logo
Pirelli's New P Zero Family Is a Huge Step Forward: Review

Pirelli's New P Zero Family Is a Huge Step Forward: Review

Motor 15 hours ago

Pirelli's CTO, Piero Misani, says the Italian brand's new P Zero family reflects a paradigm shift in how tires are designed. A big statement.
In the 10 years since the old, fourth-generation P Zero launched, simulation has completely changed automotive engineering. Software tools have improved drastically, allowing engineers to tinker with more possibilities with a high degree of accuracy before coming up with a satisfactory design, well before the first physical prototype is built.
Artificial intelligence has also had an impact. In the case of the new P Zero, it helped Pirelli trial over 100,000 different compounds virtually before finding the right combination.
The Covid-19 pandemic forced Pirelli engineers to embrace virtual tire development in a huge, unprecedented way. It also proved what was possible in space. 'We were only at home… only the testing department came to our headquarters," Misani said. "But we were able to fully develop new products virtually."
Misani also said Pirelli took a slightly different approach to its new tires. Rather than starting with homologated tires for specific road cars, it develops its own generic version based on marketing research and both internal and external testing. Then, it has a clearer idea of what the tire is when it goes to work with an automaker, and a better aftermarket product.
The new P Zero summer-tire family consists of four models; the base is the P Zero PZ5; the P Zero E is optimized for the weight and performance of hybrids and EVs; the P Zero R adds more track performance to the mix; the track-focused Trofeo RS sits at the top of the line.
Some of these tires have been out for a little while now as OEM fitments, but now with the full family launched, Pirelli invited media—including Motor1—to Italy to sample the PZ5, P Zero R, and P Zero Trofeo RS.
P Zero (PZ5)
Photo by: Pirelli
Our experience with the PZ5 was limited, a brief road drive from the Monza circuit to Lake Como in a Mercedes-Benz GLE450d. Thankfully, I have previous experience with the PZ5 in
the Lucid Gravity
, where it's an OEM fit for the 23-inch wheel option. Even with limited time for familiarization, the PZ5's strengths are obvious.
Ride quality, for one. This was always a strength of the previous PZ4—and a reason why, I suspect, it's a popular OEM fitment for luxury performance cars—and it's remarkably good here. The GLE450d we drove was on huge 21s, with 315-width tires out back, and Italian roads aren't the smoothest by any means. But you'd swear the car was on nothing larger than a 19-inch wheel. We also rode shotgun in a Lamborghini Urus SE on 23s, and even that was remarkably smooth on its PZ5s.
At least in the Mercedes, the steering feel was remarkable, too. Pirelli has figured out a way to build in a bit of texture, and a really nice weight buildup off center, all of which gives the driver a good sense of what the car is doing. An engineer later tells me that this sort of thing was a huge priority in the PZ5's development. You can hit all your targets around rolling resistance, treadwear, and grip, but none matter if the tire doesn't feel right.
We'll need more time and exposure to render a more complete verdict on the PZ5, but worth noting that this tire
already won a Tyre Reviews comparison test
, beating out the longtime standard-bearer, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. I should also note that the Lucid engineers I spoke with at the launch of the new Gravity raved about the PZ5. So, it very much seems like Pirelli is onto something here.
P Zero R
Photo by: Pirelli
The legendary Monza circuit is less than an hour from Pirelli's Milan headquarters. Where better to test the brand's track-oriented offerings? It's a particularly good track for testing tires, with two ultra-long, ultra-fast right-handers, Curva Grande and the Parabolica, and some big braking zones into the various chicanes. A recent repave also has the effect of making the track surface more abrasive.
Pirelli let us run laps in a nice mix of cars all fit with OEM-spec P Zero R tires: An Audi RS3, a BMW M5, and a Porsche 911 Carrera 4 GTS. Even in three very different cars, the P Zero R demonstrated its strengths.
Many performance tires deliver great performance up to a point, and then rapidly degrade in the face of high loads and temperatures. Monza is what Formula 1 would call a 'high-deg' track, where tires literally fall apart due to high surface temperatures, massive braking loads, and continuous high-speed cornering. The nice thing with the P Zeros past their peak, though, is that after being punished by journalist after journalist, there's a really nice plateau of grip, no precipitous drop into oblivion.
This is a tire that's approachable, forgiving beyond the limit. Braking performance was generally very good, though the RS3 braking hard from very high speeds was disconcertingly loose. That's probably not the tire's fault, though, as the RS3 is nose-heavy and actually one of the few cars with larger front tires than rear, so you can only expect so much braking from 150 mph. It's worth braking a little earlier and longer in this car.
Photo by: Pirelli
Photo by: Pirelli
In the M5, it was easy to push into understeer in the slow chicanes, but that's because it's a 700-plus horsepower, 5,000-plus-pound luxury sedan. The M5 was probably the best illustration of the problem Pirelli faces in developing modern summer performance tires. Cars are simply getting heavier and faster, asking more and more of the tire. Frankly, only really finding understeer in Monza's clumsy first chicane is remarkable.
Some of the great feel in the hands from the PZ5 was on display in the Audi and BMW, too, which was nice given that these aren't cars you typically associate with super-nuanced steering. But perhaps unsurprisingly, the P Zero R shone brightest in the 911. It's a perfect complement to this car, with its sublime balance and seemingly endless all-wheel drive traction.
Of course, the P Zero R attempts to split the difference between a road tire and a track-day tire, and we didn't get to drive it on the road. So, we can't render a complete verdict here either, especially considering that we didn't get to do any direct comparison with a competitor. But again, our initial impressions were very good.
P Zero Trofeo RS
Photo by: Pirelli
Driving a Porsche 911 GT3 RS at Monza is so much its own thing that it deserves a separate story, coming later this week. As far as the tire itself, it's deeply impressive. Compared to a Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 or Cup 2 R, I'm not sure this would be quite as quick, but it feels far more approachable. The Michelins are a little skittish past their peak, whereas the Trofeo RS, like the P Zero R, offers a nice plateau of grip beyond the peak.
The new GT3 RS is a serious car, with an aero package that gives it downforce to rival the GT3 Cup cars you might see racing here during an F1 weekend. This means almost unbelievably high cornering speeds and extraordinary braking.
Photo by: Pirelli
This tire helps make this immense car feel approachable, giving you the confidence to start leaning on the wings. And at lower speeds, where the aero is less effective, there's a ton of mechanical grip. In the medium-speed Lesmo 1 right-hander, I often turned in too late, prompting the instructor right seat to get me to get in a little closer to the apex. You could just flit the wheel, and the car dove right in, showing there was far more available grip than I initially thought.
And remarkably, the Trofeo RS feels like a part of the Pirelli family. It has a lot of the same characteristics, just dialed way, way up. Last year, I drove the Taycan Turbo GT on track with both the R and the Trofeo RS, and the difference in sheer mechanical grip is astounding.
A Paradigm Shift
Photo by: Pirelli
It's hard to draw absolutely definitive conclusions from a test like this, but it's very clear that Pirelli has taken a huge step forward with its latest generation of P Zero tires. The nature of tire development has changed so significantly, as has everything in the automotive world, and the PZ5 and its racier siblings are a reflection of this fact.
Misani is right, it's a paradigm shift.
More on Pirelli
Pirelli Has a new Street-Legal Racing Tire for the US. We Tested It
Pirelli's New Cyber Tires Can Talk to Your Car
Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily.
back
Sign up
For more information, read our
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Use
.
Share this Story
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Reddit
WhatsApp
E-Mail
Got a tip for us? Email:
tips@motor1.com
Join the conversation
(
)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Forget Cars—Tesla's Future Is A Robotaxi Empire
Forget Cars—Tesla's Future Is A Robotaxi Empire

Forbes

time21 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Forget Cars—Tesla's Future Is A Robotaxi Empire

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM - JANUARY 10: Tesla Cybercab or Robotaxi two-passenger battery-electric ... More self-driving car on display at the AutoSalon on January 10, 2025 in Brussels, Belgium. (Photo by Sjoerd van) Tesla isn't just making cars anymore—it's rewriting what a car is. The Robotaxi. While legacy automakers focus on electrifying yesterday's models, Tesla is quietly building something far more ambitious: a closed-loop, vertically integrated robotaxi ecosystem. The vehicle is no longer the product; it's the delivery mechanism for an autonomous software platform that generates recurring revenue, mile by mile. If Tesla successfully achieves this, the company will shift from being a car manufacturer to becoming the infrastructure layer of global mobility, relying on the vehicle, the AI brain, the data, and the payments stack. Think AWS, but for transportation. This endeavor isn't about selling more cars. It's about monetizing every idle second of them. Tesla's critics scoff at its valuation, but if robotaxis work, the real question becomes: is it undervalued? Why The Robotaxi Model Is Different Legacy automakers live off one-time transactions. They sell a car and book a margin of around $6,000 on average, and they hope you come back in five to seven years. That's the model. Tesla, with its robotaxi ambition, is rewriting that model entirely: recurring revenue per mile, not margin per sale. Here's the math: A single robotaxi running 70,000 miles a year and charging $0.50 to $1 per mile generates $35,000 to $70,000 in annual revenue. Over a decade, that's $350,000 to $700,000—from one car. The autonomy, enabled by software, operates continuously without the need for multiple buyers or subscriptions. There is no need for a driver, there is no downtime, and there is no intermediary involved. Compare that to Uber or Lyft. They rely on third-party drivers and vehicles — all variable, all costly. Tesla removes the biggest expense in mobility: labor. That's not competition. That's elimination. Vertical Integration: Tesla's Hidden Advantage Most people focus on Tesla's cars. But the real edge lies in something far harder to replicate: vertical integration. While legacy automakers outsource software and tech firms try to bolt autonomy onto third-party hardware, Tesla owns the entire autonomy stack. Tesla keeps everything in-house, from the car itself to its custom Dojo chip, the Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, and the billions of real-world miles that fuel its neural net. That's the flywheel. And it's already spinning. Compare that to Waymo, technically brilliant but with a fraction of the fleet and no manufacturing muscle. Cruise? GM has backed Cruise, but public trust and safety issues have stalled its momentum. Apple? Apple has discreetly withdrawn from the market. Meanwhile, Tesla has 5 million cars on the road, all collecting data, all capable of receiving over-the-air updates, and many already monetized through paid FSD subscriptions. This is not a project awaiting approval. The commercial rollout is already underway, and investors who still view this as speculative may be reconsidering their decision. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - MARCH 14: A Waymo autonomous self-driving Jaguar taxi is stopped at a ... More light while driving along a street on March 14, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. Beginning today, Waymo One is offering robotaxi services in a 63-square mile area of greater Los Angeles including Santa Monica, Venice and downtown with over 50,000 people on the wait list. Waymo is owned by Alphabet, Google's parent company. (Photo by) The FSD Milestone And What Comes Next Tesla's FSD v12 update didn't just tweak the driving algorithm; it rewrote the stack. Gone is the old rules-based logic. In its place: a neural net trained end-to-end on real-world video, learning like a human and improving like a machine. The shift is exponential, not iterative, and that's the inflection most investors still miss. We saw the first real-world glimpse of this change a day ago, when Tesla launched its robotaxi pilot in Austin. A handful of driverless Model Ys quietly began taking riders, fully autonomous but monitored, at a symbolic $4.20 fare. There was no press release at the time. Just execution. The real catalyst comes next: August 8, 2025, when Elon unveils the Cybercab, a steering-wheel-free, purpose-built autonomous vehicle designed for Tesla's own ride-hailing network. This isn't a concept. The hardware's ready. The software's learning. And the business model is recurring. Tesla isn't just selling EVs anymore. It's renting out the future, one mile at a time. The Financial Reframe: How Analysts May Be Missing It Most analysts still value Tesla as just another carmaker, projecting EBITDA based on unit sales, delivery growth, and gross margin per vehicle. But that lens misses the shift underway. Tesla isn't just selling metal; it's building a vertically integrated platform with software-like economics. Think of recurring revenue from robotaxis, not one-time car sales. Each autonomous vehicle could generate $10,000 to $15,000 per year, per car, at 70–80% margins. When multiplied across millions of units, this moves beyond the traditional Detroit territory. You are now in the realm of cloud software. Add Dojo, Tesla's in-house AI training supercomputer, which serves internal purposes and creates a revenue model akin to a data center. Add the potential licensing of Full Self-Driving software to other OEMs, and what you get is an upside-distance scenario that doesn't fit traditional comps. Tesla 2yr Chart Risk Factors And Realities There is no guarantee of Tesla's success. Even the most bullish investors need to recognize real hurdles. Regulatory approvals will roll out city by city, not all at once—and one high-profile robotaxi crash could dominate headlines and stall momentum. Public trust isn't automatic either; convincing people to ride in driverless cars will take time. And competition is fierce: Waymo has elite tech, Amazon's Zoox is quietly advancing, and China's Baidu is pushing fast in its home market. However, it's crucial to note that none of these companies possess the same scale, brand recognition, or the vast data advantage derived from billions of real-world miles as Tesla. That matters. The path won't be linear, but the opportunity is asymmetric. The market loves to overprice short-term noise and underprice long-term transformation. Investors who can stomach the bumps may end up owning a piece of mobility's future infrastructure—not just a car stock. Why Tesla's Robotaxi Vision Can't Be Ignored Tesla's robotaxi ambition extends beyond simply competing with Uber; it aims to revolutionize mobility, economics, and platform value. If it pulls this off, Tesla won't simply be a carmaker. It becomes a software powerhouse, a data flywheel, and a ride-hailing juggernaut, all vertically integrated. That kind of optionality isn't something traditional auto valuations can capture. You're not buying Ford 2.0; you're buying Apple transportation. Similar to previous significant changes, the market may not immediately recognize this shift. It'll whisper. The company controlling the chip, the car, and the algorithm is poised to transform the game. game. Ignore it at your cost. The author owns Tesla stock.

EU Council Adopts Position On Reduced Sustainability Reporting Requirements
EU Council Adopts Position On Reduced Sustainability Reporting Requirements

Forbes

time25 minutes ago

  • Forbes

EU Council Adopts Position On Reduced Sustainability Reporting Requirements

People walk by a European flag. (Photo by) On June 23, the Council of the European Union announced the adoption of their official position on reductions to sustainability reporting requirements. In February, the Commission proposed an Omnibus Simplification Package to reduce the requirements in both the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. The Council's position mostly followed the Commission on the CSRD, but greatly reduced the scope of the CSDDD. Now all eyes shift the Parliament as they debate their position before the three bodies begin final negotiations. The EU adopted a series of directives to force businesses to address climate change and report greenhouse gas missions. The CSRD created requirements for businesses to report GHG emissions and other environmental, social, and governance actions. The CSDDD created additional reporting requirements, as well as legal liability, for companies in relation to their supply chain. However, the cost of these proposals on businesses and the possible impact on the EU economy became a theme during the 2024 elections. The shift to the right in EU politics embolden opponents to the European Green Deal directives. As a result, the Commission proposed a package of new directives to 'reduce the burden' on businesses. The Omnibus Simplification Package was officially adopted by the Commission in February. Once legislation is proposed by the Commission, the Parliament and the Council adopt positions. In the Parliament, the process is a typical legislative process with committees and members proposing amendments. The Council engages in negotiations behind closed doors, only releasing periodic updates. Once the three adopt positions, they enter into a 'trialogue' to negotiate the final directive. The Parliament is actively engaged in the process to adopt their position. On June 23, the Council announced their final position. Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive The current CSRD uses a two out of three criteria test to determine if a company must report. The Commission proposes raiding the employee threshold. Stating 'to be subject to the reporting requirements an undertakings must have an average of more than 1000 employees during the financial year and either a net turnover above €50 million or a balance sheet total above €25 million.' Bringing it in line with the CSDDD. The Council's proposal uses the 1000 employee threshold, but raises the annual turnover to €450 million. They also add "a review clause concerning a possible extension of the scope to ensure adequate availability of corporate sustainability information"." Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive The current CSDDD requires companies to execute due diligence in ensuring that companies along the value chain are in compliance with environmental and human rights requirements. The Commission did not propose changes to the scope, but the Council wants to raise the employee threshold to 5000 employees and an annual net turnover of €1.5 billion. One key aspect of the CSDDD is that it holds businesses accountable for the actions of other companies along their value chain. The Commission proposal limits that responsibility of Article 8 to direct business partners. Indirect business partners may still fall under the scope, "where a company has plausible information that suggests that adverse impacts at the level of the operations of an indirect business partner have arisen or may arise, it shall carry out an in-depth assessment." The Council proposes to change 'the focus from an entity-based approach to a risk-based approach, focusing on areas where actual and potential adverse impacts are most likely to occur. Companies should no longer be required to carry out a comprehensive mapping exercise, but instead, conduct a more general scoping exercise. To provide for a significant burden relief, the Council maintains the limitation of the relevant obligations to the 'tier 1'. In-scope companies are supposed to base their efforts on reasonably available information.' The next steps to reduce sustainability reporting It is clear that the EU will significantly reduce the scope of businesses that fall under both the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. The Parliament should adopt a final position in October. Then the trialogue will commence. The Commission is pushing for the final changes to be adopted by December, although negotiations may spill over into January.

UW's CoMotion Labs names six startups for inaugural climate and green tech incubator
UW's CoMotion Labs names six startups for inaugural climate and green tech incubator

Geek Wire

timean hour ago

  • Geek Wire

UW's CoMotion Labs names six startups for inaugural climate and green tech incubator

Sustainability: News about the rapidly growing climate tech sector and other areas of innovation to protect our planet. SEE MORE The reception desk at the Seattle Climate Innovation Hub. (SCIH Photo) The University of Washington's CoMotion Labs has named the six startups participating in its inaugural Climate Tech Incubator. More than 30 companies applied to the eight-month program, which is part of the recently launched Seattle Climate Innovation Hub. The broader effort is a collaboration between CoMotion, the Seattle Office of Economic Development, the climate co-working group 9Zero, and the funding nonprofit VertueLab. The downtown-based incubator begins in July and includes access to UW facilities; mentoring, networking and entrepreneurial training; and preparation for raising capital from investors. 'These innovators are not only tackling the climate crisis head-on, they're laying the foundation for a resilient green economy. By supporting these startups, we're building a future where Washington leads in climate innovation, creates high-quality green jobs, and drives inclusive economic development across the region,' said Ashlee Esteban, director of CoMotion Labs, in a statement. The incubator companies are:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store