logo
Alaskan truck toll could be 'last nail in the coffin' of Fort Nelson, B.C., mayor warns

Alaskan truck toll could be 'last nail in the coffin' of Fort Nelson, B.C., mayor warns

CBC19-03-2025

Social Sharing
The mayor of B.C's northernmost municipality is warning that tolls on commercial trucks traveling through the province to Alaska could be "the last nail in the coffin" of an already-struggling local economy.
The ability to impose the fees is part of sweeping new legislation introduced last week by the B.C. government in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and talk of annexing Canada to make it the 51st state.
Premier David Eby says he doesn't have immediate plans to put tolls into place, but wants the option should there be a need to respond quickly to threats from the United States, should the need arise.
But even the possibility worries Rob Fraser, mayor of the Northern Rockies Regional Municipality — which includes Fort Nelson.
"Every single foreign dollar that comes in here is important to us," Fraser said. "Every flat tire, every sandwich, every cup of coffee."
"Any reductions [in traffic] would impact us significantly."
Highway built on American and Canadian co-operation
Fort Nelson is B.C.'s third-oldest non-Indigenous settlement and was once powered by forestry, and later, petroleum production. But declines in both industries have taken their toll and tourism is now viewed by many as a final lifeline.
It's located at Mile 300 (Kilometre 483) on the Alaska Highway, a travel route with its origin in Dawson Creek, B.C., that stretches more than 2,000 kilometres through Whitehorse and on to the Delta Junction, southeast of Fairbanks, Alaska.
The highway's very existence is a symbol of the strong ties between Canada and the United States: built by the U.S. Corps of Engineers during the Second World War and then turned over to the Canadian government, it's a popular tourist route among RVers and road trippers — a "bucket list item," Fraser says, for many Americans.
Flags from Canada and the United States fly side-by-side at stops all along the way, welcoming visitors to places like the Triple G Hideaway RV Park and Restaurant, which was just purchased by Bryan and Janis Stanley who moved to Fort Nelson from Saskatchewan to operate the campground.
Though snow is still thick on the ground, on March 14 they welcomed their first visitors: a family from Wasilla, Alaska who stopped in for the night on their way home from a trip to Utah's Salt Lake City.
"Americans tourists are a huge part of keeping this place going," said Bryan Stanley.
That sentiment was echoed by Murray Abs who runs the local Super 8 Motel and sits on the board for the chamber of commerce.
He says it's common to look out into his parking lot and see multiple American licence plates on vehicles passing through — something that could change should relations between Canada and the United States further deteriorate.
"It's a significant percentage traveling to Alaska and from Alaska," he said, including commercial traffic, tourists and U.S. military members on their way to a deployment further north.
The region has already taken some big blows: COVID-19 travel restrictions in 2020 led to an estimated 80 per cent decline in visitors. Wildfires that forced community-wide evacuations last year also hurt.
Combined with downturns in resource industries, the results are noticeable: Fort Nelson's official population dipped to about 2,600 in the 2021 census, a drop of approximately 25 per cent since 2011, with empty homes left behind. Even Fraser has been forced to relocate to Saskatchewan part-time for work.
That's why he's so worried about the province's Bill 7, the Economic Stabilization (Tariff Response) Act, which includes language that would allow the province to impose fees on foreign travel through B.C.
WATCH | Questions about Bill 7:
What is B.C.'s Economic Stabilization Tariff Response Act?
20 hours ago
Duration 6:59
Marc Lee, a senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, talks about the Economic Stabilization Tariff Response Act, which, if passed, would allow the government to respond without having to go through the Legislature for debate. B.C. Premier David Eby has said the response is necessary to protect jobs and businesses amid tariff threats. However, opposition parties are not convinced.
"Commercial trucks provide a base for service companies in our community. If they're not fixing flat tires and serving coffees and selling sandwiches in the winter time, we potentially lose those businesses... and they're not there for the bulk of the the traffic that goes through in the summer, all the tourists."
"So the premier is able to talk tough, but unfortunately, it's at our expense."
'We like Americans. They've just got a lousy president'
Fraser said he sent a letter to the government outlining his concerns two weeks ago, but hasn't heard back.
When asked about the potential fallout from tolls at a news event last week, Eby reiterated he would only put them in place should the situation call for it, outlining what he viewed as an existential threat posed by U.S. President Donald Trump.
"We have to be honest with ourselves," he said. "Trump is threatening to use economic force to annex our country as the 51st state. He's threatening to come after our water. He's threatening to redraw our borders."
The history and relationship between B.C. and Alaska, he said, was a long one and he called on Alaskans to send the message directly to Trump that a trade war is "not worth it for anybody."
"We don't want to use this tool," he said of the tolls. "We like Alaskans, we think they're great. We like Americans, we think they're great. They've just got a lousy president."
WATCH | Eby mulls imposing tolls on Alaska-bound trucks:
B.C. may toll U.S. trucks travelling to Alaska, Eby says
12 days ago
Duration 2:00
B.C. is sending a message to the U.S. that it plans to levy fees on commercial trucks headed to Alaska. Premier David Eby says new legislation will allow the government to take faster action in response to US President Donald Trump's tariffs against Canada. Meera Bains reports.
The implementation of a toll system has not been made clear. Bill 7 is broad and fails to specify details, which has led to worry from its critics that non-commercial travel could also be a target, in possible violation of the international treaty governing the Alaska Highway.
The document states that Canada cannot apply any charges to U.S. travelers that aren't also in place for Canadian ones, though Eby has said if Trump doesn't respect international treaties, there is less reason for B.C. to adhere to those rules when trying to protect itself.
Also not clear is whether such tolls would have much impact on Alaska itself. The majority of goods shipped into the state arrive via boat, with less than five per cent coming by road.
According to B.C.'s Ministry of Transportation, approximately 10,000 trucks travel through the province to Alaska every year, a number it admits is "not large," with traffic split between the northwest Stewart-Cassiar route and the more established Alaska Highway.
But Fraser warned that in area already so economically depressed, even a small decline would make a big difference.
He also worried that if a toll was put in place even temporarily, transport companies would switch to sea and air delivery methods and not switch back again once they were lifted.
"Once the supply chain is broken... we may never get it back," he said, adding he does understand B.C. needs to stand up against trade action from the United States but he hopes it's not at the expense of Fort Nelson's ability to survive.
"We want to be part of team Canada," he said. "But we don't believe that any retaliatory measure should impact one more community than everybody else."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Competition Bureau sues DoorDash for allegedly misleading customers over fees
Competition Bureau sues DoorDash for allegedly misleading customers over fees

Vancouver Sun

time16 minutes ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Competition Bureau sues DoorDash for allegedly misleading customers over fees

Canada's competition watchdog is suing DoorDash Inc. and its Canadian subsidiary, accusing it of marketing its online delivery services at a lower price than what consumers actually wind up paying. The Competition Bureau alleged Monday that an investigation found DoorDash customers were unable to purchase food and other items at prices advertised on the food delivery company's websites and mobile apps because of mandatory fees added at checkout. The extra charges range from service and delivery fees to amounts sought for couriering things a further distance, placing smaller orders or making purchases in B.C., where DoorDash has to comply with minimum wage regulations for gig workers. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The bureau alleged the charges were sometimes framed as if they were taxes, when in reality, they are charges imposed at DoorDash's discretion. The fees resulted in customers paying higher prices than advertised and amounted to a deceptive practice known as drip pricing, which the bureau alleges DoorDash may have used for close to a decade to make nearly from $1 billion from mandatory fees. The bureau wants the company to stop the practice, cease portraying fees as taxes, pay a penalty and issue restitution to affected consumers. DoorDash is pushing back on the requests, saying 'it does not hide fees from consumers or mislead them in any way.' 'This application is a misguided and excessive attempt to target one of Canada's leading local commerce platforms,' DoorDash spokesperson Trent Hodson said in a statement to The Canadian Press. 'It unfairly singles out DoorDash, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these claims.' The Competition Bureau has been more aggressive in its fight against drip pricing since the Competition Act was amended in June 2022 to more clearly distinguish the practice as harmful, giving regulators more room to pursue companies who engage in such activity. The bureau accused Cineplex Inc. of drip pricing in May 2023, eventually winning a $38.9-million fine against the movie theatre giant, which is contesting the decision from the Competition Tribunal. Other recent Competition Bureau targets for drip pricing have included SiriusXM Canada, Discount Car & Truck Rentals Ltd. and TicketNetwork. Its Door Dash court filing shows it is going after the business for making 'false or misleading representations' because 'when consumers go online to order, they expect these services to deliver not just food, but also honest pricing.' 'Consumers expect that the price they see advertised will match what they ultimately pay,' the bureau's application said. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

Wall Street drifts closer to its records as trade talks start between the world's largest economies
Wall Street drifts closer to its records as trade talks start between the world's largest economies

Globe and Mail

time26 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Wall Street drifts closer to its records as trade talks start between the world's largest economies

NEW YORK (AP) — U.S. stocks are drifting closer to their records on Monday as the world's two largest economies begin talks on trade that could help avoid a recession. The S&P 500 was 0.3% higher in late trading. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 93 points, or 0.2%, with an hour remaining in trading, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.5% higher. Officials from the United States and China are meeting in London to talk about a range of different disputes that are separating them. The hope is that they can eventually reach a deal that will lower each's punishing level of tariffs against the other, which are currently on pause, so that the flow of everything from tiny tech gadgets to enormous machinery can continue. Hopes that President Donald Trump will lower his tariffs after reaching such trade deals with countries around the world have been among the main reasons the S&P 500 has rallied so furiously since dropping roughly 20% from its record two months ago. It's back within 2% of its all-time high, which was set in February, and it's higher than it was before Trump shocked financial markets in April with his wide-ranging tariff announcement on what he called 'Liberation Day.' This may be the shortest sell-off following a shock of heightened volatility on record, according to Parag Thatte, Binky Chadha and other strategists at Deutsche Bank. Typically, stocks take around two months to bottom following a spike in volatility and then another four to five months to recover their losses. This time around, stocks have basically made a round trip in less than two months. But nothing is assured, of course, and that helped keep trading relatively quiet on Wall Street Monday. Some of the market's biggest moves came from the announcement of big buyout deals. Qualcomm rallied 4.4% after saying it agreed to buy Alphawave Semi in a deal valued at $2.4 billion. IonQ, meanwhile, rose 1.6% after the quantum computing and networking company said it agreed to purchase Oxford Ionics for nearly $1.08 billion. On the losing side of Wall Street was Warner Bros. Discovery, which flipped from a big early gain to a loss of 3.4% after saying it would split into two companies. One will get Warner Bros. Television, HBO Max and other studio brands, while the other will hold onto CNN, TNT Sports and other entertainment, sports and news television brands around the world, along with some digital products. Tesla drifted following its sharp, recent swings. The electric vehicle company tumbled last week as Elon Musk's relationship with Trump broke apart, and it rose 1.8% Monday after flipping between gains and losses earlier in the day. The frayed relationship could end up damaging Musk's other companies that get contracts from the U.S. government, such as SpaceX. Rocket Lab, a space company that could pick up business at SpaceX's expense, rose 3.8%. In stock markets abroad, indexes were modestly lower in Europe after rising across much of Asia. Chinese markets climbed even though the government reported that exports slowed in May, growing 4.8% from a year earlier after jumping more than 8% in April. China also reported that consumer prices fell 0.1% in May from a year earlier, marking the fourth consecutive month of deflation. Stocks rallied 1.6% in Hong Kong and rose 0.4% in Shanghai. In the bond market, the yield on the 10-year Treasury eased to 4.48% from 4.51% late Friday. It fell after a survey by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that consumers' expectations for coming inflation eased a bit in May. That provides some relief for the Fed, which has been keeping its main interest rate steady as it waits to see how much Trump's tariffs will raise inflation and how much they will hurt the economy. Economists expect a report coming on Wednesday to show inflation across the country accelerated last month to 2.5% from 2.3%.

L.A. protests inch Elon Musk back to U.S. President Trump
L.A. protests inch Elon Musk back to U.S. President Trump

CTV News

time34 minutes ago

  • CTV News

L.A. protests inch Elon Musk back to U.S. President Trump

Tesla CEO Elon Musk listens as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025. (via CNN Newsource) Last week, Elon Musk was calling for U.S. President Donald Trump's impeachment. This week, Musk is back to praising the administration, softening his tone after the two powerful leaders' very public breakup. The whiplash came as protests erupted in Los Angeles over actions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and immigration raids. Over the weekend, Musk deleted some of his most incendiary X posts about the president, including the call for his impeachment and the allegation, without providing evidence, that Trump's name appeared in documents related to the crimes of convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein. Musk appeared to wholeheartedly support the Trump administration's stance on the situation in Los Angeles, adding American Flags to a post from Vice President JD Vance about how the 'president will not tolerate rioting and violence.' Musk has long supported closed borders, stopping illegal immigration and deportations, in alignment with the Trump administration. The tech billionaire posted a screenshot of a Truth Social post from Trump that said California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass 'should apologize to the people of Los Angeles,' as clashes have broken out, cars have been set on fire and demonstrations intensify. He also wrote 'cool' to a video of Vance speaking in an interview, saying he thinks 'if Elon chills out a little bit everything will be fine.' And the Tesla CEO re-followed White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, considered one of the lead Trump administration officials on immigration policy, whom he had unfollowed on Thursday in the midst of his blow up with Trump. The move was especially notable considering Miller's wife, Katie Miller, had recently left the White House to work with Musk full time and the couple had regularly socialized with Musk outside of work. That lead to gossip among White House aides and rounds of speculation about how the fallout could impact the political fortunes of one of the most powerful couples in Trump's Washington. Katie Miller did not respond to a request for comment. Musk at one point fact checked his own AI chatbot Grok, which appeared to confirm as authentic a viral image that seemingly showed Musk writing a post that appeared to say 'Just like I took your wife' in response to Miller. 'No, it's fake ffs 🤦‍♂️ I never posted this,' Musk wrote in response to Grok. That doesn't mean it was all back to positive vibes from Musk this weekend. He continued to speak out – albeit in a more subtle manner – against Trump's domestic policy bill that passed the House and is now being considered in the Senate. On Sunday Musk replied 'Correct' to a user who wrote 'Musk's fight with Trump is neither a stunt nor distraction.' The same day he also reposted an article from the satirical site The Babylon Bee, titled 'Republicans Announce Plan To Keep Doing Opposite Of What Everyone Voted For Them To Do.' Musk had blasted the president's sweeping 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill' last week, arguing it would undermine much of what his Department of Government Efficiency team had done to cut federal spending and the deficit. The Trump administration had denied that the bill would add to the deficit, despite numerous nonpartisan organizations saying it would add trillions of dollars to America's debt. But Wall Street analysts are so far breathing slightly easier – as they hope whatever delicate détente holds out. 'While we do not expect Trump and Musk to be back to their Mar-a-Lago connected at the hip days, it would not be a surprise to see Trump and Musk slowly mend the fences (with the help of intermediaries behind closed doors) over the coming months,' wrote WedBush analyst Dan Ives. '[A]t the end of the day Trump needs Musk to stay close to the Republican party and Musk needs Trump for many reasons including a green light on a federal framework for autonomous [vehicles].' Tesla's stock has recovered somewhat but still remains well below where it started Thursday before the public breakup. Article by Hadas Gold.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store