
Kemi: SNP are stoking the politics of envy… Scots deserve better
Kemi Badenoch has insisted Scots 'deserve better' than the SNP as she launched a blistering attack on its failings in government – and claimed Nigel Farage is a threat to the Union.
The Conservative leader said Scotland is in decline under a Nationalist government focused on stoking division, with education, justice and the NHS going backwards while millions of pounds of taxpayers' cash is wasted on 'independence propaganda' and the ferries fiasco.
She said the SNP needs to be defeated in next year's Holyrood elections because 'the Scottish people deserve better', and are 'paying for more and getting less'.
She also claimed that Nigel Farage is a threat to the Union because he does not care about more SNP rule.
In her first address to the Scottish Conservative conference as leader, she said: 'We have seen Scotland decline under the rule of Left-wing parties that stoke division and the politics of envy.'
She said education standards have fallen to record lows on the SNP's watch, while police numbers have plunged and the NHS recovery is ' lagging behind England' – with 100 times as many patients in Scotland's hospitals waiting more than 104 weeks for treatment than south of the Border.
She said the SNP was still 'obsessed' with breaking up Britain and has been 'wasting millions on independence propaganda'.
And she accused the Nationalists of wasting money on 'failed ferry projects', hate crime laws which threaten free speech and 'putting male rapists in women's prisons'.
She said: 'This year we saw the SNP suffer yet another loss in
the Supreme Court, because instead of sorting out Scotland they were trying to redefine what a woman is.
'This is not a party focused on what people in Scotland need, so we need to bring about their electoral defeat. Because the Scottish people deserve better.'
She insisted that 'the answer to these problems does not involve any more devolution'.
Hitting back at Reform, which finished ahead of the Tories in third place in last week's Hamilton by-election, she said: 'The Union is just not that important to them. In April this year, Nigel Farage said he would be fine with the SNP winning another five years in power.
'He's fine with another five years of higher bills, longer waiting lists, declining school standards, gender madness, and ultimately, independence.
'Reform will vote to let the SNP in, Conservatives will only ever vote to get the Nationalists out.' Her comments about Reform refer to Mr Farage saying in a recent interview that he is 'not that worried about the SNP' and that the party is 'going to have
a resurgence'.
Asked by journalists after her speech in Edinburgh if Mr Farage is an 'active threat to the Union', Ms Badenoch said: 'If he wants the SNP to have another five years, that is a threat to the Union, so yes.'
On the Barnett Formula – the funding mechanism which delivered an extra £9.1billion over three years to Scotland in this week's spending review – she said it was not the problem, 'it is the SNP that is the problem'.
She said: 'It doesn't matter how you change it, they're still going to mess things up.
'What we need to do is get the SNP out of running Scotland, and then all sorts of things will start to improve.'
In her speech, Ms Badenoch condemned the income tax gap between Scotland and the rest of the UK, and said: 'The SNP's failure to grow Scotland's economy has cost public services more than £1billion in this year alone. And that's before Labour's jobs tax kills growth.
'Scottish people are paying for more and getting less.'
She said she will demand that the windfall tax on oil and gas is ended, saying: 'I didn't agree with imposing the levy in government ... But it is a good example of what I think we got wrong.'
Introducing Ms Badenoch yesterday, Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay said: 'We are under new management: two new leaders with a shared vision to renew our party and champion our common sense Conservative values.
'We are both realistic about the challenges we face, but we are also optimistic that our party can earn back public trust.
'Our country needs a strong Conservative and Unionist Party that can win again across the United Kingdom. We need it because of the damage that our rivals are doing to our country.
'The SNP are weaker for Scotland. Look at the mess they have made of our beloved country.'
Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie said of Ms Badenoch: 'The suggestion that she is the only one who can address the concerns of Scots is like an arsonist claiming they are best placed to put out the fire.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rachel Reeves to announce £8BILLION over ten years to fix crumbling flood defences
is set to announce nearly £8 billion for flood defences in a ten-year infrastructure pledge. Hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses will see better protections over the next decade, ministers have said. It will be part of £725 billion in capital spending on the country's infrastructure, about half of which is new promised money. The Chancellor will unveil the plan this week alongside Keir Starmer and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner in a bid to offer certainty for businesses. It will cover transport, housing and public services. About half of the £725 billion was allocated in last week's Spending Review, and the new part is a 'commitment' for the following five years – funded through borrowing. The flooding money will be used to build new defences and repair existing ones, as well as planting more trees to absorb water. It will be targeted at regions badly impacted by floods, including Yorkshire and the Midlands. Environment Secretary Steve Reed said Labour 'inherited crumbling flood defences', adding: 'This Government is taking urgent action with the largest flooding programme in our country's history.' Ms Reeves said a lack of investment in infrastructure has been ' holding back communities and stunting economic growth', adding: 'We are investing in Britain's future, brick by brick, road by road and track by track.' The Centre for Policy Studies said public spending had rocketed since pre-Covid levels to the equivalent of £24,095 per adult. Health spending will reach £4,056 per adult by 2028-29 – a 22 per cent real-terms rise since before the pandemic. A spokesman described the levels of state spending as 'not sustainable'.


Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Return to the 1970s as Angela Rayner's law could see walkouts triggered by just 10% of workforce
was last night accused of delivering a 'strikers' charter' with new laws which would allow industrial action to be triggered with the support of just 10 per cent of the workforce. Business leaders and political opponents say the Employment Rights Bill, currently being debated in the Lords, should be dubbed the 'Unemployment Bill' because of the burden it will place on already struggling companies. Last week, economic growth figures showed that the UK economy shrank by 0.3 per cent in April, worse than the 0.1 per cent decline predicted. In spite of this – as well as firms warning they are being pushed to breaking point by the Chancellor's £25 billion National Insurance raid – Deputy Prime Minister Ms Rayner is pressing ahead with plans to give staff enhanced employment rights. Central to the plans will be the repeal of Tory trade union laws which will reduce the threshold for strike action and make union funding of the Labour Party automatic – with an 'opt-in' provision – rather than optional. It is likely to see a return to the industrial unrest of the 1970s when strikes could be triggered by a small number of activists. Labour's own analysis says the Bill will cost businesses £4.5 billion a year, l ead to the loss of 50,000 jobs and increase prices in the shops. Union chiefs will also be given a legal right to enter any workplace to recruit and organise, while the 40 per cent vote threshold for union recognition could be slashed to just 2 per cent of staff. The laws pave the way for ministers to decree only one in 50 workers in a bargaining unit negotiating with employers would need to support a union in order for a formal process to start. When combined with the expected abolition of the 50 per cent turnout rule for a strike ballot, the Tories say action could be triggered by as few as one in ten workers. It means that, for example, in an office of 1,000 people, just nine employees could vote – and only five votes in favour – for a strike to be called. The Bill also includes an end to zero hours contracts; the right to unfair dismissal from the first day; strengthened collective redundancy rights; enhanced sick pay; stronger tipping rights; more family-friendly rights, and extra parental and bereavement leave rights. Shadow Business Secretary Andrew Griffith said: 'This Bill should be renamed the 'Unemployment Bill', because that is exactly what it will do. 'Unions will grind the country to a halt, causing havoc with strikes supported by just 10 per cent of the workforce. This is nothing but an extreme union charter that Rayner hopes will take us back to the 1970s. Once again, Labour are putting party first country second – and the grubby quid pro quo at the heart of the deal proves it.' Jonny Haseldine, head of business environment at the British Chambers of Commerce said the legislation 'does not strike the right balance' and provisions in the Bill would be 'deeply worrying for employers'. Mr Haseldine said: 'There's a high risk of consequences that could limit employment opportunities and economic growth. 'The Government needs to help businesses innovate and be more productive. By adding more restrictions the Bill jeopardises all of this – creating a lose-lose scenario for everyone.' He added: 'Planned changes to dismissal rules and trade union ballot thresholds, for example, are some of the critical areas that need to be revisited.' A government spokesman said: 'The old strike laws clearly didn't work, with the UK losing more days to industrial action than any year since the 1980s. Our Employment Rights Bill is fundamental to delivering our Plan for Change.'


Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Prioritise British workers if you want government contracts, Labour tells companies
Labour will tell companies that they must prioritise British workers if they want to win contracts to build roads, hospitals and power plants. Downing Street is to rewrite the bidding rules for public projects so that firms are required to demonstrate how they will create jobs in the UK. The move is designed to ensure that taxpayers feel more of the benefits from Rachel Reeves's £725 billion spending spree on infrastructure. The Chancellor said the sum would be spent over the next 10 years to fix 'crumbling' roads and public buildings and to deliver more houses. Pat McFadden, the Cabinet Office minister, told The Telegraph: 'Whether it's building roads, railways or schools, we want to open up opportunities on major infrastructure projects for firms that boost British jobs and skills. 'The new rules will deliver on our Plan for Change by rewarding companies that put money in working people's pockets as we invest in the country's future.' Public bodies will have to give greater weight to bids that prioritise British workers by either creating more jobs or boosting skills and education. That could include creating more apprenticeships and industry placements, or by opening up roles for young people leaving foster care and prison. Ministers will introduce a requirement for public bodies to monitor companies and make sure that they are following through on the promises they made. Whitehall departments, councils and quangos have to apply rules around economic, social and environmental benefits when awarding contracts. Those rules will now be rewritten to prioritise British jobs, with the changes expected to be introduced following a consultation with businesses. Downing Street hopes the reforms will mean that communities, in particular across the north of England, feel greater benefits from infrastructure spending. Ms Reeves is set to spend over £100 billion on projects in former industrial areas after rewriting Treasury rules to divert investment away from London. The splurge is the latest sign of No 10's jitters over Reform which, fuelled by a surge in support across the Red Wall, has taken a lead in the polls. Nigel Farage's party has attempted to outflank Labour to the left on jobs by committing to the reindustrialisation of former manufacturing heartlands. It has pledged to reopen coal mines and steelworks and to bring utilities such as electricity and water at least 50 per cent back into public ownership. Ms Reeves is pinning her hopes on infrastructure spending to turn around the UK's ailing economy and cancel out the damage from her budget tax rises. She said: 'For too long, our infrastructure – our schools and hospitals, or our roads and bridges – have been left to crumble, holding back communities and stunting economic growth. 'This was a dereliction of duty by previous governments overseeing an era of managed decline, but it ends with this one. 'We are investing in Britain's future, brick by brick, road by road and track by track. The strategy will rebuild people's pride in their homes, while growing the economy, and putting more money in people's pockets.' Earlier this year, the Chancellor rewrote her fiscal rules to change how national debt is calculated and free up £50 billion for long-term investment projects. It means that over the next decade at least £725 billion will be spent on major projects such as new nuclear power plants, hospitals and roads. Ms Reeves will this week unveil Labour's long-awaited infrastructure strategy, which will set out how ministers plan to achieve value for money. It includes setting up a National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority to help ensure projects are delivered on time and on budget. But the spending spree will fuel further concerns about spiralling national debt and the prospect of more damaging tax rises coming in autumn. The Tories warned that Labour is set to spend almost £80 billion more on interest payments by the end of the decade than had previously been planned. Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, said the figures showed that Ms Reeves has a 'debt addiction', which is causing her to throw 'money down the drain'. He said: 'Rachel Reeves hasn't turned on the spending taps, she's recklessly opened the spending floodgates. 'This is unsustainable, dishonest and deeply irresponsible. Hard-working families will be left to pay the price.'