Native leaders blast construction of Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' on land they call sacred
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration is racing ahead with construction of a makeshift immigration detention facility at an airstrip in the Everglades over the opposition of Native American leaders who consider the area their sacred ancestral homelands.
A string of portable generators and dump trucks loaded with fill dirt streamed into the site on Thursday, according to activist Jessica Namath, who witnessed the activity. The state is plowing ahead with building a compound of heavy-duty tents, trailers and other temporary buildings at the county-owned airfield located in the Big Cypress National Preserve, about 45 miles (72 kilometers) west of downtown Miami.
A spokesperson for the Florida Division of Emergency Management, which is helping lead the project, did not respond to requests for comment.
State officials have characterized the site as an ideal place to hold migrants, saying there's 'not much' there other than pythons and alligators.
Indigenous leaders who can trace their roots to the area back thousands of years dispute that — and they're condemning the state's plans to build what's been dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz ' on their homelands.
For generations, the sweeping wetlands of what is now South Florida have been home to Native peoples who today make up the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida and the Seminole Tribe of Florida, as well as the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma.
'Rather than Miccosukee homelands being an uninhabited wasteland for alligators and pythons, as some have suggested, the Big Cypress is the Tribe's traditional homelands. The landscape has protected the Miccosukee and Seminole people for generations,' Miccosukee Chairman Talbert Cypress wrote in a statement on social media.
There are 15 remaining traditional Miccosukee and Seminole villages in Big Cypress, as well as ceremonial and burial grounds and other gathering sites, Cypress testified before Congress in 2024.
'We live here. Our ancestors fought and died here. They are buried here,' he said. 'The Big Cypress is part of us, and we are a part of it.'
Critics have condemned the facility and what they call the state's apparent reliance on alligators as a security measure as a cruel spectacle, while DeSantis and other state officials have defended it as part of Florida's muscular efforts to carry out President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown.
Tribal leaders and environmentalists are urging the state to change course, noting billions of dollars in state and federal funds have been poured into Everglades restoration in recent years, an investment they say is jeopardized by plans to house some 1,000 migrants at the site for an undetermined amount of time.
Indigenous leaders and activists are planning to gather at the site again on Saturday to stage a demonstration highlighting why the area is 'sacred' and should be 'protected, not destroyed.'
'This place became our refuge in time of war. It provides us a place to continue our culture and traditions,' Miccosukee leader Betty Osceola wrote in a social media post announcing the demonstration.
'And we need to protect it for our future generations,' she added.
___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Native leaders blast construction of Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' on land they call sacred
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration is racing ahead with construction of a makeshift immigration detention facility at an airstrip in the Everglades over the opposition of Native American leaders who consider the area their sacred ancestral homelands. A string of portable generators and dump trucks loaded with fill dirt streamed into the site on Thursday, according to activist Jessica Namath, who witnessed the activity. The state is plowing ahead with building a compound of heavy-duty tents, trailers and other temporary buildings at the Miami Dade County-owned airfield located in the Big Cypress National Preserve, about 45 miles (72 kilometers) west of downtown Miami. A spokesperson for the Florida Division of Emergency Management, which is helping lead the project, did not respond to requests for comment. State officials have characterized the site as an ideal place to hold migrants, saying there's 'not much' there other than pythons and alligators. Indigenous leaders dispute that and are condemning the state's plans to build what's been dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz ' on their homelands. Native Americans can trace their roots to the area back thousands of years. For generations, the sweeping wetlands of what is now South Florida have been home to Native peoples who today make up the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida and the Seminole Tribe of Florida, as well as the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma. 'Rather than Miccosukee homelands being an uninhabited wasteland for alligators and pythons, as some have suggested, the Big Cypress is the Tribe's traditional homelands. The landscape has protected the Miccosukee and Seminole people for generations,' Miccosukee Chairman Talbert Cypress wrote in a statement on social media. There are 15 remaining traditional Miccosukee and Seminole villages in Big Cypress, as well as ceremonial and burial grounds and other gathering sites, Cypress testified before Congress in 2024. 'We live here. Our ancestors fought and died here. They are buried here,' he said. 'The Big Cypress is part of us, and we are a part of it.' Garrett Stuart, who lives about 3 miles (4.8 kilometers) from the site, described the crystal clear waters, open prairies and lush tree islands of Big Cypress as teeming with life. 'Hearing the arguments of the frogs in the water, you know? And listen to the grunt of the alligator. You're hearing the call of that osprey flying by and listening to the crows chatting,' he said. 'It's all just incredible.' Critics have condemned the detention facility and what they call the state's apparent reliance on alligators as a security measure as a cruel spectacle, while DeSantis and other state officials have defended it as part of Florida's muscular efforts to carry out President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. 'To have alligators and pythons be the security guards, only someone who's never spent time in the swamp would ever say something like that,' Stuart said. 'They're afraid of human beings.' The Florida National Guard is preparing to send up to 100 soldiers to the facility on July 1 to provide site security and staff augmentation, and other support 'as directed.' 'We don't have a set timeline for this mission due to the fluid nature of the situation, but we will stay on the ground for as long as we're needed and at the direction of Governor DeSantis,' Guard spokesperson Brittianie Funderburk said in a statement. Tribal leaders and environmentalists are urging the state to change course, noting billions of dollars in state and federal funds have been poured into Everglades restoration in recent years, an investment they say is jeopardized by plans to house some 1,000 migrants at the site for an undetermined amount of time. Indigenous leaders and activists are planning to gather at the site again on Saturday to stage a demonstration highlighting why the area is 'sacred' and should be 'protected, not destroyed.' 'This place became our refuge in time of war. It provides us a place to continue our culture and traditions,' Miccosukee leader Betty Osceola wrote in a social media post announcing the demonstration. 'And we need to protect it for our future generations,' she added. ___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Fox News
32 minutes ago
- Fox News
Harvard Kennedy School announces layoffs after Trump cuts billions in funding
The Harvard Kennedy School of Government will lay off staff after federal funding cuts and endowment tax threats on Wednesday, according to an email from the dean of the school that was obtained by Fox News Digital. Without mentioning the Trump administration directly, Harvard Kennedy School Dean Jeremy M. Weinstein announced in an email to faculty and staff that the cuts were in response to "unprecedented new headwinds" creating "significant financial challenges." These included a "substantial proposed increase in the endowment tax" and "massive cuts to federal funding of research." He also cited the impact on international student enrollment after the administration eliminated the student visa program due to "pro-terrorist conduct" at Harvard's campus protests. According to the Kennedy School, international students made up 59 percent of the school's student body last year, and 52 percent on average in the past five years. The Kennedy School has been planning for budget cuts since February, but the White House's recent actions appear to have exacerbated the circumstances. The Trump administration froze $2.2 billion in funding to the university and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status due to its handling of antisemitism on campus in the wake of the October 7 terror attacks on Israel by Hamas. The Department of Education's Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism released a statement on May 13, citing recent reporting that "has exposed the Harvard Law Review's (HLR) pattern of endemic race discrimination when evaluating articles for inclusion in its journal." The findings resulted in the Trump administration cutting an additional $450 million in grants from the university. In addition to layoffs, Harvard has implemented "important steps" to reduce costs across the Kennedy School, Weinstein said, such as pauses in hiring and merit-based pay, ending a lease on the first floor of an office building, halting "non-urgent" construction and renovation projects, and "reducing spending" across each core department. "Unfortunately, those efforts alone will not be enough to address our current financial challenges," the dean wrote. "As a result, we need to lay off some members of our team and restructure other positions to ensure the long-term financial future of the Kennedy School." Weinstein stated that managers would inform staff affected by the layoffs on Wednesday afternoon. "This is an extremely difficult moment, and one that we did everything possible to avoid," Weinstein added. "I am truly sorry that we need to take this step as we navigate unprecedented challenges as a School and University," Weinstein wrote, while also noting that the administration's actions caused "even greater financial uncertainty." The Harvard Kennedy School declined to disclose to Fox News Digital how many staff members were laid off. The Harvard School of Public Health implemented layoffs in April and other schools are considering cutting staff as well, the Harvard Crimson reported Thursday. The Trump administration did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
CNN
41 minutes ago
- CNN
Republicans and Democrats at odds over Iran nuclear capacity after US strikes
Emerging from a highly anticipated classified briefing on Thursday, Democratic and Republican senators were not in agreement over exactly how much US strikes on Iran set back that country's nuclear program. Many Republicans said that they believe it will now take Iran years longer to build a nuclear weapon, though some acknowledged the threat is not completely neutralized. But Democrats said the picture is far less clear – and one said the US strikes set Iran back only by months. According to an early US intelligence assessment that was described by seven people briefed on it, the US military strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities last weekend did not destroy the core components of the country's nuclear program and likely only set it back by months. The analysis of the damage to the sites and the impact of the strikes on Iran's nuclear ambitions is ongoing, and could change as more intelligence becomes available. But the early findings of the assessment are at odds with President Donald Trump's repeated claims that the strikes 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities. 'To me, it still appears that we have only set back the Iranian nuclear program by a handful of months. There's no doubt there was damage done to the program. But the allegations that we have obliterated their program just don't seem to stand up to reason,' Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut told reporters. 'I just don't think the president was telling the truth when he said the program was obliterated,' Murphy said, adding that he believed Iran still has 'significant remaining capability.' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, too, said that the briefing did not provide clear explanations to Trump's assertions. 'President Trump said that the nuclear stockpile was completely and totally obliterated. I did not receive an adequate answer to that question,' Schumer told reporters, accusing the White House of having 'no coherent strategy, no end game, no plan' for preventing Iran from building a nuclear weapon in the future. The classified briefing on Thursday was long awaited inside the Capitol, with senators of both parties eager for more information after the surprise attack by the US on Iran. A slate of top US officials spoke to senators: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. That group will also brief House members Friday morning. Republican senators, including Trump's top allies, left the briefing touting the effectiveness of the US strikes and — in some instances — echoing Trump's precise language that it 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear weapon capacity. 'They were obliterated. Nobody can use them anytime soon,' said Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, one of Trump's trusted national security advisers who had been pushing for this exact type of strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. Inside the secure room in the Capitol basement, key details of that early Pentagon intelligence assessment — which was first reported by CNN — were read aloud to senators during the briefing, according to one attendee, Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri. 'They walked through it and talked more about what it is and what exactly it says. I thought that answered a lot of questions,' said Hawley, who had been a vocal critic of US military intervention in the Iranian-Israeli conflict. 'Having listened to them now for an hour-plus walk through the intelligence and walk through what we know at this point, I think it's very fair to say that this military mission accomplished its objective for what they intended to do,' Hawley said. Other Republicans were more cautious in echoing Trump's initial language. Asked if Iran's facilities had been obliterated, Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said: 'I believe the goals of the mission were accomplished. I think that's an ambiguous term, or could be interpreted different ways, so I would just say the goals of the mission were accomplished.' Cornyn said it was unclear how long it might take for Iran to build a nuclear weapon, adding: 'Well, I don't think anybody's been underground to assess the damage. So I don't know if anyone can give you a precise number. I certainly can't.' Asked if the sites were obliterated, Sen. Rick Scott of Florida said, 'It's all in your definition.' Asked for his definition, Scott repeated to reporters: 'I think the military did an unbelievable job.' But Sen. Tom Cotton, who leads the Senate Intelligence Committee, was more definitive. He said the strikes would 'protect the world from the risk of an Iranian nuclear weapon for years.' 'I believe that this mission was a tremendous success and that we have effectively destroyed Iran's nuclear program,' Cotton said, criticizing the focus on the early assessment produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's intelligence arm. CNN has reported that the final US military 'battle damage assessment' by the DIA could take days or even weeks to complete, multiple sources familiar with the Pentagon's process told CNN. The initial DIA analysis was produced just 24 hours after the attack, according to one of the sources. Because it was only a preliminary analysis, its judgments were 'low-confidence,' the sources said. It was not coordinated with the wider intelligence community, according to a US official, and the document itself acknowledged that it could take weeks to produce a finalized assessment. 'I think that Iranian nuclear development is set back years,' Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas told reporters after the briefing. While a number of Democrats declined to weigh in at all on the briefing, Sen. Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware, said the briefing Thursday was 'constructive' even as he said the administration has more work to do to get a fuller assessment of the damages in his view. 'We do not have a complete assessment yet of the strikes of last week and when we do, I think that will answer a lot of currently unanswered questions,' Coons said. Asked by how much he felt the Iranian nuclear program was set back by the strikes, Coons said, 'we got more relevant details about that, but I think it is too early to actually fully grasp a number of critical and currently unanswered issues about what was exactly destroyed and exactly how long it would take to reconstruct it and what the intentions of the Iranian regime are.' Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, also gave a cautious assessment of the strikes. 'Clearly, damage was inflicted on the Iranian nuclear program,' Warner said, though he added that 'it is going to take time to get a final assessment of how much damage.' 'The thing that I've had some concern about is when, people jump to a conclusion too early. I mean, clearly, the president making a comment on Saturday night, before any assessment of total obliteration – listen, I hope that is the final assessment. But if not, does that end up providing a false sense of comfort to the American people or for that matter, the world?' Warner said.
