Export council for reciprocal tariffs on machine-made carpets from Turkiye
Varanasi:
Carpet Export Promotion Council
(CEPC) has urged govt to impose reciprocal tariffs on
machine-made carpets
imported from Turkiye to ensure fair protection for Indian carpets in the domestic market. CEPC also discussed how tariffs imposed by Trump administration on Indian handmade carpets weakened their global competitiveness.
Talking to TOI on Thursday, CEPC director Shri Sanjay Kumar Gupta said, "With demands including imposing reciprocal tariffs on import of Turkiye's machine-made carpets, a delegation of the council led by its chairman Kuldeep R Wattal met minister of state for commerce Jitin Prasada, in the presence of Bhadohi MP Vinod Bind in New Delhi on Wednesday. It was a crucial meeting as many important issues of the carpet industry were pressed.
"
"We urged govt to step ahead for imposing reciprocal tariffs on machine-made carpets imported from Turkiye to ensure fair protection for Indian carpets in the domestic market," said Gupta, adding that the reason behind this demand was ground realities of bilateral carpet trade between India and Turkiye. The basic customs duty on machine-made carpets and other textile floor coverings from Turkiye imported into India is 20%, he said, adding, however, Turkiye imposes a 46% duty on import of Indian carpets.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
많이 빠진 치아, 인천에서 33만원으로 다시 시작할 수 있습니다
플란치과
더 알아보기
Undo
CEPC sought immediate attention of govt towards bilateral carpet trade with Turkiye in view of the fast-dropping figures of carpet export to Turkiye. In 2015-16, India's carpet export to Turkiye was 17.08 million dollars, but since 2016-17, it started dipping, and in 2024-25 (till Jan end), this figure was 6.5 million dollars.
However, the import figures show a rise in the import of carpets and other floor coverings from Turkiye.
In 2015-16, the value of the import of carpets from Turkiye was 4.20 million dollars. The imports went up to 13.97 million dollars and 10.01 million dollarsin 2022-23 and 2023-24, respectively, and in 2024-25, it was 8.18 million dollars, said council office-bearers. CEPC also wanted immediate intervention of govt on the issue of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on Indian handmade carpets, as it is increasing the threat of weakening their global competitiveness, said Gupta, referring to the trade figures.
Except for 2021-2022, when the carpet export's value was 2232 million dollars, the annual export value since 2015-16 to 2024-25 remained between 1700 million dollars and 1800 million dollars. Over 50% of exports, especially of handmade carpets, are done to the USA, where the trend of export remained above $1000 million since 2020-21 till 2024-25. After the USA, the major importers of Indian carpets are European countries, including Germany, Canada, the UK, Australia, South Africa, France, Italy, and Brazil.
CEPC members are not only worried because the reciprocal tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump will increase the cost of carpets for American buyers, but other major exporters of carpets, including Turkiye, which have a lower US tariff compared to India, will gain an advantage. Gupta said the cottage industry of carpet weaving generates employment for not only thousands of weavers and artisans but also farmers, who work on looms part-time for weaving.
CEPC also raised the issues of the revival of the interest subvention scheme and highlighted the impracticality of the provision under Section 43B(H) of the Income Tax Act, which mandates payments to MSMEs within 45 days. They also requested the allocation of separate HS codes for handmade and machine-made carpets, which would enhance global transparency and give distinctive recognition to Indian craftsmanship.
The delegation included Ashfaque Ahmad Ansari, Umesh Shukla, Sattar Ansari, Aseem Ansari (Bobby), Sadiq Ansari and Shahid Ansari.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
India slaps anti-dumping duties on key chemical imports from China, EU, Japan, and Switzerland
New Delhi: The government has imposed anti-dumping duties on imports of Vitamin-A Palmitate and Insoluble Sulphur from China, Japan, Switzerland and the European Union (EU), aiming to shield domestic manufacturers from low-priced imports that regulators say are hurting local industry. According to a finance ministry notification issued late on Friday, the five-year duties follow investigations by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), which found that both substances were being exported to India at unfairly low prices, below cost or fair market value, and were undercutting Indian producers. These products are critical inputs for sectors such as pharmaceuticals, food, cosmetics and tyre manufacturing. For Vitamin-A Palmitate—used in fortified foods, nutraceuticals and pharma formulations—the DGTR found 'material injury' to domestic producers due to large-scale dumping from China, the EU and Switzerland. The compound, widely used in small dosages, continues to be largely import-dependent in India. Effective immediately, duties will range from $0.87 to $20.87 per kg. The highest duty has been imposed on Chinese exporters other than Shangyu NHU BioChem Co. Ltd., which will face a lower rate of $14.95/kg. Swiss producer DSM Nutritional Products Ltd will attract a duty of $0.87/kg, while other Swiss exporters will face $8.2/kg. A flat rate of $11.09/kg will apply to imports from the EU. Vitamin-A Palmitate in the strength of 1.6 MIU/Gm, used for animal feed, has been excluded from the levy. India imported $48.6 million worth of Vitamin-A Palmitate in FY25, with the bulk of the shipments coming from China and Europe, according to commerce ministry data. While the move comes as a relief for domestic Vitamin-A makers, industry players flagged India's broader dependence on imports for this compound, which is crucial for nutritional and pharmaceutical applications. 'While the anti-dumping duty provides protection to domestic manufacturers of the compound, it could raise input costs for drug makers in the short term, especially those relying on imports from Switzerland and China,' said Yogendra Sharma, a drug manufacturer. 'However, the price impact is expected to be manageable given that Vitamin-A is used in small dosages and accounts for a minor fraction of total formulation cost.' 'With global supply chains realigning, India is now far more proactive in using WTO-compliant instruments to protect its domestic industry. The Vitamin-A Palmitate case is another example of this assertiveness,' said Manish Kr Shubhay, a multidisciplinary dispute resolution expert and Partner at The Percept Law Offices. The anti-dumping duties are payable in Indian currency, based on the exchange rate notified by the Revenue Department on the date of filing the bill of entry. In a related notification, the government also slapped five-year anti-dumping duties on imports of Insoluble Sulphur from China and Japan, used primarily by tyre manufacturers to improve rubber vulcanization. DGTR's investigation found that exporters from both countries were dumping the product at depressed prices, adversely affecting profitability and pricing power of Indian producers. Depending on the exporter, the duties range from $259 to $358 per metric tonne. Chinese imports will face a flat $307/MT levy. Among Japanese exporters, Shikoku Chemicals will be charged $259/MT, while all others will attract the highest rate of $358/MT.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian techie claims toxic manager blamed his father's death for project delay: ‘That was the final straw'
A techie's post on resigning from his toxic workplace has shocked many online after he claimed that one of his managers blamed his personal life, including his recent wedding and the death of his father, for project delays. Posting anonymously on Reddit, the employee detailed his experience working at the "highly toxic huge Indian company" since 2022, when he joined as a fresher on an ₹8.5 lakh CTC. The techie claimed that even after doing meaningful work for a year, his promotion was blocked by a senior manager. 'I wasn't among the people constantly trying to please him. I focused on delivering results and improving the product," he added. Unhappy with how he was treated, he resigned but was convinced by one of his seniors to stay on, promising him a 55% hike in the next appraisal cycle in April 2025. The condition was verbal, not formalised in writing. 'Yes, I know I should've gotten it in writing. But I trusted the person involved," he said. However, when appraisals finally arrived, he received only a 37% raise. Upset over this betrayal, the techie revealed that his breaking point came during a private conversation with his team lead. In the span of a few months, he had gotten engaged, married, and tragically lost his father. During the one-on-one, her manager reportedly told her, 'You should have resigned around your wedding. Do you even realise how much your marriage delayed the work? Because of your father's situation and the leave you took, my timeline commitment couldn't be fulfilled." Stunned by the statement, he hit back: 'Please watch what you're saying and think before you speak. Choose your next words carefully.' The techie revealed he resigned soon after, and even in a tough job market, he said that he knew he had taken the right call. His post has resonated with many in the Indian tech space. "I know how it is to be under a toxic person. You stood up for yourself, and we are proud of that. And one day you will be glad that you did. You will surely get into some good company," said one of them. Another wrote, "Having worked in corporate for years, I don't even know how such people continue to exist. Going back on commitment for agreed upon raise is very common, but it would be very rare for someone to even say a fraction of what your manager told you regarding your father's situation and your marriage."
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's Patience With Putin Leaves Senate Sanctions Push on Hold
President Donald Trump's suggestion that he may let Russia and Ukraine keep fighting has left US lawmakers in an awkward spot over their plan to force a ceasefire with 'bone-crushing' sanctions against Moscow. The Senate bill has more than 80 co-sponsors, an all-but-unheard-of level of bipartisan support. Yet although that kind of veto-proof backing is enough for the Senate to press ahead without White House backing, supporters show no sign they're ready to challenge the president. Trump's comments on Thursday — he said he hadn't even looked at the bill, but will do what he wants 'at the right time' — put the brakes on what had seemed to be an accelerating push to advance the proposal as soon as this month. Republican co-author Lindsey Graham, who said earlier in the week that he aimed to have the Senate plan in place by the Group of Seven leaders' summit to be held in Kananaskis, Alberta, -17, seemed to ease off the gas in a tweet after Trump's comments. 'I have coordinated closely with the White House on this endeavor from day one,' he wrote. Trump, however, has shown little interest in backing Graham's plan, and the White House has insisted that any decision on sanctions will be the president's alone. Instead, he's signaled he may walk away from efforts to force a settlement amid growing frustration with his inability to deliver the quick peace deal he promised on the campaign trail. Graham's Democrat co-author Richard Blumenthal said the pair are still working on changes to the bill to make it more acceptable to the White House. European leaders, meanwhile, are pushing ahead with plans to impose more restrictions on Russian financial institutions and the shadow fleet of tankers Moscow uses to export its oil. Those limits have squeezed Russia's economy — but not President Vladimir Putin's resolve to continue fighting. Russia's war in Ukraine, conceived as a days- or weeks-long 'special military operation,' is well into its fourth year. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz made the case for turning up the heat on Putin during an Oval Office meeting with Trump on Thursday, but came away sounding cautious. 'I asked the president to go along with us to put more pressure on this government, on Putin, to come to an end with this terrible war,' Merz told Fox News. 'I was a little bit more optimistic a couple of weeks ago, when the first diplomatic initiatives were more or less successful.' Since then, talks have moved slowly amid a yawning gulf between Russian and Ukrainian demands, and fighting has raged. A daring Ukrainian strike on June 1, using drones smuggled into Russia to hit its strategic bombers at bases thousands of miles from the front lines, provided a stunning show of Kyiv's capabilities. While some in the US administration were privately impressed with the attack, there were also signs of unhappiness that it would only harden Putin's resolve to fight on, according to allied officials who asked not to be identified discussing matters that aren't public. Trump said he'd asked Putin not to retaliate. But the Russian leader rejected that appeal, and mounted deadly new missile and drone strikes on Kyiv and other cities Friday. The attacks continued overnight, including the largest barrage of the war so far against Kharkiv in Ukraine's northeast. At least three people were killed and 21 injured as the city, which had a prewar population of about 1.4 million people, was struck with dozens of drones, aerial glide bombs and at least two missiles, many aimed at apartment buildings and private homes. Pressed by reporters, Trump didn't completely rule out new sanctions, even suggesting that he might impose them on Ukraine as well as Russia. 'They're waiting for me to decide on what to do, and I'll know maybe very soon,' Trump said. 'It's a harsh bill, yeah, very harsh.' Earlier in the week, Trump shared a social media post suggesting the Senate move ahead with the bill to give him leverage against Putin, even if the plan might not make it into law. Andriy Yermak, a top aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, remained hopeful about the plan after a visit to Washington. 'The Graham package contains very painful sanctions. If this is voted through, they will start working very quickly,' he told Ukraine's 1 1 network on Friday. Asked about the prospect Trump might impose restrictions on Kyiv, he said, 'there were no signals on that.' The draconian nature of the penalties in the Senate bill — aimed at cutting off Russia's large and lucrative exports of oil, gas and other products with threats of 500% tariffs on buyers, including big US trading partners like China and India — would make them costly for the US if Putin didn't immediately back down. Global energy prices would spike, just as trade flows seized up. 'It's a risky but courageous proposition,' said Ben Harris, director of economic studies at Brookings Institution. Ukrainian officials estimate cutting oil exports would starve Russia of $60 billion a year, the amount it's currently spending on the war. The bill gives Trump a fail-safe, requiring the administration to certify that Russia isn't serious about peace talks or has violated a ceasefire before imposing the maximum penalties. The measure also codifies many of the sanctions already imposed on Russia, from financial and trade restrictions to bans on top officials. That would complicate any attempt by the administration to seek the potential economic deals with Moscow that Trump has touted without an end to the war. Last month, testifying before the Senate, Secretary of State Marco Rubio made Trump's position clear. The president thinks Russia will likely walk away from Ukraine peace talks if the US threatens more sanctions, he said. With assistance from Alex Wickham, Alberto Nardelli and Olesia Safronova. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
