logo
Body of fourth missing US soldier found in Lithuania

Body of fourth missing US soldier found in Lithuania

Yahoo01-04-2025

The body of a fourth US soldier has been found, a week after they went missing in Lithuania.
The soldier was part of a team of four who were conducting military drills in a large armoured vehicle when they disappeared near the city of Pabrade.
The vehicle – a M88A2 Hercules – and the bodies of the other three soldiers were found in a peat bog on Monday.
The search effort, followed by the difficult mission to drag the vehicle out of the bog, has involved hundreds of rescue workers from the US Army and Navy, as well as Lithuanian, Polish and Estonian Armed Forces, a statement said.
"This past week has been devastating. Today our hearts bear the weight of an unbearable pain... the world is darker without them," said Maj Gen Christopher Norrie in a statement released by US Army Europe and Africa.
Lt Gen Charles Costanza described the incident as a "tragic accident" and added that it was "humbling to watch the incredible recovery team from different commands, countries and continents come together".
The US Army is investigating what happened.
The statement did not specify where the final soldier's body was found. The team had been working near the border with Belarus.
The M88A2 Hercules, one of the largest military vehicles used by the US Armed Forces, is designed to recover damaged tanks and other vehicles from battlefields.
Two more M88A2 Hercules, plus bulldozers were needed to drag the sunken vehicle out of the swamp on Monday, in a recovery mission that saw teams working "day and night", the statement said.
The soldiers' identities have been withheld. They had been deployed to Lithuania as part of Operation Atlantic Resolve – a response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

America is heading down a dark road as fury boils over in California
America is heading down a dark road as fury boils over in California

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

America is heading down a dark road as fury boils over in California

America seems headed to an angry and ugly place. Inflammatory incidents, rhetoric and dissent unleashed by President Donald Trump's tough immigration crackdown are inexorably building political pressure as a polarized nation barrels into the heat of summer. Stunning scenes in Los Angeles on Thursday, when Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla was manhandled out of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's news conference and handcuffed, epitomized a dark turn taken this week in California. But there's no sign yet of a path back from the brink before cascading confrontations and protests turn violent or even tragic. If anything, the crisis is deepening. The administration, led by a president determined to use every instrument of power — including a tamed Justice Department and the military — to enforce his will, is vowing to go harder, stronger and faster to target undocumented migrants. Even those here legally are not immune. The White House on Thursday told half a million Venezuelans, Haitians, Cubans and Nicaraguans here on humanitarian parole they must return to their unstable, poverty-stricken home countries. Trump's extremism is now stirring a counter-reaction ahead of a weekend that will see hundreds of 'No Kings' demonstrations in cities and towns, and after he warned against protests at a US Army 250th anniversary parade Saturday that will bolster his dictator's schtick on his 79th birthday. A president who pledged to use the military on 'the enemy from within' said this week he wants troops 'everywhere.' The political battle is also finally being joined by Democrats, stung into finding a voice and cause after their so far desultory efforts to rebuild after their 2024 election fiasco. California was already on edge after Trump defied Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and ordered National Guard troops to the city amid protests and then added a contingent of active-duty US Marines. But the television pictures of government security agents restraining Padilla and pushing him to the ground on Thursday afternoon created an instantly iconic snapshot of the national moment. Some caveats should be noted. Any time a Cabinet official is in public, especially amid heightened political feeling, there is a concern for their safety. The horrific scenes after Trump survived his first assassination attempt last year remain a fresh national trauma. In the light of such experience, security details often act first and without waiting to establish the full context of a situation. It's perfectly possible Noem's agents didn't immediately recognize Padilla, even though he's one of the state's senators. 'I was there peacefully,' Padilla said later amid fierce dispute over his conduct. 'At one point I had a question, and so I began to ask a question. I was almost immediately forcibly removed from the room. I was forced to the ground, and I was handcuffed. I was not arrested. I was not detained.' Initially, Noem seemed to realize the incident could become a political liability. She explained that the Secret Service had feared Padilla could be an attacker, so they pushed him away. She said his behavior was 'not appropriate' but said they'd spoken afterward in what sounded like a civil conversation, even swapping phone numbers. But the Trump White House never admits fault and always seeks political vengeance. Noem toughened here message when she headed onto Fox News. 'This man burst into a room, started advancing towards the podium … he … continued to lunge towards the podium,' she said. The Homeland Security secretary's comments were quickly backed up by House Speaker Mike Johnson as the GOP launched a full court-press. 'When they storm cabinet secretaries in a press conference, I think it's wildly inappropriate behavior, and I think it sends a terrible message in tone for the rest of the country,' said a speaker who helped Trump expunge the record of the January 6, 2021, assault by MAGA supporters on the US Capitol. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, who has this week accused Democrats of supporting criminals and rioters and demonized undocumented migrants as pedophiles, wrote on X that Padilla should be 'ashamed of his childish behavior.' In a less fraught time, Padilla might have acted with more discretion and the White House would have worked to mitigate the incident's impact on America's fragile psyche. But this is 2025, five months into Trump's second term. Whatever precipitated the incident in Los Angeles, Padilla's treatment — after he identified himself, when he was shoved out of the room as he tried to ask a question and then shoved face-first to the ground and handcuffed — was unheard-of. The racial overtones of California's first Latino senator being put under such duress will become a metaphor for Trump's ruthless deportation policy. 'They use words like 'lunge' and 'charge.' He is not an animal; he's a US senator,' California's Attorney General Rob Bonta told CNN's Kasie Hunt. In Washington, Democratic senators rushed to the chamber to exploit the moment. Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz warned that his colleague's removal from Noem's briefing was 'the stuff of dictatorships.' Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, who has condemned Trump's use of the military in California, warned in a statement: 'This is America. Dissent should not be met with violence.' Across the Capitol, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Padilla suffered an 'assault.' She added, 'It's a federal offense to attack a member of Congress. … It shouldn't be anybody in our country to be treated this way.' Padilla was the latest official to face harsh action for perceived dissent. Trump administration prosecutors have already indicted a Wisconsin judge and a New Jersey Democratic congresswoman in cases arising from the immigration blitz. But the fact his roughing-up was on camera means it could be a powerful political launching pad for Democrats as they step up resistance to the president. In the initial reaction to Padilla's manhandling, there was just a hint that Democratic senators — part of an always self-reverential body — were most offended that the collective dignity of their august chamber had been affronted. But the quick and unified effort to frame the incident as an example of an encroaching Trump dictatorship suggests that the party might have found an opening at last. In some ways, the spectacle was not that different from the kind of on-camera stunt with viral social media potential that Trump has made a signature and that now dominates the populist Republican Party. A televised speech by Newsom this week finally satisfied the cravings of some Democrats for someone, anyone to take the fight to the president. His Senate colleague will never now be forgotten by Democrats after he introduced himself to the rest of the nation with the Thursday afternoon debacle that lit up cable news. But making a splash is only one of the Democrats' problems. Padilla's show of force does not necessarily point a way out of the conundrum Trump has set for them, namely that their public condemnations of his deportation plan allow the White House to portray them as soft on securing the border. Perhaps more evidence of administration thuggery could hurt Trump — and convince voters he is overreaching and inhumane. But the White House is still sure it's got the winning political hand on immigration. Democrats are also no nearer to producing a coherent policy and electoral position that addresses the public's desire to stem illegal immigration while reconciling liberal constituencies within their own political base. The Biden administration's obliviousness to a long-building crisis and public sentiment has given Trump plenty of political cover. But Thursday's drama poses an even more profound question: Do most Americans — notwithstanding their stark ideological divides — really want to live in a country plagued by ever-worsening conflict and disharmony? If not, Trump could be vulnerable and his iron-fist approach to immigration could end up serving as a microcosm of a destructive presidency. For sure, Trump's base responds to his outlandish rhetoric and strongman vibe. But no one would describe the White House's approach as a modulated effort to solve an immigration issue that has been haunting the nation for years. The crisis has confounded every president since at least Ronald Reagan. But while some commanders in chief have tried to solve it, Trump has been deliberately escalating the confrontation at every opportunity, seemingly to incite maximum discord and political stress. The president and his team argue with some justification that voters chose Trump last November because they were despairing over Biden's negligence at the border. The White House insists that protests cannot be allowed to stop deportations that are needed to keep Americans safe and to deter new waves of migrants that could strain the country's resources, unity and character. But they are also using the language of tyrants and demagogues as they seek to use the deportations to grab more and more power, to repress their political adversaries and even to threaten the choices of Democratic voters. During the news conference that was interrupted by Padilla, Noem warned that the federal government was not 'going away' from Los Angeles. 'We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialist and burdensome leadership that this Governor Newsom and this mayor placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into this city.' Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass are the democratically elected representatives chosen by Californians and the citizens of Los Angeles. Noem's comments only reinforced an impression that Trump and his team view Democratic leaders as illegitimate and blue states as enemies within the US. Trump's top domestic policy adviser Stephen Miller has spent the week portraying his boss's political opponents as supporting invasions and rebellions by forces outside the United States. 'America voted for mass deportations,' Miller wrote in one X post this week. 'Violent insurrectionists, and the politicians who enable them, are trying to overthrow the results of the election.' The country needs no reminder that incitement and extreme political language can provoke violence and threaten the rule of law and the foundational democratic principles of the republic. It happened at the end of Trump's first term. Historically, presidents have felt a moral imperative to cool political agitation when it threatens to splinter the nation and to heal such estrangements before they provoke strife and threaten life. Trump's entire political method seems designed to do the opposite.

Notice Regarding Conviction of Three Chinese Companies That Produced and Sold Counterfeit Yamaha PA Analog Mixers
Notice Regarding Conviction of Three Chinese Companies That Produced and Sold Counterfeit Yamaha PA Analog Mixers

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Notice Regarding Conviction of Three Chinese Companies That Produced and Sold Counterfeit Yamaha PA Analog Mixers

HAMAMATSU, Japan, June 13, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Yamaha Corporation (hereinafter "Yamaha") (TOKYO:7951) announces that on March 20, 2025, the Zhongshan Intermediate People's Court of Guangdong Province upheld the first-instance guilty verdicts in a criminal case against the individuals responsible for three Chinese companies involved in manufacturing and selling counterfeit Yamaha PA analog mixers. Yamaha reported the three companies that were manufacturing and selling counterfeit versions of our PA analog mixers (model numbers: MG16XU and many others) in China to Chinese law enforcement authorities in July 2023, based on the design rights held by our company. The authorities conducted an investigation into the three companies in August 2023 and seized a large number of counterfeit products that served as evidence for the criminal charges. In May 2024, the three companies were indicted by Chinese law enforcement authorities and fully admitted to the facts regarding the manufacture and sale of counterfeit products. In the first-instance judgment, the court ordered the cessation of the manufacture and sale of counterfeit products, and five defendants from the three companies were sentenced to imprisonment (three of which were suspended), along with fines proportional to the sales amount of the counterfeit products. Two of the defendants appealed the first-instance judgment, but the second-instance judgment upheld the first-instance judgment, and the penalties were finalized. Involved Entities Defendant Fixed Term Imprisonment Suspension of Sentence Fine Wan Ge Trading (Enping) Co. LtdDistributor A 4 years and 6 months None US$850,000 B 3 years and 4 months None US$110,000 Enping Ai Bei Duo Audio Equipment Co., C 3 years 5 years US$68,000 D 3 years 4 years and 6 months US$41,000 Guangdong Huaqiu Wuzhou Supply Chain Technology Co., Company E 2 years and 3 months 3 years US$6,800 Yamaha Corporation has long taken various measures against counterfeit products such as civil action, crime detection, customs injunctions, and placed informative advertising in China and worldwide. In China, Yamaha has filed lawsuits against more than 10 companies that produce and sell counterfeit PA products for infringement of its trademark or design rights, including this lawsuit. In every court case, Yamaha's claims were accepted, and the production and sale of low-quality counterfeit products were halted. Yamaha is adamantly resolved to confront any action that could damage the Yamaha brand or infringe on Yamaha intellectual property rights in order to protect its valued customers and stakeholders from low-quality counterfeit products and to preserve the reliability and trust in the Yamaha brands. View source version on Contacts For further information, please contact:Yamaha CorporationCorporate Communications Division, Media Relations GroupContact form: Sign in to access your portfolio

Mistrial declared on rape charge in Weinstein case after juror won't return to jury room
Mistrial declared on rape charge in Weinstein case after juror won't return to jury room

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Mistrial declared on rape charge in Weinstein case after juror won't return to jury room

A New York judge declared a mistrial on a rape charge in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial after one juror refused to continue deliberations over an alleged attack in 2013 on actress Jessica Mann. The jury had found Weinstein guilty of one count of sexual assault and not guilty of another count on Wednesday, but kept deliberating about a final rape charge. Thursday's mistrial comes after Weinstein's earlier sex crimes conviction in the state was overturned last year, leading to new charges last September. A panel of seven female and five male jurors deliberated for six days in the six-week trial before one juror declined to continue discussions. Jury deliberations in the trial were plagued with tensions. The jury foreperson brought concerns to the judge earlier this week, saying jurors were "attacking" one another and trying to change his mind. On Wednesday, he brought more complaints to the judge, indicating that "at least one other juror made comments to the effect of 'I'll meet you outside one day,' and there's yelling and screaming", Judge Curtis Farber told the court. On Thursday, the foreperson said he would not go back to the jury room to deliberate because he was afraid of others yelling at him, so the judge declared a mistrial on the last rape charge. "Sometimes jury deliberations become heated. I understand this particular deliberation was more needed than some others," Judge Farber told the 12-person jury, according to US media. An appeals court overturned Weinstein's previous conviction for sex crimes in New York last April, finding the 73-year-old did not receive a fair trial in 2020 because a judge allowed testimony from women who made allegations against him beyond the charges at hand. The 2025 trial was based on the testimony of three women - former television production assistant Miriam Haley, actress Jessica Mann, and Polish model Kaja Sokola. All three accused Weinstein of using his power in the entertainment industry to sexually abuse them. Ms Haley and Ms Mann both testified in the first trial against Weinstein, when he was found guilty. This time, the jury found Weinstein guilty of sexually assaulting Ms Haley, but acquitted him of assaulting Ms Sokola. The mistrial was declared on the rape charge brought by Ms Mann. The latest conviction is in addition to a 16-year sentence that Weinstein has yet to serve after being convicted of sex crimes in Los Angeles. Jury deliberations proved tense last week as well, when one juror said others were "shunning" one member of the panel, calling it "playground stuff". The foreperson also claimed jurors were considering Weinstein's past and other allegations outside the realm of the case in making decisions. This led the judge to give the jury an instruction about only considering the allegations in the case, and nothing else. Weinstein - who has cancer and diabetes - stayed at Bellevue Hospital rather than Riker's Island jail during the trial. He sat in a wheelchair for the proceedings. In total, Weinstein has been accused of sexual misconduct, assault and rape by more than 100 women. While not all reports resulted in criminal charges, the California conviction means he is likely to spend the rest of his life in prison. Weinstein and his brother Bob were among the most major figures in Hollywood, founding Miramax film studio, whose hits included Shakespeare in Love, which won best picture at the Academy Awards, and Pulp Fiction. 'For the sake of truth': A Weinstein victim's decision to take the stand again Harvey Weinstein guilty of sexual assault after New York retrial

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store