Has homophobia worsened in Ireland since the same-sex marriage referendum?
Ten years ago this week, on May 23rd, 2015, the people of
Ireland voted
to legalise
same-sex marriage
.
Writing in The Irish Times the day after the referendum,
columnist Fintan O'Toole noted
the overwhelming victory for the Yes side 'looks extraordinary' but was actually 'about the ordinary'.
'Ireland has redefined what it means to be an ordinary human being,' wrote O'Toole.
'Everybody gains from equality – even those who didn't think they wanted it. Over time, those who are in a minority on this issue will come to appreciate the value of living in a pluralist democracy in which minorities are respected.'
READ MORE
Ten years on, is Ireland a pluralist democracy in which minorities are accepted and equal? Or has the rise of far right groups and the fear-driven, macho-infused culture of
Trump
and
Tate
, impacted how gay and lesbian people in this country are perceived and treated?
Buzz O'Neill Maxwell, a nightclub promoter and freelance events manager who campaigned for a Yes vote in the 2015 referendum, is one of many LGBTQ people who feel acceptance has declined and homophobia has increased over the past five years.
Today, on In The News, ten years on from Ireland's referendum to legalise same-sex marriage, have old prejudices returned?
Social affairs correspondent
Kitty Holland
and Buzz O'Neill Maxwell reflect on whether Ireland has become a better or worse place for gay people to live their lives.
Presented by Sorcha Pollak. Produced by Declan Conlon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Ireland's research agenda: the vital role of innovation
It is not surprising that there are demands made, almost on a daily basis, by lobby and special interest groups for the State to increase funding. After all, Ireland has one of the healthiest fiscal surpluses among OECD member states. It is also one of the fastest growing economies, which is putting significant pressure on existing capacity. There is no doubt that almost every call made on the government to increase spending has some justification. But decisions must be made on the basis of what is best for the country in the long term rather than political expediency. The State must, as one key priority, focus on investment that lifts the long-term potential of the economy. In this context, the Government should consider Ibec's calls to increase public investment in research and innovation to 1 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI) by 2035. Donald Trump's second term as US president has underlined the growing vulnerability of Ireland's foreign direct investment model. These include moves to try to force pharma companies and other multinationals to relocate capacity to the US. There is also the growing risk of a global trade war, which will accelerate de-globalisation. READ MORE Against this backdrop, every effort must be made to build up the domestic economy. Producing a world class research and innovation infrastructure is an effective way of doing this. Moreover, Trump's attacks on universities are poised to grow, which will lead to a steady brain drain from the US. Increased investment in research and innovation would put Ireland in a much better position to attract some of this talent. Right now, poor funding of the sector here means the goal of attracting key researchers from the US is a nice headline, but one with little substance. Ireland also has work to do to underpin the funding of the third level sector, for both undergraduate and graduate students, which has a key role in underpinning innovation. Education has been vital to the longer-term success of the economy, but there is a sense of complacency about our position which needs to be tackled
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Young people and AI
Sir, – In one of his first speeches as pope, Leo XIV outlined his priorities for his papacy. Interestingly, one of these is the challenges posed by artificial intelligence (AI). The pope believes that AI is a threat to 'humanity, justice and labour'. He said that this was one of the key reasons for him choosing the name Leo XIV. He had spoken previously about the impact of the industrial revolution on workers' rights. We are now arguably going through another 'industrial revolution' of sorts. Before, it was concerns that machines would replace people and take their jobs. Now it's the same but with AI. We adapted before and we can adapt again; not by trying to beat AI by being robots but by fully embracing our humanity – the qualities that set us apart from AI, qualities like our emotions, our ability to connect and build strong, trusting relationships and our ability to empathise. READ MORE If we are fully human, if we stop trying to beat AI at its own game, AI can never truly replace us, never truly do away with the need for real, human people in the workforce and in society. As a young person, I'm often asked the question, 'what do you want to be when you grow up?' Whatever answer I give, the response is usually: 'Oh, that job will be done away it; AI will be doing it in the future.' But I remain hopeful, faithful that I will be needed in society. And that AI can't replace humans if we are truly human, fully ourselves. – Yours, etc, TESS LIFFEY, Birr, Co Offaly.
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Families deported to Nigeria could have left voluntarily, says Minister
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan has defended the State's handling of the deportation of 35 people to Nigeria on Wednesday, saying those removed had previously been asked to leave voluntarily. Speaking on Sunday on RTÉ Radio 1's This Week programme, the Minister said: 'Each person who was on the aeroplane that went back to Nigeria had their own individual narratives of persecution assessed by the International Protection Office , and on appeal, and subsequently they got a deportation order that wasn't responded to. 'They were requested to leave voluntarily and that didn't happen.' The Garda National Immigration Bureau carried out the operation, which involved 21 men, nine women and five children, who were deported on a chartered flight from Dublin Airport to Lagos, Nigeria on Wednesday night. The children involved were deported as part of family groups. READ MORE Friends of the families deported, who were living with them at an International Protection Accommodation Services (Ipas) centre in west Dublin, described the scenes last week as upsetting and 'traumatising'. Farhiya Ali, a mother living with her four children in the centre, said: 'The kids were coming down for breakfast when these five men wearing cargo pants, big jackets arrived. 'They came into the third floor, stood in front of the bedroom door, took the three kids back in and told them to pack up. We heard them say: 'You are going to be deported.' As soon as the other children heard then they were all crying. It was such a horrific scene.' Three siblings from one family were among those deported. They had lived at their accommodation since January 2022 with their mother and father. [ Families facing deportation are 'at serious risk of destitution', warns refugee council Opens in new window ] Asked about the criticism from families at the Ipas centre about the manner of the deportation of children, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'This is not a pleasant part of my job. I don't relish doing this, but it has to be done. If we have an immigration system or an asylum system that doesn't have a consequence for people who are ruled not to be entitled to stay here then the system becomes meaningless.' Asked whether he would put Nigeria on Ireland's safe list of countries, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'There's a difference here between putting a country on the safe list for the purposes of international protection under the [International Protection] Act, and determining whether or not to send somebody back to a country from whence they came.' [ Ministers accused of giving 'half the picture' on refugees as more than 40% get positive decisions Opens in new window ] Applicants from designated safe countries of origin receive their interview date on the day they apply for international protection, reducing their waiting time for an interview. 'There's faster time frames for Nigeria at present anyway because of the heightened number of people from Nigeria claiming asylum in Ireland,' said the Minister. 'It doesn't mean if you're not on the safe list of countries from international protection, we can't send you back to the country where you came from.'
