logo
Which DreamWorks Character Is The Coolest?

Which DreamWorks Character Is The Coolest?

Buzz Feed26-03-2025

This post has not been vetted or endorsed by BuzzFeed's editorial staff. BuzzFeed Community is a place where anyone can create a post or quiz. Try making your own!
Community
·
Which shooting star breaks the mold?
Ok, DreamWorks fans, I wanna know which character you think is the coolest. I've rounded up characters from some of the top DreamWorks movies like Shrek, Kung Fu Panda, Megamind, Madagascar, etc. So what's your pick?
Sign up for a BuzzFeed Community account to make your own Showdown now!
BuzzFeed

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hollywood's Nostalgia Timeline Is Getting Shorter
Hollywood's Nostalgia Timeline Is Getting Shorter

Atlantic

time4 hours ago

  • Atlantic

Hollywood's Nostalgia Timeline Is Getting Shorter

There's a coincidental yet meaningful connection between two of this summer's buzziest movies. The new Lilo & Stitch and How to Train Your Dragon are both remakes; beyond that, they're both live-action adaptations of animated films—each of which happened to have been co-directed by Dean DeBlois and Chris Sanders. Lilo & Stitch has made a fortune at the box office since its late-May debut; How to Train Your Dragon, which opens today, seems similarly poised for success. The two features are, if a little lacking in visual stimulation compared with their forebears, reliably entertaining. But taken together, they signal something rather alarming in Hollywood's ongoing crisis of imagination: The timeline for nostalgia is growing shorter. Since Tim Burton's big-budget take on Alice in Wonderland grossed more than $1 billion in 2010, the live-action remake has become an inevitable, pervasive cinematic trend. Fifteen years later, it seems that capturing similar financial success requires a studio to look at progressively more recent source material to work with. Disney's attempt to update the nearly 90-year-old Snow White failed at the box office earlier this year; the company shuffled efforts such as a new Pinocchio and Peter Pan off to streaming, despite the recognizable directors and casts involved. The muted response to these modern takes on decades-old classics perhaps explains the move toward reviving properties that resonate with much younger generations instead. The original Lilo & Stitch is 23 years old; How to Train Your Dragon, produced by DreamWorks Animation, is only 15. Next year, a remake of Moana will hit theaters less than a decade after the original film's release. Is that even enough time to start feeling wistful about it? Clearly, the answer is yes, given how audiences have flocked to similar adaptations. The sentimental fervor around franchises such as How to Train Your Dragon is particularly unsettling to me, because the first entry premiered when I was fully an adult; the DreamWorks canon (which also includes such films as Shrek and Kung Fu Panda) was established when I was past the ideal age to become invested. However, I've seen How to Train Your Dragon many times because my daughter is a fan; that intense familiarity helped me out as I watched the live-action version, looking for anything that might feel different about it—which would thus justify its creation. Not so much. DeBlois, who also directed the two How to Train Your Dragon sequels, makes his live-action debut by adapting his own feature; as such, the end result is wildly similar to the earlier work. The new film is again set in a Viking village that is constantly besieged by different kinds of dragons. The plucky teen son of the chief, a boy named Hiccup (played by Mason Thames), befriends a sleek black dragon named Toothless and learns that fighting the beasts isn't the only answer. The actor who voiced Hiccup's father in the animated film, Gerard Butler, returns to perform the role on-screen; in all other cases, the film uses well-suited performers to replace the voice cast. To my own surprise, I liked the new version of How to Train Your Dragon about as much as I do its ancestor. Both, to me, are above-average bits of children's entertainment that struggle with the same problems: They start to sag near the end and suffer a little from their murky color palette. I got a little choked up at the exact same point that I do while watching the 2010 Dragon, when Hiccup and Toothless take to the sky together; the boy rides on a saddle he's made for his fire-breathing pal, and the composer John Powell's excellent score soars into inspirational mode, all strings and bagpipes. If there's a difference between these redone scenes and their inspirations, it's a remarkably minor one; only good theater decorum stopped me from pulling out my phone and running the two Dragon s side by side. Hollywood is struggling to get people to buy movie tickets, so I understand the impulse to offer something that a broad swath of viewers already knows and likes. But there's simply no sense of risk in making something like How to Train Your Dragon —nothing that will convince said theatergoers that the medium has a future beyond recycling. Yes, visual-effects technology is up to the task of re-creating a cartoon on a larger scale and dotted with real actors, and yes, these redos tend to turn a profit for their makers. These shouldn't be the only reasons for art to exist. Lilo & Stitch, at least, diverges somewhat from its source material. Because most of the characters are human beings, its world seems easier to translate to one composed of flesh and blood. The film, like How to Train Your Dragon, is about a shiftless youngster (Lilo, a Hawaiian girl who has been acting out since the death of her parents) bonding with a fantasy creature (Stitch, a blue alien experiment designed as a weapon of destruction). The director Dean Fleischer Camp's tweaks for his rendition didn't particularly click for me, however. One amusing character (another alien who is searching for Stitch) is absent entirely, and the revised ending has prompted some pushback, though Fleischer Camp has tried to defend it. In theory, I should be pro-change, given that I found the carbon-copy nature of How to Train Your Dragon so irksome—except that Lilo & Stitch doesn't really commit to its big alterations. The animated versions of Lilo and her older sister, Nani, forge a closer connection after meeting Stitch and his extraterrestrial hunters; the live-action Lilo enters the care of family friends at the end of the film, so that Nani can go off to study in California. These adjustments to the girls' relationship are a bit bold, because the prior film is so emotionally focused on their frayed sisterhood, yet the remake quickly undercuts their separation with the revelation that Nani can just visit Lilo anytime she wants, thanks to some space technology that Nani has borrowed. Such a cop-out is the underlying, depressing reality with all of these remakes: No change can be too daring, no update too significant. It's heartening that Sanders, a co-director of the original Dragon and Stitch, is one of the few people working in animation who's still committed to innovation. Last year, he directed The Wild Robot; much like How to Train Your Dragon, it is an adaptation of a children's book upon which Sanders found an exciting visual spin. The movie was a critical success, a box-office hit, and an Academy Award nominee. Cinema needs more entries like The Wild Robot —novel works that take chances and trust the audience to follow along. If nothing else, they provide fodder for more live-action remakes in the near future. Hollywood can't have these nostalgic adaptations without something to redo in the first place.

Married Men, Tell Us The "Difficulties" Of Marriage That No One Talks About
Married Men, Tell Us The "Difficulties" Of Marriage That No One Talks About

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Married Men, Tell Us The "Difficulties" Of Marriage That No One Talks About

Marriage is one of the most significant decisions someone can make in their life. And even if you have a loving, healthy relationship, it can come with challenges. So, men, if you are married or have ever been married, we want to hear your perspective. What are the hardest parts of marriage that no one talks about? Related: Design Your Dream Summer Getaway And Reveal The Aesthetic You Radiate Maybe you absolutely love your spouse and family, but you've felt overwhelmed by the number of responsibilities you have — such as kids, finances, etc. — and even though you love your life, it's actually hard not to have any time for yourself. Perhaps you realize you're very hard on yourself and often feel pressure to be a "perfect" spouse, and you've never had the chance to talk openly about it. Related: What's Your 100% Career Match? Bake The Perfect Cake To Find Out! Or maybe marriage has challenged you to be open and vulnerable in a way that you previously hadn't been — and it's required a lot of self-reflection and therapy to work through personal issues that kept coming up. Or perhaps you've had moments in your marriage where you felt like you made a mistake marrying your partner, and you NEVER expected to have any doubts about that decision. Married men, in the comments below, tell us the hardest parts about marriage that you want more people to know. Or, if you prefer to remain anonymous, feel free to use this form below. Your response could be featured in an upcoming BuzzFeed Community post. Also in Community: EVERYONE Has A Dinosaur Personality Twin, So It's Time To Find Out Yours Also in Community: Create A Magical Candy Store To Find Out Which Magical Realm You Live In Also in Community: It's Time To Rate These 2025 Met Gala Looks

How to Train Your Dragon review: a thrilling, beautiful fantasy adventure
How to Train Your Dragon review: a thrilling, beautiful fantasy adventure

Digital Trends

time8 hours ago

  • Digital Trends

How to Train Your Dragon review: a thrilling, beautiful fantasy adventure

How to Train Your Dragon (2025) Score Details 'How to Train Your Dragon review is a thrilling, beautiful fantasy adventure.' Pros Fantastic cast performances Realistic fantasy visuals Compelling characters Heartfelt narrative Respects the source material Cons Some rushed plot points 'Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.' DreamWorks and Universal Pictures successfully revived an instant fantasy classic with How to Train Your Dragon. This live-action remake of the 2010 animated film follows Hiccup (now played by Mason Thames) as he defies his Viking brethren and befriends the Night Fury Toothless, defying centuries of Viking traditions and revealing the true nature of dragons and their war with humans. Recommended Videos How to Train Your Dragon had to meet high expectations as a remake of one of DreamWorks' most popular films. However, given that the animated film's co-director, Dean DeBlois, also helmed this remake, it's no surprise that How to Train Your Dragon remained true to what made the original movie so beloved. As a result, the movie presents a faithful reimagining of the original animated story, all while delivering outstanding performances and realistic fantasy visuals. The remake does the original story justice Based on this remake, it seems Dean DeBlois is a believer in the phrase, 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it.' How to Train Your Dragon retains many of the story beats from the source material, sticking to the story of friendship, compassion, parenthood, and acceptance that fans know and love. The film also maintains a brisk and thrilling pace that, for the most part, succeeds at telling a balanced narrative. Nevertheless, Hiccup and Toothless's adventure is as entertaining and heartwarming as ever, with the duo growing from reluctant enemies to symbiotic pals holding each other up. How to Train Your Dragon delivers plenty of thrilling action, with the characters battling vicious dragons on the ground or in the skies. While it features plenty of lighthearted jokes like the animated film, the new movie still pairs them well with more grounded, serious character drama, particularly between Hiccup, Astrid, and Stoick. This all makes for a family-friendly adventure that audiences can enjoy and take seriously as a live-action movie. New and returning actors steal the show While most of the remake's cast is different from the animated film's, How to Train Your Dragon boasts extraordinary talent from its actors, particularly its younger players. Mason Thames plays the ambitious hero Hiccup with such awkward, youthful energy. He also has fantastic chemistry with Nico Parker, who plays his rival and love interest, Astrid, with realistic charm, pride, and intensity. Astrid herself is given more depth in the remake as she competes with the more privileged Hiccup and tries to fight her way to the top. Likewise, the film gives Gabriel Howell a chance to shine even more as Snotlout. By giving him a new character arc in which he desperately tries to impress his father, the film presents Snotlout in a more sympathetic and relatable light. As for the adult cast, Nick Frost deserves props for bringing his skillful humor to his performance as the quirky, kind-hearted Gobber. However, Gerard Butler stands out the most, reprising his role as Stoick the Vast, portraying the battle-hungry Viking with great vigor, confidence, and charisma befitting a Viking chief. Despite this, Butler brings plenty of vulnerability to his macho-headed character. This captures Stoick as both a conflicted leader trying to protect his clan and a parent struggling to raise and accept his child, making his character arc in the remake even more compelling. A stunning and realistic live-action adventure The remake doesn't just faithfully recreate the dragons from the original animated film. How to Train Your Dragon also flawlessly blends its CGI creation with its live-action visuals, giving dragons like Toothless such depth and realism to their appearance and behavior. The CGI succeeds just as well in the film's high-flying scenes through the skies of Berk, making for an immersive and jaw-dropping fantasy epic. Overall, How to Train Your Dragon preserves the visual style and aesthetic of the animated film with near-perfect precision, making it even more enjoyable for the franchise's established fans. Cinematographer Bill Hope deserves considerable credit for recreating and enhancing the original movie's look with the remake's breathtaking imagery. It's easy to call the latter an improvement of the 2010 movie, given the significant advancements in computer-generated animation since 2010. However, that doesn't make How to Train Your Dragon's remake any less of a stirring visual marvel. Is How to Train Your Dragon worth a watch? DeBlois succeeds in preserving the legacy of How to Train Your Dragon with his faithful remake. It's an engrossing, heart-pounding story rich in lore and filled with action, humor, emotion, and incredible performances. It may not have been necessary, given that the original motion picture was already such a beloved classic. However, this How to Train Your Dragon remake is still a beautiful and blood-pumping adventure that welcomes audiences, young and old. Whether they are die-hard fans of the original movies or newcomers to the franchise, audiences should go out and watch this movie on the big screen. How to Train Your Dragon is now in theaters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store