MAGA turns n-word-shouting woman into folk hero - and blames Texas stabbing case for outpouring of support
A Minnesota woman who called a five-year-old Black child the 'n-word,' and then repeated that racial slur multiple times in a viral video while defending her actions, has raised over $700,000 as she has become a cultural folk-hero to much of the American far-right.
The crowdfunding campaign for Shiloh Hendrix, which she initially posted after she shot to infamy over her confrontation with a Somali-American man in a playground, has taken off after the online right viewed it as a form of backlash over the funds raised in support of Karmelo Anthony.
Anthony, a Black high school student, has been charged with first-degree murder over the stabbing death of white teenager Austin Metcalf at a track meet in Texas. The case has drawn attention in conservative circles, especially after Anthony's legal defense raised over $500,000 on the crowdfunding app GiveSendGo.
Besides using the Hendrix incident as a way to exhibit their own form of 'vice signaling' over the Anthony case, a large portion of the MAGA crowd has also seen their support of her as part of their fight against 'anti-white racism' and the 'cancel culture' mob.
'I'm glad she raised half a million dollars. I hope she raises half a million more,' Daily Wire podcaster Matt Walsh tweeted this week, sharing a video that featured a 20-minute monologue on why he backs Hendrix.
MAGA provocateur Matt Walsh is calling for Shiloh Hendrix to receive another half-million dollars from her crowdfunding campaign. (Gage Skidmore/X)
In the video, which was filmed by 30-year-old Sharmake Omar in a Minnesota public park, Hendrix admits that she called a young Somali boy the 'n-word' because 'he took my son's stuff.' She then goes on to repeat the slur multiple times before seemingly justifying her actions during the filmed confrontation with Omar.
'If that's what he's going to act like,' Hendrix says when asked by Omar why she used the 'n-word' to describe the child. Omar told NBC News that the child is on the autism spectrum and that the parents, whom he knows, have expressed support in filing charges against Hendrix, and a local chapter of the NAACP has raised more than $300,000 for the family since the video went viral. Local police, meanwhile, have said they completed an investigation of the incident.
'I called the kid out for what he was,' Hendrix wrote in her fundraising plea, adding that she's been doxxed. 'I am asking for your help to assist in protecting my family. I fear that we must relocate.'
'Like other viral-video incidents, a lot of the facts aren't clear. The man who shot the video claimed the child Hendrix allegedly accosted is autistic. Some of Hendrix's supporters, meanwhile, have suggested the child is actually quite older, comparing the child's height with the height of some playground equipment,' The Bulwark's Will Sommer wrote. 'They argue that the child is roughly 10, which apparently would be a far more defensible age to call the boy a racial slur.'
Media critic Parker Molloy argued in her The Present Age newsletter that the right-wing wagon-circling around Hendrix was 'the most grotesque example I've seen recently of what some people call 'vice signaling' — the conservative movement's twisted mirror image of virtue signaling, where people donate money specifically to show support for reprehensible behavior.'
'We saw similar dynamics with Kyle Rittenhouse, Daniel Penny and others who've become right-wing causes célèbre,' she added. 'The playbook is simple: do or say something awful, get rightfully called out for it, claim victimhood, and watch the money roll in from people who want to show their support for what you did while pretending it's about 'free speech' or 'fighting cancel culture.''
A number of prominent far-right personalities have voiced their support for Shiloh Hendrix, claiming that backing her fundraising campaign sends a message to those worried about 'anti-white racism.' (X)
Some of the most notorious voices on the right, such as white supremacist and Donald Trump dinner guest Nick Fuentes, have explicitly invoked the Anthony fundraiser while voicing their support for Hendrix. 'Black people just raised $500,000 for a cold-blooded killer who stabbed a white teenager to death,' he posted. 'So I don't want to hear ONE WORD about the Shiloh Hendrix fundraiser. Either everybody gets to be tribal or nobody does.'
MAGA podcaster Tim Pool said that while calling children racial slurs is 'crass and crude,' the support for Hendrix shows 'white guilt' is over. 'She's making money,' he added. 'This sends a message to other white people: Stop taking racial abuse.'
While other social media provocateurs sounded off and said they backed Hendrix 'on principle' to fight 'gay race communism,' Walsh – the creative voice and star behind the hit right-wing documentary Am I Racist? – provided Hendrix's campaign a massive boost while delivering his audience a justification for supporting her.
'The latest race-baiting story followed the cancel culture script right up until the twist ending. Shiloh Hendrix didn't apologize,' Walsh wrote on Facebook, celebrating the amount of money she raised.
'Yes, Shiloh said something offensive. No one's excusing it. But she didn't deserve to be treated like a domestic terrorist,' he continued. 'And that's what her supporters understood. That's why they gave. Because they weren't just donating to a person — they were drawing a line in the sand. They saw the pitchforks coming out again and decided it was time to start swinging back.'
In his podcast episode about Hendrix and the positive reaction she's received from the right, Walsh repeatedly said this was all about destroying the 'cancel culture' mob once and for all. Yet, while repeatedly downplaying the racial slur she used, Walsh himself wouldn't actually bring himself to say the word out loud – and tried to explain his reasoning.
'If Black people want white people to not say the word, then they need to not say it. If you say it, then everyone else can say it. Point blank, it's that simple. That's how life works. Deal with it,' he exclaimed.
'It's just a word. It's a vulgar word,' Walsh added. 'It's a rude word. It's a word that Black people shouldn't say for the same reason they shouldn't use any other vulgarity. I'm using n-word right now instead of using the actual word, for the same reason I would use f-word or c-word instead of those actual words.'
Still, the rise of Hendrix as a MAGA folk hero has made some conservative pundits a bit uneasy. Former college swimmer turned anti-trans activist Riley Gaines, for instance, asked if the massive fundraising haul was a joke before noting that the right didn't 'need a white Karmelo Anthony.' She also wondered 'what's the goal in rewarding' Hendrix.
Others, such as The Babylon Bee's Seth Dillon, expressed concern about the motivations behind many of those amplifying Walsh's support for Hendrix. 'For them, it's not about the end of cancel culture, but the success of tribal whiteness that this case represents and which they're pretending Matt has endorsed,' Dillon noted.
Much of the support for Shiloh Hendrix has revolved around conservative 'vice signaling' over the legal defense funds raised by Texas stabbing suspect Karmelo Anthony, a Black teenager who has been charged with murdering a white 17-year-old at a track meet. (Frisco Police Department)
GiveSendGo, a so-called 'Christian' platform that has become the 'go-to page for Trumpist rage,' finally decided to step in after both the Anthony and Hendrix donation pages received a flood of offensive posts in recent days.
'At GiveSendGo, we recently disabled comments on the fundraising campaigns for Karmelo Anthony and Shiloh Hendrix due to the unacceptable volume of racist and derogatory remarks,' the platform's co-founder Jacob Wells tweeted on Friday. 'At the time comments were turned off, both campaigns had raised approximately $500,000 with around 15,000 donors each.'
Stating that the comments posted don't represent 'values of hope, compassion, and fairness,' he said that the company would allow both campaigns to collect funds and ensure they are delivered to the recipients.
'We took action to stop the spread of divisive rhetoric while ensuring the campaigns continue to serve their intended purpose,' he concluded. 'We call for respectful dialogue and understanding, even in challenging situations.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
6 minutes ago
- New York Times
China Walks a Line in U.S. Trade Talks, Trying Not to Overplay Its Hand
In its high-stakes trade talks with the United States, China has been trying to strike a balance in how it wields its market clout. It controls the world's supply of rare earth metals and magnets. And it has withheld supplies of the materials — crucial ingredients in everything from cars to fighter jets — as leverage. At the same time, Beijing knows it must not overplay its hand by pushing Washington so hard that the United States feels compelled to make the long-term investments needed to break its dependence on China. This delicate dynamic was underlined in an apparent compromise the countries reached on Tuesday in London. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said China's negotiators had agreed to resume sending rare earths to American companies. The Chinese government did not confirm this. But on Wednesday afternoon, the JL Mag Rare-Earth Company, a leading magnet producer in Ganzhou, China, said in a public disclosure that it had been issued licenses by China's Ministry of Commerce for sales of nonmilitary magnet exports to the United States, Europe and Southeast Asia. China has a long history of using government policy to control markets, periodically flooding countries with very low-priced Chinese supplies. That has driven many of China's overseas rare earth competitors out of business. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Scofflaw Strongman
DONALD TRUMP SAYS HIS LATEST VENTURE into dictatorship—deploying the National Guard and Marines against American citizens, over the opposition of state and local officials—is about safeguarding the rule of law. 'If we see danger to our country and to our citizens, we'll be very, very strong in terms of law and order,' Trump told reporters on Sunday, as protests escalated in Los Angeles against his deportations. 'It's about law and order.' Don't believe it. Trump is using the Guard and the military to enforce his will, not the law. The evidence of his insincerity is what he did four years ago: When rioters were on his side, he didn't call in the Guard. He embraced the criminals, pardoned them, and purged the law enforcement officials who prosecuted them. He's a despot and a scofflaw. In the Los Angeles uprising, Trump—like every authoritarian before him—claims to be saving his country from chaos. 'Violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents,' he declared on Sunday afternoon. 'These lawless riots only strengthen our resolve.' A few hours later, he called for 'bringing in the troops . . . RIGHT NOW!!! Don't let these thugs get away with this.' And on Monday afternoon, he ridiculed any suggestion that the protesters were peaceful. 'Just one look at the pictures and videos of the Violence and Destruction,' he wrote, 'tells you all you have to know.' Insurrectionist mobs. Lawless riots. Videos of violence. We've heard such alarming descriptions before. And on January 6, 2021, we saw how little Trump cared about them. Share AT 1:21 P.M. THAT DAY, AS TRUMP returned to the White House after instructing his supporters to march on the Capitol, he was told twice by a member of his staff, 'They're rioting down at the Capitol.' The exact moment of this encounter was captured in a photograph. Trump replied, 'All right, let's go see.' He went to his dining room and watched on TV as the riot proceeded. For the next hour, TV networks aired videos of the violence and destruction. Like this week's videos from Los Angeles, they told the president all he needed to know. But Trump did nothing. Toward the end of that hour—somewhere between 2:13 and 2:24 pm, according to the final report of the House January 6th Committee—Trump's chief of staff, Mark Meadows, informed White House Counsel Pat Cipollone that Trump 'doesn't want to do anything' about the ongoing assault. A few minutes later, Cipollone was heard to tell Meadows, 'They're literally calling for the Vice President to be F'ing hung.' And Meadows was heard to reply, 'You heard him, Pat. He thinks Mike [Pence] deserves it. He doesn't think they're doing anything wrong.' Meanwhile, in a phone call, House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy warned Trump that the rioters 'literally just came through my office windows, and my staff are running for cover. I mean, they're running for their lives. You need to call them [the assailants] off.' Trump responded by rebuking McCarthy: 'Well, Kevin, I guess they're just more upset about the election theft than you are.' These conversations took place as Fox News, which Trump was watching, reported that police had been injured and that rioters inside the Capitol were 'feet from the House chamber.' On the screen, according to the House committee report, Fox 'was showing video of the chaos and attack, with tear gas filling the air in the Capitol Rotunda.' Throughout the afternoon, Trump's aides, family, and friends implored him to tell the rioters to go home. He refused. Not until 4:17 p.m., nearly three hours after being informed about the riot, did he comply. Join now TRUMP NOW CLAIMS that he told the rioters to be peaceful and that he offered ten thousand National Guard troops to protect the Capitol. The first claim is misleading. The second is a lie. The House report shows that before and during the assault, Trump resisted entreaties to call for peace. On January 6th, a text message to one of his top aides, Hope Hicks, said Trump 'should tweet something about Being NON-violent.' Hicks wrote back: 'I suggested it several times Monday and Tuesday and he refused.' At one point in his incendiary speech that morning, Trump did ask his followers to march to the Capitol 'peacefully.' But that phrase, according to the House report, was 'scripted for him by his White House speechwriters.' The main theme of the speech was to 'fight like hell.' Another Trump aide, Sarah Matthews, told the committee that once the riot was underway, Trump resisted pleas to call for peace. He did use the term 'peaceful' in a tweet at 2:38 p.m., but only grudgingly. Trump's press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, told Matthews that Trump 'did not want to include any sort of mention of peace in that tweet.' Trump's other January 6th story, about the National Guard, is also a sham. His acting defense secretary, his Army secretary, and his chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff all testified that he never ordered the Guard to deploy that day. He never even spoke to these officials. Instead, during the riot, he used his phone to press members of Congress to do what the mob wanted: overturn the election. It's true that before the attack, Trump talked about the possibility of needing guardsmen. But it was never about protecting the Capitol. It was, in Meadows's words, to 'protect pro Trump people' from anti-Trump protesters. In short, everything Trump decries in Los Angeles happened on January 6th, and more. A violent, insurrectionist mob swarmed and attacked police. And instead of bringing in the Guard 'RIGHT NOW,' Trump watched the assault, encouraged the mob, and waited to see whether it would keep him in power. In fact, when he returned to office this year, Trump pardoned nearly everyone who had pleaded guilty to or had been convicted of assaulting police on January 6th. He said the insurrectionists were right: 'They were protesting a crooked election.' He purged the prosecutors who had handled those cases. And in a speech at the Department of Justice, he boasted that he had 'removed the senior FBI officials' who, in his words, had persecuted the 'J6 hostages.' Share NOW, AS HE DEPLOYS THE MILITARY against protesters in an American city, Trump invokes 'law and order' as a bogus excuse. And he vows to go further. On Monday, he announced a policy of escalation against protesters. 'If they spit, we will hit,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'This is a statement from the President of the United States. . . . The Insurrectionists have a tendency to spit in the face of the National Guardsmen/women, and others. . . . IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before.' On Tuesday, speaking to troops at Fort Bragg, Trump said he was seizing control of the National Guard and ending the tradition of consulting governors. 'We will use every asset at our disposal to quell the violence and restore law and order right away,' he declared. 'We're not going to wait . . . for a governor that's never going to call.' And in remarks in the Oval Office, Trump said his policy of escalating state violence would apply to anyone who protests the military parade on June 14, his birthday. 'If there's any protester [who] wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' he warned. 'For those people that want to protest. . . . They will be met with very heavy force.' This is not a man defending the rule of law. This is a man continuing the project he began in his first term and tried to complete on January 6th: replacing the rule of law with himself. Share The Bulwark
Axios
16 minutes ago
- Axios
Behind the Curtain: A decades-in-the-making immigration war
President Trump undoubtedly stands on strong political ground, backed by most Americans, in cases where he's deporting convicted criminals. Now comes a new test, literally 40 years in the making: How comfortable are Americans with deporting millions of immigrants who paid taxes, built families and committed no crimes after coming here illegally? Why it matters: That's the heart of the standoff in LA, as well as the broader Trump effort to expel potentially millions of immigrants who broke the law to get here and then played by U.S. rules. "I said it from Day 1: If you're in the country illegally, you're not off the table," Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, told the N.Y. Times. "So, we're opening that aperture up." The backstory: Congress, going back to 1986, has sought and failed to find a pathway to citizenship for those who fit the precise description above. Many current GOP senators were among those seeking said solution. But concerns about border security and rewarding illegal behavior killed every effort. Now, Trump, Republicans, some Democrats and much of the U.S. public are supportive of mass deportation instead. An estimated 14 million unauthorized immigrants live here — many of them working and paying taxes. They often fill jobs other Americans won't do — hotels, construction sites, landscaping and child care. Expelling them would sink some businesses, slow services in many communities, and hit close to home for lots of U.S. citizens. Will public enthusiasm wane when this reality becomes clear? Trump and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller are pushing to hit a target of 3,000 immigration arrests a day, as first reported by Axios' Brittany Gibson and Stef Kight. That's triple the number of daily arrests that agents were making in the early days of Trump's term, Axios found. The only way to pull that off is by casting wider nets beyond convicted criminals to larger worksites. So raids could rise sharply at factories, restaurants and Home Depots, where people living here illegally often gather to seek day labor on job sites. "Wait till you find out how many trillions we have to spend on illegal aliens," Miller wrote Tuesday in reply to a tweet by California Gov. Gavin Newsom about a Pentagon estimate that the National Guard deployment in LA will cost $134 million and last 60 days. The big picture: Accelerated deportations are a top personal priority for Trump, who relishes visibility for the raids. Amid the unrest in LA on Monday, Miller posted on X: "You can have all the other plans and budgets you want. If you don't fix migration, then nothing else can be fixed — or saved." White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told us: "If you are present in the United States illegally, you will be deported. This is the promise President Trump made to the American people and the Administration is committed to keeping it." A CBS News/YouGov poll taken last week showed 54% approval of the Trump administration's program to deport immigrants illegally in the U.S. White House communications director Steven Cheung tweeted that finding and added: "And the approval number will be even higher after the national guard was sent to LA to beat back the violence this weekend." And MAGA media is egging the president on. Charlie Kirk, one of the most influential pro-Trump podcasters, tweeted Tuesday: "President Trump is getting more popular. Deportations are popular. We need more. ... America is demanding mass deportations." Asked for comment for this column, the Department of Homeland Security pointed us to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's " CBP Home" app, which lets aliens notify the government of their intent to leave the country. "Tap 'Departing Traveler' to begin," the instructions say. "We are offering those in this country $1,000 and a free flight to leave the country and preserve the potential to return the right, legal way," DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin told us. Under current law, those taking that option will be barred from coming back for either three or 10 years, or permanently, depending on how long they've been in the U.S. illegally. How it works: It's important to understand how people pay taxes even though they're here illegally: In 1996, the U.S. government created an alternative to the Social Security number for undocumented immigrants — the individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN). This allows people to pay taxes while being here illegally and awaiting a path to citizenship. Those people have been paying taxes, believing it would enhance their chances of getting citizenship. A portion of those taxes helps fund Social Security. Under that law, if they eventually get citizenship, those taxes will count toward their retirement. The amounts are substantial. Undocumented immigrants paid $96.7 billion in federal, state and local taxes in 2022, according to a tally by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. More than a third of what they pay funds programs they can't even access. Now, those ITIN numbers could be used to track people down. Deportation fears triggered a decline in tax filings this year in some immigrant communities in the D.C. suburbs, the Washington Post found. That sets the stage for a humanitarian showdown unlike any witnessed in U.S. history: Trump is willing to use the U.S. military inside America to protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents during roundups. The bottom line: There's no clear mechanism to differentiate between someone who came here recently alone versus a father of three, whose wife and children are living here legally, and have been here paying taxes and committing no crimes for a decade. In the eyes of the current law, illegal is illegal. When TV explodes with images of burning cars and lawlessness, Trump wins. But what about families torn apart or longtime neighbors yanked from their homes and taken away in handcuffs? That's when America's rawest views of immigration will be revealed.
