Federal government apologizes for 'profound harm' of Dundas Harbour relocations in Nunavut
The federal government has offered a long-awaited apology to Inuit families affected by the Dundas Harbour relocations in Nunavut nearly a century ago.
Gary Anandasangaree, the federal minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs, delivered the official apology at a ceremony in Arctic Bay, Nunavut, on Thursday afternoon.
"We recognize and acknowledge the profound harm done to your families, your communities and your way of life, for taking you from your homes and families, for the hardships you endured and the displacement and ruptures of kinships," Anandasangaree said before a crowd gathered in the local community centre.
"We offer our sincerest apology. We are sorry. We are sorry. Mamianaq."
Among those gathered to hear the apology were descendants of some of the relocatees who have advocated for years for an official apology and recognition of the impact the forced moves had on their families and communities.
The Dundas Harbour relocations were early examples of government-directed moves of Inuit.
In 1934, according to the Qikiqtani Truth Commission, a ship carried 52 Inuit and 109 dogs from several Baffin Island communities — Kinngait, Pangnirtung and Pond Inlet — to Dundas Harbour, an abandoned RCMP post on Devon Island. A Hudson Bay Company clerk also went to operate a trading post there.
A 2013 report from the Qikiqtani Truth Commission says the government's motives for the relocation were "complex."
"Reopening Dundas Harbour made a sovereignty statement at little or no expense to Canada, and also brought Inuit to an unpopulated area from more southerly locations that were considered to be overhunted," the report reads.
The move proved to be disastrous for the relocatees, as they faced harsh weather conditions and limited resources in the area that was unfamiliar to them. After two years, the Dundas Harbour trading post was abandoned, and some Inuit were taken back to Pangnirtung.
Others would be moved again, several more times over the following years — to Arctic Bay, Fort Ross and Spence Bay — despite having been promised that they would be returned to their home communities.
Anandasangaree acknowledged that the relocations, while considered "voluntary" at the time, were not in fact voluntary at all. He said the federal government "took advantage of its dominant position over Inuit living in the Arctic and moved them to further its geopolitical goals without due regard to the desires of the relocatees."
"We understand better than ever that the power imbalance between the colonial government and its officials meant that participation in the relocation was not voluntary, and Inuit were not provided with accurate information to make informed decisions for themselves."
Lucy Qavavauq, a descendant who's with the Dundas Harbour Relocation Society which had been advocating for the official apology, said it was "something that has been coming a very long time."
Qavavauq said that while she welcomed the official apology, she wishes it "would have happened sooner."
"It would have been great, ideal, for the elders that actually experienced it to be able to witness that apology," she said.
In a statement on Thursday, Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok called the apology "an important step towards healing and reconciliation."
"I want to encourage all Canadians to remember the sacrifices made by Inuit in the name of Arctic sovereignty. Teaching our children the truths about our country's past is an important step towards true healing and reconciliation for our country," the statement reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
5 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
To fight wildfires and heat waves, Manitoba needs a climate plan
Opinion Facing a record-breaking heat wave in early May, Manitoba has had a devastating start to its unofficial fifth season — fire season — as wildfires continue to ravage communities and smoke blankets much of the province. Climate change is no longer a distant problem for future generations — it is here now. To tackle the crisis, Manitoba needs more than just new water bombers. We urgently need a strong provincial climate action and adaptation plan. Manitoba has already seen over 105 fires this season and smashed numerous temperature records, leading the province to declare a state of emergency. Tens of thousands of people have been evacuated, dozens of homes have been destroyed, and tragically, two lives have been lost. Buckland Fire and Rescue / The Canadian Press / HO-Facebook A Buckland Fire and Rescue tanker truck is shown on a highway after being deployed to La Ronge, Sask., on June 2. Evacuation and emergency response supports for northern communities have struggled to keep pace, with 2,000 residents of Pukatawagan left stranded for days as heavy smoke prevented air evacuations. Tragically, this hot, dry, and smoky spring and summer weather is becoming increasingly the norm. Winnipeg is expected to experience 52 days above 30 C each summer beyond 2050. Extreme heat and wildfires are public health emergencies. They cause increased illness and death from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, injury, and heat-related illness. They contribute to rising anxiety and mental health difficulties for young people — all of which further stresses health care. Climate change poses an escalating financial crisis, with health and other climate damages in Manitoba slated to reach up to $2,235 per person annually by 2050. The climate crisis is an existential threat to Indigenous land-based knowledges and lifeways, and an ecological breaking point. These devastating impacts will continue to intensify if we keep putting off tackling the root of the problem: our reliance on fossil fuels. Failing to reduce our emissions is adding fuel to the fire. While the Government of Manitoba must meet the current moment of emergency response to ensure communities' safety, it also needs a strong and clear plan to swiftly transition off fossil fuels and proactively adapt to the impacts that are already locked in. The previous government's 2017 Manitoba Climate and Green Plan is outdated and inadequate, as it is not aligned with international targets through the Paris Agreement and lacks details such as short-term and long-term goals, specific timelines, and costing. It is not clear if this plan is being implemented because the last progress report was four years ago. Meanwhile, aside from Alberta, Manitoba is the only province with higher greenhouse gas emissions in 2023 than 2005. In 2019, the Manitoba NDP committed to reducing emissions 45 per cent by 2030 and pledged to develop a strong, science-based climate plan with solutions for every sector. However, after a year and a half in office, there is no sign of this plan. Meanwhile, the provincial government is proposing to expand fossil fuel infrastructure and is backpedalling on its clean electricity commitments. A strong provincial climate plan should have two main areas of focus. First, it should chart the equitable pathway for how Manitobans will move around, heat our homes, and feed our families — all without relying on oil and gas by 2050, and to meet their 2030 target. Though Manitoba's emissions are a relatively small contribution globally, Canadian's per-capita emissions are among the highest in the world and come with a responsibility to cut emissions and develop solutions that can be replicated elsewhere. Second, it must plan for the impacts of a changing climate, such as wildfires, extreme storms, and health emergencies like the ones we are currently experiencing. It should do these things in partnership with Indigenous communities, building a new economy rooted in equitable and reciprocal relationships. Some school divisions are taking it upon themselves to model a course, including Seven Oaks, Louis Riel, and Winnipeg School Division, that have begun to establish their own climate plans and are boldly advancing climate change education. However, a clear provincial plan for utilities, transportation, businesses, health and education is needed to make sound decisions aligned with a climate-safe future. In the absence of a plan, Manitoba Hydro's current long-term energy planning, for example, is relying on technologies that aren't commercially viable. A provincial plan will also need to reckon with the small, but not insignificant, oil industry in southwestern Manitoba. As international politics have recently demonstrated, Canada needs a robust, energy-independent economy. Given the province is forecasting a deficit of 23,600 trades people over the next five years, Manitoba should focus on training, education and job growth related to fossil fuel transition. Tuesdays A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world. With the U.S. abandoning its energy transition, Canada has an opportunity to attract low-carbon industries and bolster domestic production to create good green jobs. Manitoba, at the centre of the country, is well positioned to encourage federal action and investment in a clean energy future, increased east-west connections, and push back against new pipeline proposals. It is not too late to act. Instead of continuing to expand our reliance on dirty fuels, Manitoba can work together and be a world-class example of climate change preparation, adaptation and prevention. The vast majority of the public is in support of climate action and policy, and are looking for strong leadership. While first responders continue to fight the wildfires, the rest of us can fan the flames of the political will needed to prevent them. Scott Durling is with Educators for Climate Action Manitoba, Laura Cameron is with Manitoba's Climate Action Team), and Chris Morrow is with Manitoba Public Health Association.
Canada Standard
11 hours ago
- Canada Standard
"Carney had no options": Foreign affairs expert KP Fabian on Canada's invitation to PM Modi for G7 Summit
New Delhi [India], June 8 (ANI): Foreign affairs expert KP Fabian on Sunday shared his insights on Canada's decision to invite Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 Summit. Speaking with ANI, he said, 'Carney had no options. The others said, Listen, India must be there. It's a vital link in the supply chain and any talk of Indo-Pacific stability.' Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney, the host of this year's summit, reportedly faced significant pressure from other G7 members after initially hesitating to invite Prime Minister Modi. This reluctance was largely due to domestic political backlash within Carney's own Liberal Party, triggered by a diplomatic row linked to the killing of a Khalistani separatist in British Columbia in June 2023. He added, 'Now, of course, one should expect big demonstrations by the World Sikh Federation and others, but then it is for the government of Canada to deal with it.' Fabian remarked that India, as the world's fourth-largest and fastest-growing economy, must be included in G7 discussions given its strategic importance in global trade and Indo-Pacific stability. Fabian pointed out that India has participated in the G7 Summit in the past, including five times during former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh's tenure. He added that Canada's hesitation ultimately yielded to pressure from the G7 nations, who recognised India's critical role. He further said, 'Carney is walking a tightrope when it comes to Canadian values. At a press conference, he was asked whether he believes the Indian government was involved in the killing of Nijjar. He refused to answer, citing the ongoing RCMP investigation. That's quite ironic. When did this happen, and why is the RCMP taking so long to conclude the investigation? And if you recall, why did Justin Trudeau accuse India before the investigation was even complete? Canadian political leaders have shown a lot of inconsistency. In the end, Mark Carney did the right thing, though it took some time -- and that's that.' The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) is investigating the incident, but no conclusions have been drawn yet. Despite these political challenges, Carney reaffirmed Canada's commitment to the G7 summit's agenda. On Friday (local time), he said that G7 countries will discuss important issues, including security and energy, emphasising that India's presence at this intergovernmental political and economic forum is essential. Carney emphasised that India, being the fifth-largest economy and the most populous country in the world, must be at the table. 'Let's put the two aspects in context -- first is, we are in the role -- Canada's in the role of the G7 chair and in those discussions as agreed with our G7 colleagues, include important discussions on energy, security, on digital future, critical minerals amongst others and partnerships actually in building infrastructure in the emerging and developing world,' he said. Prime Minister Modi received a call from his Canadian counterpart, who extended India's invitation to attend the G7 Summit. 'Glad to receive a call from Prime Minister @MarkJCarney of Canada. Congratulated him on his recent election victory and thanked him for the invitation to the G7 Summit in Kananaskis later this month. As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the Summit,' PM Modi wrote in his post. The G7 Summit (Group of Seven) is an informal grouping of seven of the world's advanced economies and the European Union. Its members meet annually at the G7 Summit to discuss global economic and geopolitical issues, according to the G7's official website. The members of the G7 are France, the US, Germany, Japan, Italy, Canada, and the UK. (ANI)
Cision Canada
15 hours ago
- Cision Canada
Prime Minister Carney convenes the Incident Response Group Français
OTTAWA, ON, June 8, 2025 /CNW/ - Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, convened the Incident Response Group with ministers and senior officials to address the ongoing 2025 wildfire situation affecting many parts of the country. The group was briefed on efforts to respond to the fires and support evacuations. This includes the mobilization of Canadian Armed Forces personnel to assist with the evacuation of Sandy Lake First Nation in Ontario. The Prime Minister emphasized the close contact between various arms of the federal government, premiers, and the Canadian Armed Forces. All orders of government remain engaged, including with Indigenous leadership. Prime Minister Carney and the group thanked all first responders and officials on the ground, and reiterated that the federal government stands ready to mobilize additional support wherever needed and in all aspects.
