Russia warns Starmer's peacekeeping troops plan would amount to ‘direct war'
Russia has hit out at Sir Keir Starmer's plan for British troops to form part of a peacekeeping force in Ukraine, saying it would amount to direct involvement in the war.
The prime minister, along with Emmanuel Macron, has been seeking to build a 'coalition of the willing' to enforce any potential deal.
But Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said troops on its border would amount to the "direct, official and unveiled involvement of Nato members in the war against Russia,' adding: 'It can't be allowed.'
Britain has signed a deal with an Anglo-American security firm to provide Ukraine with more advanced attack drones – in contrast to Donald Trump's White House which has paused supplies of US military aid and intelligence-sharing.
'The fighting is going on and it's a big mistake to think that well all we've got to do is wait for a deal now,' the prime minister said. 'We've got to make sure that if they are fighting on they're in the strongest position and even if they go into negotiation that they're in the strongest position.'
It came as defence secretary John Healey was due to hold talks last night with US counterpart Pete Hegseth.
Britain's agreement with Anduril will see cutting-edge Altius 600m and Altius 700m systems - designed to monitor an area before striking targets that enter it - being supplied to Kyiv to help tackle Russian aggression in the Black Sea. The new contracts total nearly £30 million and are backed by the International Fund for Ukraine, the Ministry of Defence said.
It comes amid concerns that the US move to halt intelligence-sharing with Ukraine will affect the country's ability to use western weaponry and deprive it of advanced information about incoming threats.
In Brussels, European Union leaders met Mr Zelensky for talks about support for Ukraine and increased defence spending.
The Ukrainian president thanked European leaders for their support, saying: 'We are very thankful that we are not alone. These are not just words, we feel it.'
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen has put forward proposals for a £670 billion defence package for the European Union as it grapples with the prospect of Mr Trump reducing security assistance for Europe.
She said it was a 'watershed moment,' adding: 'Europe faces a clear and present danger and therefore Europe has to be able to protect itself, to defend itself as we have to put Ukraine in a position to protect itself and to push for a lasting and just peace.'
Moscow said French president Macron's offer of peacekeeping troops was 'extremely confrontational'.
"Unlike their predecessors, who also wanted to fight against Russia, Napoleon, Hitler … Mr Macron does not act very gracefully, because at least they said it bluntly: 'we must conquer Russia, we must defeat Russia'.'
Former president Dmitry Medvedev mocked him on social media, calling him 'Micron' and saying 'poses no big threat.'
'He'll disappear forever no later than May 14, 2027. And he won't be missed,' Medvedev wrote.
Trump aide Steve Witkoff said peace talks on the framework of a peace agreement are planned next week in Saudi Arabia.
And Trump's special envoy to Ukraine and Russia, Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, said the suspension of military help to Zelensky is already having an impact. adding that the Ukrainians 'brought it on themselves.'
'The best way I can describe it is sort of like hitting a mule with a two-by-four across the nose,' Kellogg said at an event at the Council on Foreign Relations. 'You got their attention.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
41 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Israel attacks Iran's nuclear and missile sites, prompting drone retaliation
The assault on Tehran raises the potential for an all-out war between the two bitter Middle East adversaries and appears to be the most significant attack Iran has faced since its war with Iraq in the 1980s. The strikes came amid simmering tensions over Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme and appeared certain to trigger a reprisal, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warning that 'severe punishment' would be directed at Israel. Hours later, Israel's military said it had begun intercepting Iranian drones launched in retaliation. An Israeli official said the interceptions were taking place outside of Israeli territory, but did not elaborate. Iraq said more than 100 Iranian drones had crossed its airspace, and a short time later neighbouring Jordan said its air force and defence systems had intercepted several missiles and drones that had entered its airspace for fear they would fall in its territory. Israel's attack on Iran hit several sites, including the country's main nuclear enrichment facility, where black smoke could be seen rising into the air. Later in the morning, Israel said it had also destroyed dozens of radar installations and surface-to-air missile launchers in western Iran. The leader of Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, Gen Hossein Salami, was confirmed dead, Iranian state television reported. This is a significant blow to Tehran's governing theocracy and an immediate escalation of its long-simmering conflict with Israel. The chief of staff of Iranian armed forces, Gen Mohammad Bagheri, was also confirmed dead by Iranian state television. Other top military officials and scientists were believed to have been killed. In Washington, the Trump administration, which had cautioned Israel against an attack during continued negotiations over Iran's nuclear enrichment programme, said that it had not been involved and warned against any retaliation targeting US interests or personnel. Still, it seemed likely the US suspected an attack could be in the offing, with Washington on Wednesday pulling some American diplomats from Iraq's capital and offering voluntary evacuations for the families of US troops in the wider Middle East. Israeli leaders cast the pre-emptive assault as a fight for the nation's survival that was necessary to head off an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs, though it remains unclear how close the country is to achieving that or whether Iran had actually been planning a strike soon. 'It could be a year. It could be within a few months,' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, as he vowed to pursue the attack for as long as necessary to 'remove this threat'. 'This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival,' he added.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Israel attacks Iran's nuclear and missile sites, prompting drone retaliation
The assault on Tehran raises the potential for an all-out war between the two bitter Middle East adversaries and appears to be the most significant attack Iran has faced since its war with Iraq in the 1980s. The strikes came amid simmering tensions over Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme and appeared certain to trigger a reprisal, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warning that 'severe punishment' would be directed at Israel. Hours later, Israel's military said it had begun intercepting Iranian drones launched in retaliation. An Israeli official said the interceptions were taking place outside of Israeli territory, but did not elaborate. Iraq said more than 100 Iranian drones had crossed its airspace, and a short time later neighbouring Jordan said its air force and defence systems had intercepted several missiles and drones that had entered its airspace for fear they would fall in its territory. Israel's attack on Iran hit several sites, including the country's main nuclear enrichment facility, where black smoke could be seen rising into the air. Later in the morning, Israel said it had also destroyed dozens of radar installations and surface-to-air missile launchers in western Iran. The leader of Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, Gen Hossein Salami, was confirmed dead, Iranian state television reported. This is a significant blow to Tehran's governing theocracy and an immediate escalation of its long-simmering conflict with Israel. The chief of staff of Iranian armed forces, Gen Mohammad Bagheri, was also confirmed dead by Iranian state television. Other top military officials and scientists were believed to have been killed. In Washington, the Trump administration, which had cautioned Israel against an attack during continued negotiations over Iran's nuclear enrichment programme, said that it had not been involved and warned against any retaliation targeting US interests or personnel. Still, it seemed likely the US suspected an attack could be in the offing, with Washington on Wednesday pulling some American diplomats from Iraq's capital and offering voluntary evacuations for the families of US troops in the wider Middle East. Israeli leaders cast the pre-emptive assault as a fight for the nation's survival that was necessary to head off an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs, though it remains unclear how close the country is to achieving that or whether Iran had actually been planning a strike soon. 'It could be a year. It could be within a few months,' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, as he vowed to pursue the attack for as long as necessary to 'remove this threat'. 'This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival,' he added.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Claimants set to lose disability benefits 'will get payments for an extra three months' as Keir Starmer desperately tries to quell Labour revolt
Claimants losing disability benefits could keep them for an extra three months as Keir Starmer scrambles to defuse a Labour revolt. The transitional arrangements for proposed curbs to handouts look set to be extended from four weeks. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said she is planning changes to the package of welfare curbs to 'protect those most in need'. But the government is desperate to avoid substantive concessions that could stop the measures trimming £5billion off the expected benefits bill by the end of the decade. The proposals include tightening of the eligibility criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit in England, and cutting the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). Dozens of Labour MPs last month urged the PM to press pause, warning the current plans are 'impossible to support'. But Chancellor Rachel Reeves insisted yesterday that the government was 'not going to be changing' the package before crunch votes. 'Even with these changes we will substantially be increasing the amount of money we are paying in sickness and disability benefits during the course of this parliament,' she said. There have been hints that the government will move on easing the two-child benefit cap, another flashpoint with Labour backbenchers. Ms Kendall told the Guardian there will be extra protections added to the Bill when it is published next week. The transitional period when people would continue getting Pip could be lengthened from four weeks to three months. She said: 'When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. 'I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. 'That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. 'These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable.' Labour MP Rachel Maskell told Playbook: 'These changes will not stop people getting ill and needing support, but will cause sick people to deteriorate and lose their independence. 'I will have to vote against something which will cause such harm to my constituents — too many lives will be put at risk if they press ahead.' A Government impact assessment published alongside the reforms warned some 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, across England, Scotland and Wales, could fall into relative poverty after housing costs as a result of the changes.
