Risk Management Division reports $3.9 million shortfall in settlement fund
The state government building that houses the General Services Department, seen from West Cordova Road in Santa Fe.(Photo by Austin Fisher / Source NM)
The agency charged with insuring New Mexico state government reported a negative balance of $3.9 million in its settlement fund, and estimated during a Wednesday presentation to the Senate Finance Committee that the fund could be on the hook for $87.9 million more in outstanding settlements.
In short: 'The fund is currently negative with outstanding liabilities that far exceed the assets,' said Risk Management Deputy Director Markita Sanchez.
Several large settlements — particularly from New Mexico's child welfare and corrections departments — drove the losses, the Legislative Finance Committee reported in its proposed budget.
The government insurer plans to raise rates across most state agencies by $10 million to nearly $33.7 million and is also seeking a $17 million dollar plug from state lawmakers to shore up the fund's reserves. But independent legislative analysis found in 2023 the state's laws are not primed to 'cover or prevent escalating settlement costs,' a responsibility often left to the agencies.
The $87.9 million figure is only an estimate of future costs for the fiscal year, but lawmakers said the dollar amount raises continued concerns for the solvency of the state's public liability fund.
'The system is broke,' said Sen. Pat Woods (R-Clovis) to members of Risk Management on Wednesday. 'It's not your fault, you're living under the law; it's not your fault the system is broke.'
The Risk Management Division — a portion of the broad umbrella of the General Services Department — is the self-insurer of 130 state agencies against a variety of claims, and manages the fund for voluntary or court-ordered settlements from anything from injuries from tripping on a sidewalk, to civil rights violation allegations, severe injuries, sexual misconduct and death.
The state pays those settlements using the Risk Management Fund but, in recent years, the increase in the number and costs of settlements has risen.
The average number of claims filed against New Mexico doubled in the last four years to 2,350 per year. In May of 2024, the public liability fund only had enough cash to cover 16% of the anticipated payouts, about $145 million short, according to a report from the Legislative Finance Committee.
Last year, the Legislature allowed a $20 million dollar transfer to boost reserves in the Public Liability Fund and allowed for additional transfers from state state agencies. The goal, according to state report cards, is for the fund to have at least 50% of reserves to cover outstanding liabilities. State law has some caps for settlements, but those limits do not apply to federal civil rights.
The state Constitution usually limits most state agencies from spending money they don't have, but because these settlements are often made to end lawsuits, state law allows Risk Management to fulfill settlements and recoup the costs from later premium charges.
But the costs of settlements are outstripping how much the agency is charging for the costs of insurance, and more agencies are having to pay higher premiums.
Joe Vigil, the spokesperson for the General Services Department, told lawmakers that insurance premiums are rising for approximately 74% of the state's 130 agencies.
Large departments with large settlements had the highest insurance premium increases: the New Mexico Corrections Department; New Mexico State University; the Children Youth and Families Department; the University of New Mexico; and UNM Hospital, according to an August Legislative Finance Committee report.
'Most agencies, even those without claims history, saw a large percentage increase – it might only be a few thousand dollars – but a large percentage increase in their liability premiums,' Vigil told the committee. ' Because, to make up those other rate increases, other agencies are pitching in as well.'
The premiums increase is based on loss history, so the greatest jumps are for the small number of agencies with 'significant claims history,' while 34 agencies will see no change or insurance costs decrease.
State accounting procedures mean that higher liability insurance payments show up as increases in agency's personnel costs, the LFC noted.
Sen. Nicole Tobiassen (R-Albuquerque) said she was frustrated that some agencies are picking up the tab for other agencies' settlements.
'If I were running an effective agency that maybe had the lowest rate of claims, I would be very unhappy right at this moment, knowing that I'm paying for the challenges – let's say, the gaps in all these other agencies,' Tobiassen said. 'I understand why it works that way, but it's definitely alarming.'
Acting General Services Secretary Anna Silva said Wednesday the agency is instituting steps to better address the number of claims, such as doubling the number of attorneys working at the agency. She promised to hold meetings with the state agencies that generate the majority of claims.
These meetings would address that 'claims are being settled without the knowledge of leadership,' Silva said, adding that the meetings would start after the legislative session.
The staffing changes include a team of three staff assigned to the Children Youth and Families Department, Silva told lawmakers.
In 2024, CYFD settled $18 million across 12 settlements, according to a Source NM review of the settlement data available on the state's portal. The settlements ended lawsuits alleging the department's responsibility for the deaths or severe injuries of children in state custody, from years ago.
The most recent was a $4 million December 2024 settlement to end a civil lawsuit brought on behalf of two children who had remained in the custody of parents when the department had more than two dozen complaints alleging abuse first filed in 2020.
Additional attorneys will address state agencies before claims are filed, but also have more time for fighting in the courtroom, Risk Management Division Director Jeannette Chavez said during Wednesday's Senate Finance Committee meeting.
'With the amount of attorneys that we have in the team that we have, we can start working with the individual agencies with their legal counsel, informing them and partnering with them on what we can do to not only settle the claims, but also fight those claims that can be fought,' Chavez said. 'Because before we have always just been an open checkbook and we are stopping that.'
On Monday, the Senate Judiciary Committee tabled Senate Bill 132, which would have capped settlement payments.
The Senate Judiciary did approve Senate Bill 220, also carried by Woods, which requires the Risk Management Division to continue publishing settlement data with state agencies within 30 days of settlement, which the department is currently doing voluntarily. The bill heads to Senate Finance next.
SB 220, if passed, would also require Risk Management to appoint a review team when a state agency's alleged actions cause a death, serious injury or substantial loss, a practice inspired by a program in Washington state.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to Pennsylvania ruling about provisional ballots
Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to Pennsylvania ruling about provisional ballots Show Caption Hide Caption Supreme Court hears arguments on judges' block on Trump birthright EO The justices heard arguments on whether its ok for judges to universally block President Donald Trump's birthright citizenship executive order. WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court on June 6 rejected a Republican challenge to a Pennsylvania court's ruling on provisional ballots, a case that could have restricted how much leeway state courts have to interpret federal election rules. During the 2024 election, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said voters should be able to cast provisional ballots if they failed to encase an absentee ballot in the required secrecy sleeve. State and national Republicans argued that would give voters an 'unauthorized do-over' for 'naked ballots' or for other mistakes on mail-in votes. And they said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision usurped the power the Constitution gives state legislatures to set federal election rules. In November, the U.S. Supreme Court declined the GOP's emergency request to intervene as ballots were being cast. The Republican National Committee said the justices should decide the issue now because they can do so without worrying whether their decision would affect an ongoing election. Related: Supreme Court to decide if challenge to Illinois' grace period for mail-in ballots can proceed Pennsylvania Democrats countered that the 2024 ruling by the state supreme court was consistent with the text of state election law and with the intent of the legislators who set the rules. There's no good reason, Democrats said, for the Supreme Court to review what was a routine interpretation of a state law. Getting involved would invite appeals in 'any and every state-law election case," lawyers for the Pennsylvania Democratic Party told the justices. 'That is not a regime the Court should foster,' they wrote. The case is the second about election law the court agreed to hear next term. They will also decide whether a GOP congressman can challenge Illinois' decision to count mail-in ballots that are cast, but not received, before the end of Election Day.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kilmar Abrego Garcia indicted on human trafficking charges, ordered to appear before judge in Nashville
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national deported earlier this year, is now back on U.S. soil — but this time, in General Pam Bondi announced Friday that Abrego Garcia, 29, has landed in the United States and is set to face federal charges for human smuggling and conspiracy. "Abrego Garcia has landed in the United States to face justice," Bondi said. "A grand jury in the Middle District of Tennessee returned a sealed indictment charging him with alien smuggling and conspiracy." According to the indictment, Garcia played a "significant role" in a human smuggling ring operating for nearly a decade. Bondi described him as a full-time smuggler who made more than 100 trips, transporting women, children, and MS-13 gang-affiliated persons throughout the United Alleged Gang Member Abrego Garcia 'Will Never Be On American Streets Again,' Dhs Says "He traded the innocence of minor children for profit," Bondi said. Children were among those allegedly trafficked. The indictment, filed under seal last month, includes two felony News Digital obtained Tennessee Highway Patrol bodycam footage from a 2022 traffic stop where troopers pulled over Garcia for speeding. Inside his vehicle were eight other men, raising immediate suspicions. "He's hauling these people for money," one trooper said. Troopers found $1,400 in cash and flagged Garcia in the National Crime Information Center, which returned a gang/terrorism alert. ICE was called, but never responded."What's changed since then?" Bondi asked rhetorically at the press conference. "Donald Trump is now president of the United States, and our borders are again secure." The grand jury also heard allegations that Garcia trafficked firearms, narcotics, and solicited explicit images of a minor. He is even accused by a co-conspirator of being involved in the murder of a rival gang member's mother. Read On The Fox News App Pam Bondi thanked El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele for cooperating with the U.S. government and returning Garcia after the U.S. presented an arrest warrant. "This is what American justice looks like," she Abrego Garcia Suspected Of Human Trafficking In Report Obtained By Fox News This development comes after controversy erupted in March when Abrego Garcia was deported to El Salvador, a move many politicians on the Left claimed was unjust. "For months the Trump Administration flouted the Supreme Court and our Constitution. Today, they appear to have finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and with the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States," wrote Democrate Senator Van Hollen in a Hollen made the trek to El Salvador to visit Garcia earlier this year, sparking internet backlash after being photographed with purported margaritas at a restaurant."As I have repeatedly said, this is not about the man, it's about his constitutional rights – and the rights of all. The Administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along," Van Hollen concluded. Court filings submitted today in the District of Maryland confirm that the government has complied with an April 4 preliminary injunction ordering his return. "Abrego Garcia was returned to the United States today, to stand trial," federal attorneys wrote in the notice. But the Trump administration made it clear this was no victory for his defenders:"The Justice Department's Grand Jury Indictment against Abrego Garcia proves the unhinged Democrat Party was wrong, and their stenographers in the Fake News Media were once again played like fools," a Trump administration statement said. "Abrego Garcia was never an innocent 'Maryland Man' — he is an illegal alien terrorist, gang member, and human trafficker... Democrat lawmakers like Senator Chris Van Hollen and the so-called 'journalists' who defended this criminal must immediately apologize to his victims." Abrego Garcia was reportedly sent to the notorious CECOT mega-prison in El Salvador after deportation, despite a 2019 court order temporarily blocking his removal due to claimed fears of persecution. Court records show Garcia entered the U.S. illegally in 2011 and was ordered deported in 2019. He will be prosecuted and, if convicted, serve his sentence in the U.S. before being returned to El Salvador, officials confirmed. "Today, the United States of America confronts Kilmar Abrego Garcia with overwhelming evidence— he is being indicted by a grand jury for human smuggling, including children, and conspiracy. Justice awaits this Salvadoran man."Fox News' Adam Sabes contributed to this article source: Kilmar Abrego Garcia indicted on human trafficking charges, ordered to appear before judge in Nashville


New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Federal judge approves Colorado's age limit for firearms purchases
A federal judge upheld Colorado's restriction on firearms sales requiring buyers to be 21 or older after Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and two people looking to purchase firearms sued Democratic Gov. Jared Polis. Chief U.S. District Judge Philip A. Brimmer agreed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit's decision that age-based requirements for purchase do not fall under the Second Amendment's right to keep and bear arms. The 10th Circuit and Brimmer agree that the issue falls under a 'safe harbor' exclusion, placing it outside the scope of the Constitution. The only exceptions to Colorado's firearm purchase age restriction are for those in the U.S. Military and for peace officers. In both cases, the person must be making the purchase while on duty and is 'serving in conformance with the policies' of their respective agency. 'Governor Polis is committed to making Colorado one of the ten safest states, and common-sense laws encourage responsible gun ownership and keep people safe. For decades in Colorado, you had to be 21 to purchase a handgun, per federal law. The requirement to be 21 was expanded to rifles and shotguns with the signing of SB23-169, and Governor Polis is glad to see the court affirm that Colorado's common sense law does not infringe on Second Amendment rights. Governor Polis is confident this law has and will help keep Coloradans and our communities safe,' Polis' Communications Director Conor Cahill said in a statement to Fox News Digital. 3 A federal judge upheld Colorado's restriction on firearms sales requiring buyers to be 21 or older. REUTERS Brimmer acknowledged that Adrian Pineda and Matthew Newkirk — the two individuals under 21 who sued Polis together with Rocky Mountain Gun Owners — are part of 'the people' as written in the Second Amendment. However, he referred to the 10th Circuit's decision, saying it had resolved the case back in 2023, according to Courthouse News Service (CNS). The decision in Colorado comes in contrast to one issued by the Supreme Court in 2022 in which justices determined that New York issued unconstitutional requirements for carrying a concealed weapon in public. Then-President Joe Biden said he was 'deeply disappointed' by the ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. He said that SCOTUS had 'chosen to strike down New York's long-established authority to protect its citizens.' 3 The only exceptions to Colorado's firearm purchase age restriction are for those in the U.S. Military and for peace officers. DmyTo – 'This ruling contradicts both common sense and the Constitution, and should deeply trouble us all,' Biden said in a statement at the time. He went on to reaffirm his commitment to reducing gun violence and making communities safer. 3 The 10th Circuit and Brimmer agree that the issue falls under a 'safe harbor' exclusion, placing it outside the scope of the Constitution. Los Angeles Times via Getty Images Brimmer is also going against a decision made by the New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which struck down a federal restriction banning the sale of firearms to anyone below the age of 21. That court held that those aged 18 to 20 are protected under the Second Amendment, according to The Trace, an organization of journalists who report on gun violence in the U.S. 'The federal government has presented scant evidence that eighteen-to-twenty-year-olds' firearm rights during the founding-era were restricted in a similar manner to the contemporary federal handgun purchase ban,' Judge Edith H. Jones wrote in the opinion. Several states, including New York, Massachusetts, California, Florida, Illinois, Delaware and Vermont have raised the age for purchasing firearms, according to the Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund. While some states have limited the age restrictions to handgun purchases, others have applied the restriction to any kind of firearm.