ChatGPT-generated op-eds appeared in mainstream Latin American media outlets
Chinese propagandists used ChatGPT to write and translate op-eds that they successfully planted in Spanish-language news outlets last fall, researchers said Friday.
A report published by OpenAI, the company that owns the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT, found that a pro-China campaign had used the program to produce 18 articles and op-eds that were published across eight Spanish-language media platforms. Four of the outlets are Peruvian, two Ecuadorian, one Mexican and one Spanish. None of the eight outlets responded to requests for comment.
The articles don't mention China, but are broadly critical of the U.S., highlighting problems like homelessness, racism, crime and income inequality. Often the people using ChatGPT asked it to translate and expand the articles from existing ones originally written in Chinese, the researchers found.
'The actor generated these articles by asking our models to translate and expand publicly available Chinese-language articles,' the researchers wrote in the report.
'This is the first time we've observed a likely Chinese influence actor successfully publishing articles in mainstream outlets in Latin America,' they added.
The researchers' findings came as part of OpenAI's quarterly threat report that also documented efforts by a variety of bad actors to use its tools in a variety of malicious ways, including generating fake articles about the Ghanaian presidential election and to perpetuate romance scams.
One of the news outlets indicated an article was 'sponsored,' but the rest were presented as authentic opinions. Most were published in October 2024, in the lead-up to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation conference, held in Peru.
Some of the articles have the byline of a company, Jilin Yousen Culture Communication Co., instead of a person. A profile of a company with that name on Chinese search engine Baidu describes it as a multimedia tech and public relations firm.
A spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
All of the articles are still live, and many were published the same day that ChatGPT produced them. The people who used the chatbot to generate the articles usually worked during daytime business hours in China, OpenAI found.
The accounts that asked ChatGPT to write the op-eds also sometimes had the program write short posts in English that criticized a Chinese dissident, Cai Xia, which were posted by various accounts on X that purported to be people from the U.S. or India.
For years, U.S. tech companies have accused pro-Chinese propagandists of using inauthentic accounts on Western social media platforms to target people around the world, including Americans, with messages that align with Beijing's priorities, like promoting the Chinese Communist Party, downplaying allegations of human rights abuses in China, or criticizing the U.S. China has consistently denied any such efforts.
Those efforts sometimes involve significant investment but almost always fall flat, with few people interacting with them. The X posts tied to the Latin American op-ed campaign similarly did not appear to get any significant social media engagement, OpenAI said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI Fund Assets Reach $38B on Record Chinese Inflows
Global assets in artificial intelligence and big data funds surged more than sevenfold over the past five years, reaching $38.1 billion by the end of 2025's first quarter, with AI ETFs dominating the U.S. market, according to a recent Morningstar Direct report. The artificial intelligence investment theme experienced record inflows in the first quarter, driven by Chinese investors responding to the breakthrough success of domestic AI startup DeepSeek. The Chinese company's efficient AI model demonstrated how advances could improve performance while reducing dependency on high-powered computing hardware, according to the report. The surge reflects growing investor interest in AI technologies following the late-2022 launch of ChatGPT 3.5, which marked a pivotal moment in AI adoption and sparked institutional and retail investor enthusiasm for the sector, Morningstar reports. However, the investment landscape has been marked by high volatility, with AI funds experiencing both dramatic growth and sharp declines as market sentiment shifts. The growth demonstrates how ETFs have become the preferred vehicle for AI investing in the U.S., contrasting with Europe, where actively managed mutual funds dominate, according to the Morningstar report. Unlike Europe, where AI funds are typically actively managed mutual funds, AI investing in the U.S. is overwhelmingly dominated by exchange-traded funds, according to Morningstar Direct. The ETF structure appeals to investors because of its lower cost, greater transparency and enhanced trading flexibility compared with traditional actively managed vehicles. U.S.-domiciled AI and big data fund assets grew 14-fold in just two years, reaching a record $5.5 billion by the end of May 2025. Despite this surge, the U.S. still accounts for only 15% of global AI fund assets, according to the report. The largest AI fund in the U.S. is the Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ), which benefits from first-mover status as the region's inaugural AI-focused ETF. The rise of actively managed ETFs has also contributed to growth, with assets in actively managed thematic AI ETFs reaching $415 million, representing nearly 10% of total U.S.-domiciled AI fund assets, according to Morningstar Direct. The focused style of ETFs makes them suited for targeting granular exposures within the broader AI theme. The largest funds illustrate this diversity of options, according to the report. The so-called Magnificent Seven technology stocks dominate AI ETF holdings, creating structural challenges for fund managers. NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) appeared in almost nine out of every 10 AI funds, while all seven companies were held by more than half of AI portfolios, according to Morningstar Research. The dominance presents a dilemma for ETF designers. Including these stocks results in overlap with core equity exposures, potentially reducing the appeal of AI ETFs as tactical investments. Excluding them introduces underperformance risk relative to peers, according to the report. The concentration highlights limited geographic diversification. Nearly all frequently held AI stocks globally are U.S.-listed, underscoring American leadership in the technology sector, according to Morningstar | © Copyright 2025 All rights reserved Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
New York state lawmakers passed a bill on Thursday that aims to prevent frontier AI models from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic from contributing to disaster scenarios, including the death or injury of more than 100 people, or more than $1 billion in damages. The passage of the RAISE Act represents a win for the AI safety movement, which has lost ground in recent years as Silicon Valley and the Trump Administration have prioritized speed and innovation. Safety advocates including Nobel prize laureate Geoffrey Hinton and AI research pioneer Yoshua Bengio have championed the RAISE Act. Should it become law, the bill would establish America's first set of legally mandated transparency standards for frontier AI labs. The RAISE Act has some of the same provisions and goals as California's controversial AI safety bill, SB 1047, which was ultimately vetoed. However, the co-sponsor of the bill, New York state Senator Andrew Gounardes told TechCrunch in an interview that he deliberately designed the RAISE Act such that it doesn't chill innovation among startups or academic researchers — a common criticism of SB 1047. 'The window to put in place guardrails is rapidly shrinking given how fast this technology is evolving,' said Senator Gounardes. 'The people that know [AI] the best say that these risks are incredibly likely […] That's alarming.' The RAISE Act is now headed for New York Governor Kathy Hochul's desk, where could either sign the bill into law, send it back for amendments, or veto it altogether. If signed into law, New York's AI safety bill would require the world's largest AI labs to publish thorough safety and security reports on their frontier AI models. The bill also requires AI labs to report safety incidents, such as concerning AI model behavior or bad actors stealing an AI model, should they happen. If tech companies fail to live up to these standards, the RAISE Act empowers New York's Attorney General to bring civil penalties of up to $30 million. The RAISE Act aims to narrowly regulate the world's largest companies — whether they're based in California (like OpenAI and Google) or China (like DeepSeek and Alibaba). The bill's transparency requirements apply to companies whose AI models were trained using more than $100 million in computing resources (seemingly, more than any AI model available today), and are being made available to New York residents. While similar to SB 1047 in some ways, the RAISE Act was designed to address criticisms of previous AI safety bills, according to Nathan Calvin, the Vice President of State Affairs and General Counsel at Encode, who worked on this bill and SB 1047. Notably, the RAISE Act does not require AI model developers to include a 'kill switch' on their models, nor does it hold companies that post-train frontier AI models accountable for critical harms. Nevertheless, Silicon Valley has pushed back significantly on New York's AI safety bill, New York state Assemblymember and co-sponsor of the RAISE Act Alex Bores told TechCrunch. Bores called the industry resistance unsurprising, but claimed that the RAISE Act would not limit innovation of tech companies in any way. 'The NY RAISE Act is yet another stupid, stupid state level AI bill that will only hurt the US at a time when our adversaries are racing ahead,' said Andreessen Horowitz general partner Anjney Midha in a Friday post on X. Andreessen Horowitz, alongside the startup incubator Y Combinator, were some of the fiercest opponents to SB 1047. Anthropic, the safety-focused AI lab that called for federal transparency standards for AI companies earlier this month, has not reached an official stance on the bill, co-founder Jack Clark said in a Friday post on X. However, Clark expressed some grievances over how broad the RAISE Act is, noting that it could present a risk to 'smaller companies.' When asked about Anthropic's criticism, state Senator Gounardes told TechCrunch he thought it 'misses the mark,' noting that he designed the bill not to apply to small companies. OpenAI, Google, and Meta did not respond to TechCrunch's request for comment. Another common criticism of the RAISE Act is that AI model developers simply wouldn't offer their most advanced AI models in the state of New York. That was a similar criticism brought against SB 1047, and it's largely what's played out in Europe thanks to the continent's tough regulations on technology. Assemblymember Bores told TechCrunch that the regulatory burden of the RAISE Act is relatively light, and therefore, shouldn't require tech companies to stop operating their products in New York. Given the fact that New York has the third largest GDP in the U.S., pulling out of the state is not something most companies would take lightly. 'I don't want to underestimate the political pettiness that might happen, but I am very confident that there is no economic reasons for them to not make their models available in New York,' said Assemblymember Borres. Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil can remain in detention, judge rules
The Trump administration can continue to hold anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil at the Louisiana detention facility where he's been locked up since March, a federal judge ruled Friday. Judge Michael Farbiarz had issued a preliminary injunction earlier this week barring the Trump administration from deporting the ex-Columbia University student and ordering his release. On Friday, however, the New Jersey judge determined that federal authorities can continue to hold Khalil on a separate alleged immigration violation discovered after his initial arrest. 3 Farbiarz previously ordered the Trump administration to release Khalil by Friday. Senate Judiciary Committee 'It would plainly be unlawful to detain [Khalil] on a charge the Court preliminarily enjoined,' Farbiarz wrote in his order. 'But by their letter of this afternoon … the [Trump administration] have now represented that [Khalil] is being detained on another, second charge.' 'That second charge has not been preliminary enjoined by the court.' Farbiarz noted that Khalil's legal team has not 'put forward factual evidence as to why it might be unlawful to detain him on the second charge' and 'failed to make meaningful legal arguments as to that second charge.' The second charge accuses Khalil of failing to disclose on his green card application that he was a member of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA) and the Columbia University Apartheid Divestment coalition, as well as his work for the Syria Office in the British Embassy in Beirut. 'We are profoundly disappointed that Mahmoud has to bear any more delay and detention from this historically outrageous government conduct,' Baher Azmy, an attorney for Khalil, told Politico. 3 The Trump administration claims Khalil engaged in pro-Hamas activities at Columbia University and hid information about his background on his green card application. James Keivom 3 Khalil has been held in a Louisiana detention facility since March. REUTERS Farbiarz, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, noted that Khalil has 'a number of avenues' for release still available, including filing a bail application with the immigration judge handling his case. 'To the extent the Petitioner requests relief from this Court, the request is denied,' the judge wrote. On Wednesday, Farbiarz determined that it was 'overwhelmingly likely' that the alleged green card application was not the reason for his detainment, but rather Secretary of State Marco Rubio's initial decision to revoke his legal status over his role in anti-Israel protests at Columbia University. The Trump administration claims Khalil engaged in activities 'aligned to Hamas,' the Palestinian terror group, while attending the Ivy League School.
