Nebraska Supremes take show on road, hold court at Omaha high school
Omaha Bryan High School students listen to the "traveling" Nebraska Supreme Court that convened at the high school on April 2, 2025. (Cindy Gonzalez/Nebraska Examiner)
OMAHA — It was not your typical day in the Nebraska Supreme Court.
Chief Justice Jeffrey Funke and six associate justices donned their traditional black robes and convened to hear customary oral arguments — but only after maneuvering past the theater props, art supplies and other items common to the back stage of a school auditorium.
The state's high court judges peppered attorneys with questions about the appellate case at hand. But in a different twist afterward, they faced their own barrage of questions from a group of curious teenagers.
Wednesday's official Supreme Court proceedings played out on a stage at Omaha Bryan High School. Taking a real-life court session out of the State Capitol and on the road was part of the Court's efforts to increase public understanding and trust in the judicial system, and to inspire more young people to join the legal profession.
For Kyra Carpenter, editor-in-chief of the Bryan High Orator, the event on Bear turf pulled back the curtain on a system she had only read about. She said she came to school 'really nervous' to ask questions of the justices, but later felt at ease.
'They seem more like people, more real,' the junior said after the event. 'They even laughed at one of my jokes.'
Saúl Muñoz-Macias, also a junior, said he will be the first in his family to go to college when he pursues a political science and economics degree on the way to law school.
'It's cool to see this,' the 16-year-old said. 'I'd like to be in a position like them some day.'
Joining Funke on the auditorium stage — before an audience of about 50 students from the school's classes on American Government, Law and Juvenile Justice and AP History — were Justices Lindsey Miller-Lerman, William Cassel, Jonathan Papik, Stephanie Stacy, John Freudenberg and Jason Bergevin.
The Supreme Court, supported by the Nebraska State Bar Foundation, holds such school-based court sessions a few times a year in various parts of the state. A similar event was held earlier in the day at Creighton University School of Law.
While intended as outreach and education for students, Funke said in an interview that he believes judges also reap benefits.
'They ask us questions, they challenge us, and it makes us think a little bit about what we do, how we do it, why we do it and if there are ways we can do it better,' said Funke, a graduate of the University of Nebraska College of Law who was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2016 and elevated to chief justice last year.
At Bryan, official business came to order about 1:30 p.m. with a shout from a member of the Nebraska State Patrol: 'This room is now a courtroom…Welcome to the Supreme Court.'
A student bailiff gave the 'all rise' alert. Prior to that, the Patrol had searched and secured the school grounds. Student ambassadors escorted justices backstage, where they assembled before taking their seats.
The spotlighted case had to do with a battle over a roadway, and a 'prescriptive easement,' which is a legal right to use someone else's property based upon a long-term, consistent and open use of that property without the expressed consent of the owner.
In this situation, a family had owned a swath of land in Otoe County since 1857. But the Little Nemaha River cuts off part of the property to the south, making it inaccessible to vehicles or farm machinery except by crossing through the neighboring Dowding property.
The Dowding property owners grew frustrated enough to lock an access gate, which pushed the other family to sue, and a district court granted them access based on prescriptive easement.
Attorneys David Domina and Ryan McIntosh argued their respective sides, and justices asked a lot of questions.
'I wasn't expecting the judges to just interrupt them like they did — I was like, 'Oh,'' said Kyra.
Perhaps the tougher inquisition came after attorneys wrapped up their arguments, and as students stepped up to question the justices.
One teen wanted to know the judges' most difficult or impactful case.
For Funke, that was deciding as a trial judge the fate of a child in a custody or divorce situation.
'What you want and what you can do sometimes are two different things,' he said. 'You know the importance of it and if you get it wrong, the impact is significant for that child.'
Cassel talked about death penalty decisions.
'A very solemn and complicated undertaking,' he said, adding that such cases fortunately aren't frequent. 'That's probably the highest single responsibility that one of us can have — (rendering) our judgement whether someone lives or dies.'
Asked to describe 'most interesting' cases, Miller-Lerman recalled the Beatrice Six. Miller-Lerman — the first woman on the Nebraska Supreme Court and longest-serving member of the current high court — wrote the 7-0 opinion in 2007 that allowed DNA testing for two men in the Beatrice Six who had been convicted of murder in 1989.
Results showed neither man had committed the crime, leading to the exoneration of them and four others who had falsely confessed. They won a wrongful conviction judgement of $28 million.
Students ventured into politics, with one wondering if justices believed the country was in a 'constitutional crisis' between the Trump administration and the courts.
Cassel suggested the student google President Franklin D. Roosevelt's 'court-packing plan' and said, 'We aren't even close.'
We think it's important you trust your judiciary. That's why we take these opportunities.
– Chief Justice Jeffrey Funke
Another wanted to know if the justices feared for their jobs under Donald Trump's administration, given that the president called for the removal of a judge who ruled against deportation plans.
Funke used the moment to delve into differences between Nebraska's method of appointing and removing judges versus that of the federal government. In Nebraska, he noted, voters choose whether a judge should be retained. In a case of alleged bad behavior, a process overseen by a Judicial Qualifications Commission made up of attorneys and lay persons can sanction or remove a judge from the bench.
In response to a question about $80 million being poured into a Wisconsin Supreme Court race, Cassel differentiated between states that elect their judges and Nebraska, where the governor appoints judges from candidates submitted by a nominating commission.
To one student's observation that the high court spent a lot of time obsessing over terms such as consent and prescriptive and necessity easements, Papik said law school would prepare them for this new vocabulary.
'Much of what you're doing is learning a new language,' he said.
When asked what the Supreme Court does to earn high school students' trust, Stacy said: 'We're here.'
She said the hope is students 'learn a little about how the process works.' She added, 'Some of you might even be thinking, 'Law school doesn't sound horrible.''
Stacy touched upon open access to courts, cameras in the courtroom, publicly broadcasted proceedings. 'We don't do our work in secret,' she told the teens.
Funke said if the Court loses its authority, rule of law gives way to survival of the fittest, and whoever is the strongest, has the most muscle or guns, he said.
'We think it's important you trust your judiciary,' he said. 'That's why we take these opportunities.'
Students got a primer ahead of the proceedings from a couple of local lawyers: Abigail Moland of the Omaha McGrath North law firm and Ceci Menjivar, a Douglas County assistant public defender, who also is a Bryan alumna.
'It's a great opportunity to give back and have Latino students see there are attorneys that look like them … and let them know ways they can contribute.'
Bryan Principal Anthony 'CK' Clark-Kaczmarek said he wasn't sure how his school was selected as a site, but that he jumped at what would be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for many in the student body.
'I loved that our kids were so fearless in the question-asking,' he said, adding that they hear a lot of news and were eager to hear the perspective of the state's highest-level judges.
'All students really want to know is that things are going to be okay — that government is going to do the right thing and protect them.'
As is standard, the Supreme Court did not immediately announce a determination on the civil case argued Wednesday, Fey v. Olson. The Court relays decisions in written opinions filed with the Court's clerk.
The justices stuck around to take photos with students. The principal took a selfie with the justices and students, at the urging of Carpenter. Funke said such road trips help the court reset.
He said he appreciated the atmosphere — the occasional school bell during proceedings, voices from hallways. He got a kick out of assembling with fellow judges backstage amid drama props, a change from pristine quarters in the Capitol.
'It kinda brings you back to the normal, everyday world,' said Funke.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
South Korea President Lee's election law violation hearing postponed indefinitely, court says
SEOUL (Reuters) -A Seoul court said on Monday it will indefinitely postpone a trial of President Lee Jae-myung on charges of violating election law in 2022. South Korea's Supreme Court ruled in May, before Lee was elected, that Lee had violated election law by publicly making "false statements" during his 2022 presidential bid, and sent the case back to an appeals court. The Seoul High Court, which had scheduled a hearing for the case on June 18, said on Monday that it will postpone the hearing "to be decided later" without a date, a court spokesperson confirmed. Lee's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The court said its decision to postpone the hearing was due to "Constitution Article 84", without elaborating. South Korea's Constitution, Article 84, says a sitting president is "not subject to criminal prosecution while in office" for most crimes. However, legal experts are divided on whether that applies to ongoing trials that were already prosecuted before a president was elected. The National Court Administration under the Supreme Court gave as its opinion that judges of each court where Lee's trials are being held will have to decide whether to stop or proceed, according to its statement to a lawmaker in May. "The court in charge of hearing the case will determine whether Article 84 of the Constitution should be applied to a criminal defendant who was elected in the presidential election," the statement said. Lee's ruling Democratic Party, which controls parliament, is planning to pass a bill this week which suspends ongoing trials for the incumbent president, local broadcaster KBS reported on Monday. The Constitutional Court may be asked to rule whether the bill is unconstitutional, legal experts have said.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alexandre de Moraes: Brazilian judge in showdown with far-right
With his steely gaze and bald pate, Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes has emerged as one of the most powerful and polarizing people in Brazil. In the 56-year-old judge's sights is far-right ex-president Jair Bolsonaro, accused of plotting to cling onto power despite his failed October 2022 re-election bid. A showdown with tech titan Elon Musk has meanwhile put Moraes in the crosshairs of US President Donald Trump's administration, which has hinted it could deny visas to foreign officials who threaten US nationals or residents over social media posts. Moraes shut down Musk's X network in Brazil, one of its largest markets, for 40 days for failing to tackle disinformation, mostly shared by supporters of Bolsonaro. Musk reacted with fury at the time, branding Moraes an "evil dictator cosplaying as a judge" and accusing him of "trying to destroy democracy in Brazil." Bolsonaro also has called Moraes a "dictator," while his son Eduardo, an MP, has lobbied for US sanctions against the "totalitarian" judge. Moraes ordered that the younger Bolsonaro be placed under investigation for alleged obstruction of justice. - Hero or villain? - Known by his nickname, "Xandao," Moraes looms large over a deeply divided Brazil. The immensely powerful judge, who previously headed the Superior Electoral Tribunal (TSE), is hated by the far right, which accuses him of censorship and abuse of office. To others, the muay thai aficionado is a hero on a mission to save Brazil's young democracy. There was little in Moraes's background to hint he would become a thorn in the side of conservatives. The constitutional law expert worked as a Sao Paulo state prosecutor, and went on to become state security secretary. Known as a hardliner, he drew criticism from left-wing activists, who accused him of repressing social movements. He served as justice minister under center-right ex-president Michel Temer, who named him to the Supreme Court in 2017. "He's a political animal," constitutional law expert Antonio Carlos de Freitas told AFP. Supreme Court insiders call him a pragmatist. But his pursuit of Bolsonaro and Musk's X showed a steelier side. Moraes has presided over a slew of cases targeting Bolsonaro, barring the so-called "Trump of the Tropics" from running for office until 2030 over his attempts to discredit the electoral system. But it is the coup investigation that threatens to definitively torpedo Bolsonaro's political comeback bid. The 70-year-old former army captain risks up to 40 years in prison if convicted of plotting to prevent leftist Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva from taking power. Prosecutors say the plot included a plan to arrest and even assassinate Lula, his vice president Geraldo Alckmin and Moraes. - 'Political animal' - Moraes was an omnipresent figure during the polarizing 2022 election campaign, aggressively using his rulings to fight election disinformation on social media. That included blocking the accounts of some prominent conservative figures, leading to his standoff with Musk, who has been accused of turning his social media platform into a megaphone for right-wing conspiracy theories. The married father of three gives few interviews, and rarely posted on his X account, where he had a million followers, before closing it in February. "Freedom of expression doesn't mean freedom of aggression," he has said. "It doesn't mean the freedom to defend tyranny." Still two decades away from the mandatory retirement age for judges in Brazil of 75, Moraes has been cited as a possible future candidate for president. He has never discussed any such ambitions publicly. msi-rsr/jhb/cb/sla/sst


USA Today
9 hours ago
- USA Today
'Civil rights for everyone!' LGBTQ+ community holds massive rally in DC
'Civil rights for everyone!' LGBTQ+ community holds massive rally in DC DC is hosting WorldPride at a time when rights for the queer community are being threatened. Show Caption Hide Caption Jim Obergefell talks LGBTQ+ rights 10 years after Supreme Court ruling Jim Obergefell, the lead plaintiff in the Supreme Court case that legalized gay marriage nationwide, looks back on its impact 10 years later. WASHINGTON − A crowd of hundreds of protesters clad in the colors of the rainbow gathered Sunday at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial to protest what organizers describe as a "coordinated, systematic attack" on human rights. The rally, which will conclude with a march to the Capitol, is part of WorldPride 2025, a global festival held in different cities and countries every year that promotes LGBTQ+ visibility and awareness. The event is being hosted by DC's Capital Pride Alliance, celebrating 50 years of Pride in the nation's capital. June is Pride Month, which comes amid a seismic shift in federal policy as the Trump administration turns back the clock on diversity, equity and inclusion rights the queer community battled to attain. Organizers warn that decades of progress in all human rights are under siege. "Our fundamental freedoms − and our very democracy − are at risk," organizers say on the website promoting the rally and march. "And if we fail to recognize the urgency of this moment, we'll only have ourselves to blame. Resist the marginalization and persecution of people just for being who they are." The front of the Reflecting Pool at the Lincoln Memorial was packed with Pride flags and flags representing trans and bisexual communities. The many signs read 'Proud and Gay,' 'Trans rights are human rights' and 'Gender affirming care saved my life.' The rally and march, which come a day after a parade through city streets, will be followed by the WorldPride DC Street Festival and concert. WorldPride comes to DC: Queer community vows to be 'louder than ever' Kat Robinson, 34, an active service member, attended the rally and march to protest the Trump administration's move to force transgender troops out of the military. In the first days in office, Trump issued executive order barring anyone who is transgender from military service, setting a June 6 deadline for transgender troops to leave voluntarily. While she is not transgender, the 15-year veteran said she knows many transgender troops who faced the decision of whether to leave the military voluntarily or stay and fight. She said it is becoming harder to put on the uniform and "represent something I deeply disagree with. This is not why I enlisted.''I am enraged by what is happening Robinson said. 'The language in the executive order was despicable and it makes me sick to my stomach.' The activities took place Sunday under cloudy skies with scattered showers. Miranda Burmeister, 29, and Danielle Caldwell, 33, drove seven hours from Connecticut to Washington to celebrate Pride and their wedding pair, who run a day care and have three children, said the mood has been celebratory, though they noted that the Trump administration and its anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric and actions have cast a dark cloud over the event. But it was an urge to protest that brought them to the Lincoln Memorial on Sunday.'I wanted to fight back against the administration,' said Caldwell, a social said World Pride has been uplifting and inspiring.'It's nice to be around people who are like us and accepting,' she said. Many in the crowd wore ponchos and were holding umbrellas as they danced to pop songs − including Chappell Roan's 'Pink Pony Club."JC Cummings, an architect born and raised in Washington, has been attending the city's Pride festivals for decades. Cummings, 69, said this year's event is important because it provides hope and optimism in the face of 'attempted oppression.''It's almost as if we're partying while Rome is burning,' he said while holding a sign reading 'Civil rights for everyone!''We're thumbing our nose at (Trump)," he added. Several speakers addressed the crowd, including local organizers based in Washington and those who helped put on WorldPride. At one point, a video message from former Vice President Kamala Harris appeared on the large screens at the base of the Lincoln Memorial, bidding the crowd 'a happy WorldPride.''Pride is a celebration and it is also a statement − a statement about courage, about community and about determination,' Harris said.'In this moment as we gather with friends and allies across the world, let us be clear: No one should be made to fight on their own. We are all going through this together,' she said to an eruption of cheers. President Donald Trump marked his first day in office by signing an executive order to dimantle diversity, equity and inclusion practices. The transgender community has been a primary target of the ensuing directives. They incude moves to end gender-affirming care for minors, revive a ban on transgender people in the military, remove references to the community from the Stonewall National Monument website and direct that federal agencies recognize only two sexes, male and female − affecting the ability of transgender people to identify on items such as passports. The actions have led some corporate sponsors to end support of Pride parades and prompted safety concerns for LGBTQ+ people traveling internationally to the WorldPride festival. Trump's 'bullying': LGBTQ+ advocates decry President Trump's actions during Pride Month "WorldPride is occurring at a crucial time, bringing together voices from around the world to support the LGBTQ+ community's ongoing fight for equality, visibility, and justice," the organization says on its website. "We encourage everyone in our global community to participate in this historic moment. By showing up and supporting Pride events globally, the LGBTQ+ community will be visible, vigilant, and heard."