Please, kids: Do not set your Chromebook on fire
The "Chromebook challenge" is a TikTok trend in which kids jam a paperclip into a laptop to make it smoke.
Several kids are facing charges for messing with their Chromebooks.
Take it from me, kids. Don't do it.
*Grabs chair, spins it around, and sits on it backward.*
Hey teens, it's me. Your friendly local 44-year-old tech blogger at Business Insider, every high schooler's favorite website. And I'm here to say: Setting your Chromebook on fire is "skibidi Ohio." Don't do it.
Sure, there's a viral TikTok challenge going around that encourages kids like you to jam a paperclip, gum wrapper, or other item into the USB drive of your school-issued Chromebooks, which causes them to start smoking, shoot sparks, or even catch on fire.
But don't do it.
Even though you may be bored, and lighting stuff on fire is undeniably cool-looking, and it's almost summer break, and your teacher has a negative aura, and Chromebooks represent the tyranny of the prison called "school" where they indoctrinate your mind with algebra and facts about the Treaty of Ghent that you will never need in real life because there's calculators, and Prussia isn't real, and there's ChatGPT anyway that can do this all for you, and adults will all be using it in the future, it's still not worth it. (Note: No AI was used to write this important public service message.)
So please, do not light your Chromebook on fire — it can cause serious injury. This is a rizzless and sus road you don't want to go down. There is no sigma here.
TikTok has taken some action. Searching "Chromebook challenge" on the app generates a warning message saying: "Some online challenges can be dangerous, disturbing, or even fabricated." (Though searching Chromebook still generates plenty of videos of smoking Acers.) TikTok did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
You're a teen, you know how silly grown-ups are about this stuff. We're always yapping about some moral panic "challenge" on TikTok that's not even real. But this time? No cap, it's real.
Kids are facing charges in several states for messing with their Chromebooks. A 13-year-old was arrested on suspicion of arson in Long Beach, California, and students at schools in Arizona face criminal charges, according to the Bullhead City Fire Department. Two teens in Southington, Connecticut, are facing misdemeanor charges including criminal mischief and reckless endangerment.
Fellow kids, I understand that you're living in a time where you might feel under the yoke of technology. You feel complicated about how much you use social media, and, meanwhile, your parents read "The Anxious Generation" and are now freaking out because they regret giving you a phone in sixth grade, even though that phone has had Life360 surveillance software installed this whole time. You know that the future of work involves AI, but your teachers get weird and mad about you using it for homework (even though literally everyone does). And this whole time you're supposed to be getting good grades to go to college, but the institution of higher education is under attack and kids are getting arrested on campus for protesting, and you're taking on a lifetime of debt for some degree for a job that could be replaced by a chatbot in five years anyway. So like the Luddite cloth workers of the Industrial Revolution, you take a stand and fight and break against the machine that yokes you. Why not just jam a paperclip in that Chromebook just to see if something real happens, something tangible, like smoke or fire, just to remember that you're here, you're alive, you're young, you exist?
But kids, harming laptops isn't cool. So please, don't do the Chromebook challenge.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
Boston Dynamics And Unitree Are Innovating Four-Legged Robots Rapidly
Depending on who you ask, the robotics revolution is happening quite rapidly. It's not just a question of trying to design a more stable humanoid robot and making those gradual moves toward mimicry of human dexterity. There are a lot of different applications for robotics that most of us have never even considered. I have, of course, been paying a lot of attention to Boston Dynamics, which is close to home. But across the world, there's a different robotics company emerging as a powerful forced to be reckoned with. Its quadruped robots are now out in the world, and we have to consider what this means. Doing a price check on these active creations, we see that getting a particular model of Unitree robot run on an LLM model can cost around $16,000, for example. According to ChatGPT, the three biggest uses for these robots are as follows – academic research, Infrastructure management and physical site security. People are buying and using Unitree robots as guards and sentinels, maybe sort of in the same way that you would keep attack dogs in the days before AI. But the ability to buy one of these guardians is really a game-changer. All you have to do is take a look at this Inventory page for a Unitree robot equipped with a flamethrower to start to get an idea of how crazy and dangerous this trend could become. If you haven't heard of jailbreaking robots, it refers to the process of an end-user getting around key security implementations, and getting the robot to do harmful and/or dangerous things. People attribute research on the jailbreaking technology ROBOPAIR to students at the University of Pennsylvania's School of Engineering and Applied Science. In general, engineers are finding that certain kinds of tampering are essentially dangerous. You can see an abstract here from a team doing research on how this process works: 'The recent introduction of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized the field of robotics by enabling contextual reasoning and intuitive human-robot interaction in domains as varied as manipulation, locomotion, and self-driving vehicles,' the authors write. 'When viewed as a stand-alone technology, LLMs are known to be vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks, wherein malicious prompters elicit harmful text by bypassing LLM safety guardrails.' The scholars named also mention Unitree by name: 'The attacker has partial access to a Clearpath Robotics Jackal UGV robot equipped with a GPT-4o planner, and a black-box setting, wherein the attacker has only query access to the GPT-3.5-integrated Unitree Robotics Go2 robot dog,' they write. 'In each scenario, and across three new data sets of harmful robotic actions, we demonstrate that RoboPAIR, as well as several static baselines, finds jailbreaks quickly and effectively, often achieving 100% attack success rates. Our results reveal, for the first time, that the risks of jailbroken LLMs extend far beyond text generation, given the distinct possibility that jailbroken robots could cause physical damage in the real world. Indeed, our results on the Unitree Go2 represent the first successful jailbreak of a deployed commercial robotic system. Addressing this emerging vulnerability is critical for ensuring the safe deployment of LLMs in robotics.' You can also see on Reddit that various users have purchased these robots and used jailbreaking technology on them. The risks are evident – having these kinds of four-legged beasties roaming free around us without the guardrails they're programmed with could be – well - pretty chaotic. A bit of research on the origin of Unitree Robotics provides an interesting look at how ChatGPT and the new search model contrast with traditional keyword-based Google search. I read the Wikipedia page for Unitree, where the originator of the initial tech was identified as Wang XingXing. But ChatGPT doesn't recognize any public individual with that name. It suggested that someone named Donsheng Zhu was instrumental in getting Unitree up and running. However, a Google search doesn't turn up any information for that individual, although there are numerous scholars with that name coming up in top page rankings. Finally, I got ChatGPT to identify Ye Wang, who is also publicly identified elsewhere on the web. That's an example of how hard it can be to do the granular research on these companies. We may have only a general idea, as end users, about how the enterprise evolved, but we do know that its products are out there running around with flames-throwers attached to them. Will we need new legislation and regulation around robotics? I suggest we will, when these technologies become commonplace in America. Most of us have never seen one of these designs, either from Unitree or Boston Dynamics, walking down the street like a dog. But when they come, it's pretty certain that not all of them will be on a leash.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
TikTok Rolls Out New Badges to Highlight Seller Performance
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. As it continues to develop its in-stream shopping tools, TikTok has launched an expanded badge system to highlight reputable sellers, based on various qualifiers in the app. As you can see in these examples, TikTok has begun displaying revised badges on seller profiles, which also include its 'Official Shop' and 'Authorized Seller' tags, to highlight some of the top brands and providers in the app. So what does each badge mean, exactly? Official Shop is awarded to certified sellers of certain products Authorized seller is awarded to approved sellers of certain products Gold Star Seller badges are awarded to shops that meet customer service benchmarks, based on Shop Performance Score (SPS) and product feedback rate The Silver Star badge is the same, and is awarded to stores that meet a lower level of service in these areas Finally, TikTok's 'Top Brand' badge recognizes a brand's popularity and service qualifiers In terms of specifics, in order to qualify for a Gold or Silver Star badge, businesses need to maintain an SPS of 90% or higher, while also achieving a positive product feedback rate of 80% or more. You also need to have at least one active product listing. As explained by TikTok: 'The new badges will appear across content, so you might notice them popping up on LIVEs, product detail pages, short videos, and in search. This seamless integration into every part of the platform will help us elevate the shopper experience, and ensure that, wherever you discover new favorite products, you'll feel confident in the sellers and items you find on TikTok Shop.' TikTok says that the updated badge system is designed to increase transparency, and elevate the customer experience on the platform, by providing more context on what buyers can expect when dealing with different businesses. They'll also incentivize sellers to prioritize better service, and if TikTok shopping does end up becoming a more significant commerce consideration, these could end up playing an important role in driving in-app sales performance. And there are signs that more people are looking to buy products in the app. TikTok saw a 3x increase in in-app sales on Black Friday last year, with livestreams, in particular, driving significant interest. It's seen significant in-app shopping growth in the U.S., while U.K. consumers are also increasingly turning to the app, along with various Asian markets. So while buying products from TikTok may not be ubiquitous just yet, and may not have caught on like it has in the Chinese version of the platform, there are signs that people are increasingly looking to make purchases from TikTok's shop options. These new badges, then, could end up being valuable markers to help drive sales performance. Recommended Reading TikTok Adds More Options To Simplify Commerce Promotion Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
LinkedIn's founder says Gen Z graduates are 'enormously attractive' to employers for one reason
The rise of AI has sparked fears that it will cause jobs to disappear. But Reid Hoffman says young people should embrace AI in their job hunt. The LinkedIn founder said knowing how to use AI will make them "enormously attractive" to employers. Reid Hoffman, venture capitalist and the founder of LinkedIn, says young people should use their familiarity with AI as a selling point to potential employers. "You are generation AI. You are AI native. So bringing the fact that you have AI in your tool set is one of the things that makes you enormously attractive," Hoffman said in a video he published on his YouTube channel on Thursday. Hoffman was addressing questions sent in by college students on how they should best navigate the job hunt. Several students had asked Hoffman about AI's impact on their employment prospects. Hoffman said in his video that AI's impact on jobs is a "legitimate worry," but he added that students could try to use it to their advantage. "Look, on this side, it's transforming the workspace, entry-level work, employers' confusion. But on this side, it's making you able to show your unique capabilities. That, you know, in an environment with a bunch of older people, you might be able to help them out," he said. A representative for Hoffman did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. The rise of AI has sparked fears that companies could end up hiring fewer staff in the years to come. Last month, the CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, said in an interview with Axios that AI may wipe out half of all entry-level office jobs. In the interview, Amodei said he expects unemployment to rise by 10% to 20% over the next one to five years. "Most of them are unaware that this is about to happen," he said. "It sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it." But not all business leaders agree with Amodei's dire prediction. Jensen Huang, the CEO of chip giant Nvidia, told reporters on the sidelines of VivaTech 2025 in Paris this week that Amodei was wrong. "I pretty much disagree with almost everything he says," Huang said of Amodei. "He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it." Huang said that while some jobs would disappear, AI could also create new job opportunities. "Do I think AI will change jobs? It will change everyone's — it's changed mine," Huang said. Mark Cuban had a similar response to Amodei's comments as Huang. The "Shark Tank" star wrote in a BlueSky post last month that AI will create, and not destroy, jobs. "Someone needs to remind the CEO that at one point there were more than 2m secretaries. There were also separate employees to do in office dictation. They were the original white collar displacements," Cuban wrote. "New companies with new jobs will come from AI and increase TOTAL employment," he added. Read the original article on Business Insider
