logo
Bryan Kohberger murder trial in limbo with Idaho judge facing two critical decisions that could upend case

Bryan Kohberger murder trial in limbo with Idaho judge facing two critical decisions that could upend case

Daily Mail​5 hours ago

The trial against Bryan Kohberger is currently in limbo as an Idaho judge is set to hand down critical decisions that could upend proceedings and impact the defense's strategy to try to save him from the firing squad.
Two critical hearings are being held in Ada County courthouse Wednesday - to determine whether to grant a last-minute delay to the trial and whether the accused killer can argue an alternate suspect is the real killer.
Judge Steven Hippler's rulings on the matters will drastically shape the trial for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in a crime that struck terror into the college town of Moscow and horrified the nation.
It is not clear if the judge will rule on the two matters Wednesday or at a later date.
Kohberger is accused of killing Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen in a stabbing rampage inside an off-campus student home on November 13, 2022.
Two other roommates were inside the home at the time of the attack and called 911 after finding one of their friend's bodies hours later.
The motive for the murders remains a mystery and the suspect has no known connection to any of the victims.
Now, following more than two years of legal wrangling, delays and the trial being moved to another county, opening statements in the trial are slated to begin August 11.
But, in an 11th-hour move less than two months before the trial finally gets underway, Kohberger's defense is now asking the judge for a delay.
In its argument, the defense cited a recent Dateline episode that revealed bombshell new details and suggested there had been an evidence leak in the case.
The defense also argued the team needs more time to effectively prepare for trial and investigate Kohberger's 'life story' ahead of the potential penalty phase.
If convicted, Kohberger faces the death penalty. Under state law, this means he could be sent to the firing squad.
Prosecutors, meanwhile, are fighting back against the request to delay the trial, furiously responding: 'It is time to try this case.'
In a court filing last week, prosecutor Bill Thompson rubbished claims a delay would make it easier to seat an impartial jury and blasted the defense for going down 'every rabbit hole.'
'Defendant's Motion amounts to a request for a perpetual continuance so that his counsel can go down every rabbit-hole until Defendant - rather than the Court - deems himself ready for trial,' prosecutors said.
The state argued that Kohberger's team has had plenty of time to prepare for the trial - coming more than two years after his arrest on December 30 2022 and indictment in May 2023.
While acknowledging the Dateline episode does pose 'challenges' to the trial, the prosecution described the defense's motion as 'misplaced' and argued a delay would 'only allow more opportunities for pretrial publicity' in the high-profile case.
Some of the victims' families have also condemned the prospect of yet another delay - having already waited more than two years since their loved ones were murdered to get their day in court.
'I pray with all my heart that the trial does not get delayed. My head is spinning that it's even a possibility!' the Goncalves family wrote on their Facebook page.
The Dateline episode at the heart of the fight for a delay revealed explosive new details about the case, including the suspected killer's phone records, porn choices and online searches for Ted Bundy.
It also aired never-before-seen surveillance footage of a suspect vehicle fleeing the crime scene moments after the murders.
Its release of never-before-seen evidence rattled proceedings with the judge saying it showed someone close to the case had 'likely' violated a gag order that has been in place since the early days.
Judge Hippler launched an investigation into the leak and ordered both sides to preserve and hand over records, vowing to root out the source of the leak.
New court records show that Kohberger's defense is now asking for a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate the apparent leak. Prosecutors have responded to this request but the records remain under seal.
The defense and the prosecution will go head-to-head presenting arguments for and against the delay in Wednesday's hearing, scheduled for 12.30pm local time.
If the judge grants the delay, the trial could be postponed indefinitely.
While that hearing is open to the public, a second hearing on the matter of alternate suspects will be held behind closed doors - keeping the identity of this suspect or suspects a closely guarded secret.
Kohberger's team announced in May that they had identified an individual they allege could be the real killer.
The lead was found among a trove of tips collected by law enforcement during the original investigation, Kohberger's lead attorney Anne Taylor said.
The name of that individual or individuals and what evidence the defense has that could tie them to the brutal murders remains a mystery with all filings related to the matter sealed.
It is likely that these explosive claims will only come to light at trial.
But, if the judge blocks the defense from presenting this argument to jurors, it's a theory that may never be revealed.
The defense has handed over evidence to support the claims, and the prosecution has since filed a response.
In the sealed hearing Wednesday, the judge will hear arguments from both sides.
Based on comments during the hearing in May, Judge Hippler appears skeptical that the defense has enough evidence to make this argument admissible at trial, telling the defense he needed to see more 'than just allegations.'
Experts told the Daily Mail that it could have a 'significant impact' on the outcome of the trial if jurors hear testimony pointing to another potential suspect.
'Ultimately, the jury has to be unanimous… if you convince just one juror that there is a reasonable alternative suspect, he walks,' criminal defense attorney David Seltzer said.
He believes the idea could provide a powerful story to counter the more technical prosecution case based on DNA evidence and data.
'The state's problem is it's a DNA trial, and DNA trials are boring. They're not engaging because people don't understand the science of DNA,' he said.
For a jury, the idea of an alternate suspect 'is something you can hold on to, that here's somebody else who did the crime,' Seltzer added.
Kohberger was connected to the murders after his DNA was found on a Ka-Bar leather knife sheath found next to Mogen's body at the scene.
Prosecutors also found cellphone records placing him outside the student home multiple times prior to the murders, as well as surveillance footage showing a vehicle matching his white Hyundai Elantra speeding away from the crime scene.
One of the surviving roommates - Dylan Mortensen - also saw a masked white man, dressed in all black and with 'bushy eyebrows' inside the home that fateful night.
She is expected to be a star witness in the trial.
It has now emerged that the DoorDash driver who delivered food to Kernodle minutes before the murders also told police she 'saw Bryan' outside the house that night.
The unidentified 44-year-old woman is also expecting to testify at the trial, she told police during a traffic stop in Pullman, Washington, last year.
Jury selection is slated to begin in late July or early August, with the trial getting underway August 11.
Kohberger stood silent at his arraignment, with a judge entering a not guilty plea on his behalf.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US sanctions leadership of Mexico's Jalisco cartel
US sanctions leadership of Mexico's Jalisco cartel

The Independent

time36 minutes ago

  • The Independent

US sanctions leadership of Mexico's Jalisco cartel

The Trump administration on Wednesday imposed economic sanctions on five high-ranking members of Mexico's powerful Jalisco New Generation Cartel for their drug trafficking, while also citing their involvement in killings. Previous administrations have also sanctioned the cartel – one of Mexico's most powerful -- as the Trump administration also did in May, when it targeted the cartel's fuel theft operations. The sanctions freeze any assets the individuals or companies have in the U.S. and prohibit U.S. citizens from doing business with them. 'CJNG's reign of terror across Mexico and its trafficking of fentanyl into the United States has destroyed countless innocent lives,' U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement. 'The United States remains strongly committed to leveraging all available tools to degrade the capacity of CJNG and other cartels to flood our streets with dangerous drugs and perpetrate heinous acts of violence against civilians.' In February, the U.S. administration designated Jalisco New Generation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and Specially Designated Global Terrorist. The cartel is led by Nemesio Rubén 'El Mencho' Oseguera Cervantes and he was among the five leaders named Wednesday. Washington has offered a $15 million reward for information leading to his capture. Two of those sanctioned have been recently connected to high-profile investigations in Mexico. Gonzalo Mendoza Gaytan has been linked to a ranch in Jalisco state where relatives of missing people found hundreds of garments, shoes and other items. Authorities believe the ranch was used by the Jalisco cartel to train recruits. Families of the missing believe recruits who didn't comply were also killed there. Ricardo Ruiz Velasco is a cartel lieutenant affiliated with its special forces unit. The U.S. Treasury said he also handles their propaganda and communications. Ruiz is a suspect in the killing of social media influencer Valeria Márquez, who was allegedly his romantic partner and was killed while on a live video stream in her salon on the outskirts of Guadalajara last month. The other cartel members sanctioned were Julio Alberto Castillo Rodríguez, Oseguera's son-in-law, who allegedly runs the cartel's operations in the Pacific port of Manzanillo, and Audias Flores Silva, a regional commander for the cartel in several Mexican states. ____

Grieving parents want $95m from Texas Roadhouse over tragedy involving drunk-driving Karen
Grieving parents want $95m from Texas Roadhouse over tragedy involving drunk-driving Karen

Daily Mail​

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Grieving parents want $95m from Texas Roadhouse over tragedy involving drunk-driving Karen

Parents of a 13-year-old boy killed by a drunk driver are seeking $95 million from Texas Roadhouse for the restaurant's alleged role in his death, a court heard. Leonardo 'Leo' Camacho was fatally struck in June 2020 as he helped his father Jose with yard work at Christ Culture Center Church in Cumming, Georgia. Katie Pancione's white SUV careened down the road, hopped the curb and crashed into the young teen, the jury heard, according to The Atlantic Journal-Constitution. Leo's body hurled into the air before landing in the church parking lot. He was taken to a local hospital in critical condition and died three days later. Jose Camacho suffered an ankle injury in the deadly crash, the attorney representing him and his partner Daniela Torres told the court. Camacho and Torres allege Texas Roadhouse is partially responsible for Leo's death because a restaurant bartender served Pancione a pint of Michelob Ultra when she was 'noticeably intoxicated' and knew she was 'likely to drive away' afterwards. Pancione's blood alcohol concentration was three times over Georgia's legal limit at the time of the crash, Camacho family lawyer Dax Lopez said during his opening statement Tuesday. But an attorney for Texas Roadhouse dismissed the allegation, arguing Pancione 'showed no signs of intoxication in the 13 minutes she spent in the restaurant'. Pancione, then 38, arrived at the restaurant at 6:18pm on June 16, 2020. Lopez claims an expert will testify that she likely had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.225 at this point, the Journal reports. She ordered the pint while waiting for her to-go food ordered, with Lopez telling the court that she drank 'most' of the beer while in the restaurant. Pancione left the restaurant around 6:30pm and was reportedly seen 'driving erratically' before the fatal accident, the jury heard. She hit the curb, traveled onto the sidewalk and struck Leo and Camacho at 6:36pm, before fleeing the scene, Lopez said. Pancione, who was going through a divorce at the time, was arrested at her boyfriend's house about three hours later. Her BAC was tested at 9:48pm and was 0.176, well above Georgia's legal limit of 0.08. But Jeremiah Byrne, representing Texas Roadhouse, claims Pancione did not appear to be drunk while at the restaurant. He reportedly showed the jury surveillance camera footage captured during her 13 minutes at the restaurant bar, which he argues proves the bartender on duty did nothing wrong by serving her. Byrne told the court Pancione would have been 'a stumbling, puking drunk' if her BAC was 0.225 when she arrived, as the Camacho family's attorney claimed. Lopez admitted Pancione was 'not falling down drunk' at the restaurant. 'That one light beer didn't cause the accident,' Byrne told the court. 'Katie Pancione did. She was texting and driving.' Pancione pleaded guilty to felony first-degree homicide by vehicle in August 2023 in connection to Leo's death, Forsyth County News reported. She also pled guilty to charges of hit and run involving a death, serious injury by vehicle, and hit and run involving a serious injury. She was sentenced to five years in jail, followed by five years of probation. Pancione previously reached a $2.6 million settlement with Camacho and Torres to end civil claims over her involvement in Leo's death. She is among the witnesses expected to testify in the Texas Roadhouse trial, which is expected to last more than a week.

EXCLUSIVE Antifa sharpshooter Peter Stinson's outrageous excuse as he demands bail after 'threatening to kill Trump'
EXCLUSIVE Antifa sharpshooter Peter Stinson's outrageous excuse as he demands bail after 'threatening to kill Trump'

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Antifa sharpshooter Peter Stinson's outrageous excuse as he demands bail after 'threatening to kill Trump'

The former US Coastguard lieutenant charged with making threats against Donald Trump has sensationally claimed his disturbing social media posts were simply 'political speech' and even likened them to statements made by the president. In a court memo arguing for his pre-trial release on Tuesday, Peter Stinson's public defender characterized the 57-year-old Virginia father's threatening comments about Trump as mere 'political advocacy' that should be protected by his First Amendment rights. Attorney Geremy Kamens argued that Stinson, a trained sharpshooter, has engaged in 'abstract' political commentary on social media over several years and had no 'specific' or 'imminent' plans to harm the president. Stinson, who served in the Coast Guard for 33 years, was arrested on Monday after a 19-page FBI affidavit alleged he made a series of threats against Trump between April 2020 and June 11, 2025. He is scheduled to appear in court for his detention trial hearing Wednesday afternoon. Describing Stinson as a 'devoted father of five children' with 'deep ties to his community', Kamens pointed out that his client has no 'significant' prior criminal history and does not pose a flight risk or danger to the community. In an extraordinary statement, Kamens also noted that Stinson 'repeatedly disclaimed his own ability to carry out violence', which he argues 'demonstrates' that his posts 'constitute political hyperbole' and 'disclaim any personal intention to engage in violent conduct'. The apparent disclaimers were in reference to the posts in which Stinson stated he lacks the 'skills' and is 'not a good enough shot' and would serve only in a 'support capacity.' Federal investigators alleged Stinson, a self-declared member of the far-left Antifa movement, posted a string of threats online, including writing that Trump needed to be 'Luigied,' a reference to Luigi Mangione, the man accused of killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson incold blood on a New York City street. He also allegedly made graphic threats against Trump on multiple social media platforms involving guns, knives and poisoning. Stinson served in the United States Coast Guard for 33 years from 1988 until 2021. He was a sharpshooter and an instructor with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) during that time. He is listed on LinkedIn as a coordinator for the MayDay Movement, which has the goal of impeaching and removing Trump as president. Stinson also made several references online to '8647,' which government officials recognized as a reference to an Instagram post made by former FBI Director James Comey. To '86' means to cancel or get rid of something. Many interpreted Comey's post as a threat against Trump, who was the 45th and is now the 47th president. The document written by an FBI counter-terrorism task force officer stated: 'The post by Comey was interpreted in the news media as a violent threat to President Trump and prompted an investigation by the Department of Homeland Security and the United States Secret Service.' Stinson's arrest comes amid heightened scrutiny by federal prosecutors, who are taking an aggressive approach to threats against the president and other government officials, following previous assassination attempts on Trump. He is listed on LinkedIn as a coordinator for the MayDay Movement, which has the goal of impeaching and removing Trump as 47th U.S. president Thomas Matthew Crooks shot Trump in the ear in an assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Crooks was taken out by counter snipers – but not before the shooter killed a rally attendee and badly injured two others. Based on the timing of that attempt on Trump's life and Stinson's social media posts, investigators found that the former Coast Guard officer was referencing the attack when he wrote: 'A missed opportunity will not come around again.' Stinson referenced online on February 6, 2025 that he didn't have the 'necessary skills' to carry out an assassination and claimed that many people and groups were plotting action. He suggested, however, in other posts that he does have those skills. The court documents come as neighbors in the quiet rural enclave in Oakton, Virginia, where Stinson lives with his wife, two high-school aged sons and their dog Betty-Lou, told of the dramatic moment FBI agents and an armored vehicle swooped on the property on Friday evening at about 5pm. One neighbor, who did not want to be named, said about 10 FBI agents in multiple unmarked vehicles with blacked out windows took over the three-bedroom house for several hours. Some of the agents were wearing heavy military fatigues, he said, but he understood they were conducting a federal search warrant. Another said when she saw an 'aggressive' armored vehicle roll into the street – which appeared to have a machine gun mounted on the back – she took her family into their basement. 'We didn't know what was happening at this stage, and we were fearful of a shootout,' she said. The locals said they did not see Stinson detained by the authorities, but that his younger son was at home during the search as they saw him standing at the top of the street. Neighbors believe the FBI had been scoping out the house – which is set back from the road in a wooded glade – all day on Friday, as they'd seen several unfamiliar cars driving down the road. Documents show Stinson was arrested in Fairfax county, on Friday before news broke of the charges against him yesterday. Locals were in disbelief at the charges levied against Stinson, who they described as an 'unassuming, quiet guy' and a 'nice, down-to-earth man'. 'There was nothing that gave me cause to think he'd be accused of anything like that, but we didn't really know them too well,' one said. They said Stinson and his family had been renting their home for about a year-and-a-half and 'kept themselves to themselves'. Many interpreted '86 47' as a threat against Trump, since '86' means to get rid of something and Trump is the 47th president Another neighbor, who did not want to be identified, said: 'I met him on Halloween, it was a two-second conversation, he seemed nice. 'So when Friday happened, I was like, "Ok holy cow, what's going on", but they [the authorities] didn't tell us anything. 'I went outside to take out the recycling and saw them up there, and was like oh "do I need to move my vehicles?" They were like "no" and I was like "Am I safe?" and they said "you're fine". 'My husband called me earlier because he heard news of it on the radio, I only just found out what it was about today. I didn't even know his name. 'It's kind of crazy. You never know who's living next door, but unfortunately this is a time when there's a lot of people upset with a lot of things on both ways.' In their memo arguing for Stinson's release, his attorneys cite President Trump's January 2021 speech encouraging listeners to 'fight like hell' and march on the Capitol, amid his false claims the 2020 election was rigged against him. Trump was acquitted in a Senate impeachment hearing over inciting an insurrection after a mob of his supporters attacked the Capitol on January 6, highlighting, say Stinson's lawyers, 'the high bar for criminalizing political speech'. They cited Trump's 2023 remark on Truth Social warning 'of potential death and destruction' if he were criminally charged as 'political speech that could be construed as encouraging violence'. They also highlighted Trump's apparent 2016 suggestion that Second Amendment gun rights supporters could take matters into their own hands if Hillary Clinton were elected President and appointed judges who favored stricter gun control. They said the statement, which could be construed as encouraging violence against a political opponent, was widely criticized but also recognized as protected political speech'. Stinson's attorneys said by contrast his statements were 'less specific' and are protected by the First Amendment. They claimed his 'general posts on social media' between 2020 and 2025 showed a 'lack of imminence' and a 'lack of specific plans, targets, timing or methods' suggesting 'the statements at issue constitute political hyperbole reflecting deep-seated opposition to President Trump, not true threats'. It went on that his membership of the Mayday movement 'demonstrates his commitment to lawful and peaceful political expression and democratic processes'. Hannah Markley of the group said Wednesday that Stinson stood down from leadership positions in April. Arguing for his pre-trial release, his lawyers said: 'Mr. Stinson's decades of faithful service to his country, his role as a devoted father, his deep community ties, and his commitment to lawful political expression through the democratic process all weigh heavily in favor of pretrial release. 'His PTRA score of 1 reflects minimal risk, and no evidence suggests he poses a danger to the community or risk of flight.' In a statement posted online Tuesday, activists from the Mayday movement 'expressed dismay and a high degree of suspicion' about Stinson's arrest. 'We learned today that Peter is charged with threatening President Trump. We think these charges are exaggerated and overblown. 'The Peter we know has been very clear that the only solution to Donald Trump's transgressions is impeachment and removal, the Constitutionally sanctioned remedy. We would be surprised if Peter made any comments suggesting he was inclined toward violence. 'We remain firmly committed to the goal Peter set when he founded the Mayday Movement: impeachment, conviction and removal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store