logo
How previous prime ministers handled the ‘special relationship'

How previous prime ministers handled the ‘special relationship'

Independent28-02-2025

As Sir Keir Starmer prepares to meet Donald Trump for key talks in the White House, observers will be looking for signs of the health or otherwise of the 'special relationship' between the UK and the US.
Here the PA news agency takes a look at previous relationships between prime ministers and presidents, and the key challenges they faced.
The so-called 'special relationship' between the UK and US shaped interactions between prime ministers and presidents as it developed throughout the 20th century.
It was Winston Churchill who coined the phrase during a speech in Missouri in 1946.
The fact that Mr Churchill was invited to stay at the White House during a trip to Washington following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941, which forced the Americans directly into the war, was seen as a reflection of how close the transatlantic alliance had become.
But an anecdote from the time suggests the relationship went beyond conventional diplomatic boundaries.
One morning, then-president Franklin D Roosevelt was said to have entered Mr Churchill's suite to find the prime minister emerge 'pink, glowing and completely naked' from the bath.
As an embarrassed president turned to leave, Mr Churchill said: 'The prime minister of Great Britain has nothing to conceal from the president of the United States.'
The two men later that year signed the Atlantic Charter, a key joint declaration outlining a broad statement of British and US war aims.
– Howard Macmillan and John F Kennedy
Howard Macmillan and Dwight D Eisenhower developed a positive relationship during the Second World War when the former was a Cabinet minister and the latter a supreme allied commander in the Mediterranean.
In 1959, Mr Eisenhower accepted an invitation from the then prime minister to London – the first state visit by a US president in half a century.
But perhaps more significant was the visit of Mr Eisenhower's successor John F Kennedy in June 1961, which followed a meeting between the young president and Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev in Vienna.
The meeting during the height of the Cold War was described as 'bruising'.
With Mr Kennedy suffering from acute back pain, Mr MacMillan discarded plans for a big meeting with advisers in favour of a private chat in his room, which featured sandwiches and whisky.
Mr Kennedy was said to have 'unburdened himself' about the Vienna meeting, later describing the meeting as a 'special moment'.
– Jim Callaghan and Jimmy Carter
Labour prime minister Jim Callaghan worked hard to cultivate a positive relationship with newly elected Jimmy Carter in 1977.
Mr Callaghan is said to have significantly developed Mr Carter's understanding of European affairs and also sought to improve his difficult relationship with German leader Helmut Schmidt.
A trip to Tyneside featured in the US president's visit to Britain in May 1977.
– Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan
The relationship between Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan is often singled out as a high point in US-UK relations, but interactions between the two were not always cordial.
Mr Reagan gave special addresses to both Houses of Parliament in June 1982, only one of three US presidents to do so since then.
However, later Mrs Thatcher remarked that their relationship 'worked… because he was more afraid of me than I was of him', while there are accounts of ferocious rows over issues such as the Falklands conflict, the US invasion of Grenada in 1983, and Mr Reagan's 'Star Wars' defence project.
But mutual respect is said to have been maintained throughout these exchanges, with both passionate defenders of the transatlantic alliance and a shared vision seen as playing a key role in ending the Cold War.
– Tony Blair and George W Bush
The connection shared by Tony Blair and George W Bush has proved hugely controversial.
Mr Blair formed a strong political alliance with Mr Bush on foreign policy with a backdrop of the emergence al Qaida.
In a post-9/11 speech Mr Bush said that 'America has no truer friend than Great Britain', but the close relationship between the two was frowned upon by some in the Labour Party and members of the public uncomfortable with US influence and a perception that the relationship was not equal.
Mr Blair continued to argue that it was in Britain's interest to 'protect and strengthen the bond' with the US regardless of who is in the White House.
The prime minister in 2003 signed the 'The letter of the eight' supporting US policy on Iraq and built his foreign policy on the principles of close ties with the US and the European Union.
But the strategy included an interventionist streak which led to Britain joining the US in the global 'war on terror'.
This led the UK to participation in the 2002 invasion of Afghanistan and the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
The Iraq war attracted widespread public criticism in the UK and beyond, while 139 Labour MPs opposed it.
The circumstances of the decision on the UK's participation were intensely scrutinised, with claims that Iraq leader Saddam Hussein controlled weapons of mass destruction later proved to be false.
As casualties in the war mounted, Mr Blair was accused of misleading Parliament and his popularity dropped.
However, he did win a third term but some would argue his domestic achievements have been overshadowed by his support for Mr Bush and their shared approach to Iraq.
– David Cameron and Barack Obama
During David Cameron's term in office, Barack Obama addressed Parliament in another demonstration of the importance of the special relationship to both countries.
However, in 2016 Mr Obama partly blamed European leaders for the chaotic state of Libya following the fall of Colonel Gaddafi.
He accused Mr Cameron of being 'distracted by a range of other things' and said he had 'more faith in the Europeans'.
In an interview published in The Atlantic, Mr Obama touched on an issue that is set to be a key feature of Sir Keir's talks with Donald Trump when he lamented 'free riders' in the international community and seemed to suggest Britain was in danger of falling into that category.
According to the article, the US president told Mr Cameron at a G7 summit in Bavaria in 2015 that 'you have to pay your fair share' on defence spending if the special relationship is to continue.
Soon after, Downing Street announced that the UK would meet a Nato commitment to spend 2% of gross domestic product on defence.
– Theresa May and Donald Trump
Theresa May arrived at the White House just a few days after Donald Trump's first inauguration in 2017, in what was seen as strong sign that positive relations would endure.
Ms May was reportedly focused on persuading Mr Trump to make a supportive statement about Nato, amid concerns he was too sympathetic to Vladimir Putin.
But it was pictures of the President holding Ms May's hand as they walked through the White House that dominated coverage across the world.
Mr Trump's first term is perceived as a time of relatively chaotic foreign policy, while reported comments at the time suggest the president did not see Ms May as 'strong'.
What followed was the US unilaterally withdrawing from the Iranian nuclear treaty and the Paris climate accord among other unpredictable moves.
During a visit to the UK in 2018, Mr Trump said the relationship between the two countries was 'very, very strong' but he was highly critical of Ms May's approach to negotiations with the European Union over Brexit.
Despite this element of friction, the pair again held hands ahead of a press conference at Chequers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut
Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut

South Wales Argus

time41 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut

Ms Reeves' £1.25 billion plan unveiled on Monday will see automatic payments worth up to £300 given to pensioners with an income less than £35,000 a year. It followed last year's decision to strip pensioners of the previously universal scheme, unless they claimed certain benefits, such as pension credit. Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, warned ministers they risked making a 'similar mistake' if they tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payments, known as Pip. Leeds East MP Richard Burgon called on pensions minister Torsten Bell to 'listen now' so that backbenchers can help the Government 'get it right'. In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.' Nadia Whittome (James Manning/PA) The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving Pip is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'. In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so Pip claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. 'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the Pip daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted. Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers? 'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.' Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'. Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on Pip and on the two-child benefit cap'. The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?' The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.' Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'. Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.' Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children. 'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons. 'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?' Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table. 'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.' He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that. 'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.'

'Rachel Reeves hopes public gives her credit for listening to winter fuel anger'
'Rachel Reeves hopes public gives her credit for listening to winter fuel anger'

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

'Rachel Reeves hopes public gives her credit for listening to winter fuel anger'

Rachel Reeves today tried to turn the page on Labour's biggest mistake so far. Only weeks after the party's landslide election victory, she stunned the country by announcing plans to strip around 10 million pensioners of their winter fuel payments. A Tory aide who served two Chancellors once told me that the winter fuel allowance was at the top of the Treasury hit list offered to No11's new incumbents. Ms Reeves's predecessors didn't fancy picking a fight with pensioners and baulked at being blamed for leaving OAPs struggling to heat their homes. But in the early days in Government, the Chancellor was focused on proving she had an iron grip on the public finances. It was clear from the start that it was a serious error, puncturing the optimism and goodwill from the public who had handed Labour a massive majority. Even senior Government figures acknowledged it had been a mistake but there were fears that they couldn't afford to U-turn - either politically or economically. However it became a running sore for Labour. MPs complained they were being inundated by complaints from constituents and it came up repeatedly on the doorstep in last month's local elections. Unnerved by the surge in support for Reform UK and growing unrest from Labour MPs, Keir Starmer and his Chancellor blinked. Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday. Initially Downing Street suggested we would have to wait until the Budget for the full details, leaving pensioners in the dark about whether they would be eligible. But Ms Reeves gave them hope by confirming an almost complete U-turn, with only the richest OAPs missing out. The Chancellor will take some flak in Westminster for this U-turn. There will be questions over how it's funded and whether the Government is vulnerable to pressure on other unpopular policies. But she'll be hoping that the public gives her credit for listening to their concerns, allowing the Government to draw a line under this sorry episode and shift focus to the positive things it's trying to do.

Labour MPs call for action on benefits after winter fuel U-turn
Labour MPs call for action on benefits after winter fuel U-turn

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Labour MPs call for action on benefits after winter fuel U-turn

Labour MPs have broadly welcomed the government's decision to reinstate winter fuel payments for three-quarters of pensioners but some are using the U-turn to renew their calls for planned benefit cuts to be million pensioners in England and Wales with an annual income of £35,000 or less will now be eligible for up to £300 to help with energy bills this MPs thanked the government for listening to their concerns, arguing means testing the payment was fair but that the threshold was set too low last several urged ministers to also think again on planned cuts to disability payments, while others called for the two-child benefit cap to be scrapped. Under planned changes to the benefits system it would be harder for people with less severe conditions to claim personal independence payments (Pips), while the government is promising more support to help people get into the two-child benefit cap policy prevents most families from claiming means-tested benefits for any third or additional children born after April 2017, which critics say has pushed people into are considering lifting the cap, with a decision expected in the autumn, when a child poverty strategy is published. Pressure from Labour backbenchers over the issues - as well as on winter fuel payments - has been growing since the party's poor performance at local election's in May. The winter fuel payment was previously paid to all pensioners but last year the government announced only those receiving pension credit or another means-tested benefit would be eligible in England and Wales. The original cut last year was estimated to save £1.7bn, with the government arguing it was necessary because of the state of the public finances. But the move, which meant more than 10 million pensioners did not receive the payment in 2024, was criticised by charities, unions, opposition parties and many Labour MPs. Following mounting pressure, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced a U-turn last month, with the details of who will get the payment this winter set out on chancellor said she would detail how the £1.25bn policy would be paid for in the autumn Budget. Imran Hussain was among the Labour MPs to call for the planned benefit cuts to be scrapped in response to a government statement in the Commons on changes to winter fuel payments."It is clear the government has listened, so I ask them to listen again to the growing calls in this chamber and scrap their planned, devastating cuts to disability support," the MP for Bradford East said. Fellow Labour MPs Nadia Whittome and Richard Burgon also welcomed the winter fuel U-turn but urged the government to listen to backbench concerns over benefit cuts. In response, Torsten Bell, who is both a Treasury minister and pensions minister, told MPs there needed to be "a better system focusing on supporting those who can work into work". He added that the status quo - where 1,000 people a day are going onto Pips - was not "a position that anybody should support". Labour MP Rachael Maskell, who has been a leading campaigner for restoring winter fuel payments, welcomed the government's change in policy, saying it was "long overdue".She told BBC Radio 4's World at One programme the £35,000 salary threshold for the payment was a "sensible measure". However, Maskell called on the government to consider a larger payment following increases in energy prices over the past MP for York Central also urged a rethink on planned benefit cuts, adding: "You can't rob disabled people in order to pay older people, that doesn't make sense."Meanwhile, she was among several MPs to reiterate their calls for the government to scrap the two-child benefit cap. In the Commons Rebecca Long Bailey, Labour MP for Salford, also asked for reassurances minsters "are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible" to bring children out of poverty. In response Bell said "all levers to reduce child poverty are on the table".The minister added: "She's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this government. "We cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty." The Conservatives have called for the government to apologise to pensioners who lost out on winter fuel payments last year. Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately described the U-turn as "the most humiliating climbdown a government has ever faced in its first year in office".She told the Commons "this rushed reversal raises as many questions as it answers", arguing the move was "totally unfunded" and could lead to tax rises. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: "Finally the chancellor has listened to the Liberal Democrats and the tireless campaigners in realising how disastrous this policy was, but the misery it has caused cannot be overstated."Countless pensioners were forced to choose between heating and eating all whilst the government buried its head in the sand for months on end, ignoring those who were really suffering." Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store