logo
The view from Delhi: New world order emerging from ruins of the old

The view from Delhi: New world order emerging from ruins of the old

The National20-03-2025

Policymakers, industry leaders and think tanks from around the world convened in India this week for the Raisina Dialogue 2025, engaging in discussions to navigate a rapidly evolving world. At a time when old power structures are increasingly being challenged, a key question frequently came up: What will the new and emerging world order look like, and who will shape it? The consensus was clear – the old order is fading, and a new one is taking shape, one that is more fragmented, competitive and formed by forces beyond the traditional centres of power, in a shift that requires abandoning old assumptions and embracing a more adaptive, inclusive approach. 'We do need an international order just like we need a domestic order,' said Dr S Jaishankar, India's Minister of External Affairs. 'And it's not just big countries that will benefit from this new order. I would argue that any country willing to take risks … will actually use this order to its advantage.' With the inward-focused US pursuing unilateral strategies, Europe faces a pivotal moment in redefining its global role. The shifting security landscape and uncertainty surrounding Washington's long-term commitments have compelled European nations to invest more in defence, military capabilities, technology and infrastructure to strengthen their influence. European officials stressed that while the continent remains resilient, greater efforts are needed to bolster security and defence, reinforcing that Ukraine's stability was central to European security. 'There will be no compromises on Ukraine's territory and sovereignty. There will be no revisions to our military capabilities. No third country has the right to block our participation in any union or bloc. We will never recognise any territories occupied by Russia,' said Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha. Meanwhile, the view from Washington is one of commitment to a pragmatic and realistic foreign policy, said US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, emphasising the need for stable alliances. Yet there was a sense that US unilateralism has fuelled frustration among allies. As these discussions unfolded, Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to temporarily halt attacks on Ukrainian energy centres but refused to support a full 30-day ceasefire, which US President Donald Trump had hoped would be the first step towards a lasting peace deal. Ukraine accused Russia of effectively rejecting the ceasefire proposal, and both countries blamed each other on Wednesday for launching air strikes that caused fires and damaged infrastructure. From Europe to the Middle East, the conflicts shaping the new world order seem more interconnected than ever, a point illustrated during the Raisina Dialogue, held under the theme People, Peace and Planet. A narrative emerged of a shifting balance of power. While Iran, an ally of Russia, remains a major regional actor, analysts suggested it had been significantly weakened following the October 7, 2023 attacks. Meanwhile, Israel is emerging as the dominant force, frequently altering the rules of engagement and crossing previously defined red lines. One notable statement came from Anwar Gargash, diplomatic adviser to President Sheikh Mohamed, who emphasised that the UAE and other Arab states should prioritise finding common ground with Iran rather than focusing on disagreements. While Mr Trump has reinstated his 'maximum pressure' policy on Iran, India continues to maintain cordial relations with both Israel and Tehran, carefully balancing its interests. 'India has not been and continues to be a non-interventionist part,' said Manish Tewari, Indian member of parliament. 'We would be more than happy to be catalysts, but we have historically not been mediators or facilitators. 'The world survives in hope, and we do hope that there is peace and stability in the Middle East. I think the important thing to remember is that except for the military-industrial complexes, there's nobody else who benefits from wars. They are the ones who make the money out of the killing machines,' added Mr Tewari. With peace remaining an aspiration, traditional assumptions about diplomacy, deterrence and regional stability are being upended. The pathways towards peace now demand complex compromises and strategic recalibrations. What became evident from the dialogue discussions is that the world order is no longer dictated by a single superpower or a singular ideology. Instead, power is diffused across several poles, forcing states to navigate a competitive international system. Whether this transition leads to stability or deepens geopolitical divides remains uncertain. One thing is clear – the age of unchallenged western dominance is over, and a new, multipolar world is taking shape.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russian attacks on Ukraine's Kharkiv kills four, wounds at least 60
Russian attacks on Ukraine's Kharkiv kills four, wounds at least 60

Dubai Eye

time21 minutes ago

  • Dubai Eye

Russian attacks on Ukraine's Kharkiv kills four, wounds at least 60

Russia attacked the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv at night and in the evening with drones, missiles and guided bombs, killing at least four people and injuring more than 60, including a baby, local officials said on Saturday. One of Ukraine's largest cities, Kharkiv is located just a few dozen kilometres from the Russian border and has been under constant Russian shelling during more than three years of war. "Kharkiv is currently experiencing the most powerful attack since the start of the full-scale war," city mayor, Ihor Terekhov, said on the Telegram messenger early on Saturday. Dozens of explosions were heard in the city through the night and Russian troops were striking simultaneously with missiles, drones and guided aerial bombs, he said. Multi-storey and private residential buildings, educational and infrastructure facilities were attacked, Terekhov noted. Photos by local authorities and Reuters showed burnt and partially destroyed houses and vehicles, and of rescuers carrying those injured to safety and removing debris. Kharkiv governor Oleh Syniehubov said that one of the city's civilian industrial facilities was attacked by 40 drones, one missile and four bombs, causing a fire, adding there may still be people under the rubble. In the evening, Russian aircraft once again attacked Kharkiv with guided bombs, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy called "another brutal murder". "It was a brutal blow to the city in broad daylight, and in fact, they have been attacking our city of Kharkiv for the entire day," Zelenskiy said in his evening statement. "Last night, there was a massive drone strike on Kharkiv, and now there are aerial bombs. Dozens of people have been injured in the past 24 hours." he said. The Ukrainian military said Russia launched 206 drones, two ballistic and seven other missiles against Ukraine overnight. It said its air defence units shot down 87 drones while another 80 drones were lost - in reference to the Ukrainian military using electronic warfare to redirect them - or they were drone simulators that did not carry warheads. Ten locations were hit, the military said.

Russian attacks on Ukraine's Kharkiv kills four, wounds at least 60
Russian attacks on Ukraine's Kharkiv kills four, wounds at least 60

ARN News Center

time2 hours ago

  • ARN News Center

Russian attacks on Ukraine's Kharkiv kills four, wounds at least 60

Russia attacked the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv at night and in the evening with drones, missiles and guided bombs, killing at least four people and injuring more than 60, including a baby, local officials said on Saturday. One of Ukraine's largest cities, Kharkiv is located just a few dozen kilometres from the Russian border and has been under constant Russian shelling during more than three years of war. "Kharkiv is currently experiencing the most powerful attack since the start of the full-scale war," city mayor, Ihor Terekhov, said on the Telegram messenger early on Saturday. Dozens of explosions were heard in the city through the night and Russian troops were striking simultaneously with missiles, drones and guided aerial bombs, he said. Multi-storey and private residential buildings, educational and infrastructure facilities were attacked, Terekhov noted. Photos by local authorities and Reuters showed burnt and partially destroyed houses and vehicles, and of rescuers carrying those injured to safety and removing debris. Kharkiv governor Oleh Syniehubov said that one of the city's civilian industrial facilities was attacked by 40 drones, one missile and four bombs, causing a fire, adding there may still be people under the rubble. In the evening, Russian aircraft once again attacked Kharkiv with guided bombs, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy called "another brutal murder". "It was a brutal blow to the city in broad daylight, and in fact, they have been attacking our city of Kharkiv for the entire day," Zelenskiy said in his evening statement. "Last night, there was a massive drone strike on Kharkiv, and now there are aerial bombs. Dozens of people have been injured in the past 24 hours." he said. The Ukrainian military said Russia launched 206 drones, two ballistic and seven other missiles against Ukraine overnight. It said its air defence units shot down 87 drones while another 80 drones were lost - in reference to the Ukrainian military using electronic warfare to redirect them - or they were drone simulators that did not carry warheads. Ten locations were hit, the military said.

Vance silence on Musk may be Game of Thrones tactic ever
Vance silence on Musk may be Game of Thrones tactic ever

Gulf Today

time9 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

Vance silence on Musk may be Game of Thrones tactic ever

Richard Hall, The Independent The kingdom is in turmoil, the great Houses of Musk and Trump at war, and their subjects forced to choose sides. But as the scheming Littlefinger in Game of Thrones famously said as he plotted to take the King's place: 'chaos is a ladder.' And so it is for JD Vance, the ostensibly loyal vice president, and perhaps the person who stands to benefit the most from the chaos unleashed by the feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump — which is perhaps why he's remaining uncharacteristically subdued. Vance has never been one to shy away from a fight, especially an online one, especially if it's in defense of his boss. He once launched a 400-word diatribe against historian Niall Ferguson for criticising Trump's Ukraine policy, slamming his "moralistic garbage" and "historical illiteracy." He had no problem accusing senior members of his own party of "pettiness" for voting against what Trump wanted, and mocked world leaders who've had run ins with the president. The practicing Catholic even found himself on the wrong side of the Pope himself when he got into another online beef with British politician Rory Stewart over Trump's deportation policies. So one would expect the online warrior to rush to the defense of his president in response to the firestorm of abuse unleashed by Musk against the president on Thursday, which began with accusations of ungratefulness and ended with claims of him being close to Jeffrey Epstein. But Vance has been remarkably quiet. His only public comment at the time of writing has been the kind of terse statement a wife gives in support of a cheating politician spouse. "President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him," Vance wrote on X. The next day, he continued with his lawyerly posts. "There are many lies the corporate media tells about President Trump. One of the most glaring is that he's impulsive or short-tempered. Anyone who has seen him operate under pressure knows that's ridiculous," he wrote. "It's (maybe) the single biggest disconnect between fake media perception and reality," he went on. Where was the combative Vance who demanded the Ukrainian president say thank you to his boss in the Oval Office? The one who told Kamala Harris to "go to hell" over the Biden administration's handling of the withdrawal from Afghanistan? Instead, Vance did not utter Musk's name in the 24 hours since the feud burst into the open. Vance was asked by Trump to remain diplomatic in his dealings with Musk, The Independent learned from a source familiar with the situation. Regardless, the VP has other motivations for keeping quiet. For years, he has been dogged by rumors of dual loyalties between the tech billionaires who fueled his rise and the president he now serves. Vance first came to public attention as the best-selling author of Hillbilly Elegy, a memoir of a rough Appalachian upbringing that many liberals praised as an intellectual explanation of Trump's appeal to the white working class. But before that book set him on a path to Congress and the Senate, he was already being courted by a set of right-wing tech billionaires known as the "PayPal mafia" — the billionaires Musk, David Sacks and Peter Thiel, who worked together at the pioneering online payments company back in the late Nineties and early Noughties and were bound together by a belief in deregulation, libertarianism and later, by darker right-wing ideology that railed against multiculturalism. Vance was working in venture capital at the time and went to work for Thiel at his San Francisco investment house, Mithril Capital. Thiel would be instrumental to Vance's rise, backing his campaign for Senate in 2021-22 to the tune of $15 million, and reportedly introduced Vance to Trump. The trio of Musk, Sacks and Thiel were instrumental in convincing Trump to choose Vance as his running mate, seeing in him an ideological ally, the libertarian tech investor who could one day take over as president. Some have gone so far as to call Vance a Manchurian Candidate for the tech elite. When the feud between Musk and Trump spilled out into the open, Musk was not shy about announcing his desire for Vance to take over as president. He responded to a tweet calling for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance with one word: "Yes." That is not an empty threat. Vance's path to the White House would inevitably require the support of Musk, the man who spent $395 million on electing Republicans in 2024. So his decision to ignore Musk's call for mutiny is an interesting — and calculated — choice. Much like Littlefinger, Vance has made sharp ideological turns and formed strategic alliances to find his way to within arm's length of the throne. He was once vehemently opposed to Trump, only to radically change course to stand by his side in his quest for power. But, spoiler alert, his fictional counterpart's calculating and maneuvering didn't end well for him. Trump spent his entire first term weeding out traitors, and claims to have gotten very good at it over the years. Will he be able to sniff out Vance?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store