Employees, families predict turmoil if Pierce County center for disabled adults closes
Dozens of people spoke out in Buckley on Tuesday night against two bills in the state Legislature that would close the Rainier School, a facility that serves people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
About 40 or 50 people went to the 'Save Rainier School' town hall at the Buckley Fire station, 611 South Division St. The Washington Federation of State Employees sponsored the event.
Many of the people who attended work for the Rainier School or have a family member who resides there.
'It affects the residents there, that's all they've known,' said Danielle Modrow, an employee at the Rainier School. 'They don't know anything else, and it's very sad the Senate is trying to do this – they're taking their home away.'
The two Democratic-backed bills – one in the state Senate and one in the state House – would shut down the Rainier School. The House bill, if passed, also would close the Yakima Valley School in Eastern Washington, but would maintain respite and crisis beds in the area. The bills both say the Rainier School would shut down on June 30, 2027 and would not be able to accept new residents in the meantime.
Both bills have been deemed Necessary to Implement the Budget, meaning they are not subject to the usual cutoff dates to pass out of committee. On March 24, both bills were implemented into the House and Senate budgets. The legislature must negotiate and adopt a budget before the session ends on April 27.
The Rainier School has served people with disabilities in Buckley since October 1939. It includes housing, medical care, occupational and speech therapies, employment, nutrition services, recreation facilities and more. The Washington State Department of Social and Health Services – the agency that runs the Rainier School – previously told The News Tribune that there are 81 residents and 460 full-time employees, with the state paying $52 million to run the facility each year.
Many of the people who attended the town hall were concerned about what would happen to residents if the facility shut down. Brittany Barber, a lead investigator at the Rainier School, said many clients would have to go to the state's two residential habilitation centers that would remain open – Fircrest School in Shoreline and Lakeland Village in Medical Lake, a town in Spokane County.
'I spoke to a gentleman earlier whose currently back at Rainier School. His parents live in Vancouver,' Barber said. 'If Rainier School closes and he moves to another RHC, they're having to drive from Vancouver to Spokane to be able to visit him, or all the way up to Fircrest, and there are no other settings close to their home that he can go to.'
DSHS previously told The News Tribune that if the Rainier School shuts down, employees would work with each person to find the best choice for them. Options include the Fircrest School and Lakeland Village or a community-based setting, such as an adult family home, a companion home, a group home or supported living.
Many attendees at the town hall said the Rainier School has resources for residents that many community-based organizations do not and that they are worried some residents will end up in jails, hospitals or on the streets. Cathy Frie, an attendee who worked at the Rainier School for 42 years before retiring, said she has seen many residents go to community-based settings and then have to go to the Rainier School for help they weren't receiving.
'I've seen so many clients come over here over-medicated or on the wrong medication because the community doctors are not specialized in the interactions of different drugs,' Frie said.
Marie Buss, another attendee, pointed out that a closure would affect potential future residents. Buss's niece is 11 years old and has intellectual and behavioral disabilities, as well as a condition that means she will someday have to use a wheelchair.
'I've always kind of had that thought that, if it came to the point where it was too difficult to care for her, she needed specialized assistance, there was always Rainier School that she could go to,' Buss said. 'That was an option for her and with that option going away, the fear comes out of, 'What's going to happen with my niece and where will she go?''
Courtney Brunell, the city administrator of Buckley, attended the meeting and told the crowd that the Rainier School is the largest employer in the town of 5,114. She said the city is measuring the economic impacts that could happen if the school closed. Employees also repeatedly said they were scared of losing their jobs.
Both bills order DSHS to offer employees 'opportunities to work in state-operated living alternatives and other state facilities and programs.'
Attendees also noted that, with community-based programs, it could be hard to determine if they are safe or if residents will be well-cared for.
'We're a community within a community,' Frie said. 'The clients still at the Rainier School? If they see me, they will come up to me and visit with me. You don't find communities like that very often.'
Stacy Dym, spokesperson for The Arc, a disability rights organization in Washington state, told The News Tribune in an interview that residential habilitation centers like the Rainier School are based on 'an extremely old model of care' and that smaller, community-based options provide better care.
Dym pointed out that Washington is the only state on the West Coast that has residential habilitation centers, and 18 states across the country – including Oregon and California – have closed such centers completely.
'We have a long history in Washington state of successfully transitioning people in their community,' Dym said. 'My sister lived in a state institution, and we went through the same kind of fears and trepidation – and [it still worked] because Washington state has a good planning process.'
She also mentioned that Washington state closed the Frances Haddon Morgan Center in December 2011 with successful results. A report from DSHS in May 2013 said the 52 people who had been living at Frances Haddon Morgan Center found new homes at other residential habilitation centers or in community-based residences. It also said those 52 people were 'remain[ing] stable in their new homes.'
The Senate and House bills say DSHS has until June 30, 2027 to come up with a plan for each resident.
'People are not going to be turned out in a day, they are not going to fill our jails and hospitals,' Dym said. 'There's not a good reason to fear that these individuals that have been left uncared for or that we don't have sufficient time to plan for these needs.'
Dym said that residents don't have to go to community-based facilities if they don't think it would be a good fit — there are still lots of capacity at one of the state's other residential habilitation centers.
She also said the Rainier School should shut down because it has a long history of abuse. The News Tribune reported in 2018 that a former supervisor was sentenced for sex crimes against residents. In 2020, a resident's family sued the state, alleging the Rainier School staff's neglect following her bunion surgery led to her death in 2017.
The News Tribune asked Dym if she thought moving residents to community-based facilities was the safer choice. She said abuse is always a possibility, but residents can experience better care in smaller settings.
'Abuse is something that we cannot guarantee won't happen anywhere ever, but it is something we can plan for,' Dym said. 'Large congregate care is more susceptible to a level of abuse because people are not treated individually. When you're all at the cafeteria at the same time, you're all going to the meeting together at the same time, your activities are based on what the larger group wants and not what you want or need, there is always that danger.'
Dym said community-based settings give residents more freedom and personalized care.
'In a community-based setting, they are quite happy – they get to do things like pick the color of their room, or have a pet for the first time, or see their family more frequently,' Dym said. 'We're really excited because we believe that it is the right thing to do – to move to Washington state into the future of care.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reports: Virginia Democrats outdoing Republicans in raising campaign contributions
Democratic House of Delegates hopeful Kimberly Pope Adams raised the second-highest amount in Virginia of contributions to House campaigns for the latest campaign reporting period, according to the nonpartisan Virginia Public Access Project. Pope Adams, who has already locked up the Democratic nomination in the 82nd House District, reported a total of $262,048 in money raised for the April 1-June 5 window, based on data from the Virginia Department of Elections that was compiled by VPAP. That trailed only House Speaker Don Scott of Portsmouth, who raised just over $344,000 for the period. Political watchers were keeping a close eye on this round of reports, the last before the crucial June 17 party primaries across Virginia. Like Pope Adams, Scott already has the Democratic nod sewn up. He also does not appear to have any GOP opposition this year. The only House primary next week in the Tri-City area is in District 75 where three Democrats are vying to oppose Republican incumbent Carrie Coyner. In that contest, Lindsey Dougherty continues to outdistance Dustin Wade and Stephen Miller-Pitts. For the reporting period, Dougherty raised $171,695, compared to $136,276 for Wade and $4,471 for Miller-Pitts. As of June 5, Wade showed more than $100,000 in cash on hand over Dougherty and five times more than Miller-Pitts. VPAP reported Dougherty raising the sixth-highest amount of contributions for the period, and Wade the 12th. Dougherty and Miller-Pitts ran against Coyner in the 2019 and 2023 elections, respectively. The 75th District covers all of Hopewell and portions of Chesterfield and Prince George counties. More: The primary menu for June 17: Heavy on the state races and a first time for Petersburg In the 82nd District [Petersburg, Surry County, portions of Dinwiddie and Prince George], Pope Adams continues to run away from GOP incumbent Kim Taylor in campaign contributions. For the latest reporting period, Pope Adams' total was more than four times that of Taylor, who listed receiving $64,489 in donations. Her cash-on-hand amount of $289,468 was eight times more than Taylor's $34,502. The race is a rerun of 2023's race, one of the top three most expensive contests in recent Virginia political history. Taylor squeaked out a victory over Pope Adams by only 53 votes following a recount, and Democrats are clocking the 2025 race as pivotal in holding their slim majority in the House for the next two years. Pope Adams' contributions included $25,000 from the Clean Virginia Fund on April 23, $7,500 from the Jane Fonda Climate PAC on May 14, and three $5,000 donations from Elizabeth Simons on May 29, The Next 50 PAC on April 30 and Fund Her PAC on April 29. Taylor's largest contributions for the period were $20,000 from the Dominion Energy PAC on May 8, $10,000 from the Wren Williams for Delegate campaign on April 24, and identical $7,500 amounts from Friends of Scott Wyatt on April 2 and Chris Runion for Delegate on June 5. The reports indicate Taylor getting three donations of $100 or less, and Pope Adams receiving 1,461. More: House GOP incumbent lauds endorsement from local Democratic group. Democrats cry 'foul' In the 75th District primary, Dougherty received two contributions totaling $80,000 from the super PAC Secure Progress and $35,000 from the campaign of Democratic Del. Dan Helmer. Wade's top donations were $5,000 from himself and two donations from Anita Thurston totaling $4,500. Miller-Pitts' sole contribution of over $100 for the period was $250 from Rhonda Clanton-Davis. Coyner, a Republican seeking her fourth term in the House, received $69,056 in contributions over the period. Her largest donations were $10,000 from Carolyn Williams, $7,500 from Strong Start PAC, and three of $5,000 each from Thomas McInerney, Vision Management Services, and Clean Virginia Fund. Records indicate her having $315,350 in cash on hand as of June 5. The district traditionally leans Republican. Coyner has won re-election with as much as 55% of the vote, but Democrats still target her as vulnerable. In Petersburg, history is being made with the first-ever Democratic primary for the constitutional officer Commissioner of the Revenue. Incumbent Brittani Flowers is being challenged by Mary 'Liz Stith' Howard for the right to be the Democrat on the November ballot. Five years ago, the Virginia General Assembly voted to allow any local-office candidate [except School Board] to seek official party backing. The law went into effect last year, as Petersburg Vice Mayor Darrin Hill received the Democratic nomination for his Ward 2 seat by acclimation. The commissioner primary is the first contested one in Petersburg. Campaign records show Flowers receiving just shy of $3,000 in contributions for the reporting period. Her largest donations were $500 from former state Senate candidate Waylin Ross and $300 from Bernard Flowers Jr. Howard did not record any contributions for the reporting period. Petersburg City Councilor Marlow Jones, who is running as an independent for Virginia's lieutenant governor, raised $700 in donations during the latest reporting period. Five hundred dollars came from three contributions of more than $100. The remaining $200 was split among five contributions of less than $100. To see the latest donation data for any race this year, click on the VPAP website. Bill Atkinson (he/him/his) is an award-winning journalist who covers breaking news, government and politics. Reach him at batkinson@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @BAtkinson_PI. This article originally appeared on The Progress-Index: Virginia primary 2025: Campaign finance reports show money pouring in
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House to vote on repealing DC local laws on noncitizen voting, policing, immigration enforcement
The Brief House Republicans are voting on three bills that would override D.C. laws on noncitizen voting rights, limiting police powers, and restricting immigration enforcement cooperation. One bill, HR 884, repeals D.C.'s 2022 law allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections. HR 2056 would dismantle D.C.'s sanctuary city protections by mandating cooperation with federal immigration authorities. WASHINGTON - The House of Representatives are voting Tuesday on three Republican-backed bills that would override several local D.C. laws. The bills would roll back D.C. efforts expand voting rights for non-citizens, restrict police and force the District to work with immigration enforcement efforts on a federal level. D.C. passed the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act in 2022, granting noncitizens in D.C. the right to vote in local elections. That includes mayoral races, D.C. Council positions, attorney general, ANC members, attorney general and D.C. ballot measures. Noncitizens can also run for elected office in the D.C. government. HR 884 would repeal the act, removing voting powers from noncitizens. Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton released a statement, pushing back at Congress' power of local D.C. matters. "Last Congress, Republicans introduced 14 bills or amendments to prohibit noncitizens from voting in D.C. or to repeal, nullify or prohibit the carrying out of D.C.'s law that permits noncitizens to vote," said Norton. "Yet, Republicans refuse to make the only election law change D.C. residents have asked Congress to make, which is the right to hold elections for voting members of the House and Senate." The Protecting Our Nation's Capital Emergency Act, would dismantle parts of D.C.'s Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022. HR 2096 would allow D.C. police officers to negotiate disciplinary matters through collective bargaining. It would also restore a statute of limitation for claims against the Metropolitan Police Department. "This bill was introduced three days after House Republicans passed a continuing resolution that cut D.C.'s local budget by one billion dollars. That act of fiscal sabotage, which did not save the federal government any money, has led to a freeze on overtime, hiring and pay raises, and furloughs or layoffs may be next," said Norton. "Nine weeks ago today, the Senate passed the D.C. Local Funds Act to reverse the cut. The D.C. Local Funds Act is just sitting in the House. Like President Trump and the National Fraternal Order of Police, I call on the House to pass immediately the D.C. Local Funds Act." READ MORE: Congress' spending bill error leaves DC scrambling to cut $400M from budget HR 2056 would strike down D.C. policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. It would prohibit DC officials from "sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchanging with any Federal, State, or local government entity information regarding the citizenship or immigration status (lawful or unlawful) of any individual." The bill would effectively dismantle D.C.'s sanctuary city policies. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser made moves to quietly overturn a law that prevents local police from cooperating with ICE, including it in a provision of her 2026 budget proposal. Big picture view The D.C. Home Rule Act of 1973 allows the city to elect its own mayor and council. It's also allowed for D.C. to choose Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners to handle community concerns. Congress still maintains control over D.C., including the ability to review all local legislation and appoint the city's judges. D.C. has no voting member in Congress, though it has a nonvoting Delegate. In February, legislators from Utah and Tennessee introduced a bill to strip D.C. of its ability to govern itself. The bill is named after D.C.'s Mayor Muriel Bowser – the "Bringing Oversight to Washington and Safety to Every Resident (BOWSER) Act." The bill would eliminate D.C. Home Rule Act of 1973 and would place D.C. under the full control of Congress. The Source This story includes information from the US House of Representatives, Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, and previous FOX 5 DC reporting.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thune not sure what authority Trump using to deploy Marines to Los Angeles
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) supports President Trump's deployment of federal resources to quell the riots in Los Angeles, but he's not sure what authorities Trump is relying on to deploy 700 active-duty Marines to a U.S. city. 'I don't know the particulars on what authorities exist there but my assumption is that the administration has been looking carefully at what he can and can't do under the law. Obviously, the 1798 Act is available to them if they choose to exercise it,' Thune said, citing the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which authorizes the president during a declared war, invasion or predatory incursion to detain and deport citizens of an enemy nation. Thune argued that a federal response was warranted because local authorities failed to contain property destruction and the threat of violence. 'In this case at least there were clear just failures on the part of state and local officials, which is why I think it required the president to take a federal response,' he told reporters. 'There was a security situation out there that needed to be addressed and I think ultimately the president's objective is to keep people safe.' The Pentagon on Monday ratcheted up the federal response to immigration enforcement protests by mobilizing 700 active-duty Marines. Trump has also deployed 4,000 National Guard soldiers to the area — doubling the 2,000 he initially mobilized. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) insist the situation was under control before the Trump administration escalated tensions by making a provocative show of force. Newsom accused Trump of 'intentionally causing chaos, terrorizing communities and endangering the principles of our great democracy.' He said Sunday that Trump had taken over the California National Guard because 'they want a spectacle.' Bass said over the weekend that deploying the National Guard was 'completely unnecessary' and would escalate tensions. She argued that the Los Angeles Police Department was 'well equipped' to handle protests of actions by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.