New recommendations for regulating neurotechnology in Canada include protecting Indigenous rights
With Canada's federal election behind us, we can now focus on a renewed commitment to our values and to economic growth. Both entail a commitment to the health and well-being of Canadians.
Brain health in particular has taken on new meanings over the past years, and has garnered substantial recent attention from major international organizations such as UNESCO and the World Health Organization.
Once centred on finding treatments for conditions that affect the nervous system such as movement disorders and epilepsy, neurotechnology is evolving.
Advances involve implantable technologies, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). Other examples include responsive neurostimulation and stimulation of the vagus nerve.
The market in non-invasive and wearable devices is also growing. These technologies aim to address mental health disorders and improve quality of life for people suffering from conditions like chronic depression and post-traumatic stress disorders.
Combined with AI, these brain technologies are also finding their way into the non-medical lives of Canadians for personal use, education, workplace and entertainment.
Read more: Two-thirds of Canadians have experimented with generative AI, but most don't understand its impacts
The finalized version of the UNESCO ethics recommendation for neurotechnology will be negotiated during the week of May 12. This will prepare the way for its formal adoption this fall by the 194 member states.
The recommendation carefully considers how neurotechnology can respect human dignity and the human rights of privacy, freedom of thought, data authenticity and protection, and justice. Other concerns pertaining to Indigeneity, marginalization, disability and vulnerability are touched upon.
If Canada adopts the recommendation, it could have far-reaching implications for Canadian citizens. It will influence - if not directly affect - federal funding and resource priorities and relevant government ministries. These include Health Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
In 2024, drawing upon the work of both Health Canada and the Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a group of Canadian experts from medicine, law and public health delivered guidance for responsible innovation in neurotechnology.
These experts - including two of the authors of this article - strategically revised the original nine principles offered by the OECD into five tailored for Canada. These were: physical and personal safety and trust; societal deliberation and stewardship; global collaboration; strong oversight; and inclusivity and Indigeneity.
In April 2025, Indigenous and non-Indigenous members of the original UNESCO expert group published considerations to further safeguard against the risk of neurotechnology becoming an instrument of colonialism. These considerations include access to neurotechnologies for the relief of neurological conditions, as well as for their adoption in research, industry and daily life guided by the values and rights of Indigenous Peoples about brain health and wellness.
They included strategies for informed consent processes that align with Indigenous perspectives, and transparency about the use, storage and collection of neural data. Recommendations were also made for investments in digital infrastructure and literacy, and paths to intellectual property protections suitable to holistic and collective knowledge.
The behind-the-scenes efforts that led to the UNESCO ethics recommendation must come to the forefront.
In October 2024, a Bioethics Council for Canada/Le Conseil canadien de bioethique (BCC-CCB) was legally constituted to provide independent advice to the Canadian government and public. Building on the lessons learned from 140 bioethics councils worldwide, Canada's new BCC-CCB is poised to ensure that the public's trust in science is central to the federal government's mission.
Trust must be a renewed theme in matters pertaining to brain health and brain data, alongside other advances that will affect future generations. This trust will mitigate the noise and confusion surrounding us in a time of rapid technological progress, and foster leadership that an informed Canada can provide.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ottawa Citizen
42 minutes ago
- Ottawa Citizen
DND says F-35 review will be completed in the summer
Article content The Department of National Defence's review of its F-35 purchase will be completed sometime in the summer, but officials won't say exactly when or whether the report will be released to the public. Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney ordered a review of Canada's $19-billion F-35 purchase in mid-March in the wake of threats against Canadian sovereignty by U.S. President Donald Trump. The U.S. has become increasingly hostile to Canada, with the American president continuing with his economic efforts to punish Canada and push for this country to become the 51st state. Article content Article content Article content At this point, Canada has only financially committed to purchasing the first 16 jets from the U.S. government. The entire order was for 88 F-35s, which are manufactured by the American defence giant Lockheed Martin. Article content Department of National Defence spokeswoman Andrée-Anne Poulin stated in an email that the F-35 review is being led by the offices of the assistant deputy minister for review services and the assistant deputy minister for materiel. They are receiving input from other organizations such as the Royal Canadian Air Force. The assistant deputy minister for material and the RCAF played key roles in the original selection of the F-35 for Canada. Article content 'It is anticipated that this review will be finalized in Summer 2025,' the email from Poulin pointed out. Article content DND could not say which month the review would be completed. Article content Asked by the Ottawa Citizen if it would be accurate to state the review would be finished by the end of August, the DND responded that, 'Further information will be provided in due course.' Article content Article content Poulin had previously noted that, 'The review would take into account the work already done to replace Canada's current fighter jet fleet.' Article content Article content Former defence procurement chief Alan Williams and various defence analysts have warned that the F-35 represents a strategic vulnerability for Canada since the U.S. has total control over software upgrades and spare parts on the aircraft. Article content The Ottawa Citizen reported May 5 that the U.S. owns all parts for Canada's F-35s even when they are located at Canadian bases.
Ottawa Citizen
an hour ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Today's letters: Ontario is being simplistic about hospital parking fees
Article content Article content The reasons Dr. Nili Kaplan-Myrth have given for her resignation as a trustee from the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board reinforce the growing knowledge that board employees will not be protected from extremist intimidation and threats (depending on who is making the threat and who the target of the threat is), nor from years of administrative abuse of power. Article content Kaplan-Myrth's story is another example of a public school system that has run amok due to years of not having to be accountable to its taxpayers. Its financial mismanagement is just the tip of the iceberg. Article content We truly need the Ontario government to ensure our children and youth are being properly educated for the 21st century and to demand that the school boards committed and hard-working employees get the support and protection they need in the face of administrative indifference and the multifaceted extremist ideologies that infuse our culture and threaten our children's future. Article content Article content I was struck by news coverage of homes destroyed by wildfires and tornadoes and by how vulnerable wooden homes are. That, plus the rise of homelessness and the recent tariffs on Canadian steel, makes me think that now is the time for Canada to develop its own modular, pre-fabricated steel homes. Article content This would create a local demand for Canadian steel and aluminum products, while providing easily deployable, strong, durable structures resistant to the natural disasters. They could be transported by truck or rail, then dropped on site as needed to address emergency/temporary and long-term housing needs. The walls themselves could then be reinforced and insulated locally with poured concrete. Article content
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Finding what's missing in the Winnipeg housing market
Opinion Last week, Winnipeg city council spent several long days and late nights debating a sweeping set of zoning bylaw amendments that could fundamentally change how our city is built in the future. Like all Canadian cities that signed on to the federal government's Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF), Winnipeg is being asked to revamp its planning policies to allow greater density and more diverse housing types to be built in every neighbourhood across the city. The federal government recognizes that if we are going to build more housing supply in cities to balance market demand and create more affordability, it can't be accommodated by simply expanding outward in sprawling low-density suburbs. Brent Bellamy photo New rules for infill housing can invigorate Winnipeg neighbourhoods. The costs of infrastructure and municipal services can no longer be supported by low density growth, evidenced by increasing taxes, reduced services, and deteriorating infrastructure. The federal government is using the financial carrots of HAF to push cities into making uncomfortable changes to policies that regulate where housing can be built. The planning changes being implemented effectively eliminate single-family zoning, allowing at least a duplex to be built on almost any lot in the city. It will also allow up to threeplexes and fourplexes depending on lot size, location, and considerations like proximity to transit and existing street conditions. To speed up development, these new housing types will be allowed as-of-right, meaning that if they meet certain restrictions like height, lot coverage, and setbacks, they can be built without a public hearing. The need for cities to densify, combined with ever-rising land and construction costs, means that the future of housing will be less and less about single-family homes. Already only one-quarter of new homes built in Winnipeg each year are houses, with three-quarters being multi-family dwellings. This is an almost perfectly inverted ratio from 25 years ago. Current zoning policies effectively segregate densities, protecting single-family neighbourhoods and pushing most multi-family options into downtown high-rises or six-storey buildings on large streets. The new zoning changes will allow smaller multi-family developments to be peppered throughout neighbourhoods instead of being relegated to their fringes. Many people prefer the quality of life offered in a single-family home, and much of what is desirable in that lifestyle can be more affordably found in the types of housing these new zoning changes promote, commonly called 'missing middle housing.' Low-rise, multi-family housing types like townhouses, duplexes and fourplexes can offer more flexible and diverse living arrangements than a neighbourhood that is exclusively single-family, accommodating a wider range of household sizes, ages, and income levels. Missing middle housing can fit seamlessly into the character of walkable residential neighbourhoods, while still increasing density and providing a greater range of home sizes and affordability options. This housing diversity responds to the needs of people at different stages of life, whether it's a rental or starter home for a young person, a downsizing option for a senior ageing in their community, or a family home. A concern often raised about missing middle development is that it can mean the loss of smaller, older houses that are often affordable. Winnipeg is fortunate in some ways to have the oldest housing stock of any major city in Canada, with one in five houses being more than 80 years old, and one in 10 more than a century old. An old housing stock creates affordability, but it can't be relied on as a strategy to achieve that forever. We must allow our housing stock to be organically replenished in a way that will respond more specifically to the evolving needs of people today and in the future. Change will happen to our aging neighbourhoods whether we like it or not, but we can shape and guide this change by designing zoning regulations that push more multi-family housing towards smaller scale, neighbourhood focused developments that provide a more desirable lifestyle option for many. When a small bungalow is demolished for a fourplex, one house may be lost, but three more families are able to gain access to the neighbourhood. The new construction may not be as affordable immediately, but a neighbourhood's transition to higher density happens slowly, and as more and more older houses are lost over time, the infill will age and start a new cycle of affordability. In today's market, most new missing middle housing is built as rental properties, but 10 years ago it would likely have been condominiums. Market trends change, and by creating zoning regulations that promote this scale of development, more ownership options and home types will appear in the future. As this housing type becomes more prevalent and ages over time, it will replace the old bungalow as a common type of starter home that is the first step in the property ladder for young people. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. The idea of allowing different densities and housing types to sit on the same street is not a new one. Many of our most beloved older neighbourhoods have houses, townhouses, condominiums and apartment buildings sitting comfortably side-by-side. Higher-density neighbourhoods serve the greater good of reducing the cost of infrastructure and services needed to support new growth, helping to keep taxes down. It also improves support for local shops and amenities like libraries and community centres, while making public transit more effective, and improving walkability. New zoning bylaws that will create more missing middle housing over time will result in more diverse and livable communities that provide varied ownership models, home types and sizes. Missing middle housing will also allow broader access to good neighbourhoods, creating a more prosperous, affordable, and socially equitable city in the future. Brent Bellamy is creative director at Number Ten Architectural Group. Brent BellamyColumnist Brent Bellamy is creative director for Number Ten Architectural Group. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
