Rau Tongia killing: Defendant recalls discovering dead body in her bed
By Catherine Hutton, Open Justice reporter of
Rau Tongia, 33.
Photo:
Open Justice / Supplied
A woman accused of being a party to murder says she'd never seen a dead body before, but she knew Rau Tongia was gone as soon as she saw him, because he was so pale.
The woman, whose name is suppressed, is on trial in the High Court at Wellington, where she denies being a party to Tongia's killing in December 2020.
The woman is charged with abetting, inciting or counselling the killing by allegedly sending Facebook messages to a woman who had a gun, including ones saying "Org it" and "Come get this c***".
The court heard police believe Shayde Carolyn Weston, who has already been convicted of Tongia's murder, used the gun to shoot him in the back as he slept beside the woman now on trial.
The woman's lawyer Elizabeth Hall says Weston would have shot Tongia regardless of the messages.
Others in the house also had access to the Facebook account from which the woman is alleged to have sent the messages, something she vehemently denies doing.
In two written statements given to police shortly after Tongia's death, which were read to the jury this week, the woman described the shock of discovering Tongia's body in her bed and the tumultuous events that night.
The woman told police she'd met Tongia in Christchurch more than a decade ago. Over the years, they'd become close friends and had a casual sexual relationship.
She told police what began as drinks to celebrate Tongia's first week in a job as a scaffolder, after recently arriving in Wellington, had soured after he'd seen her and Weston kissing.
Shayde Carolyn Weston has been convicted for the murder of Rau Tongia in December 2020.
Photo:
Stuff/Juan Zarama Perini
Angry and upset, Tongia had attacked Weston while she'd slept.
Tongia and Weston continued to fight and argue on the balcony of the Karori house. Police were called, but left after the woman assured them everything was okay.
In her statement, the woman said Tongia then sustained a head injury after a fight on the driveway against a group that included Weston. He'd returned to the house complaining of being struck with a hammer or an axe. She'd tried to stem the bleeding with a pillowcase.
She said Tongia had hurled abuse at her, accusing her of being selfish and not caring about him.
During her interview, the woman told police Tongia was so drunk, he was impossible to reason with. She'd shut and locked her bedroom door, but Tongia had broken in and got into bed beside her.
He'd put her in a chokehold, tight enough that she'd struggled to breathe. He'd continued to abuse her while also telling her he loved her and said they needed to go to sleep, she said.
In the morning, she said she'd slid out of bed and gone downstairs, where she and her niece had laughed about the night's events. About 20 minutes later, she'd gone back to bed.
Offering Tongia a drink of water, she'd realised he was dead.
"I looked at him and he looked dead. I've never seen a dead body before, but he looked all pale and his eyes were slightly open," she told police, according to the statement.
There was a patch of blood in the bed behind him by his lower back, she'd told police.
She didn't know how it got there, saying she'd been so "out of it" she'd heard nothing during the night.
While speaking to police, she'd noticed specks of blood on her socks, pants and T-shirt - the clothes she'd slept in. But she didn't know how they got there.
She'd run downstairs, telling her niece and son to check on Tongia. Confirming he was dead, they'd called emergency services.
As they stood on the driveway while paramedics were inside, her neighbour approached her. The teenage girl said that while everyone was asleep, someone had come up to the house carrying a long firearm and had let off some rounds.
The woman told police Tongia had only arrived in Wellington shortly before his death. In that time, the only people he'd had a problem with were a neighbour, whom he'd knocked out during a domestic dispute with his partner, and Weston, who'd he'd only met the night she'd fatally shot him.
Three months later, in March 2021, the woman gave a video interview to police, which was played to the jury.
During that interview, the police officer showed the woman Facebook messages, which police allege she wrote shortly before Tongia was shot.
"My bro attacked Shayde while she was asleep. F***** peanut. Now he's attacking me."
The messages continued, "I'll f***** kill him. Yes org."
Asked by the person receiving the messages whose she's talking about, the woman allegedly replied saying: "Come get this c***."
Police say that while more than one device in the house was logged on to the Facebook account in question, it was the woman who wrote the messages - something she vehemently denied in the police interview.
"I didn't write that. I can't even write like that drunk. I was f***** off my face," she told police.
Questioned further during the interview, she said "that wasn't me. Look, it honestly wasn't. I did not write those messages. No f***** way. Nah. If it was from my phone, well, then someone's written those. Are you trying to implicate me?" she asks the police officer.
Police say the woman sent the messages while upset and frustrated at the way Tongia had treated her that night.
But towards the end of the interview, the woman makes it clear she's unhappy at the suggestion she played any part in Tongia's death.
"Oh f*** off I did. No. F*** off I did. 'Cause this is actually bullshit. Yous [sic] are f***** stupid if that's what you f***** think. F*** this. F***** get me down here and f***** talk shit and then tell me that I played a part in f***** shooting my f***** friend."
The Crown has now finished its case in the jury trial, which is now in its third week before Justice Paul Radich.
*
This story originally appeared in the
New Zealand Herald
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Kiwi who killed a Melbourne motorcyclist in a hit-and-run to be deported from Australia
By Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter of Melbourne man Keith Stevens was fatally struck and dragged on his motorbike by a Kiwi teenager who failed to stop the car he was driving. Photo: Open Justice / NZME The "inhumane" and "cruel" actions of a young Kiwi who killed a motorcyclist in a fiery hit-and-run have raised concerns for Australian officials and resulted in him being exiled from the country. The New Zealand-born man was 17 when he failed to give way at a Melbourne intersection in a stolen BMW he was driving and collided with a motorcycle. The bike and its rider, Keith Stevens, became trapped under the vehicle but the then-teenager continued to drive, dragging them for 85 metres. The friction caused the motorcycle to burst into flames, engulfing Stevens and causing burns to 80 percent of his body. When the driver, who had lived in Australia since he was 1, finally stopped, he reversed off the motorcycle and drove off at speed, leaving the 33-year-old father for dead. Australian media reported the teen only paused to dislodge Stevens when his three teenage passengers begged him to do so. Stevens died in hospital the next day after his life support was turned off. After the November 2017 fatal crash in Mitcham, Melbourne, the car driver, who has not been named because of Australian laws around reporting youth offender matters, was sentenced in the County Court of Victoria to six years' imprisonment, with a minimum non-parole period of four years. In sentencing him, Judge Irene Lawson was brought to tears and needed a moment to compose herself when describing the void left by Stevens' death, according to Australian media. She described the actions of the teenager as inhumane and cowardly. As a result of his offending, his visa was cancelled in 2020 under section 501 of Australia's Migration Act. His plea to have that decision revoked was declined and he then applied to the Administrative Review Tribunal of Australia for a review. The review hearing for the now 25-year-old, who is currently detained in immigration detention, was held last month. According to the decision, he moved to Australia as a 1-year-old with his family in 2001. It stated he had a "difficult upbringing" that had, in part, influenced his offending. He began smoking marijuana at 12, drinking alcohol around 14 and progressed to methamphetamine use at 16. The decision reported he had displayed "anti-social behaviours" that had manifested into violence since he was young. His conviction history showed frequent and repeated offending and that he was on youth parole for offences including burglary when he fatally hit Stevens. Immediately after that collision, the teen ditched the stolen BMW and he and his associates ran up an embankment and jumped over a fence into a property. They tried to kick down a door at the house but a female resident threw her weight against it so they couldn't get in. They gave up but moved on to another home in the street, breaking in and stealing a car, a cellphone and a wallet. That car was later found abandoned and destroyed by fire. At his sentencing, the court heard the teen was egocentric, addicted to meth and had limited capacity for remorse at the time. Australian media reported that he had called a friend in juvenile detention after the crash and said: "Even after the accident, bro, I didn't feel anything. Like, I didn't feel no pain, no emotions about it." His friend then asked him if he cared about the life he had taken. "Yeah, bro, I f***in' murdered a f***in' innocent 33-year-old man," he responded. At the recent appeal, he told the tribunal he had not been remorseful for killing Stevens at the time but now accepted full responsibility and made no attempt to excuse his behaviour or to attribute blame to anyone else. The tribunal accepted that he had matured and was truly remorseful. The man attributed several factors to his youth offending, including parental neglect, poor mental health, anti-social peers and drug use, including meth, cannabis and ecstasy. But his mental health and emotional and psychological issues have not been professionally addressed and he remains a risk of reoffending. In his plea to remain in Australia, the man said he had no family support in New Zealand and was unfamiliar with the country. His mother had "grave fears" that if deported, and without his Australian support network, he would fall into gang life and drugs and be at risk of serious physical, emotional and mental harm. The tribunal accepted that, because of being incarcerated since he was a teen, he has no experience as an adult in the community and would face difficulties in adjusting to life in New Zealand without family support. But the decision stated he was not unfamiliar with New Zealand, as movement records showed he had travelled to New Zealand 15 times during 2001 and 2015, and had a relative in Wellington. While the tribunal accepted the man has strong and enduring ties to Australia, they were diminished by his extensive criminal record and his "very limited" positive contribution to the community. In declining to revoke the cancellation of the man's visa, the tribunal stated the nature of the offending had raised serious character concerns about the man. "The nature of the applicant's offending and the harm that would result if it were repeated are so serious that the countervailing considerations are insufficient to outweigh considerations of the protection of the Australian community and the expectations of the Australian community so as to justify revoking the cancellation of the applicant's visa." * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald . (fyi italics don't work within link brackets)
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Tribunal asked to halt seabed mine fast-track
Rachel Arnott with kaumatua Ngāpari Nui at the New Plymouth District Council committee. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki South Taranaki hapū want the Waitangi Tribunal to halt a fast-track bid to mine the seabed off Pātea. Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) has applied under the new Fast-track Approvals Act to mine in the South Taranaki Bight for 20 years. The mining and processing ship would churn through 50 million tonnes of the seabed annually, discharging most of it back into the ocean in shallow water just outside the 12-nautical-mile territorial limit. Hapū and iwi are seeking a tribunal injunction to block processing of TTR's fast-track application. The claimants want an urgent hearing into alleged Crown breaches and are seeking to summon Crown officials they say are responsible. They say the Crown failed to consult tangata whenua, breaching Te Tiriti o Waitangi and ignored a Supreme Court ruling against the seabed mine. To get an urgent Waitangi Tribunal hearing, applicants must be suffering or likely to suffer significant and irreversible prejudice, as a result of current or pending Crown actions. Lead claimant Puawai Hudson of Ngāruahine hapū Ngāti Tū said their moana was rich in taonga species. "If seabed mining goes ahead, we lose more than biodiversity - we lose the mauri that binds us as Taranaki Mā Tongatonga [people of south Taranaki]," Hudson said. The area was also subject to applications under the Marine and Coastal Area Act - the law that replaced the Foreshore and Seabed Act. "This is not consultation - this is colonisation through fast-track." The applicants' legal team, who're also of Ngāruahine, say the Wai 3475 claim breaks new ground. Legal tautoko Alison Anitawaru Cole and Te Wehi Wright said the Court of Appeal proved the tribunal's powers to require Crown action in urgent and prejudicial cases, when it summonsed Children's Minister Karen Chhour. They argue the tribunal should be able to halt other urgent and prejudicial Crown actions - such as processing TTR's application under the Fast-track Approval Act (FAA). The Taranaki claimants are: Groups outside Taranaki facing FAA applications have also joined, including Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Porou ki Hauraki. As opponents press their claim, TTR is due to argue its case this week at New Plymouth District Council (NPDC). Trans-Taman said opposition to seabed mining lacked scientific credibility and the waste sediment it discharges would be insignificant, given the load already carried by the turbid Tasman Sea. TTR managing director Alan Eggers is expected to lay out his wares to councillors at a public workshop on Wednesday morning. The company promises an economic boost in Taranaki and Whanganui, creating more than 1350 New Zealand jobs and becoming one of the country's top exporters. The only known local shareholder - millionaire Phillip Brown - last week was reported to lodge a complaint to NPDC, alleging bias by its iwi committee, Te Huinga Taumatua. The Taranaki Daily News reported Brown thought tribal representatives and councillors on the committee talked for too long during a deputation opposed to TTR's mining bid. After the hour-and-a-quarter discussion, Te Huinga Taumatua co-chair Gordon Brown noted it was a record extension of the officially allotted 15 minutes. The committee, including Mayor Neil Holdom, voted that the full council should consider declaring opposition to TTR's mine, when it meets on 24 June. Brown reportedly believed the meeting was procedurally flawed and predetermined. Iwi liaison committees in north and south Taranaki typically relax debate rules to allow fuller kōrero. Taranaki Regional Council's powerful policy and planning committee recently reached a rare accord on dealing with freshwater pollution, when its new chair - Māori constituency councillor Bonita Bigham - suspended standing orders in favour of flowing discussion. Ngāti Ruanui has stood against Trans-Tasman for more than a decade, including defeating their application in the Supreme Court. Rūnanga kaiwhakahaere Rachel Arnott said the Crown should know mana whenua would never give up. "We are still here, because our ancestors never gave up fighting for what is right. "Tangaroa is not yours to sell - we will never leave, we will be here way beyond TTR, they have no future here." LDR is local body reporting co-funded by RNZ and NZ on Air
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Government considers Crown contributions to partnership projects
PPPs were considered for court construction, but not included in Budget 2025. Photo: RNZ / Anneke Smith Government agencies are looking into how the Crown could put capital directly into Public Private Partnership projects. This is among moves to get try to get more partnerships underway to build a wider range of public infrastructure, from courts to health facilities. Minutes from the NZ Transport Agency show it has explored direct Crown contributions to PPPs for several months. Treasury said these were used in other countries to improve value for money or project outcomes. Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop said PPP guidelines due out later this year would show how to consider Crown contributions. "The inclusion of a Crown capital contribution will be considered on a project-by-project basis throughout the business case and procurement processes," Bishop said. Officials did not believe legislative or regulatory change would be required to implement contributions. A blueprint to change PPPs was put out late last year, as the Government sought to get the private sector, including international companies, enthused about investing. "The blueprint signalled that their use would be carefully considered on a project-by-project basis," Treasury said of the contributions. At the Government's infrastructure investment summit in March, PPPs were raised as an option in health. PPPs to build three new courts in Waitākere and Rotorua, and a Māori Land Court in Rotorua were initially considered by justice officials, but the courthouse builds did not receive funding in Budget 2025. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
