logo
Trump urged by Ben Stiller, Paul McCartney and hundreds of stars to protect AI copyright rules

Trump urged by Ben Stiller, Paul McCartney and hundreds of stars to protect AI copyright rules

Fox News20-03-2025

Ben Stiller, Paul McCartney and Ron Howard were among the over 400 Hollywood stars and industry workers who signed an open letter this week urging President Donald Trump to protect artificial intelligence copyright rules.
"We firmly believe that America's global AI leadership must not come at the expense of our essential creative industries," the letter, addressed to Trump's Office of Science and Technology Policy and shared by Deadline and Variety, began.
"America's arts and entertainment industry supports over 2.3M American jobs with over $229Bn in wages annually, while providing the foundation for American democratic influence and soft power abroad. But AI companies are asking to undermine this economic and cultural strength by weakening copyright protections for the films, television series, artworks, writing, music, and voices used to train AI models at the core of multi-billion-dollar corporate valuations."
The letter was submitted as part of comments on the Trump administration's U.S. AI Action Plan.
OpenAI and Google recently put forth their own submissions to the Office of Science and Technology asking their respective companies to be able to train their models on copyrighted material.
"The federal government can both secure Americans' freedom to learn from AI and avoid forfeiting our AI lead to the PRC by preserving American AI models' ability to learn from copyrighted material," OpenAI's letter states.
Google's states, "Balanced copyright rules, such as fair use and text-and-data mining exceptions, have been critical to enabling AI systems to learn from prior knowledge and publicly available data, unlocking scientific and social advances. These exceptions allow for the use of copyrighted, publicly available material for AI training without significantly impacting rightsholders and avoid often highly unpredictable, imbalanced, and lengthy negotiations with data holders during model development or scientific experimentation."
Hollywood's letter counters, "There is no reason to weaken or eliminate the copyright protections that have helped America flourish. Not when AI companies can use our copyrighted material by simply doing what the law requires: negotiating appropriate licenses with copyright holders — just as every other industry does.
"Access to America's creative catalog of films, writing, video content, and music is not a matter of national security. They do not require a government-mandated exemption from existing U.S. copyright law.
"For nearly 250 years, U.S. copyright law has balanced creator's rights with the needs of the public, creating the world's most vibrant creative economy. We recommend that the American AI Action Plan uphold existing copyright frameworks to maintain the strength of America's creative and knowledge industries, as well as American cultural influence abroad."
While a large group of A-listers are rallying against AI, a team of top-grossing directors is openly embracing the technology.
Joe and Anthony Russo, the brothers behind some of Marvel's biggest hits, like "Avengers: Endgame," recently released their film "The Electric State" on Netflix, starring Millie Bobby Brown and Chris Pratt.
The film tells the story of a world full of powerful robots dominating the landscape and touches on the subject of AI.
Joe told The Sunday Times this week that they used AI for some voice modulation in "The Electric State" and that AI use is more prevalent in Hollywood than people are willing to admit.
"There's a lot of finger-pointing and hyperbole because people are afraid," Joe said. "They don't understand. But ultimately you'll see AI used more significantly."
He continued, "Also, AI is in its generative state now, where it has, as we call them, hallucinations. You can't do mission-critical work with something that hallucinates. That is a reason self-driving cars haven't taken over or why AI surgery is not taking place worldwide. But in its generative state, AI is best suited towards creativity."
AI, especially generative AI, has been a divisive topic in Hollywood since before the strikes by writers and actors in 2023.
Both unions shut down the industry for almost six months, but it was "necessary at the time," SAG-AFTRA National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator Duncan Crabtree-Ireland told Fox News Digital last year.
"Our members suffered. Other workers in the industry suffered. The industry suffered. It was necessary at that time. I wish it hadn't been," Crabtree-Ireland said. "I mean, to me, when I look at the ultimate agreement, I feel like the companies could have made this deal with us on July 12, and this entire thing could have been avoided, and yet they refused. And so that's very frustrating.
"On the other hand, it was essential that we be out ahead of the implementation of AI. If we were trying to negotiate this after the industry had already started using it in a big way, it would be impossible to actually sort of put that genie back in the bottle. And so I feel really good that we successfully anticipated this challenge."
At this month's SXSW festival, SAG-AFTRA held a panel addressing the continued effect of AI on Hollywood.
WATCH: SAG-AFTRA REP ON WHY THE 'DEVASTATING' HOLLYWOOD STRIKES LAST YEAR WERE 'NECESSARY'
"The copyright issue is a very big deal to the studios, and, for our folks, it's been good, in that [employers] do really want to hear from our people because if something isn't [protected under] copyright — if anybody can make Superman's suit, and you don't own it anymore — that's very bad," Vanessa Holtgrewe, IATSE international vice president & assistant department director of motion picture and television production, said in a press release on the union's website.
"So, they're being very cautious and careful about AI."
DGA Associate National Executive Director & Western Executive Director Rebecca Rhine added, "Ultimately, there has to be some federal legislation, and I think all the unions are discussing among themselves about what approaches may bear the most fruit."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump's big bill will directly impact your wallet — from paying your taxes and healthcare to raising a child and owning a home
How Trump's big bill will directly impact your wallet — from paying your taxes and healthcare to raising a child and owning a home

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Trump's big bill will directly impact your wallet — from paying your taxes and healthcare to raising a child and owning a home

While Capitol Hill wrangles over the tax-and-spending package that President Donald Trump has dubbed the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' Americans are trying to understand what the sprawling legislation could mean for them. Republican lawmakers are wrestling with the bill's multitrillion-dollar cost. They also face questions — from both within their party and outside of it — about who would win and who would lose as a result of the measure. My sister and her husband died within days of each other. Their banks won't let me access their safe-deposit boxes. What now? Investors brace for 'unpredictable spillovers' in markets after Trump announces Iran strikes 'I'm at my wit's end': My niece paid off her husband's credit card but fell behind on her taxes. How can I help her? Israel-Iran clash delivers a fresh shock to investors. History suggests this is the move to make. How can I buy my niece a home in her name only — without alienating or upsetting her husband? But there's no question the legislation would be a big deal for millions of Americans. The bill would keep the 2017 tax cuts enacted in the first Trump administration, and make more changes. The costs to raise a family, own a home and afford healthcare would be directly impacted by the bill. Its specifics matter to the parents of little kids and to people who are age 65 and older. The bill also has implications for car buyers, gig workers and millions of employees who make money from tips and overtime pay. On top of that, the bill would place new restrictions and requirements on public assistance programs — including Medicaid, the state-and-federal program offering health coverage to low-income people. The bill could cut a person's taxes 'by hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars depending on the situation a taxpayer is in,' said Andrew Lautz, an associate director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center. 'Folks on both sides of the aisle will debate the beautifulness,' Lautz told MarketWatch. 'But the bigness of it cannot be debated — both the impact on Americans and its budget impact.' The Senate now has the bill after the House of Representatives passed it by a single vote last month. Differences between the House bill and the Senate version are taking shape; some are stark and some are subtle. Lawmakers have to bridge the gap, which they are trying to do quickly. President Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July, but that deadline might be more aspirational instead of ironclad. Nearly half of people (47%) said the bill would negatively affect them and their families, while 24% foresaw a positive impact, according to a Pew Research Center poll, Another 26% said the bill would not impact them much, said the survey released this week. Taxes are complicated, and political talking points make it even more confusing for the public to understand, said Erica York, vice president of federal tax policy at the Tax Foundation. 'It's this big education gap that makes it difficult for talking about what's at stake and what's important.' York gives the bill mixed grades. It could have been a chance 'to build on what the 2017 law did really well,' she said. Instead, the legislation is 'spending way too much money on political carve-outs and gimmicks.' Here's a look at how the tax-and-spending bill would affect Americans' wallets. The bill's core move is keeping income-tax rates where they are now. It's maintaining the status quo, but with some tweaks. Though income-tax brackets have long been adjusted for inflation, the House and Senate are offering some extra inflation indexing. But it's not for everyone. Six of seven brackets, sparing the top 37%, would get the extra adjustment under the House bill. The Senate Finance Committee text applies those extra inflation protections to the bottom three rates of 10%, 12% and 22%. Most taxpayers are in multiple brackets, and taxed at higher rates as their income increases. So if the bottom rungs of the income ladder get more adjustments, 'it means that more income is subject to the lower bracket than the higher tax brackets,' Lautz explained. That's a good thing for someone minding their tax bill, he noted. Instead of a simple extension of the 2017 Trump tax cuts' rates, that adjustment 'is a tax cut for the brackets that get it,' he said. There are other unflashy but important potential changes. The widely used standard deduction is poised to become more generous in both the House and Senate versions. There are differences on timing, but the general idea is to add another $1,000 to the standard deduction for single filers and another $2,000 for married couples. This year, the standard deduction is $15,000 for individuals and $30,000 for married couples filing jointly. The 2017 tax law doubled the standard deduction, and more than 90% of taxpayers use it now instead of itemizing. Any changes will be far-reaching considering how many people use the standard deduction to lower their taxable income, Lautz said. For example, an extra $2,000 for a household in the 22% bracket would shave over $400 from that tax bill, he noted. Staying healthy costs more money than ever, but the tax bill's impact is a sore spot. An open question is how far the bill will go on changes to Medicaid. That includes certain new requirements for recipients and possible new tax formulas for states in the program. Lawmakers supporting the cuts say program costs have to get under control. Critics say millions of people could lose health coverage as a result. The bill's healthcare impacts aren't just about Medicaid. An enhanced tax credit that helped people pay for coverage purchased on the Affordable Care Act's exchange is set to expire at the end of this year. These changes to Medicaid and the lapsed enhancement for the premium tax credit could add 16 million more people to the country's uninsured population by 2034, according to estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Meanwhile, the House and Senate are taking different paths on health-savings accounts. The House bill is trying to make these tax-advantaged HSAs more generous and easy to use; the Senate text, for now, doesn't include those provisions. 'Not including the HSA expansion provisions in the initial Senate draft represents a significant missed opportunity to address America's healthcare affordability crisis,' said Scott Cutler, president and chief executive of HealthEquity, an administrator of HSA plans. If Congress allows the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to expire, the child tax credit would shrink to $1,000 from its current $2,000 level. The House bill would avoid that by increasing the credit to $2,500 from 2025 to 2028, and then indexing the amount to rise with inflation beginning in 2029. The Senate version would permanently increase the credit to $2,200, and peg its payout with inflation rates. The country's immigration debate also makes its way into the credit's possible alterations. Children already needed to have Social Security numbers for their households to claim the credit. The House bill says all parents on the return need to have a Social Security number; the Senate Finance Committee's text takes one step back, saying the taxpayer must have a Social Security number and at least one of the two people on a married couple's return need a Social Security number. Additionally, both the House and Senate versions would create tax-advantaged 'Trump accounts' and seed them with $1,000 for children born between 2024 and 2028. Both chambers' bills would also enhance tax credits for employer-sponsored childcare — but some observers have said these credits are inefficient and little-used. No taxes on tips and no taxes for overtime pay were two rally cries during Trump's campaign. Now, the House and Senate are delivering related tax breaks. These are deductions — not outright exemptions. In a bill where some provisions are still in flux, the two deductions seem destined to become law in at least some form. The House version offers a deduction equal to the amount of tips or overtime. The Senate caps the tip deduction $12,500 per individual or $25,000 for a married couple. Both versions have income limitations that would prevent wealthier taxpayers from taking the deduction. For the House, 'high-compensated employees' who are paid $160,000 or more this year wouldn't be eligible for the deduction. For the Senate, it's a $150,000 threshold for single filers and $300,000 for married couples. Homes are the source of some of the bill's most contentious spots. The big thorn in the side is how large a break should be for homeowners who want to deduct their state and local taxes. The SALT deduction, as it's known, is now limited to $10,000. The House bill would bring the deduction to $40,000 with certain income restrictions. The Senate text keeps $10,000 for now, noting it's the topic of 'continuing negotiations.' If the 2017 tax cuts expire, the cap would go away, and several Republican House lawmakers believe they have leverage in a thin majority to insist on a $40,000 cap. It's not the only big-ticket purchase at stake in the bill. Both the House and the Senate have tax subsidies for people buying cars assembled in the U.S.; it comes as a deduction on the car-loan interest for eligible vehicles. At the same time, both chambers end a $7,500 credit drivers can claim when they buy a new electric vehicle, and a separate credit for used EVs. The Senate text would end the credit months after enactment, but the House bill would let the credit drive along for the rest of 2025 and possbily 2026 in some cases. Both the House and Senate bills offer 'bonus' deductions for people age 65 and above. The deductions come in place of Trump's campaign proposal to eliminate taxes on Social Security income, which can be imposed on as much as 85% of a recipient's benefit. The Senate suggests a temporary deduction of up to $6,000 for individuals 65 years and older, with a phaseout rate of 6% for a single person with a modified adjusted gross income of more than $75,000 (or $150,000 for those who are married filing jointly). The proposal is an increase from the House bill's $4,000 deduction. Meanwhile, both the House and Senate are setting the new estate-tax exemption limit at $15 million for an individual (and $30 million for a married couple) for 2025. This top-line amount will be adjusted for inflation starting in 2026 and going forward permanently. This avoids a sunset of the estate-tax exemption levels set in 2018, which would have cut the current amount roughly in half to about $7 million for an individual ($14 million for a couple). Neither proposed version strips the estate tax out of the system altogether. However, it is high enough that very few estates will be over the limit, and of those, only a few thousand per year will likely owe any federal estate tax. Israel-Iran conflict poses three challenges for stocks that could slam market by up to 20%, warns RBC I'm 51, earn $129K and have $165K in my 401(k). Can I afford to retire when my husband, 59, draws Social Security at 62? 'I'm 68 and my 401(k) has dwindled to $82,000': My husband committed financial infidelity and has $50,000 in credit-card debt. What now? I'm 75 and have a reverse mortgage. Should I pay it off with my $200K savings — and live off Social Security instead? 'It might be another Apple or Microsoft': My wife invested $100K in one stock and it exploded 1,500%. Do we sell? Sign in to access your portfolio

The Return Trends At B.O.S. Better Online Solutions (NASDAQ:BOSC) Look Promising
The Return Trends At B.O.S. Better Online Solutions (NASDAQ:BOSC) Look Promising

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Return Trends At B.O.S. Better Online Solutions (NASDAQ:BOSC) Look Promising

If you're looking for a multi-bagger, there's a few things to keep an eye out for. One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Speaking of which, we noticed some great changes in B.O.S. Better Online Solutions' (NASDAQ:BOSC) returns on capital, so let's have a look. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for B.O.S. Better Online Solutions, this is the formula: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.14 = US$3.5m ÷ (US$38m - US$13m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). So, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions has an ROCE of 14%. By itself that's a normal return on capital and it's in line with the industry's average returns of 14%. See our latest analysis for B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Historical performance is a great place to start when researching a stock so above you can see the gauge for B.O.S. Better Online Solutions' ROCE against it's prior returns. If you're interested in investigating B.O.S. Better Online Solutions' past further, check out this free graph covering B.O.S. Better Online Solutions' past earnings, revenue and cash flow. We like the trends that we're seeing from B.O.S. Better Online Solutions. The data shows that returns on capital have increased substantially over the last five years to 14%. The company is effectively making more money per dollar of capital used, and it's worth noting that the amount of capital has increased too, by 66%. This can indicate that there's plenty of opportunities to invest capital internally and at ever higher rates, a combination that's common among multi-baggers. To sum it up, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions has proven it can reinvest in the business and generate higher returns on that capital employed, which is terrific. And with a respectable 59% awarded to those who held the stock over the last five years, you could argue that these developments are starting to get the attention they deserve. Therefore, we think it would be worth your time to check if these trends are going to continue. If you want to continue researching B.O.S. Better Online Solutions, you might be interested to know about the 2 warning signs that our analysis has discovered. While B.O.S. Better Online Solutions isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Oracle Full Year 2025 Earnings: In Line With Expectations
Oracle Full Year 2025 Earnings: In Line With Expectations

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oracle Full Year 2025 Earnings: In Line With Expectations

Revenue: US$57.4b (up 8.4% from FY 2024). Net income: US$12.4b (up 19% from FY 2024). Profit margin: 22% (up from 20% in FY 2024). The increase in margin was driven by higher revenue. EPS: US$4.46 (up from US$3.82 in FY 2024). AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Revenue was in line with analyst estimates. Earnings per share (EPS) was also in line with analyst expectations. The primary driver behind last 12 months revenue was the Cloud and License segment contributing a total revenue of US$49.2b (86% of total revenue). The largest operating expense was Research & Development (R&D) costs, amounting to US$9.86b (35% of total expenses). Explore how ORCL's revenue and expenses shape its earnings. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 14% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 13% growth forecast for the Software industry in the US. Performance of the American Software industry. The company's shares are down 4.7% from a week ago. Before you take the next step you should know about the 2 warning signs for Oracle that we have uncovered. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store