
Oregon abandoned its radical drug law. Then came the mass arrests
At 7.45am on a cool February morning in Medford, Oregon, six police officers pulled up to a desolate road lined with tarps and a shopping cart and began making arrests.
The officers directed four adults to sit on the sidewalk, handcuffing them behind their backs and rifling through their pockets. They were being detained for illegal camping, but the officers were also searching for evidence of drugs.
'Love you!' a husband and wife shouted at each other as they were separated to be taken to jail.
Officer Paul Verling placed one 43-year-old woman in the back of his car while his team tested a confiscated glass pipe for drug residue. He told her she could potentially avoid jail if she entered drug treatment.
The woman said she had been using methamphetamine to cope with homelessness and would be grateful for treatment. But once Verling ran her name through the system, he discovered she had a warrant for a probation violation. That made her ineligible for 'deflection'. She, too, would be going to jail, he said, possibly for a month.
'You wanna engage in some rehab when you get out?' he said.
'Yes sir,' she mumbled.
'I'm glad we had this talk today,' Verling said, as he took her out of the car to escort her into a jail enclosure.
Welcome to Oregon's 'war on drugs' 2.0.
In September, Oregon lawmakers enacted legislation turning low-level drug possession into a more serious crime punishable by up to 180 days in jail. The resulting crackdown has led to thousands of arrests statewide in recent months. People targeted in cities like Medford, and overworked public defenders tasked with representing them, say the drug enforcement has been chaotic and at times brutal.
While the new policy has appeared to reduce visible drug use in some public spaces, unhoused people, who have been most impacted by the police response, say it has exacerbated their struggles.
The new law also marks a stunning reversal of policy for the Pacific north-west state.
Just four years ago, Oregon voters passed Measure 110, a groundbreaking drug decriminalization measure that abandoned jail sentences for possessing small amounts of drugs and imposed an infraction citation instead. Passed on the heels of Black Lives Matter uprisings, the measure aimed to treat addiction as a disease instead of a crime, prioritize services and recovery over jail, reduce overcrowding behind bars and help address racial disparities in policing and prosecutions.
At the time, Oregon was grappling with rising overdoses. It ranked second nationally for drug addiction rates and worst in the US for access to treatment. The problem was systemic, rooted in decades of failure to invest in the level of behavioral health services needed for people with mental illnesses and addiction. Measure 110 called for an infusion of $302m for addiction recovery and harm reduction services, with a focus on underserved communities, including Black and Indigenous people impacted by criminalization.
Drug policy reform advocates hoped the first-in-the-nation decriminalization experiment would become a model.
But the timing could not have been worse. The law went into effect in 2021 as fentanyl was rapidly entering Oregon's unregulated drug market, the pandemic was shuttering vital social services and homelessness was surging amid Covid and unprecedented wildfires.
As Measure 110-funded recovery programs were just getting off the ground, the decriminalization measure was widely blamed for crime, surging fentanyl overdoses and the increasing visibility of homelessness and drug use, even as research suggested a complex set of factors behind these trends. The backlash was fierce, and the state's Democratic governor, Tina Kotek, signed the bill last year recriminalizing possession.
Supporters say the renewed enforcement is restoring order on the streets, while helping people with addiction and maintaining funding for services. Kotek said she did not want the policy to be 'business as usual' of jailing drug users, but a 'treatment first' approach. The bill encourages counties to set up 'deflection' programs, enabling some arrestees to forgo charges if they get help for their substance use disorders. People with possession cases can also avoid conviction if they complete probation, and lawmakers have promised pathways for records to eventually be expunged. And part of the funding for new treatment programs first passed under Measure 110 has remained intact, enabling some innovative projects to continue their work, though with fewer resources.
Implementation of the new law varies widely by county. Data reveals some jurisdictions are launching mass arrests, while referring very few people to treatment.
The Medford police department has led the state in drug criminalization – by a lot.
The city is located in a region near the California border that is one of the more conservative areas of a blue state; more than half of voters in Jackson county, which includes Medford, supported Donald Trump.
From September, when the new law was enacted, through 26 March, the Medford police force carried out 902 drug possession arrests – more than double the number of cases in Portland (a city with seven times the population). Jackson county has logged 1,170 arrests total.
Verling, an officer on the city's 'livability' team, a unit focused on low-level crimes, including unlawful camping, trespassing, public drinking and drug possession, said many police were relieved when drugs were recriminalized. The 2020 reform had led to increasing reports of drug use on the streets and growing concern about public intoxication.
Recriminalization, Verling said, allows him to engage people in hopes of pushing them to treatment. 'I really don't want to see someone go to prison … but this gives us the ability to get back into their lives,' he said on a recent patrol through Medford.
He said the job was most rewarding when seeing someone turn their life around after they've been jailed – and when his team arrests dealers, potentially 'making people sober by making the drugs inaccessible'.
One of the livability team's main priorities has been clearing homeless encampments, and as Verling drove his patrol car onto a pedestrian greenway, the impact was clear. During the pandemic, encampments were a common site. Now, there were few visible signs of homelessness. Several locals were jogging.
Where did people go?
'People leave town. They're like, 'OK well it's a crime to camp here,'' he said, adding he believed many were in shelters.
The issues of homelessness and drug addiction are deeply intertwined, and Verling said he had become adept at spotting signs of drug use and paraphernalia: 'Focus on their hands – that will lead you to it.'
Oregon's recriminalization law allows the state's 36 counties to adopt individualized approaches to deflection.
Jackson county designed its program so officers could directly hand over arrestees to drug treatment programs instead of jail, a collaborative approach meant to get people immediate help without involving the courts. But many don't qualify, aren't offered this alternative during their arrest, or they decline an officer's offer. According to the latest available data, while there have been nearly 1,200 possession arrests, as of 27 March, only 69 people have been referred to deflection.
Instead, many get arrested. And rearrested. One 43-year-old unhoused woman said police were 'acting like every person on the street is a drug addict, which is not true', and that she had been arrested four times by Medford's livability team since October, generally for camping violations. While she was quickly released after her last arrest, her partner was not, leaving her to camp outside alone. The woman, who asked not to use her name out of fear of police retaliation, said she was sleeping in front of a social services center in hopes her partner could easily find her when he gets out. 'The separation makes me feel like I can't breathe,' she added. 'Police say they're helping the homeless, but they're just throwing us in handcuffs and jail.'
Inside the county jail, as livability officers were processing an arrest of an unhoused man who had camped under a bridge, officer Elliott Jantzer said the hardest part of the job was 'arresting the same person over and over again and seeing no change'.
'Society is supposed to fix these problems. We can't really fix it. We don't have capacity,' he said.
But the criminal justice system is where most people targeted by the new law end up.
On two days that week in February, dozens of defendants waited to be arraigned in courtroom 301 of the Jackson county circuit court justice building. Some appeared in person in the windowless hearing room, others appeared over video from the county jail in Medford. Some pleaded with the judge, saying they needed to get home to take care of children, asserting the charges were incorrect or expressing bewilderment about the entire ordeal.
None of the jailed defendants had lawyers for their cases, and most said they wanted one. One man facing a drug possession charge quietly asked for a lawyer, but then changed his mind and pleaded guilty, seemingly hoping for a quicker resolution.
The defendants were there on all types of charges, but when drug possessions were called for defendants not already in jail, the outcome was the same: the defendant didn't show. 'Failure to appear – warrant', the judge repeated four times.
The scenes laid bare the impact of recriminalization on the state's criminal system, which for years has struggled with a massive public defender shortage, in part due to difficulties recruiting lawyers to the low-salary, high-caseload jobs. In that particular week, there were more than 900 defendants in Jackson county alone who, despite having active criminal cases, had no lawyers.
'It's a violation of their constitutional rights,' said Clint Oborn, executive director of the Southern Oregon Public Defenders (SOPD), walking back to his office after arraignments. 'Some people plead guilty and never get an attorney, or if they want one, they're put on a waiting list.' Most clients with drug possession cases who don't show up to court are unhoused and eventually get jailed on warrants, he said.
Cyril Rivera Neeley, one SOPD attorney, said one of his clients was a senior citizen charged with drug possession in September who refused to plead guilty, had to wait five months for a trial and then was jailed for missing a court appearance; another is a defendant who thought they were being hospitalized for a mental health episode, but was instead jailed for a drug misdemeanor when officers found paraphernalia.
Patrick Green, the Jackson county district attorney, said he supported recriminalization because defendants end up supervised by probation officers, who hold defendants accountable and connect them to treatment and services. And he argued jail can be helpful: 'We know with addiction, you do have to get a person some clean time for them to be in the right frame of mind to be willing to engage in treatment.'
But he also acknowledged that the return of possession arrests had increased his staff's caseloads. The majority of his 18 prosecutors have had to take on these cases, giving them less time for other matters, and the new law has exacerbated jail overcrowding, he said. Many possession cases are resulting in 'conditional discharge', he said, where defendants waive their right to a trial or an attorney and are immediately placed on probation, but can be jailed again if they lose contact with their officer or commit other violations.
'Once they get out of jail, they often keep using, their probation gets revoked and they return to jail,' said Colin Murphy, another public defender. 'It's the same cycle I saw before we decriminalized. If this approach to getting rid of drugs in our community actually worked, it should have worked by now, because we've been doing this since the 1970s.'
The strategy diverts police away from serious investigations, he said: 'We're told law enforcement has very scarce resources. But in these possession cases, I see five cops standing around investigating one unhoused person because she had a baggie in her pocket.'
With limited use of deflection, and a shortage of lawyers to represent people, the new system has felt pointless to some unhoused people in Medford.
'It's not fair, it's unethical, it's a fucking scam,' said 34-year-old Nikki, sitting early one morning under a bridge in Medford's Hawthorne Park. A thick layer of fog hung in the air, and she gestured at the flowing creek beside her: 'Look at how beautiful this place is.'
The state's affordable housing shortage is the primary driver of homelessness, with over 27% of renters facing severely unaffordable rent, forced to spend half or more of their income on housing. Some unhoused people like Nikki come from out of state in hopes of better services. Her main motivation, she said, was healthcare: she's a transgender woman, and her deep-red home state of Missouri had become a leader in anti-trans laws and medical restrictions. But she also liked the environment of Medford, in an area known as the Rogue Valley. There's a backdrop of mountain ranges, and a greenway bike path connecting local cities.
'It's been awesome living here, and it's been shit,' said Nikki, who asked to use a nickname as she talked openly about drug use. She said she regularly uses meth and has done stints in rehab that didn't last.
She said she had spent time in the county jail when she was picked up on warrants, forced into the men's section. For people with serious addictions, detox in jail is 'horror beyond what you can imagine', she said. Incarceration can also increase overdose risks when people are released with lower tolerance.
Now, Nikki tries to sleep in hidden corners in the woods where police won't bother her – 'out of sight, out of mind'.
Christopher De Falco, a 30-year-old who had gathered in Hawthorne Park for a weekly potluck lunch for the unhoused, said he had long dealt with addiction, homelessness and incarceration and felt the new approach would help few people getting sober: 'Until the person truly wants to quit, they're not going to. Forcing people into treatment, it's against our will and unjust.'
Nearby, 38-year-old Ray, who only gave his first name, said going to jail felt routine to him: 'another day in the office.' He heard other countries had safe injection sites, which he said seemed like a better way to get people into services than jail time.
Nikki said one Medford officer recently came up to her while she was sitting by the creek asking, 'What's in your bag? What's in your pocket? Where are your drugs?' she recounted. 'I didn't even have drugs on me!' She said she was being profiled: 'I've got two bags, messy hair, dirty pants and dirty shoes.'
As she described the encounter, a Medford 'livability' officer drove by. Nikki jokingly hummed a Nazi anthem as the vehicle passed, adding: ''livability' just means they work for everybody but you.'
People who do enter deflection in Medford are often taken by officers directly to the Addictions Recovery Center (ARC), one of two treatment providers partnering with police on the program. Staff address participants' basic needs, including food, clothes, medications; conduct an addiction assessment; and place them in temporary shelter. The clients are required to complete ten appointments, generally within 30 days, which can include meetings with counselors or peer support staff, at which point the threat of prosecution is erased.
Ben Spence, ARC's community justice program manager, said roughly half of their participants have successfully completed deflection; some people fail when they become unreachable, though his staff works hard to track people down and keep them engaged. The ten appointments are just a start to their recovery journey, he added.
Of the 69 referrals in the county, as of 27 March, 23 had successfully completed the program, 26 had failed and 17 remained in the process, said Vicky Armstrong, the county's deflection coordinator. She emphasized that the program was in its early days and that deflection was just one of many pathways into treatment: 'You can't legislate people into sobriety. You can legislate opportunity.'
Green, the DA, said he felt deflection was a better path to treatment than the criminal system, which can be a slow process, and that the fact that only some people were succeeding was a good sign: 'We didn't [make it] too easy or too hard. We really found that sweet spot.'
At Medford police headquarters, Lt Rebecca Pietila, in charge of community engagement, said law enforcement viewed recriminalization with deflection as a 'compromise – a happy medium'. She said deflection was working well due to close partnerships between police and providers, noting that Jackson county had a higher success rate than the state average.
She said it would take time to build law enforcement buy-in as many officers were pleased to have an opportunity to restart arrests. 'They want to hold people accountable, because we know drug crime is not just about addiction, it leads to theft and disorderly behavior and victimization,' she added.
Pietila said she would like to see drug laws become tougher, with stiffer penalties for certain possession quantities, and that she supported efforts to expand the county jail so more arrestees could be held longer. For unhoused people with severe addiction, 'sometimes jail is the only intervention'.
For many in the region, it is still easier to get a jail cell than into treatment.
OnTrack Rogue Valley, another drug treatment provider and deflection partner, has more than 300 people on its waitlist for residential programs. That includes 200 people waiting for a 16-bed program, said executive director Sommer Wolcott. 'Many of those 200 people are unhoused with severe substance use disorders who desperately want a treatment bed,' Wolcott said. 'They need 24-hour care and support. They can't just stop using.'
Some people are stuck for more than a year on the waitlist, and at times, when staff try to track them down, they discover the client has died of an overdose.
Wolcott personally knows of three people who died while on her treatment waiting list last year. But, she said, there could be many more.
As Medford police escalate their crackdown on possession, and treatment facilities remain at capacity, some advocates are doing their best to keep drug users safe and alive through harm reduction. Max's Mission, a southern Oregon group founded by a couple whose son died of an overdose in 2013, does weekly outreach in Hawthorne Park, which involves syringe exchanges, connecting people to housing and treatment services and giving out tarps, socks, snacks, wound care kits and naloxone, the overdose-reversal drug.
Crystal Bilyeu, who was helping lead Max's Mission outreach one recent afternoon, said she had reversed 48 overdoses with naloxone, including 17 in 2024. The 41-year-old was herself unhoused and struggling with addiction in the early years of the pandemic. While living outside, she would give out cards advertising a 'never use alone' hotline people can call while using so that EMS can be alerted if they overdose, and she became known as someone who always had naloxone in her backpack.
The strict anti-camping laws worsened her substance use disorder, she said, as she often used drugs to stay awake since sleeping brought the risk of trouble with law enforcement. 'I used it for survival,' she said. She got clean after she became pregnant, she said, and Julia Pinsky, Max's Mission founder, got her a motel room until she could get into treatment. Having somewhere stable to sleep made the start of her recovery possible, she said.
Bilyeu, who was eventually hired by the organization, now gives out harm reduction supplies to the same communities she used to live with. 'We meet people where they are at,' she said. 'I think empathy matters. I've been there before and I can help them with an open mind and no judgment.'
The presence of someone like Bilyeu can be the difference between life and death. Later that day, Christy Sexton, 50, stopped in Hawthorne Park to greet another volunteer assisting the unhoused. Her 31-year-old son, Mike, had died of a fentanyl overdose two weeks earlier, she said, and she had just viewed his body. 'He looked very peaceful,' Sexton said. 'I couldn't stop kissing his head and telling him how much I loved him.'
Sexton is unhoused, living in her car, and her son was also struggling with homelessness. She described him as 'everybody's friend' and a devoted son: 'He made sure every single day that I knew how much he loved me.'
She didn't know the circumstances of his overdose, but wished more people were aware of the state's Good Samaritan law, dictating that people can't be prosecuted for drug possession if they seek aid for someone overdosing.
While starting to process the shock of her son's death, she said she was plagued by the thought that someone might have been too scared of police to call 911 – and instead left her son to die.
'I'll never understand why my son's life had to be taken.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
Five years since Colston fell, there have been setbacks – but those who demanded race equality have not gone away
The toppling of the statue of the British enslaver Edward Colston, five years ago today, felt like a historic moment. Bringing down this one statue and symbolically hurling it into Bristol harbour, protesters – predominantly white – drew international attention to the barbarity of African enslavement, its generated wealth that turbocharged the UK's global power and the legacy of slavery, whose long historical tail had led to the murder of George Floyd less than two weeks before. Five years on, however, it seems fanciful that out of those protests a global reset on race could occur. Back then, structural race inequities were also laid bare by the Covid-19 virus. We watched our TV screens with dread as the kaleidoscope of Black and Asian doctors, nurses and other health workers were dying disproportionately. Those same minoritised communities were also more likely to be in precarious jobs, forced to travel to work as cleaners, care workers and security guards, and were thereby more exposed to the deadly disease. These two seismic occurrences sparked a discussion the likes of which we had never seen in the UK. Corporations held multiple staff meetings over what their response to the Black Lives Matter protests should be. I, along with other race equality activists, was often invited. The discussions would usually begin with the chief executive or a director leading the conversation, proclaiming their commitment to race equality with the usual caveat: 'But we must do better.' Then would come the uncomfortable truth, from their own Black staff, who for the first time felt emboldened to speak truth to power. 'I've been in your company for 20 years. I've lost count of how many white women I've brought in, trained up, only for them to be promoted and often become my line manager.' 'Normally we don't dare speak out. Managers quickly spread the word that Black people are trouble and are always complaining.' I witnessed one woman tell her boss: 'I don't care if you sack me. I've had enough. This charade, you being down with Black Lives Matter, is a bit like you showing up for 10 minutes to our Black History Month in-house event. It changes nothing.' These were difficult and chastening conversations, but with the prolonged Black Lives Matter protests they did bring about action that we hoped might create generational change. For example, company boards began to look at their desperate lack of Black members. Institutions appointed some Black men and women to top roles. And perhaps one of the most noticeable changes was the way that advertisers, along with TV and film producers, placed Black characters in 'everyday' roles, away from the usual villainous or holier-than-thou stereotypes. It could be argued that this cultural normalisation of Black and Asian faces on our TV screens may yet play a significant part in bringing communities closer together. Educationally too, there was the beginning of what we thought would be institutional shifts. My own university, Cambridge, under the stewardship of the vice-chancellor Stephen Toope, had already begun its first serious investigation into its own slavery roots in 2019. After the toppling of Colston, many other universities, such as University College London, Newcastle, Nottingham and Nottingham Trent, opened up their archives. Others looked to broaden their curriculums, bringing in developing-world perspectives. Yet despite so much optimism, the national momentum began to slow down, came to a halt and, in many quarters, is now in reverse. The most significant blocker to change came from Boris Johnson's government, which in the face of the Black Lives Matter protests was forced to set up a race inquiry. Led by Tony Sewell, this report into systemic racism in the UK is widely seen as one of the most flawed race reports ever written. Despite all the evidence, Sewell questioned the level of systemic racism in the UK and also claimed there was a positive story to tell about the enslavement of Africans 'not only being about profit and suffering but how culturally African people transformed themselves'. Sewell was given a peerage by Johnson in 2022. Other factors that stalled the momentum included the rightwing attack on England football players taking the knee in support of Black Lives Matter. Then came the attacks on critical race theory, which examines the structural and systemic aspects to racial inequality. Fast forward to 2024 and the climate had gone from tackling race inequality to race hatred riots that sought to firebomb Muslims and refugees. The unprecedented scenes, whipped up by lies around the Southport killer but fuelled by years of Islamophobic and anti-migrant newspaper headlines, harked back to the Ku Klux Klan lynch mobs. And this year we have a US president who demands that businesses and all public institutions abandon their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programmes. Many of those institutions, in the UK and the US, which had been seen as allies for the Black Lives Matter movement, didn't take much persuasion to fall into line and abandon their commitments. Five years on from that momentous day in Bristol, many of the hopes of generational and systemic change have evaporated. However, we can be somewhat hopeful that, while on the surface many companies have capitulated, some are covertly continuing with their DEI trajectory. Others, such as the Co-op, where I am a director, wear their DEI credentials as a badge of honour. I think the greatest hope will come from the tens of thousands of people, Black and white, young and old, who demanded change during the longest race equality protest ever seen. They have neither gone away nor lost their ideals. The challenge, then, for this government and others, is to reconnect and empower them to demand that historical change they still want to see. Simon Woolley is co-founder of Operation Black Vote and head of Homerton College, Cambridge


Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
Judge threatens to remove Sean 'Diddy' Combs from trial
Judge Arun Subramanian has threatened to kick Sean 'Diddy' Combs from his courtroom after he 'vigorously nodded' at jurors. The 55-year-old music artist is facing charges of racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution – he has denied all allegations against him. The hearings kicked off last month in New York, with his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, and Kid Cudi among those who have taken the stand so far. As proceedings began earlier today, multiple outlets have reported that Diddy has been threatened with expulsion from the court for seemingly attempting to 'interact' with jurors. Speaking to Comb's attorney, the judge Subramanian said in court: 'Mr Agnifilo, your client was looking at jurors and nodding vigorously. 'This can't continue, or I will give a limiting instruction you won't like, or other measures, including barring your client from the courtroom. Do you understand?' Defence attorney Marc Agnifilo told the judge that it would not happen again. The judge then added: 'There should be no efforts whatsoever to have an interaction with this jury.' This comes just days after a screaming woman was removed from the trial after an explicit outburst. More Trending According to People Magazine, she could be heard screaming: 'These motherf**kers are laughing at you. 'You're laughing at a Black man's legacy.' Combs is thought to have remained seated during the incident, but turned around when Judge Subramanian ordered officers to remove the woman. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Tom Hanks reacts after daughter reveals childhood of 'violence and deprivation' MORE: Samuel L Jackson reveals horror moment he was dragged by a subway train MORE: Halle Berry awkwardly rejects boyfriend Van Hunt's marriage proposal


The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
'It shouldn't be illegal for men to buy sex' Ash Regan bill won't work
The details of his crimes are harrowing and heartbreaking. The case exposed just how deeply seated the police's systemic bias towards sex workers was. Just how vile and entrenched its institutional racism towards Indigenous people was – many of the missing women were Indigenous. Read more The failures in this case made one thing crystal clear. To the police in Vancouver, sex workers had no value. Pleas from families and the community to trace missing women were ignored over and over again. To say the results were devastating is an understatement. It is for this reason that I do not think sex workers or the people (men) who buy sex should be criminalised. Because the involvement of police with prostitution historically does not bode well for the women involved. It also ignores the agency of women in sex work and ensures the industry remains stigmatised. And marginalises those within it further. This week, Alba MSP Ash Regan introduced her 'Unbuyable Bill'. The Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill would see the buying of sex criminalised and the selling of sexual services decriminalised. It hinges on the principle that prostitution is a form of male violence against women. The Bill would also quash historic convictions and create a statutory right to support for those in and exiting prostitution. Essentially following the Nordic model. Though, will those statutory support services be funded properly? If not, they are redundant. Right now, in Scotland, the sale of sex is not illegal, but it might as well be. Running a brothel and soliciting or loitering in public to sell sex are against the law. In Canada after the Robert Pickton trial concluded, outrage over the way the way the missing women were ignored led to the Missing Women Commission of Inquiry. A direct result of the inquiry was a new policing strategy in Vancouver that effectively decriminalised sex work. Alba MSP Ash Regan (Image: free) The result was meaningful change, and sex workers were safer for it. But despite recommendations to replicate the Vancouver approach nationwide, in 2014, Stephen Harper's Conservative Government introduced Bill C-36, which followed the Nordic model. Buying sex became illegal. Advertising someone's sexual services was criminalised. So was accepting money to place those ads and profiting from someone's sexual services. It has been more than ten years since the Nordic Model was introduced in Canada, and sex workers have argued that it still polices sex work, and they still face harassment from the force. They also say that it makes it more difficult to screen clients, which pushes the industry further into the shadows. The other issue is that the model does not recognise the autonomy of sex workers. Not all sex work is survival sex work, and no abolitionist policy will be able to control the fact that consensual sex work does exist. Bill C-36, like the 'Unbuyable Bill', is rooted in radical feminist and abolitionist views. The law claims to address gender inequality and coercion, but it paradoxically limits women's ability to choose sex work, keeps their circumstances criminalised and fails to provide viable alternatives. A paper published in the Melbourne Journal of International Law found that if you separate Bill C-36's rhetorical claims from its actual effects, the law in reality 'is exposed as little more than a moralising condemnation of female sex workers, designed to limit their freedoms and capacity for self-determination, in order to induce their exit from sex work, in a manner which is wholly irreconcilable with the pursuit of 'gender equality'.' Legislating sex work is inherently difficult. It's crucial to make sure that the most vulnerable are protected, but it's contentious to paint everyone with the same brush. In Ireland, where buying sex was criminalised in 2015, sex workers reported that demand actually increased following the introduction of the new legislation. A report on the new law by the Department of Justice published in 2019 found that the law had a 'minimal effect' on demand. Sex workers also reported a heightened fear of crime, and it contributed to a climate where they felt even more marginalised and stigmatised. READ MORE MARISSA MACWHIRTER Scotland has a history of institutionalised abuse of working-class women and girls that is intertwined with its view of the 'social evil' of prostitution. The Glasgow System of the mid-nineteenth century saw the systemic policing of women and girls. Aged from seven to 39, they were plucked off the streets by police officers at will and taken to places like the Magdalene Asylum or the Lock Hospital for brutal and intimate examinations (often carried out by men) and barbaric treatments for venereal disease that often killed them. The Lochburn Magdalene Institution closed in 1960. Not that long ago. The case of Emma Caldwell, a 27-year-old woman murdered in 2005 by serial rapist Iain Packer, highlights how stigma against sex workers remains a serious issue in Scotland, just as it does in Canada. Failures in the police investigation have led to a forthcoming independent public inquiry. It took 19 years for Packer to be brought to justice. Regan's Bill is good in the sense that it has sparked fresh debate about the rights of sex workers. Though the reality of it becoming law before Scottish Parliament elections in 2026 is pretty unlikely. As in Canada, decriminalising sex work does not win as many votes as clamping down on it. And the Nordic model, as far as I am concerned, is still a crackdown. Shifting the burden of criminality does not constitute gender equality. Marissa MacWhirter is a columnist and feature writer at The Herald, and the editor of The Glasgow Wrap. The newsletter is curated between 5-7am each morning, bringing the best of local news to your inbox each morning without ads, clickbait, or hyperbole. Oh, and it's free. She can be found on X @marissaamayy1