
Aussie Farmers Warn ‘Green Tape' Hurting Their Livelihoods
Australia's farmers are ramping up pressure this election season, calling for urgent fixes to environmental and energy policies they say are hurting the land and threatening livelihoods.
Water buybacks, excessive regulation, rushed emissions targets, and poorly managed renewables are all in the firing line.
Farmer groups are demanding genuine consultation, practical reforms, and a stronger voice in shaping the policies that shape their future.
Water Woes and 'Green Tape'
New South Wales Farmers' Bronwyn Petrie says the current federal water policy is failing everyone, especially farmers.
'The federal government is buying up the water that we need to grow food and fibre,' she said.
'Not only is our Basin not benefiting, but our farmers and their communities are being stripped of their lifeblood.'
She called the current approach 'a lose-lose' for the environment and farmers.
Related Stories
10/2/2024
7/18/2024
'There's so much green tape that's simply creating a lose-lose situation where the landscape hurts, and farmers do too. That must change before it's too late.'
She also criticised the silence on climate and land care during the campaign.
'There's no doubt we need action to end our cost-of-living crisis, but when it comes to climate and caring for our landscape, we're hearing nothing but crickets this federal election,' she said.
She urged parties to rethink their emissions plans and include farmers in the conversation.
'We need realistic, viable emissions reduction strategies, not aspirational ones that expect farmers to use electric tractors that don't exist and report on emissions we can't track,' she said.
Farmers Want a Say in Energy Rollout
The Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF) also wants a better deal on renewables.
VFF President Brett Hosking said farmers support green energy, but not if it ignores their rights.
'Farmers aren't opposed to progress, but we won't accept a system where multinational energy companies dictate terms to local landholders,' he said.
Hosking is calling for a firm commitment: no federal funding for energy projects unless developers follow a Land Access Code of Conduct.
The Code is a set of principles that guide how energy companies interact with landowners including requirements for early engagement, clear communication, fair compensation, and respect for farming operations.
'If developers haven't done the work with farmers and their neighbours, they shouldn't receive a cent of taxpayer money. No engagement, no funding, it's that simple,' he said.
The Coalition has vowed to axe Labor's $20 billion Rewiring the Nation Fund, arguing it funnels money to poorly managed projects. But if Labor wins, the VFF wants strict new rules to ensure only respectful and transparent developers get access to public money.
'We need more than guidelines. We need a legislated code that holds developers to account,' Hosking said.
Bipartisan Support on Farm Safety
One rare point of consensus has been farm safety, with both major parties committing to a $2.5 million investment in 2024 after a deadly year on farms. Seventy-two people died and 133 were seriously injured.
'We thank both sides of politics for stepping up and committing to this investment in saving lives,' said NFF President David Jochinke.
Farmsafe Chair Felicity Richards said the funding would drive practical change.
'This support comes at a critical time. We've seen far too many tragedies over the years,' she said.
Animal Welfare and Activism Concerns
Despite that progress, tensions remain, particularly over animal welfare policy.
The NFF says it is alarmed by the increasing influence of activist groups, and criticised Labor and the Greens for backing activist ideas without consulting farmers.
'The NFF is extremely concerned with who these parties are choosing to listen to when developing policy,' Jochinke said.
'Farmers' livelihoods depend on positive animal welfare outcomes—our animals are our number one priority.'
As the people managing Australia's food supply and rural landscapes, farmers say it is time politicians stopped making decisions about them and started listening to them.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Who is David Huerta, the California labor leader who was arrested in Los Angeles?
Immigration Labor unionsFacebookTweetLink Follow A revered California labor leader arrested for his involvement in protests decrying immigration raids in Los Angeles is out on bond, after demonstrators came out nationwide Monday to demand his release. David Huerta, the president of the Service Employees International Union California, was arrested Friday as he protested an immigration raid in Los Angeles. After three nights of detention, Huerta was released on a $50,000 bond Monday afternoon, though he remains charged with conspiracy to impede an officer, a felony that could result in up to six years in prison, according to the US Attorney's Office. A well-known figure in the California labor movement, Huerta started his career mobilizing immigrant janitors in Los Angeles to demand better working conditions as part of a 1990s campaign called Justice for Janitors, according to a UNI Global Union statement. He was once praised by former President Barack Obama's administration for his efforts to advocate for immigrant workers. 'As a labor leader, David has worked to build an immigrant integration program that includes English classes for union members. Under his leadership, hundreds of SEIU-USWW members have become U.S. citizens. In addition, he has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform by empowering SEIU-USWW members to become their own advocates for change,' an archived White House post from the Obama administration reads. Huerta's union has described him as 'a father, a union leader, and a fighter for immigrant justice.' Supporters in California rallied around Huerta when he was released from custody Monday afternoon, chanting 'Si se puede.' Speaking outside the courthouse after his release, Huerta said authorities are trying to make an example out of him, cautioning that while he was released on bond, other detainees are still locked up, with some allegedly unable to see their lawyers or attend critical court hearings. 'We will have our time for justice, but we must do it in a way that we demonstrate the power of working people across this country and stand united,' Huerta told the crowd. After Huerta was released Monday, his union released a statement: 'We are relieved that David is free and reunited with his family and we are deeply grateful to the hundreds of elected officials, civil rights leaders, labor partners and allies from across the nation who stood in solidarity and demanded David's release,' Service Employees International Union President April Verrett said. 'But this struggle is about much more than just one man,' Verrett continued. 'Thousands of workers remain unjustly detained and separated from their families. At this very moment, immigrant communities are being terrorized by heavily militarized armed forces.' The national union boasts about 2 million members in healthcare, the public sector and property services, with more than 700,000 workers represented throughout California. After Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials began performing targeted raids and arresting community members in the Los Angeles area last week, protestors came out in numbers to voice their objections. Huerta was among the demonstrators gathered in Los Angeles Friday at a business prosecutors say was suspected of unlawful employment and falsifying employment records. Prosecutors have accused Huerta of blocking access to a gate while law enforcement attempted to execute a search warrant and refusing to leave when asked, saying multiple times, 'it's a public sidewalk.' When a law enforcement vehicle approached the scene and Huerta refused to step aside, an officer tried to physically move him, prosecutors said. When Huerta pushed back, the officer pushed him to the ground, handcuffed and arrested him. Video of the incident shows the tense moments around the arrest, Huerta face down on the ground as multiple masked ICE agents surround and try to detain him, with demonstrators loudly objecting. The union has described his treatment at the hands of the masked officials as 'assault.' Huerta was later hospitalized and treated for injuries sustained during the arrest, SEIU said in a statement. As President Donald Trump called in the National Guard to quell the protests in Southern California – against the guidance of the governor – lawmakers around the nation condemned Huerta's arrest. 'David Huerta is a respected leader, a patriot, and an advocate for working people. No one should ever be harmed for witnessing government action,' California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement. US Democratic Sens. Adam Schiff of California, Alex Padilla of California and Chuck Schumer of New York wrote a letter to the Department of Homeland Security, ICE and the Department of Justice Monday demanding a review of Huerta's arrest – including exactly how the labor leader was injured in the process. 'During a workplace enforcement action, Mr. Huerta, a well-known and deeply respected community leader, was exercising his lawful right to observe the conduct of immigration enforcement personnel,' the senators wrote. Schiff attended Huerta's initial appearance Monday, his team told CNN. Beyond Huerta's immediate release on bond, Democratic leaders are demanding the charge against him be dropped. 'House Democrats will stand with David Huerta for as long as it takes until the charges are dropped and the rogue federal actions that have been unleashed will be completely investigated and exposed,' House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries said in a statement. 'Free Huerta now!' massive crowds in Los Angeles chanted Monday. Their demands were echoed around the nation, as demonstrators took to the streets in at least a dozen cities, including San Francisco, Boston, Pittsburgh, Seattle, Washington, DC, Charlotte, North Carolina, and parts of Connecticut and New York. Members of Huerta's union, along with other labor leaders and workers, held up signs reading, 'FREE DAVID' and 'END ICE RAIDS.' Union leaders across other industries voiced their support for Huerta's due process. 'We must fight back. We reject these attacks on our communities and demand the immediate release of our union brother David Huerta,' Manny Pastreich, president of the property service workers labor group 32BJ SEIU, said while speaking at the demonstration in New York. 'The United Farm Workers, along with the entire labor movement, stands in strong solidarity with our comrade, labor leader David Huerta. We demand his immediate release and condemn indiscriminate sweeps targeting working class immigrants,' the United Farm Workers union said on X. The International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees also chimed in: 'The apparent targeting of labor activists by federal authorities is unacceptable and dangerous,' the group said in a statement Monday. 'We stand united with David Huerta, immigrant workers, and all who seek justice.' And upon Huerta's release, the California Federation of Labor Unions said it was relieved to see its 'brother' out of custody and on bond. While many across the labor movement celebrated Huerta's release Monday, the focus has turned to the workers and family members still detained by immigration authorities. Huerta has thrown his support behind them. 'I know when we organize, we win,' he said Monday. CNN's Amanda Musa, Taylor Romine, Hannah Rabinowitz, Holmes Lybrand and Maureen Chowdhury contributed to this report.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
As Albanese returns, what next for Australia's mining and minerals?
When Anthony Albanese, leader of Australia's Labor Party, secured his second term as prime minister in May of this year – the first Labor leader to do so since Bob Hawke, who served three terms from 1983 to 1991 – world leaders were quick to congratulate him. But did Australia's mining industry, a sector critical to the nation's economy, do the same? Just a few days before the election, Albanese made his intentions around critical minerals clear via a statement on his website. If elected, his government promised to 'pursue Australia's national interest and boost our economic resilience by establishing a Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve'. 'In a time of global uncertainty, Australia will be stronger and safer by developing our critical national assets to create economic opportunity and resilience,' stated Albanese. 'I will ensure that Australia continues to produce and benefit from the resources that are essential to our national interest.' The strategic reserve will see the federal government commit to entering contracts to purchase, or obtain options over, key critical minerals, which will likely give Australia's national government some leverage in relation to critical minerals as geopolitical tensions increase. The government will make an initial investment of A$1.2bn ($767m), including through a A$1bn increase in the existing Critical Minerals Facility established in 2021, taking the total investment in the facility to A$5bn. Australia is home to some of the largest critical mineral deposits on Earth. In 2024, government agency Geoscience Australia was pledged A$566m by the previous Albanese government to map out the nations' critical minerals over the next ten years and identify a strategy to develop them. Identified as crucial to developing infrastructure in everything from renewable energy to defence and communications, these critical materials are already believed to be abundant in Australia. However, Geoscience figures suggest more than 80% of the country remains under-explored. As such, the country 'is uniquely placed to meet the needs of increasing global and domestic demand, while the size and sophistication of our mining industry allows us to take maximum advantage of these resources', Albanese says. The reserve will create two new mechanisms: national offtake agreements, with the government taking agreed volumes via a voluntary contract; and selective stockpiling, with the government establishing stockpiles in Australia of certain key critical minerals. The reserve 'will generate cash flow from sales of offtake on global markets and to key partners [and] accumulate stockpiles of priority minerals when warranted by market conditions and strategic considerations, but it is anticipated that these will be modest and time-limited in most cases'. Resources Minister Madeleine King also says that the reserve, 'combined with production tax credits and the expansion of the Critical Minerals Facility, shows the Albanese government is taking the development of an Australian critical minerals industry seriously'. King, who is also Minister for Northern Australia, was re-appointed to the role on 13 May 2025. The Critical Minerals Production Tax Incentive (CMPTI) – passed into law in early 2025 – is a scheme intended to support the critical minerals industry and promote downstream processing in Australia. It offers a refundable tax credit on 10% of eligible costs associated with the processing of certain critical minerals between July 2027 and the end of June 2040. The Australian Government has two lists of minerals that are important for the nation's modern technologies, economies and national security: a critical minerals list containing 31 substances including cobalt and lithium; and a strategic materials list containing aluminium, copper, phosphorus, tin and zinc. The minerals on these lists support Australia's 'transition to net-zero emissions, advanced manufacturing, defence technologies and capabilities, and broader strategic applications', according to its Department of Industry, Science and Resources. Albanese's Government will now be able to carry on with its overarching Future Made in Australia policy – essentially an attempt to enhance the benefits of net-zero and energy transition policies. The creation of the critical reserve is central to that, along with a A$750m commitment to develop new low-emissions technology, and A$1bn to boost green iron manufacturing and supply chains. A statement from Andrew Forrest, executive chairman and founder, Fortescue, claims the return of Albanese 'sends a clear and unequivocal message: Australians will back and support policies that recognise the economic opportunities which come from acting on the existential threat of climate change'. Forrest continues that the government's commitments, 'including the Future Made in Australia plan, the Capacity Investment Scheme, the Hydrogen Production Tax Incentive and the Green Iron Fund, provide a strong foundation for a green energy future'. Australia is likely trying to position itself as a green iron manufacturing powerhouse, with the A$1bn fund boosting green iron manufacturing and supply and helping to unlock substantial levels of private investment. 'Green iron can be the biggest industry Australia has ever built,' adds Forrest, so 'let's start in the Pilbara this decade, with investment, markets and skills'. Pilbara is home to Fortescue's Green Metal Project, which is expected to produce more than 1,500 tonnes per annum of green metal, with first production anticipated in 2025, according to the company's website. The plant will use green hydrogen in a reduction furnace to convert iron ore into sponge iron, revealed the company. Soroush Basirat, energy finance analyst, global steel at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, was also hopeful Albanese would help the growth of Australia's high-grade magnetite mining sector, as a key feedstock for green iron production. 'The industry remains focused on hematite mining due to its higher profit margins, but this approach limits flexibility,' Basirat told Mining Technology. 'A transition to magnetite mining – better suited for producing high-grade ore – has yet to gain traction. Given the long lead times for magnetite projects (often a decade to become operational and deliver stable output), government support is essential to accelerate development.' Of Australia's total economic demonstrated resources of iron ore, just over 58.29 billion tonnes (bt), some 24.25bt is magnetite ore, according to 2023 research from Australia Minerals, a collaboration of Australia's federal, state and Northern Territory Government geoscience agencies. The research added that the 'projected demand for high-grade iron ore products has provided momentum for the recent development of magnetite deposits, such as the Iron Road Central Eyre project in South Australia and Fortescue Metals Group's Iron Bridge project in Western Australia. Basirat continues that while the government 'is backing green iron initiatives, significantly more effort is needed to establish even a single low-emissions ironmaking facility in Australia'. To remain competitive in the evolving global iron ore market, Australia must also act swiftly to diversify beyond hematite and invest in the future of high-grade, low-emissions iron production. 'Without action, Australia risks losing its competitive edge. Emerging competitors such as the Simandou [iron ore] mine in [Guinea], Africa, are set to enter the market and could claim a significant share by the end of the decade, challenging Australia's dominance, which has been largely built on lower-grade ores,' Basirat adds. There is an 'urgent need' to shift toward producing high-grade iron ore that is suitable for the direct reduced iron pathway, says Basirat, noting that this process is 'critical as steelmakers transition to more environmentally friendly technologies such as electric arc furnaces to replace the traditional, coal-based blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace method'. Australia's minerals sector is central to the nation's prosperity, says an early May statement from the Mineral Council of Australia (MCA), 'supporting over 1.2 million jobs, contributing more than A$455bn in export earnings last year, and playing a vital role in the global energy transition through the supply of critical minerals'. Tania Constable, CEO, MCA, added that she hopes the new government 'will place investment at the heart of its economic growth strategy [with a] strong focus on skills, training and workforce, ensuring that Australia has the capability and talent it needs to meet growing demand for critical minerals and resources'. Some key aspects of the policy are tax incentives for processing of critical minerals and production of hydrogen, as well as resources to assess the dangers of foreign investment in critical infrastructure, critical minerals and critical technology. The Association of Mining and Exploration Companies' CEO, Warren Pearce, welcomed the re-election, and publicly stated that his organisation is 'ready and willing to work constructively with the returned Albanese government to deliver the minerals and metals critical to Australia's prosperity and the global energy transition'. Pearce added that it is now time 'for action on key policy initiatives that will support long-term investment and drive Australia's international competitiveness, especially in critical minerals'. 'The exploration sector is struggling,' said Pearce, 'with investment extremely hard to come by, and this crucial cog in the wheel of mining industry needs clarity around the continuation of Junior Minerals Exploration Incentive (JMEI)'. The JMEI encourages investment in small minerals exploration companies that carry out greenfields mineral exploration in Australia, allowing eligible companies to generate tax credits by choosing to give up a portion of their losses from greenfields mineral exploration expenditure. Initially introduced in 2017, JMEI is currently funded until the end of June 2025. Rebecca Tomkinson, CEO, Chamber of Minerals and Energy Western Australia, sees the re-election of Albanese as a chance to streamline environmental regulations, with reform of 'environmental law long overdue, but any change must [offer] improving outcomes for both the environment and for business'. "As Albanese returns, what next for Australia's mining and minerals? " was originally created and published by Mining Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
MN House, Senate convene for special session to pass state budget
Minnesota lawmakers returned to the Capitol Monday morning to complete the state's next two-year budget as agencies prepared to warn thousands of government employees of a potential government shutdown next month. Most of the state government only has funding through the end of June after the Legislature failed to pass the majority of the bills that form the roughly $66 billion state budget by the end of the regular legislative session on May 19. Gov. Tim Walz called a special session so lawmakers can finish their work. State leaders finalized the details in a series of mostly closed meetings over the last few weeks. The Senate and House went into session at 10 a.m. and are expected to finish their work by Tuesday morning. However, there's no guarantee that will happen. Democratic-Farmer-Labor and Republican legislative leaders and the governor may have signed an agreement to finish up the special session by 7 a.m. Tuesday, but nothing can stop other state senators and representatives from introducing amendments and engaging in lengthy debate on controversial bills. Some bills that are part of the budget deal between Walz, the tied House and DFL majority Senate may pass on thin margins. A proposal to end state-funded health insurance for adults in the U.S. without legal immigration status is opposed by many DFLers and may only pass with the support of Republicans and the DFL leaders who signed the agreement. Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy, DFL-St. Paul, and House DFL Leader Melissa Hortman, of Brooklyn Park, have said they agreed to remove coverage for adults to avert a government shutdown, which would interrupt services on a much larger scale. The immigrant care proposal was the first bill the House took up Monday morning, and representatives continued to debate the matter as noon approached. If the measure passes both chambers, Walz would have a tough time vetoing it. Republicans managed to get DFLers to agree to tie the activation of health care spending to ending MinnesotaCare for around 17,000 adults in the state who came to the U.S. illegally. Meanwhile, GOP lawmakers have expressed reservations about the tax and transportation bills. The tax bill includes an increase to the sales tax on cannabis, and Republican leadership had initially said it wouldn't support any new taxes, and some members may stick to that pledge. There were also questions on Friday about whether a proposal to shift $93 million in sales tax revenue from metro counties to the Metropolitan Council would survive floor votes, as members of both parties might turn on shifting money from local governments to a central planning agency. This is a developing story that will update throughout the day. Letters: It's unfortunate that we can't have certain conversations Gov. Tim Walz calls for special session for Legislature Monday Timeline for Minnesota special session blurry as budget talks continue MN government return to office order kicks in as shutdown layoffs loom Ramsey County: Economic Development Authority to allow flexibility on housing projects