logo
There's Now a Third Way to Inherit Traits That Isn't Your DNA or RNA, Scientists Say

There's Now a Third Way to Inherit Traits That Isn't Your DNA or RNA, Scientists Say

Yahoo07-04-2025

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
Most people know that inherited traits between generations is a genetic process, but a new study says other inheritable mechanisms may exist.
Scientists at the University of Toronto studying the hermaphroditic worm Caenorhabditis elegans found that amyloid-like structures—proteins often associated with diseases like Alzheimer's—can have inheritable traits.
This pathway, or others like it, could explain why some inheritable traits between generations can't be explained exclusively via DNA and RNA.
Containing some 3.2 billion base pairs, the human genome is far from a simple set of genetic instructions, but the process of inherited traits from parent to child is often described as a straightforward one. The genes of one parent combine with the genes of another, which forms the genetic traits of their offspring. While DNA and RNA are the primary pathways through which traits are inherited, a new study from the University of Toronto suggests its not the only pathway—and they came across this groundbreaking discovery by complete accident.
Brent Derry's lab at the University of Toronto led by Matthew Eroglu—now a postdoctoral research scientist at Columbia University—first began studying cancer signaling pathways using the hermaphroditic worm Caenorhabditis elegans. Surprisingly, over the course of the study the researchers noticed that the worms—which could be both male and female—became increasingly less fertile and more feminine over subsequent generations until eventually reaching complete sterilization. Intrigued by this epigenetic trait—changes that affect genes without altering the DNA sequence itself—Eroglu and his team kept digging and discovered the culprit: amyloids. The results were published in the journal Nature Cell Biology.
"There are a lot of traits and disorders that we know are passed on from parents to offspring if we look at family trees and so on,' Eroglu said in a press statement, 'but when people have done genome-wide association studies trying to link these traits to mutations or variants in genes, they frequently fall short of explaining all of the heritability that we see.'
One of the reasons could be epigenetic impacts such as these amyloids. Amyloids are extracellular proteins that, when built up in the body, can cause neurological diseases like Alzheimer's (though the amyloids in this study aren't exactly the same). When examining the increasingly feminizing worms, the authors noted that they contained 'autofluorescent green dots,' as the website El País describes. They called these dots 'herasomes,' and inside them were amyloid-like structures that are known to have the DNA-like ability to replicate themselves, making them possible inheritance vectors.
The researchers then performed a variety of tests, subjecting some worms to heat-induced stress while deactivating certain genes to test their hypothesis. These experiments only confirmed that amyloid structures in the herasomes are the cause behind this hyper-feminine (and eventual sterilization) phenomenon. Of course hermaphroditic worms are one thing, and humans traits are another, so future studies will need to investigate if similar pathways are possible in humans (though the authors suggest they don't see why they wouldn't).
'There's this alternate inheritance mechanism on top of DNA,' Eroglu said in a press statement. 'Could we discover something that, in fact, doesn't change sex but changes some other traits? Or predict diseases that we couldn't base on DNA alone?'
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Does coffee boost longevity? 47,000 women were studied for 30 years to find out
Does coffee boost longevity? 47,000 women were studied for 30 years to find out

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Does coffee boost longevity? 47,000 women were studied for 30 years to find out

Drinking moderate amounts of coffee in midlife may boost healthy aging decades later, according to a study presented this week at the annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition. The findings add to the existing body of research showing there may be health and longevity benefits to consuming coffee. Most of these studies are observational and do not directly show that consuming coffee necessarily causes better health, just that people who drink coffee often tend to be healthier — as measured by such metrics as lower cardiovascular mortality, lower risk of some cancers and lower risk of Type 2 diabetes. The analysis, which followed more than 47,000 women over about 30 years, found that those who drank coffee during midlife, ages 45 to 60, were more likely to exhibit healthy aging later in life. On average, they consumed 315 milligrams of caffeine a day, the equivalent to about three small cups of coffee. The researchers defined healthy aging as being at least 70 years old and free from 11 major chronic diseases — including heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, cancer and Parkinson's disease — with no major mental health or cognitive impairment or memory problems. The study followed female nurses starting in 1984 and asked them to fill out questionnaires about their consumption of coffee, tea and soda. By 2016, about 3,700 women were considered part of the healthy aging group. Within that group, each extra cup of coffee a day was linked to a 2% to 5% higher chance of doing well later in life, up to five small cups a day. The same link between coffee consumption and better health in later life was not found among women who drank tea, soda or decaffeinated coffee. 'While past studies have linked coffee to individual health outcomes, our study is the first to assess coffee's impact across multiple domains of aging over three decades,' Sara Mahdavi, an adjunct professor of nutritional sciences at the University of Toronto who led the study, said in a statement. 'The findings suggest that caffeinated coffee — not tea or decaf — may uniquely support aging trajectories that preserve both mental and physical function.' The study did not examine why caffeinated coffee and not other caffeinated beverages was linked to healthy aging. But previous research suggests that coffee contains antioxidants like polyphenols, which may help the body lower inflammation, reduce oxidative stress on cells and fight diseases. The analysis accounted for other factors that influence healthy aging including body weight, smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, education level and protein in the diet. 'The takeaway is not that people should start drinking coffee for the sake of longevity, nor that more is better,' Mahdavi said. 'What we found is that moderate caffeinated coffee consumption — approximately 1 to 3 cups per day — was associated with a modestly higher likelihood of healthy aging over time.'

‘Superorganisms' were just seen in the wild for the first time ever
‘Superorganisms' were just seen in the wild for the first time ever

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Superorganisms' were just seen in the wild for the first time ever

If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. For years, scientists have watched nematodes build massive superorganisms in the form of writhing towers. But, they've only seen it happen in the lab. Now, though, researchers write that they've observed these massive, disturbing towers writhing in the wild for the first time ever. Previously, researchers believed that the behavior was meant to be an attempt to escape from the rest of the group. However, new images of the writhing towers appear to suggest they're actually used cooperatively, to benefit many worms instead of just one. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 The researchers reported their findings in a report published in Current Biology, writing that these towering superorganisms only existed naturally in their imaginations for the longest of times. Observing the towers also taught researchers quite a bit about how different species of nematode work together. While watching the towers, the scientists note that while many different species crawled through the worm towers, only one species, a tough larval stage known as a dauer, actually participated in building up the writing masses. This specificity in the construction of the tower points to something more than just random cooperation. These towers are truly superorganisms, then, and not just piles of writing worm bodies. This discovery also got researchers thinking: could other worms form writhing towers like this, too? To test that hypothesis, they stuck a toothbrush bristle into a food-free agar plate, then unleashed a bunch of roundworms from the species Caenorhabditis elegans into the structure. Immediately, the worms began to work together and build up a tower. Within two hours, the researchers say the C. elegans had formed a tower using the bristle as its spine. The researchers watched as some worms along the superorganism writhed and acted as exploratory arms. Others acted as bridges between gaps. To see how the superorganism would respond, the researchers tapped the top of the tower with a glass pick. Almost immediately, the worms began to wriggle and move toward the area. This, they say, shows that these towers are always growing and moving toward stimulus. It's an intriguing show of cooperation between the worms, and just one more way that worms continue to astound scientists. It also raises more questions about why these superorganisms form in the first place. Even more interesting, though, is that the roundworms didn't appear to hold any kind of class system in place. Where the nematodes only relied on the larval stage worms to create the tower, all the roundworms chimed in to help build up the mass. Researchers will need to dig deeper to see exactly why worms form these writhing superorganisms. Hopefully other species, like the parasitic hairworm, aren't capable of this same kind of behavior. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the

Apple Watch 圈圈真的準?美國有研究指 Apple Watch 部份運動數據追蹤表現準度不足
Apple Watch 圈圈真的準?美國有研究指 Apple Watch 部份運動數據追蹤表現準度不足

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Apple Watch 圈圈真的準?美國有研究指 Apple Watch 部份運動數據追蹤表現準度不足

Yahoo購物節,6月2至13日正式舉行!集合全球精選著數的網上大型購物節:波鞋低至36折、手袋低至4折、自助餐半價、旅遊產品買一送一等,更有獨家優惠為您而設,把握限時兩星期優惠,1Click買盡全世界! 早前消委會就發表智能手錶評測報告,強調智能手錶、手環的運動數據都是估算,只適宜作參考之用。其實智能手錶在追蹤不同數據時準度的確存在著誤差。最近美國就有研究指 Apple Watch 於運動時記錄燃燒了多少卡路里的數據,準度並不是想像中的高。 美國密西西比大學的研究人員做了一個關於 Apple Watch 的研究,分析了 56 數據得出一個整合分析,並以 Apple Watch 每一項的表現都與標準的醫療級工具進行了比較。結果顯示 Apple Watch 於測量心率及步數方面極大部份情況下是準確的。研究人員指,測心率與步數的平均絕對百分比誤差(即衡量準確度的標準指標)分別為 4.43% 與 8.17%,然而估算燃燒了卡路里數據表現就達 27.96%。對於一般大眾買到的穿戴式裝置而言,低於 10% 的誤差值表現已被視為「十分優秀」,但研究團隊測試 Apple Watch 在走路、跑步、混合強度訓練和踩單車等多種活動中計算用戶燃燒了多少卡路里的數據時,卻發現其估算值大幅超出可接受範圍。 不過研究人員同時指出,這個數據本身就相當難以估算,因為涉及許多變數如體重及運動方式等等。因此,不要把每個數字都當作 100% 準確,而是可當成其中一種鼓勵的工具,達至恆常運動、保持追蹤習慣並維持動力。團隊還指出,目前 Apple Watch 的準確度已提高了不少,顯示蘋果在硬體及演算法方面都在逐步改進,而指出弱點可幫助開發者獲得更真實的回應建議,協助他們進一步研究,以製出更好的感應器或演算法,提升智能手錶追蹤健康數據的表現。 更多內容: 9to5mac 消委會試智能手錶運動偵測,Garmin 最貴最高分,一款千元級高評分!Apple、Samsung、華為各有高低 智能手錶推薦 2025 | Apple、三星、Garmin 如何選?三鐵、跑山、單車各有不同,睇清楚點揀! 緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠,追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台! 🎉📱 Tech Facebook: 🎉📱 Tech Instagram: 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群: 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道: 🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store