Man arrested 'for plot to firebomb US Embassy' after 'threatening Trump'
Israel has handed over a US citizen after authorities uncovered his alleged plan to firebomb a U.S. Embassy branch office - the man was arrested on Sunday at New York's John F. Kennedy Airport
A 28-year-old man was arrested on Sunday at New York's John F. Kennedy Airport after authorities discovered his alleged plot to firebomb a U.S. Embassy branch office, the Justice Department revealed.
Joseph Neumayer, a dual American-German citizen, was also reportedly detained on May 19 following a heated confrontation with a security guard outside the embassy office in in Tel Aviv, Israel. Officials found three crude Molotov cocktails in a backpack he'd left behind.
The justice department also disclosed that before his arrest, Neumayer, 28, had posted a chilling message on social media: "Join me as I burn down the embassy in Tel Aviv. Death to America, death to Americans, and f*** the west." He is also said to have made threats against the life of U.S. President Donald Trump. "The Department will not tolerate such violence and will prosecute this defendant to the fullest extent of the law," U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi stated.
Kash Patel, the director of the FBI, also issued a stern warning. "This despicable and violent behaviour will not be tolerated at home or abroad, and the FBI, working with our partners, will bring him to face justice for his dangerous actions," he declared, reports the Mirror US.
"As alleged, Neumeyer, armed with potentially lethal devices, sought to cause chaos and destruction at the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv," stated U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella for the Eastern District of New York. "His arrest and prosecution clearly show that my Office and the Department of Justice will not tolerate violence in our homeland or violence targeting U.S. interests abroad."
After being deported back to the States by Israeli authorities, Neumayer could face a 20-year stretch in the clink if found guilty, along with a hefty fine of up to $250,000. The DOJ has said that a "federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors."
The apprehension of Neumayer follows closely on the heels of a tragic incident where an Israeli couple were gunned down outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, DC. "The young man purchased a ring this week with the intention of proposing to his girlfriend next week in Jerusalem. They were a beautiful couple," lamented Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leite.
The fatal shooting took place around 9:08pm, as per police reports. The duo, a man and a woman, had just left an event at the Capital Jewish Museum when they were caught in gunfire as the assailant targeted a group of four, revealed Metropolitan Police Chief Pamela Smith during a press briefing.
Smith detailed the chilling events, saying: "We believe the shooting was committed by a single suspect who is now in custody. Prior to the shooting, the suspect was observed pacing back and forth outside of the museum," adding, "He approached a group of four people, produced a handgun and opened fire, striking both of our decedents. After the shooting, the suspect then entered the museum and was detained by event security once in handcuffs. The suspect identified where he discarded the weapon, and that weapon has been recovered."
Elias Rodriguez, the man arrested for the attack, faces two counts of first-degree murder, while footage circulating on social media reveals him exclaiming "Free, free Palestine" as he was being apprehended.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Newspaper's 'disgraceful' puff piece on Boulder attack suspect's daughter faces avalanche of criticism
USAToday was forced to heavily edit a story on the daughter of the Colorado terror suspect after thousands hammered the newspaper's glowing puff piece for excluding horrific details of the attack. The article, originally published Tuesday, did not specifically state that 45-year-old Egyptian national Mohamed Soliman allegedly threw Molotov cocktails at a group of pro-Israel demonstrators. The revised version added this detail to the body of the story and to the headline, with an editor's note saying the story had been updated to provide 'context and detail'. However, the main thrust of the piece was that Mohamed's 18-year-old daughter, Habiba Soliman, had dreams to attend medical school in the United States. 'Before the attack, Habiba Soliman had written about her hope of accomplishing great things,' the article says in both versions, adding that her 'favorite activity' was volunteering at a local hospital. The article further portrayed the despicable crime allegedly committed by her father as an unfortunate disruption to Habiba's aspirations to become a physician now that the entire family is set to be deported. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced on Tuesday that Mohamed's wife and five kids were in ICE custody and that federal investigators would determine 'to what extent his family knew about this heinous attack.' Hours later, the White House said the family 'could be deported by tonight.' The headline used to promote the USAToday article on X glossed over the brutal specifics of the attack, which left an 88-year-old Holocaust survivor with severe burns. 'Boulder suspect's daughter dreamed of studying medicine. Now she faces deportation,' the headline read in the post, which is still up on the social media site. This was also the headline used in the original version of the article, which USAToday said has been updated to include: 'Then, her father firebombed Jewish marchers in Boulder'. But before the update could be made, social media users had plenty of time to share their outrage at a major American newspaper showing what appeared to be sympathy for a suspected terrorist's daughter over the innocent victims of her father's alleged cruelty. Many were also frustrated that USAToday seemed to be sympathizing with Mohamed's family now that they face deportation, despite all of them being in the country illegally. 'I don't care what she dreamed of,' one X user commented underneath USAToday's post. 'If she's here illegally, AMERICANS dreamed that she gets deported.' 'Interesting editorial decision to allocate more words to the family of the terrorist than to the families of the victims,' another replied. Christina Hoff Sommers, an author and a well-known critic of modern feminism, said she was 'awaiting stories about how families of the burn victims are faring.' And Anna Kelly, the Deputy White House Press Secretary, simply commented, 'Are you so for real?' The opening four paragraphs of the revised article (pictured) added more context about the attack, not all of which were present in the original This excerpt of the revised piece adds this context about the motive behind the crime. None of this was broached in the original The main differences between the original and updated article from USAToday come in the very beginning. The original headline, which made no mention of the pro-Israel protestors who were attacked, was updated to the following: 'Habiba Soliman wanted to be a doctor. Then, her father firebombed Jewish marchers in Boulder.' The opening of the original and updated version also read differently, with the latter taking the whole second and third paragraphs to better explain the gruesome attack. 'Then her father, Mohamed Soliman, drove from Colorado Springs to Boulder on June 1, picked up 87-octane gas and flowers and made firebombs that he threw at a group of Jewish marchers on Pearl Street, investigators said,' read the second paragraph of the updated article. None of this context, at least in the specificity used above, was present in the original piece. The original piece also failed to mention the motive behind the attack, which took place at an outdoor mall where about 30 people were marching to raise awareness of the Israeli hostages still being held by Hamas. Mohamed, the suspect, allegedly branded this crowd a 'Zionist group' and said he wanted 'to kill all Zionist people,' according to investigators on the scene. After searching his car, police also found a red gas container, rags and documents with the words 'Israel,' 'Palestine,' and 'USAID' on them, according to an FBI affidavit. The original piece in USAToday did not mention any of this, even though all these details had already been widely publicized in the media. The revised piece added much of this context in the 12th paragraph, while also mentioning his alleged statement about wanting to stop Jews from taking over Palestine. Still, the revised piece largely retained the same angle, mostly focusing on Habiba Soliman's struggles when she moved to the US from Kuwait as a young teenager. The piece talks about how she joined a private charter school in Colorado Springs as a sophomore, detailing her difficulties learning English and making friends. It's meant to be a tragic tale, since Habiba won a college scholarship, became fluent in English and was on her way to medical school before her father messed it all up by getting them all deported. approached the USAToday newsroom for comment on the controversy. Mohamed has been charged with 16 counts of attempted first-degree murder, eight of which are 'with intent and deliberation,' the other eight of which are 'with extreme indifference.' Mohamed, who is being held on a $10 million bond, also faces federal hate crime charges. His first scheduled court appearance in Denver's federal court is on Friday.
Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
We still have time to avoid this looming dystopia
Rayner College, Oxford, June 2044 ' The characteristic blindness of the 20th century … concerns something about which there is untroubled agreement between Hitler and President Roosevelt or H G Wells and Karl Barth.' (CS Lewis, 1944) Those of us who came relatively unscathed through the Great Catastrophe of the early years of this decade can now – unlike so many of our countrymen – look back and ask ourselves what went so badly wrong. Some of it is obvious. Mass immigration transformed our major cities and gradually suffocated our public services. Our casual, unfunded, ill-thought-through defence commitments led to the destruction of most of our Armed Forces and kit in Ukraine a decade ago. Our failure to enforce the criminal law properly meant the fractious social environment of the 2020s degenerated into flight from the cities, no-go zones, and violence not seen since Northern Ireland in the 1970s. But these are symptoms. The real cause was our gradually accelerating economic decline and the social tensions that followed, turbo-driven by the psychological Bantustans created by the Equality Act. The middle classes in the private sector saw a future of struggle and genteel poverty, while public 'servants' behaved like pre-Revolutionary French aristocrats defending their privileges. The rich got out, and so did the young – if they could. The productive part of the economy was overwhelmed by the hangers-on. Conflict became inevitable when those with something to lose said to themselves 'we need a strong man: crack a few heads if you have to, I don't care anymore', and when those who didn't decided to try overthrowing the system as a whole. What went wrong? Why did we condemn ourselves to economic decline and worse? It's not that we lacked lessons. The Americans avoided it. The Argentines dug themselves out of it. The Eastern Europeans were doing well enough until the 2033-4 war. Of course we can see the answer clearly now. The economy didn't grow because we didn't want it to grow. On that, our leaders were united. If I had said, in the days when classical music was still a thing, that I wanted to be a concert pianist, but didn't learn to read music and didn't practice, eventually people would have concluded I might say it, but I didn't really want it. Similarly both Left and Right said they wanted growth. In practice they put other objectives first. Left and Right may have had different objectives, but they still had one big thing in common: they thought they knew best. No one would trust the market or trust the people. Our characteristic blindness, as C S Lewis put it, was to statism. And if the 20th century should have taught us anything, it was that statism led to economic decline and war. The big problem areas were obvious. In 2025 Britain was about three to four million houses short. A massive building programme was needed. The Left's solution was new towns and social housing. The Right wanted building in cities and mansion blocks. No one wanted the one thing that might have made a difference: scrap the 1947 Planning Act, protect national parks, and let the market work. That's why young London professionals now live two to a room in south east Esher – and why so many have left for South East Asia. Similarly, Left and Right blamed different things for the NHS's failure, but no one would let the market in to solve them. They had slightly varying views of the ideal tax burden, but both believed in regulating business. They had slightly different views about how quickly we should decarbonise but neither disputed the goal. That's why – until the government banned them – we all had a private generator in the 2030s. Both Left and Right wanted growth. Just not as much as other things: electoral success, political convenience, avoiding reality. To be charitable, maybe most of them didn't really understand what was needed. Certainly very few in the 2020s, let alone later, spoke of the power of the market, the prosperity created by free individuals, the new ideas that came from government getting out of the way. All the talk was of regulation and of social engineering. No one spoke of incentives and of profit. We can see now that this meant Britain couldn't benefit from the skills and enterprise of all its citizens, only from the dubious skills of its policymakers. AI, which might genuinely have helped every person change their life, in fact only reinforced our leaders' belief that ever more cleverly worked-out policy could solve our problems. That is, after all, why Baroness Rayner founded the college where I now sit, as she said at the time, 'to use my experience to inspire very ordinary people to believe they can run the country'. How strange it all seems now. If there is one silver lining to these past horrific few months, it is that we can now face reality. Like Adenauer's Germany in the 1950s, we don't have the luxury of deceiving ourselves. Scrap the controls, free up the markets, get people rebuilding: that has to be the way out of our problems. We have had no end of a lesson. And now we must turn it to use.
NBC News
14 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump says he will travel to China to meet with Xi
President Trump said he had a "very positive" call with his Chinese counterpart President Xi Jinping, regarding tariffs and said he plans to travel to China to meet with the leader. Trump made the announcement during his meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz who was visiting the White House for bilateral talks.
