Forget AirPods Max, Marshall Bluetooth Headphones Drop to the Lowest Price We've Ever Seen
If you're tired of headphones that look generic and need constant recharging, the Marshall Major V might be exactly what you're looking for. They look a lot more like some rock equipment than headphones you can get from a major retailer, and on top of that, they're actually from an amp maker! But they're actually great headphones too. If you want to avoid the typical headphone-buying path and get something from a different manufacturer, now's your chance to do so.
Head over to Amazon today and get the Marshall Major V Headphones for just $108, down from their usual price of $150. That's $42 off and a discount of 28%.
See at Amazon
Booming sound and long-lasting battery for these Marshall headphones
The Major V keeps the iconic Marshall look while offering a great audio experience. That means they're made of black leatherette, brass accents, the classic script logo, and rockstar attitude. They're unmistakably Marshall but built for everyday listening, not just the recording studio. And they have the most decadent sound you'll have heard from the brand.
These headphones last quite a while on a charge, too. The Major V offers over 100 hours of playtime on a full charge, so you'll be able to use them for a long time before stopping to recharge. They also support wireless charging, so you can use them with wireless chargers to save a bit of time and money too.
Sound-wise, you get the signature Marshall tuning you'll have come to expect from the comapny over time. . Expect bold bass, warm mids, and clear highs, with nothing too sharp or distorted. It's a fun, full-bodied sound that works well across genres, from rock and hip-hop to podcasts and phone calls.
These headphones are also foldable, so they're easy to pack up and toss into a bag. And with improved microphones for voice calls and a customizable M-button that lets you launch your favorite voice assistant or Spotify Tap, they're built to work with your routine.
The Marshall Major V headphones are a great choice for anyone who wants a stylish, long-lasting pair of headphones with good sound and useful features without paying top-tier prices. If you want headphones that look great and don't need to live on a charger, this is a deal worth checking out. At Its lowest price, you're getting plenty of functionality, giving you the best chance at enjoying your favorite songs through headphones at an excellent price point.
See at Amazon
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
10 minutes ago
- Forbes
The AI Paradox: When More AI Means Less Impact
Young business man with his face passing through the screen of a laptop on binary code background AI is in the news every day. On the one hand, this highlights the vertiginous speed at which the field is developing. On the other, it creates a sense saturation and angst that makes business organizations either drop the subject altogether or go at it full throttle without much discernment. Both approaches will lead to major misses in the inevitable AI-fication of business. In this article, I'll explore what happens when a business goes down the AI rabbit hole without a clear business objective and a solid grasp of the available alternatives. If you have attended any AI conference lately, chances are that, by the end, you thought your business was dangerously behind. Many of these events, even if not on purpose, can leave you with the feeling that you need to deploy AI everywhere and automate everything to catch up. If you've succumbed to this temptation, you most likely found out that is not the right move. Two years into the generative AI revolution, a counterintuitive truth is emerging from boardrooms to factory floors. Companies pursuing 100% AI automation are often seeing diminished returns, while those treating AI as one element in a broader, human-centered workflow are capturing both cost savings and competitive advantages. The obvious truth is already revealing itself: AI is just one more technology at our disposal, and just like every other new technology, everyone is trying to gain first-move advantage, which inevitably creates chaos. Those who see through and beyond said chaos are building the foundations of a successful AI-assisted business. The numbers tell a story that contradicts the automation evangelists. Three in four workers say AI tools have decreased their productivity and added to their workload, according to a recent UpWork survey of 2,500 respondents across four countries. Workers report spending more time reviewing AI-generated content and learning tool complexities than the time these tools supposedly save. Even more revealing: while 85% of company leaders are pushing workers to use AI, nearly half of employees using AI admitted they have no idea how to achieve the productivity gains their employers expect. This disconnect isn't just corporate misalignment—it's a fundamental misunderstanding of how AI creates value. The companies winning the AI game aren't those deploying the most algorithms. They're the ones who understand that intelligent automation shouldn't rely on AI alone. Instead, successful organizations are orchestrating AI within broader process frameworks where human expertise guides strategic decisions while AI handles specific, well-defined tasks. A good AI strategy always revolves around domain experts, not the other way around. Consider how The New York Times approached AI integration. Rather than replacing journalists with AI, the newspaper introduced AI tools for editing copy, summarizing information, and generating promotional content, while maintaining strict guidelines that AI cannot draft full articles or significantly alter journalism. This measured approach preserves editorial integrity while amplifying human capabilities. AI should be integrated strategically and operationally into entire processes, not deployed as isolated solutions to be indiscriminately exploited hoping for magic. Research shows that 60% of business and IT leaders use over 26 systems in their automation efforts, and 42% cite lack of integration as a major digital transformation hurdle. The most effective AI implementations focus on task-specific applications rather than general automation. Task-specific models offer highly specialized solutions for targeted problems, making them more efficient and cost-effective than general-purpose alternatives. Harvard Business School research involving 750 Boston Consulting Group consultants revealed this precision matters enormously. While consultants using AI completed certain tasks 40% faster with higher quality, they were 19 percentage points less likely to produce correct answers on complex tasks requiring nuanced judgment. This 'jagged technological frontier' demands that organizations implement methodical test-and-learn approaches rather than wholesale AI adoption. Harvard Business Review research confirms that AI notoriously fails at capturing intangible human factors essential for real-world decision-making—ethical considerations, moral judgments, and contextual nuances that guide business success. The companies thriving in 2025 aren't choosing between humans and machines. They're building hybrid systems where AI automation is balanced with human interaction to maintain stakeholder trust and capture value that neither could achieve alone. The mantra, 'AI will replace your job,' seems to consistently reveal a timeless truth: everything that should be automated will be automated, not everything than can be automated will. The Path Forward The AI paradox isn't a failure of technology—it's a lesson in implementation strategy. Organizations that resist the allure of complete automation and instead focus on thoughtful integration, task-specific deployment, and human-AI collaboration aren't just avoiding the productivity trap. They're building sustainable competitive advantages that compound over time. The question isn't whether your organization should use AI. It's whether you'll fall into the 'more AI' trap or master the art of 'smarter AI'—where less automation actually delivers more impact.
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Early Access Alexa+: I tested Amazon's AI assistant. Here's why it's a game-changer
Early Access Alexa+: I tested Amazon's AI assistant. Here's why it's a game-changer Show Caption Hide Caption Amazon faces lawsuit as customers report disappearing refunds after returns Customers allege that Amazon reversed their refunds for returned products, leading to a lawsuit that challenges the company's advanced refund policy. Scripps News After Amazon's New York City reveal of the new AI-infused Alexa a few months back, I made you wait to read my take on the news. Before I finished writing, you see, I filled out the form to request Early Access to Alexa+. It didn't take long. But I still felt kind of bad about it. Not anymore, though, because for the past two months, I've been kicking the tires on Alexa+ as part of that program. And now you can read about it! Early access to Early Access Keep in mind, Amazon isn't offering Early Access to publications because Alexa+ isn't a finished product. The Alexa+ Early Access program is as much a beta-testing round for Amazon as it is an exclusive opportunity for some customers to get an early look at the service. That said, when you onboard 'hundreds of thousands' of US customers – as Amazon says it has since the program launched March 31 – you're going to let in a few columnists whether you like it or not. It's inevitable. If you want, you can apply for Alexa+ Early Access. All you need is a late-model Echo Show – a smart display that doubles as a video-enabled Amazon Echo and a FireTV entertainment center – and, apparently, a little luck. The company says it plans to have 'millions' enrolled by month's end, which probably means the amount of luck you need is dropping sharply. In case you missed it: Amazon turns command-taker into plan-maker with Alexa+ launch Bottom line I've been very pleased – and occasionally quite impressed – with Alexa+. It can do everything the original Alexa can do, only with a flexible, approachable personality that makes interactions more pleasant and accurate. The AI-enabled Alexa+ can also handle more complex tasks, from brainstorming menus and managing calendars to planning repairs and finding the right restaurant – and making the reservation. Of course, my time with the new-and-improved AI assistant hasn't been without off-the-rails interactions. That's to be expected with generative AI, regardless of whether it's in pre-release or a finished product. More often, though, I've had expansive, interesting and helpful conversations that, like the sweet smack of a perfect golf drive, make you want to come back and try again. Those experiences are critical, I've found. Because Alexa+ doesn't magically integrate into your life. It requires a routine change. Which means that if you don't work to find reasons to engage, Alexa+ will end up being just a wittier, more pleasant-sounding egg timer than the one you have now. The more you engage – and the more Alexa+ delivers – the easier it gets. You'll start thinking of more things to ask. And Alexa+, in turn, will chalk up more successes. All that's a long way of saying that if you're not going to bother, then don't bother. Because you won't get to see what Alexa+ can unless you make the effort. A smarter smart home Our smart home may not be any smarter now. But Alexa+ makes it much easier to use. Alexa+ is also much more tolerant of word choice. It doesn't care, for example, if I call it the entry light or foyer light, or front door light. It will turn it on regardless. It's much easier to ask for live views of our Ring cameras on our Echo Show 21. As well, I can ask Alexa+ to show me all packages delivered in the past day. I was even able to build a routine – turn off a set of lights at bedtime, then report the weather and review my day tomorrow on the Echo device in our walk-in closet – by talking to the Echo Show 21 in the kitchen. That's next-level accessible! This feature alone could turn out to be the killer smart home app. Other early successes My wife and I have had some fruitful conversations with Alexa+. As we prepared dinner one night, we lamented how the seafood quality has declined at our go-to grocer. Alexa helped us find a specialty shop with super-fresh – albeit pricey – fish. Another valuable back-and-forth came when I took my DIY project to Alexa. I wanted to add an electrical outlet to an exterior wall. Alexa offered step-by-step instructions that we iterated on together as I shared more specifics. It felt natural. Early glaring misses to improve upon Alexa made me a shopping list for my external outlet project. Pretty good, except that it forgot to include the electric outlet. It incorrectly concluded that an outlet came bundled with the outlet cover. When I challenge errors, Alexa+ reassesses in much the same agreeable manner I've experienced with chatbots like ChatGPT, Gemini and CoPilot. That's generative AI for you. Even at this early stage, the difference between Alexa+ and the others is shaped by the territory they're carving out. Unlike the others, which are built more for smartphones and desktops, Amazon is clearly trying to lock in its place on the kitchen counter with Alexa+. Smart move. Because the kitchen is where many families naturally plan together. And the features Amazon has built thus far – along with the ones still on the punch list, like ordering groceries, meal delivery and event tickets – are shaping up to make Alexa+ an able partner for planning and executing plans – provided you're willing to put in the effort. If not, no worries. The kitchen counter will always be a great spot for a voice-activated egg timer. Mike Feibus is president and principal analyst of FeibusTech, a Scottsdale, Arizona, market research and consulting firm. Reach him at mikef@ Follow him on X at @MikeFeibus.
Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Tesla Stock Recovers as Musk Feud With Trump Eases
Tesla's shares rose after Elon Musk suggested he might make amends with President Donald Trump, easing tensions after their public feud. Musk said on X that he should 'cool off and take a step back for a couple days.' Craig Trudell reports. (Source: Bloomberg)
