Sadiq Khan is "urgently" looking into the banned British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) adverts, which share stories of police investigations into women - some of who were prosecuted for having an Stewart, chief executive of BPAS, said the adverts supported Tonia Antoniazzi MP's amendment to the Crime and Policing a letter sent to BPAS, TfL said the campaign made "serious allegations about the police" and could bring TfL or the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) into disrepute". TfL was contacted for comment. One of MOPAC's functions is to hold the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) Commissioner to account, TfL said in its said that MOPAC's functions in respect of the force were "to some extent regulatory", adding that "the nature of the copy could bring MOPAC into disrepute given its responsibilities in relation to the MPS". A spokesperson for Sir Sadiq said the mayor had "stepped in"."We are now urgently looking into this issue so we can allow adverts from the British Pregnancy Advisory Service on London's transport network," they said. A spokesperson for BPAS said they had not been contacted by the mayor's office directly and said the campaign had a "very narrow window."Ms Heidi Stewart said: "This is a pivotal moment for MPs to reform our abortion law and prevent more women from suffering the trauma and injustice of police investigations and the risk of criminalisation. "Ahead of the vote in parliament, it is absolutely vital that the voices of the women who have been so deeply harmed by the current law are allowed to be heard. "We urge the mayor to take swift action and allow our charity to share these stories as a matter of urgency."


Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
'Rattled' Sadiq Khan challenged over his 'Trumpian' attack on Robert Jenrick after London mayor brands top Tory 'Mr Ozempic' in Tube fare-dodging row
A 'rattled' Sir Sadiq Khan was challenged over his 'Trumpian' attack on top Tory Robert Jenrick today amid a deepening feud between the two politicians. The London mayor faced questions over his decision to take a personal swipe at Mr Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, by branding him 'Mr Ozempic'. His outburst came after Mr Jenrick - who once used the weight-loss drug - last week used social media to highlight the issue of fare-dodging on the London Underground. Footage shared by the ex-Cabinet minister showed him confronting those who forced their way through ticket barriers at Stratford station in the east of the capital. Responding to Mr Jenrick's video, Sir Sadiq took a dig at Mr Jenrick's past battle with his weight by claiming it was 'an example of the chutzpah of Mr Ozempic'. This saw the London mayor, a fierce critic of Donald Trump, accused of aping the US President by resorting to name-calling when being quizzed about his record. An ally of Mr Jenrick said the outburst showed how Sir Sadiq had been 'so rattled' by Mr Jenrick's campaign, adding: 'Anti-Trump Sadiq has gone full Trumpian.' In 2019, during Mr Trump's first spell in the White House, the London mayor compared the US President's name-calling to the actions of 'an 11-year-old' and said it was 'beneath me'. Speaking to Times Radio at the SXSW festival in London on Monday, Sir Sadiq admitted that fare evasion 'is an issue' on the Tube. 'It's an issue for London, has been for some time,' added the London mayor, who oversees Transport for London. 'That's one of the reasons why we've invested hugely in terms of not just enforcement officers, not just in terms of body-worn videos, not just in terms of CCTV, but invested in the police as well. 'What I find ironic, and it's an example of the chutzpah of Mr Ozempic, is that he was in government when the government cut more than a billion pounds from their police budget. 'He was in government when the government removed Transport for London's operating grant, and now he's criticising the consequences of the cuts in policing and TfL made by his government. 'Where was he in 2010, 2024 when those cuts were being made in our policing? Where was he in 2015 when the government cut their operating grant to TfL?' Asked whether he was copying Mr Trump by resorting to name-calling, Sir Sadiq replied: 'Look, you asked me a question, I gave you an answer.' Last summer, during his unsuccessful bid to be Tory leader, Mr Jenrick revealed how he took Ozempic 'for a short period of time' in a bid to shed the pounds. He spoke of how he lost four stone in 12 months after realising he was 'overweight'. Mr Jenrick said Ozempic had been 'helpful' but he 'didn't particularly enjoy it' and he had since 'lost weight in the normal way by eating less... doing some exercise'. In April, the Tory politician ran the London Marathon in aid of a Armed Forces charity. In June 2019, as Mr Trump began a state visit to the UK, Sir Sadiq responded to the US President branding him a 'stone-cold loser' on social media. 'This is the sort of behaviour I would expect from an 11-year-old,' the London mayor told CNN. 'But it's for him to decide how he behaves. It's not for me to respond in a like manner. I think it's beneath me to do childish tweets and name-calling.'