Egypt's grand mufti rejects fatwa for jihad against Israel as 'irresponsible'
Egypt's Grand Mufti Nazir Ayyad on Monday said it was "irresp0nsible" for the International Union Of Muslim Scholars (IUMS) to issue a fatwa that said all "able Muslims" are under an obligation to wage "jihad" against Israel due to its atrocities in Gaza.
The IUMS said all Muslim countries are under a legal duty "to intervene immediately militarily, economically and politically to stop this genocide and comprehensive destruction" and to impose a siege on Israel.
'The failure of the Arab and Islamic governments to support Gaza while it is being destroyed is considered by Islamic law to be a major crime against our oppressed brothers in Gaza,' its secretary general, Ali al-Qaradaghi, said in a decree issued on Friday.
In response, Ayyad, who is the highest authority for issuing religious opinions in Egypt, rejected the fatwa, saying that "no individual group or entity has the right to issue fatwas on such delicate and critical matters in violation of Sharia principles and its higher objectives".
"Such actions may endanger the security of societies and the stability of Muslim states," he added.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"Supporting the Palestinian people in their legitimate rights is a religious, humanitarian and moral duty. However, this support must be provided in a way that truly serves the interests of the Palestinian people, and not to advance specific agendas or reckless ventures that could lead to further destruction, displacement, and disaster for the Palestinians themselves."
Ayyad said that the declaration of jihad in Islam must be made by a "legitimate authority".
"In our current era, this authority is embodied in the recognised state and political leadership, not in statements issued by entities or unions that lack legal authority and do not represent Muslims either religiously or in practice," he said.
'Calling for jihad without regard to the nation's capabilities and its political, military and economic reality is an irresponsible act that contradicts Sharia principles'
- Nazir Ayyad, Egypt's grand mufti
"Calling for jihad without regard to the nation's capabilities and its political, military and economic reality is an irresponsible act that contradicts Sharia principles, which call for preparedness, prudence, and consideration of consequences."
Instead of calling for military intervention and jihad, it is wise of Muslim nations to attempt to deescalate instead, Ayyad added.
Qaradaghi is one of the region's most respected religious authorities and his decrees carry significant weight among the world's 1.7 billion Sunnis.
A "fatwa" is a non-binding Islamic legal ruling from a respected religious scholar, usually based on the Quran or the Sunnah - the sayings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad.
His statement, which was also backed by 14 other prominent Muslim scholars, called on all Islamic countries to 'review their peace treaties' with Israel and for Muslims in the United States to pressure President Donald Trump to 'fulfill his election promises to stop the aggression and establish peace'.
Israel has killed more than 50,000 Palestinians since its war on Gaza began in October 2023. It has laid waste to the Palestinian enclave, displaced most of its inhabitants and in recent weeks enforced a siege that has blocked all food and medical aid from entering.
A case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice has accused Israel of waging genocide. The International Criminal Court has also issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defence minister, Yoav Gallant.
More than 50,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel in Gaza since October 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Saudi Arabian and Omani officials propose nuclear facilities for Iran on Gulf island: Report
Omani and Saudi Arabian officials have proposed building a nuclear enrichment facility in the Gulf alongside Iran in an attempt to overcome obstacles in ongoing nuclear talks. US envoy Steve Witkoff provided Iran with a proposal for a nuclear deal over the weekend, which includes a consortium to provide nuclear fuel to Iran and any of its neighbours interested in developing civilian nuclear power or research programmes, according to a New York Times report on Tuesday. The idea is part of an attempt to bridge Washington and Tehran's red lines that could scuttle a deal. US President Donald Trump says the US will not allow Iran to enrich uranium as part of a nuclear deal, while Tehran insists it retains the right to enrichment for civilian purposes. The nuclear consortium could include Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the report said. The Gulf states are close US partners with their own nuclear ambitions. They are rivals with Iran but have undergone a fragile rapprochement. The consortium would be overseen by the International Atomic Energy Agency. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The NYT reported that Iran may be prepared to accept the consortium idea in order to prevent the collapse of talks but could push to build the enrichment facility on one of their islands, including Kish or Qeshm in the Gulf. Another option could be to build the facility on a disputed island. Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, and Lesser Tunb in the Gulf have been occupied by Iran since 1971 but are claimed by the UAE. Until the consortium gets up and running, Iran would be allowed to continue enriching uranium at low levels. Axios reported on Monday that the Witkoff proposal would allow Iran to enrich Uranium to three percent, well below the 60 percent it is currently at. Trump said on Monday, after the Axios report, that Iran would not be allowed to enrich uranium. But if the final stage of the deal prevents Iran from enriching uranium alone once a consortium is established, it could give Trump some wriggle room around his publicly stated position. Although there are several flashpoints that could derail an agreement, whether Iran is able to enrich uranium on its soil, as part of a consortium or not, is shaping up to be the biggest obstacle. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Tuesday that Iran's right to enrich uranium on its soil was a "red line" after the United States submitted its proposal for a new nuclear deal. "Continuing enrichment on Iranian soil is our red line," Araghchi said while on a visit to Lebanon, adding that his country will respond to the proposal in the coming days based on Iran's "principled positions and the interests of the Iranian people'. Iran has also called on the US to lift all sanctions on the country, not just those related to its nuclear programme, as part of a deal, the NYT reported. Trump is under pressure from Republicans in the US Congress and Israel to take a hard line on Iran. He said last month that he warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to launch preemptive military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
The quiet migration: Why Muslims are leaving India in staggering numbers
When *Taufeeq Ahmed boarded a flight from New Delhi to Canada in early 2020, he wasn't chasing a promotion, a degree or the promise of a better paycheque. Instead, he was trying to leave something behind - a heavy sense of unease that had been quietly building for years, and a fear that had finally become impossible to ignore. 'I lived close to Jamia Millia Islamia,' he said, referring to the prominent university in New Delhi where he used to study. 'During the anti-CAA protests, I saw police beating unarmed students, dragging them by their hair, firing tear gas into libraries. I had seen footage of this kind of state violence in Egypt or Hong Kong. But now, it was right outside my door.' The CAA, or Citizenship Amendment Act, was passed in 2019 by India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), sparking nationwide protests. The law fast-tracks Indian citizenship for non-Muslim refugees from neighbouring countries, drawing criticism for institutionalising religious discrimination. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The protests at Jamia turned violent when police stormed the campus. For Ahmed, that moment ended any illusion he had of safety. 'That night changed something inside me,' he said. 'It wasn't just about policy anymore. It was personal. The fear was immediate and physical.' Vulnerability In the following weeks, the weight of that fear hardened into a more profound disillusionment. What Ahmed had once brushed off as isolated incidents - lynchings in distant towns, discriminatory remarks at workplaces, inflammatory speeches by politicians - now felt systemic and undeniable. The realisation that the institutions built to protect people were complicit, or worse, indifferent, left him questioning the very idea of belonging. 'I was totally disillusioned by the idea of our country. It is truly messed up in so many ways - inequality, environment, caste, urban planning. I can go on, but speaking as a Muslim, the hate that the majority population have for Muslims is unimaginable. The levels of Islamophobia are through the roof,' Ahmed told Middle East Eye. Today, Ahmed and his wife live in Toronto, where he says his faith is respected, not scrutinised. Muslims fear potential 'Israel-like' retaliation after Kashmir attack Read More » 'There are prayer rooms in public buildings, and accommodations during Ramadan exams. It is unimaginable in India,' he said. 'The contrast made me realise just how deep Islamophobia runs back home.' Ahmed's story is part of a broad but quiet trend: Indian Muslims leaving the country in growing numbers. While India's economic migrants and tech talent continue to dominate headlines, this exodus, driven by religious polarisation, is rarely discussed. 'I am selling my property here and shifting to Dubai. At least I will get some peace,' said *Karim Sadiq, a businessman based in Lucknow, the capital of India's most populous state. Sadiq says the police have been after him since he and his family volunteered for one of the anti-government protests. For fear of reprisal, he refused to divulge more details. 'I will take my family along soon after things are settled there (Dubai),' he added. According to a Pew Research Center analysis, India is the second-largest source of Muslim migrants globally, after Syria. Roughly six million Indian-born Muslims now live abroad. Though Muslims represent about 15 percent of India's population, they account for an estimated one-third of Indian emigrants, indicating a migration rate significantly higher than other religious groups. 'This isn't just economic,' said Dr Nizamuddin Ahmad Siddiqui, a legal academic and co-founder of Project Mishkat, which fosters Muslim public discourse. 'It is social, political, psychological. Indian Muslims increasingly feel like second-class citizens in their own country.' Rising hostility India's political climate under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's BJP, which has been in power since 2014, has been marked by rising Hindu nationalism. Incidents of communal violence, discriminatory laws, and hate speech targeting Muslims have grown more frequent. Muslims in India have faced a range of challenges during this period, including mob lynchings over allegations of cow slaughter, campaigns against interfaith marriages often labelled as "love jihad", economic and social boycotts, and rising barriers to employment and housing. Hate speech by political leaders and the spread of Islamophobic narratives through social media have further fuelled hostility. In several instances, Muslim places of worship have been targeted, and there has been growing pressure on Muslim identity and practices in public life. The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom recommended that the US government designate India as a "Country of Particular Concern" in its 2025 report, citing egregious systematic violations of religious freedoms. For Muslims in India, day-to-day life has become fraught. Ahmed says that after every major incident of violence against Muslims in the country, friends start reaching out, asking how to move to Canada. 'As a Muslim scholar, I no longer feel safe even expressing my views' - Kamran Ahmed, Delhi-based researcher 'Whenever something awful happens - a lynching, a hate crime - I get calls,' he said. 'But many have to give up because migration is expensive and hard. Not everyone can afford it.' For those who can afford it, though, the decision is increasingly clear. Kamran Ahmed, a Delhi-based research scholar, says he is using most of his and his parents' savings to move out of the country. The decision, he says, is heartbreaking but necessary. 'As a Muslim scholar, I no longer feel safe even expressing my views,' he said. 'I have faced veiled threats, professional exclusion, and constant surveillance. I want to work in a place where I can breathe and where I am not reduced to my religion.' His story is not unique. According to a study by the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies in India, in collaboration with German think tank Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 44 percent of Muslim youth reported experiencing discrimination because of their religion. Another study revealed that 47 percent of Muslims feared being falsely accused of terrorism. 'The normalisation of hate and the silence of institutions is making it impossible to live with dignity,' Kamran said. To be clear, migration for economic reasons is not new among Indian Muslims. Communities in Kerala, Uttar Pradesh, and Telangana have long histories of labour migration to the Gulf. However, experts say that what has also changed is the nature and intention behind this new wave. 'In the past, migration was temporary. People went to the Gulf for work and came back,' Siddiqui said. 'Now, they go to settle. They want their children to grow up in safer, more equitable societies.' He cites everyday examples of exclusion like being refused rental housing, facing suspicion for wearing a hijab or sporting a beard, or hesitating to pray in public. 'These might seem small,' he said. 'But together, they wear down your sense of belonging.' Institutions and identity under siege The sense of alienation is also tied to key flashpoints in India's communal landscape. The 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid - a 16th-century mosque claimed by Hindu groups - was a defining moment. Its aftermath left scars that festered for decades. The 2019 Supreme Court verdict awarding the site to Hindus further deepened disillusionment, even among those who had reconciled with the loss. More recently, disputes over places of worship like the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi and the Shahi Eidgah in Mathura have kept communal tensions simmering. 'Every other week, there is a new controversy targeting Muslim history, culture, or existence,' said Siddiqui. He also cited new laws regulating Waqf properties and the push for a Uniform Civil Code as examples of legislative efforts that, he said, aim to weaken institutions central to the Muslim community. Why Indian Muslims must endure endless loyalty tests Read More » 'It's hard to fight on every front,' he said. 'The minute one issue fades, another takes its place.' In 2022, over 225,000 Indians renounced their citizenship, the highest number in recent history, according to India's Ministry of External Affairs. While the government does not provide religious breakdowns, anecdotal evidence suggests a disproportionate number of Muslims are among those quietly exiting. 'Around 30 percent of the cases that come to us are Muslims,' said Khwaja Mohammad, owner of Yaseen Travels, a visa and travel agency based in Telangana, a state with a Muslim population of less than 13 percent. 'People are also investing a lot in Middle Eastern countries like the UAE and also in Turkey, which was not the case earlier. It means they intend to stay long-term or settle in these countries,' Mohammad said. Apoorvanand Jah, a professor at the University of Delhi, however, cautions against framing the exodus as entirely religious. 'It is those with resources who are leaving,' he said. 'Muslims are part of that class too, but so are many others.' Still, he notes, disillusionment is rising, especially among young Indians who see no economic or social future in the country. 'This is the first time, since independence, that India's youth feels completely hopeless,' he said. 'The economy is adrift, and hatred fills the airwaves. Who would want to stay in such a place?' Can the rift be healed? Despite the exodus and alienation, many of those leaving say they would return - if the climate changed. Ahmed hopes to one day return to India to care for his ageing parents. "I want to go back to India because my parents are there, and they will need care and support as they grow older," he said. And even if they didn't need care and support, I want to spend more time with them." If and when he does return, Ahmed said he would likely settle in a city he considers safer, such as Hyderabad or Chandigarh. Staying in his hometown in Uttar Pradesh, a state ruled by the BJP, he explained, would mean living "a very subjugated existence". 'Living there means to just quietly endure the numerous, daily, progressively more virulent acts of microaggression that the country's majority will do to you,' he said. 'The economy is adrift, and hatred fills the airwaves. Who would want to stay in such a place?' - Apoorvanand Jah, professor Siddiqui believes reconciliation is possible, but only through institutional reform and societal reckoning. 'This is not something Muslims alone can fix,' he said. 'The onus is on the majority community, the judiciary, and democratic institutions to step up.' He draws on the words of BR Ambedkar, a key architect of the Indian Constitution, who warned that the majority must earn the trust of minorities. 'That trust has been broken,' Siddiqui said. 'Now it must be rebuilt, if not for Muslims, then for India itself.' As India continues to project itself as a global economic power, the exodus of some of its brightest and most vulnerable citizens tells another story. 'What is happening may not be loud. There are no mass protests, no refugee convoys. But it is real,' said Kamran. 'It is a quiet, growing migration that says as much about the future of Indian Muslims as it does about the state of Indian democracy.' *Names have been changed to protect the identities of those interviewed.
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Hit TV show Andor spurs viewers to draw parallels to Israel's war on Gaza
Fans of the Star Wars prequel series Andor have taken to social media this week to draw comparisons between Israel's war on Gaza and the show's narratives of occupation, resistance, and authoritarian violence. Set as a prequel to Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, the Andor series traces the formation of the Rebel Alliance and Cassian Andor's role within it, focusing on the rise of resistance against the Galactic Empire. It provides context to the political and social conditions that shaped the early rebellion and expands on characters and events that influence the broader Star Wars narrative. Following the first season, which aired in late 2022, Andor viewers took to their social media accounts throughout the last season, drawing parallels between the show and Israel's war on Gaza. Specifically likening the Empire to Israel and the US, and the Palestinians to the people of Ghorman. Make no mistake, this shit is real. Right now. Just today, Israel announced the complete elimination of Gaza. Open your eyes to what this show represents. Real life genocide. If we don't engage with that then there is no purpose. So let the aid in and free Palestine. #Andor — Andres Cabrera (@SquadLeaderAce) May 7, 2025 In an opinion piece published back in April for The Guardian, film critic Radheyan Simonpillai detailed the similarities that were also echoed among viewers. 'In the new and final season of Andor, an occupied civilian population is massacred; their cries for help ignored by the Empire-run media, which instead paint the victims as terrorist threats to public safety. Meanwhile, the politicians who have enough backbone to speak out, and use the word 'genocide' to describe these aggressions, are met with violent suppression.' New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'Star Wars fans will be forced to reckon with how this story isn't about what happens 'a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away'. It's about what's unfolding right now in Gaza.' Just watched this series and kept saying it reminded me of Israel and Palestine. Especially the part where they demonize those people in collusion with the press to manufacture consent for their genocide / destruction of their planet. — Anna (@annaskiba16) June 2, 2025 Although it is not certain that Andors' creator Tony Gilroy had Gaza in mind when writing the second season, he did mention Palestine as an example of the history that informed the show in a 2022 Deadline interview. In addition, actors from the show, like Irish actress Denise Gough, who plays a villain in the series, have been vocal about their support for Palestine. 'Andor' actress: 'I refuse to stay silent on Gaza.' "We're being asked by Palestinian people to speak,' so those who don't speak out can't say 'I didn't know what to do' says Denise Gough. WATCH: — BreakThrough News (@BTnewsroom) May 31, 2025 A recent Reddit post, in which a social media user says they have 'never felt more on the side of the Palestinian cause', has brought the conversation on the parallels between the show and Gaza back into the limelight one month after the finale aired. 'It showed me the side of resistance we often grapple with, the side where resistance more often than not becomes an armed resistance when the peaceful part of resistance doesn't get you anywhere,' the post reads. 'When your land is taken forcibly, when your city is besieged, when your land, sea, and air borders are controlled by an occupying entity, and you are left with one choice, to fight back, even if the empire (Israel/US) is overwhelmingly stronger, more powerful, and better funded.' The person continued to write that although the story is fictional, it made them see that in 'fighting an empire, you do not get to choose the terms. You are forced into the shadows, pushed into impossible choices, and made to sacrifice lives so others might have a future'. 'Right now, in Gaza, people are making those same impossible choices. When your children are bombed to smithereens, starved to death, your hospitals destroyed, your homes flattened, and the world either watches in silence or arms your oppressor, resistance stops being about right or wrong. It becomes survival.' This brought about a flow of responses that agreed with the post's writer. 'There is a shot of Gorman with white buildings and a golden dome-like structure reminiscent of the dome of the Rock. I immediately thought of Palestine.' Others disagreed that there was a parallel between the armed resistance of Palestinians to that of Ghorman's Rebel Alliance. 'People comparing the rebellion to Hamas is definitely not what I thought I would see today yet here we are," one person responded. There are also those who argue that attempting to draw the parallel in the first place was futile. 'Human history doesn't have a narrative as simple as Andor and never will,' one person said. 'What happened on Oct 7th was unjust and horrifying and counterproductive. What is being done in response is unjust and horrifying and counter productive.' The Reddit post found its way to X, and one person posted a screenshot of the thread, joking that it would be the end of the series. nah, they're about to cancel this series — Sana Saeed (@SanaSaeed) June 1, 2025 While many joked that the show cannot be cancelled now that it's already done, others highlighted the irony of how the show was produced by Disney, which has historically aligned itself with being pro-Israel. "I still cant process that disney backed a show about resistance while staying silent on the real thing happening in Gaza," one social media user wrote on X. "Ironic doesnt even cover it."
