logo
Bolsonaro co-accused testifies on plot to ‘redo' 2022 Brazil election

Bolsonaro co-accused testifies on plot to ‘redo' 2022 Brazil election

CTV News3 hours ago

Brazil's former president Jair Bolsonaro speaks to the press at Congress in Brasilia, Brazil on March 26, 2025. (Eraldo Peres / AP Photo)
Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro helped draft a plan to 'redo the election' he narrowly lost in 2022, a co-accused testified in the former president's coup trial on Monday.
Prosecutors accused the 70-year-old far-right leader, who governed Brazil from 2019 to 2022, of having led a 'criminal organization' plotting to prevent leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva taking power.
The plot failed, the charge sheet says, for a lack of military backing.
Bolsonaro and six co-accused appeared in the Supreme Court on Monday to undergo questioning. A seventh took part via videoconference from prison.
Former right-hand man Mauro Cid, who has turned state's witness, told the court that Bolsonaro had 'received and read' a draft decree for the declaration of a state of emergency.
He then 'edited' the document, which would have paved the way for measures to 'redo the election' Lula had narrowly won, and also envisaged the imprisonment of officials.
Apart from the alleged coup plot, Bolsonaro also stands accused of having been aware of plans to assassinate Lula, his vice president Geraldo Alckmin, and Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes -- an arch-foe.
Bolsonaro, who is hoping to make a comeback in 2026 presidential elections despite being barred from running, denies all charges.
He and his former aides risk sentences of up to 40 years behind bars.
Although he has the right to remain silent, the former president told reporters he plans to respond 'without any problem' to questions from the court.
'It's an excellent idea to speak openly about the coup. I will be very happy to have the opportunity to clarify what happened,' the former army captain said last week.
'It's the moment of truth.'
'Dictator'
The Supreme Court headquarters in Brasilia, where Bolsonaro will take the stand -- likely Tuesday or Wednesday -- was one of the targets of rioting supporters known as 'Bolsonaristas' -- who raided government buildings in January 2023 as they urged the military to oust Lula.
Bolsonaro was abroad at the time of the last gasp effort to keep him in power, after the alleged coup planning fizzled.
For the former president, the trial marked a reunion with former allies and sworn enemies including Cid, who has been labeled a traitor for testifying against his former boss.
His testimony had allowed police to identify various actors in the alleged coup plot and to lay hands on compromising information, according to the investigation.
Four former ministers and the former heads of Brazil's navy and intelligence agency will also be giving testimony in an in-person questioning session expected to run no later than Friday. The proceedings are broadcast live.
Bolsonaro will face questions not only from prosecutors and defense attorneys, but also judge Moraes, whom the former president calls a 'dictator.'
'History' in the making
Since the alleged plot was conceived over a long period, and because some of the charges are new to the Brazilian system, 'an extremely complex legal discussion' is expected, according to Rogerio Taffarello, a criminal law expert at the Getulio Vargas Foundation.
New witnesses may yet be called before the court gets to closing arguments and sentencing deliberations.
Bolsonaro spent the weekend with his lawyers preparing his testimony at the residence of Sao Paulo state governor Tarcisio de Freitas, local media reported.
In a preliminary phase, Freitas, who served as Bolsonaro's infrastructure minister, testified his boss had 'never touched' on the subject of a coup or 'mentioned any attempt at constitutional disruption.'
But two former army commanders said Bolsonaro had hosted a meeting where the declaration of a state of emergency was discussed as a means to overturn Lula's election victory.
Bolsonaro's trial is the first for an attempted coup under a democratic regime in Brazil.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mi'kmaq band drops legal case on N.S. lobster fishery
Mi'kmaq band drops legal case on N.S. lobster fishery

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

Mi'kmaq band drops legal case on N.S. lobster fishery

HALIFAX - A Mi'kmaq band has dropped a legal case alleging Ottawa was violating its treaty rights in the lobster fishery, after hopes were raised of a historic deal. Last December, the lawyer for Sipekne'katik First Nation told Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice John Keith that discussions with Ottawa to settle the matter were 'moving to a conclusion.' Keith gave the parties until June 16 to finish the mediation, but said at that point the case would carry on before the courts. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW However, a letter to the courts sent June 6 by Sipekne'katik's lawyer Nathan Sutherland dropped the case without any further explanation. Neither side has provided an update on the status of negotiations for a new agreement. Chief Michelle Glasgow, the leader of the Indigenous community about 70 kilometres north of Halifax, didn't reply to a request for comment. Band members had argued their 'moderate livelihood' lobster harvest outside of the regular season is permitted by a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada decision, while non-Indigenous commercial fishers have contended it threatens stocks and fails to recognize how the courts have maintained Ottawa's right to regulate. The original lawsuit was launched by the band in 2021, seeking a declaration that current federal regulations infringe on its treaty right to fish. The Unified Fisheries Conservation Alliance, a group that represents commercial fishers, said in a news release Monday that the discontinuing of the case is a 'major victory' for its members. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'It is an acknowledgement by Chief (Michelle) Glasgow and Sipekne'katik First Nation that the rights to the illegal out-of-season lobster fishing ... are not a treaty protected right, it is poaching, plain and simple', said Colin Sproul, president of the group. Meanwhile, the group said they will be pursuing separate legal action, filed in August 2024, asking the provincial Supreme Court to determine the rules and limits to be applied to Sipekne'katik First Nation's fishery under the Marshall decision. The Supreme Court of Canada's 1999 Marshall decision said the Mi'kmaq, Maliseet and Passamaquoddy bands in Eastern Canada could hunt, fish and gather to earn a 'moderate livelihood,' though the court followed up with a clarification saying the treaty right was subject to federal regulation to ensure conservation. In September 2020, the Sipekne'katik First Nation issued five lobster licences to its members, saying they could trap and sell their catch outside the federally regulated season. In the months that followed there were confrontations on the water, rowdy protests and riots at two lobster pounds, one of which was razed by arson. According to a letter the band's lawyers sent to the court last December, seven federal officials — including the regional director of the Fisheries Department — attended weekly mediation talks in the legal case, with 10 representatives of the First Nation participating. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'The progress made to date and moving forward from our 25 years of impasse is immeasurable,' wrote Ronald Pink, the lawyer at the time, in the 2024 letter to the judge. The talks were also described by lawyers last December as being extensive, with former senator Dan Christmas and retired federal mediator Barney Dobbin guiding discussions. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.

N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery
N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery

Global News

time2 hours ago

  • Global News

N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery

A Mi'kmaq band has quietly discontinued its legal case alleging Ottawa was violating its right to fish for lobster, after hopes were raised of a historic deal. Last December, the lawyer for Sipekne'katik First Nation told Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice John Keith that discussions with Ottawa to settle the matter were of historic importance and 'moving to a conclusion.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Keith gave the parties until June 16 to finish the mediation, but said at that point the case would carry on before the courts. However, a letter to the courts sent June 6 by Sipekne'katik's lawyer Nathan Sutherland dropped the case without any further explanation, and without any kind of deal announced. Band members had argued their 'moderate livelihood' fishery outside of the regular season is permitted by a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada decision, but non-Indigenous commercial fishers have contended it threatens stocks and fails to recognize the courts also maintained Ottawa's right to regulate. Story continues below advertisement The original lawsuit was launched by the band in 2021, seeking a declaration that current federal regulations infringe on its treaty right to fish. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.

N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery
N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery

Winnipeg Free Press

time2 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery

HALIFAX – A Mi'kmaq band has quietly discontinued its legal case alleging Ottawa was violating its right to fish for lobster, after hopes were raised of a historic deal. Last December, the lawyer for Sipekne'katik First Nation told Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice John Keith that discussions with Ottawa to settle the matter were of historic importance and 'moving to a conclusion.' Keith gave the parties until June 16 to finish the mediation, but said at that point the case would carry on before the courts. However, a letter to the courts sent June 6 by Sipekne'katik's lawyer Nathan Sutherland dropped the case without any further explanation, and without any kind of deal announced. Band members had argued their 'moderate livelihood' fishery outside of the regular season is permitted by a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada decision, but non-Indigenous commercial fishers have contended it threatens stocks and fails to recognize the courts also maintained Ottawa's right to regulate. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. The original lawsuit was launched by the band in 2021, seeking a declaration that current federal regulations infringe on its treaty right to fish. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store