
A global rice crisis looms – can technology level the (paddy) field?
From paella and sushi to jollof and biryani, rice feeds over half the world's population. Yet the staple grain is under threat.
More frequent droughts, extreme heat and erratic weather in Asia, where 90 per cent of the world's rice is grown, have damaged crops and reduced yields, sending prices soaring and creating a global crisis.
In Japan, ubiquitous bowls of donburi are starting to look more precious. The government has had to dip into its emergency stockpile, auctioning off 165,000 tonnes of rice to bring down rising costs.
In the Philippines, a 'food security emergency' has been declared, allowing the government to release buffer stocks to help check rising rice prices.
And in Indonesia, ministers are setting aside a further million hectares of land for rice production – an area six times the size of Greater London – to meet soaring global demand.
More than 3.5 billion people around the world depend on rice for essential calories and nutrition, among them people living in some of the poorest countries. It is these populations who will suffer if the rice shortage continues, experts say.
But there is hope yet for the world's favourite grain. In recent years, a revolution has begun to bear fruit, with new technologies emerging to make rice production more resilient and more sustainable.
Genetic modification
In 2021, the Philippines became the first country to approve nutrient-enriched 'golden rice' – a grain genetically modified to fight vitamin A deficiency – but crop modification has come a long way since then.
Prof Julie Gray, Professor of Plant Cell Signalling at the University of Sheffield, is developing drought- and heat-resistant rice crops for the UK Rice Research Consortium.
She and her colleagues are producing rice plants with fewer stomata – the tiny pores through which carbon dioxide enters, and water leaves, to make them more resilient in arid conditions.
Cereals like rice are slow to adapt to changes in their environment, but carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are significantly higher than they have been in the past and are expected to rise further.
At first she was doing this through genetic modification. This has become easier since the introduction of The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill (2023), allowing the use and development of genetically modified plants across the UK.
Yet many people are still sceptical of genetically modified foods, so Prof Gray has been working with scientists in Thailand to create mutants through selective breeding, rather than genetic modification.
'Let me show you some of the rice,' she says, rummaging around in her bag for a moment before producing several plastic bags bulging with rice. The grains are a surprising array of colours, from off-white to deep red.
'I have actually eaten some of my low stomatal density rice,' she says. 'As a genetic engineer we very rarely get to eat anything that we make, so doing it with plant breeders who are using non-GM techniques is really exciting.'
Did she enjoy it though? There's a long pause and she wrinkles her face in distaste – it seems GM rice still has a way to go when it comes to flavour.
Drones and satellite technology
It's not just the crops that are evolving, but the way they are planted.
Increasingly, drones are being used to plant rice, spread fertilisers, and map weeds and nutrient levels in rice fields, making the process more precise and efficient.
Drones are also helping farmers to offset labour shortages across Asia, as people migrate from rural locations to cities.
But the upfront cost of the drones can be prohibitive.
'Indian agriculture is dominated by small and marginal farmers who can't afford the precision agriculture practices [like drones],' says Jayahari KM, India Country Coordinator for the World Resources Institute (WRI).
This is why, last year, the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) launched the Drones4Rice Project in the Philippines, which aims to improve access for smallholder farmers.
So far, the project has been a success. Dr Alisher Mizabaev, who works for the IRRI, says: 'I was surprised myself when I asked a farmer in Thailand, 'How do you do this seeding?' He said he used drones because everyone else has moved to Bangkok to work outside of agriculture. There is not enough labour anymore.'
Drones aren't the only way rice farming has taken to the skies.
Satellites are also being used to map rice paddies, estimate methane emissions and even predict yield.
One scientist doing this is Dr Belen Marti-Cardona, an associate professor in earth observation and hydrology at the University of Surrey.
'We need a lot of parameters,' she says, 'such as the type of soil, meteorological information, temperature and flooding status of the field'.
Key to her work is reducing methane emissions – something that needs to happen if we are to continue ramping up the production of rice around the world.
'Farmers can get paid for reducing their emissions, so what we're doing with satellite data is verifying that this is happening,' she says.
Direct seeded rice
Ironically, while climate change is damaging the cultivation of rice, rice production itself is contributing to climate change and feeding the vicious cycle.
Rice cultivation alone accounts for 12 per cent of the methane created by people, a gas which warms the planet 25 times faster than carbon dioxide. It also uses a lot of water – around 2,500 litres per kilogram of rice, which is enough to fill about sixteen bathtubs.
Sustainable rice farming doesn't necessarily require a high-tech solution; just changing the way it's grown can have a significant impact.
A method called direct seeded rice (DSR) moves away from the traditional method of rice production – flooding fields and then transplanting seedlings into the water – and instead sews the seeds directly into the field. This reduces methane emissions, water usage, and damage to the soil.
Dr Smita Kurup, a plant developmental biologist at Rothamstead Research, is an expert in the technique.
'Rice is not a thirsty crop,' she tells The Telegraph. 'Puddled fields is the traditional practice so we have consistently selected rice varieties that perform well in [this environment]. But rice absolutely does not need to be grown like that.'
She has screened hundreds of rice plants and selected the best varieties for DSR, so that farmers can transition to the new technique without compromising their yield.
But the sheer number of rice varieties presents its own challenge.
'Rice is funny,' she says. 'In every country, the kind of rice you grow has different properties in terms of taste and how it feels in the mouth and the cuisine – compare jasmine rice and sticky rice to long grain rice for example.'
This means that different DSR-varieties need to be selected and introduced in every country – it's not a fast process but it's an effective one.
'I hope that all these initiatives will lead to collaboration, and making sure we are growing rice in a good way,' says Dr Mirzabaev. 'I'm very optimistic.'
Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
22-05-2025
- South Wales Guardian
Proposals to protect creatives' copyright from AI rejected by MPs
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle pledged to set up a series of expert working groups to find a 'workable way forward' for both industries, as he urged MPs to reject the Lords' amendment. Peers attempted to amend the Data (Use and Access) Bill by adding a commitment to introduce transparency requirements, aiming to ensure copyright holders are able to see when their work has been used and by who. MPs voted 195 to 124, majority 71, to disagree with Baroness Beeban Kidron's transparency amendment, in a bid to end the so-called ping-pong. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Kyle said: 'Pitting one against the other is unnecessarily divisive and damages both. 'The truth is that growing Britain's economy needs both sectors to succeed and to prosper. Britain has to be the place where the creative industries, and every bit as much as AI companies, can invest, grow, are confident in their future prosperity, that is assured. 'We have to become a country where our people can enjoy the benefits and the opportunities of both.' He added: 'It is time to tone down the unnecessary rhetoric and instead, recognise that the country needs to strike a balance between content and creativity, transparency and training, and recognition and reward. 'That can't be done by well-meaning, but ultimately imperfect amendments to a Bill that was never intended to do such a thing. 'The issue of AI copyright needs properly considered and enforceable legislation, drafted with the inclusion, the involvement, and the experience of both creatives and technologists. 'To that end, I can tell the House that I am now setting up a series of expert working groups to bring together people from both sectors, on transparency, on licensing and other technical standards to chart a workable way forward.' Intervening, Labour MP James Naish said many of his constituents in Rushcliffe feel 'AI development has already trampled over their rights', adding: 'This is a time-limited issue and action is required.' Mr Kyle said it is 'the truth that so much content has already been used and subsumed by AI models, usually from other territories and also under the current law'. Chairwoman of the culture, media and sport committee Dame Caroline Dinenage said: 'What rights holders need is what this amendment says – clear, relevant, accurate and accessible information about the use of their copyright works and the means by which they're assessed. 'That's exactly what it says here, a legislative vehicle in the future, however welcome, is going to be simply too late to protect the livelihoods of so many of the UK's 2.5 million creative workers.' The Conservative MP for Gosport added: 'Is the Government really committed to proactively enforcing our copyright and if not through this Bill and now, how and when?' Mr Kyle replied: 'We need to make sure that we can have a domestic legal system that is fit for the digital age.' He added that he wanted to 'give the certainty in words, but also, most importantly, to give the certainty in legislation in the most rapid fashion possible, so that creatives and the AI sector can move forward together'. Conservative MP Joe Robertson (Isle of Wight East) said: 'He talks about delivering certainty, but does he not see that the certainty he is giving is to large, multinational tech companies to get away with scraping original content that is copyrighted. 'But he is going to give them the certainty through this Bill to abuse the rights of creatives.' Mr Kyle replied: 'I am confused by his intervention. The Bill before us does not mention AI, it does not mention copyright, it has nothing to do with any of those items.' SNP MP Pete Wishart (Perth and Kinross-shire) accused the Government of offering creators 'nothing', adding: 'I've looked at this amendment the Lords presented, it seems a reasonable amendment, what is wrong with it as a way forward?' Mr Kyle said: 'It is my belief, and it is this Government's belief, that there is a better way forward to give the protections that creative sectors and creators need, and that will deliver them the certainties, protections and the ability to see transparency.' 'We need to take these issues in the round, not one part of it,' he added. Mr Kyle continued: 'Much of the creative content on the internet has already been scraped elsewhere in the world. We cannot turn back time nor should we kid ourselves that we can exercise extraterritorial reach that we simply do not have. 'My determination is to get this absolutely right, not just rush it right now to make ourselves feel better but make no real improvements to the status quo. So let me be absolutely clear to the House – I get it and I will get it right.' Shadow technology minister Ben Spencer said he welcomed the 'huge benefits' which the Bill would have on the economy and public services, but added: 'I fear this Bill will go down in the Government's record as the Bill of missed opportunities. 'A missed opportunity to fix our flawed public datasets which present a barrier to tracking and tackling inequalities in areas such as women's health, a missed opportunity to commit to a review of protections for children and their use of social media platforms, and to commit to taking action to increase those protections where the evidence shows there's good reason. 'And a missed opportunity to provide much-needed certainty to two of our key growth industries – the creative and AI sectors – over how they can interact to promote their mutual growth and flourishing.'

Leader Live
22-05-2025
- Leader Live
Proposals to protect creatives' copyright from AI rejected by MPs
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle pledged to set up a series of expert working groups to find a 'workable way forward' for both industries, as he urged MPs to reject the Lords' amendment. Peers attempted to amend the Data (Use and Access) Bill by adding a commitment to introduce transparency requirements, aiming to ensure copyright holders are able to see when their work has been used and by who. MPs voted 195 to 124, majority 71, to disagree with Baroness Beeban Kidron's transparency amendment, in a bid to end the so-called ping-pong. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Kyle said: 'Pitting one against the other is unnecessarily divisive and damages both. 'The truth is that growing Britain's economy needs both sectors to succeed and to prosper. Britain has to be the place where the creative industries, and every bit as much as AI companies, can invest, grow, are confident in their future prosperity, that is assured. 'We have to become a country where our people can enjoy the benefits and the opportunities of both.' He added: 'It is time to tone down the unnecessary rhetoric and instead, recognise that the country needs to strike a balance between content and creativity, transparency and training, and recognition and reward. 'That can't be done by well-meaning, but ultimately imperfect amendments to a Bill that was never intended to do such a thing. 'The issue of AI copyright needs properly considered and enforceable legislation, drafted with the inclusion, the involvement, and the experience of both creatives and technologists. 'To that end, I can tell the House that I am now setting up a series of expert working groups to bring together people from both sectors, on transparency, on licensing and other technical standards to chart a workable way forward.' Intervening, Labour MP James Naish said many of his constituents in Rushcliffe feel 'AI development has already trampled over their rights', adding: 'This is a time-limited issue and action is required.' Mr Kyle said it is 'the truth that so much content has already been used and subsumed by AI models, usually from other territories and also under the current law'. Chairwoman of the culture, media and sport committee Dame Caroline Dinenage said: 'What rights holders need is what this amendment says – clear, relevant, accurate and accessible information about the use of their copyright works and the means by which they're assessed. 'That's exactly what it says here, a legislative vehicle in the future, however welcome, is going to be simply too late to protect the livelihoods of so many of the UK's 2.5 million creative workers.' The Conservative MP for Gosport added: 'Is the Government really committed to proactively enforcing our copyright and if not through this Bill and now, how and when?' Mr Kyle replied: 'We need to make sure that we can have a domestic legal system that is fit for the digital age.' He added that he wanted to 'give the certainty in words, but also, most importantly, to give the certainty in legislation in the most rapid fashion possible, so that creatives and the AI sector can move forward together'. Conservative MP Joe Robertson (Isle of Wight East) said: 'He talks about delivering certainty, but does he not see that the certainty he is giving is to large, multinational tech companies to get away with scraping original content that is copyrighted. 'But he is going to give them the certainty through this Bill to abuse the rights of creatives.' Mr Kyle replied: 'I am confused by his intervention. The Bill before us does not mention AI, it does not mention copyright, it has nothing to do with any of those items.' SNP MP Pete Wishart (Perth and Kinross-shire) accused the Government of offering creators 'nothing', adding: 'I've looked at this amendment the Lords presented, it seems a reasonable amendment, what is wrong with it as a way forward?' Mr Kyle said: 'It is my belief, and it is this Government's belief, that there is a better way forward to give the protections that creative sectors and creators need, and that will deliver them the certainties, protections and the ability to see transparency.' 'We need to take these issues in the round, not one part of it,' he added. Mr Kyle continued: 'Much of the creative content on the internet has already been scraped elsewhere in the world. We cannot turn back time nor should we kid ourselves that we can exercise extraterritorial reach that we simply do not have. 'My determination is to get this absolutely right, not just rush it right now to make ourselves feel better but make no real improvements to the status quo. So let me be absolutely clear to the House – I get it and I will get it right.' Shadow technology minister Ben Spencer said he welcomed the 'huge benefits' which the Bill would have on the economy and public services, but added: 'I fear this Bill will go down in the Government's record as the Bill of missed opportunities. 'A missed opportunity to fix our flawed public datasets which present a barrier to tracking and tackling inequalities in areas such as women's health, a missed opportunity to commit to a review of protections for children and their use of social media platforms, and to commit to taking action to increase those protections where the evidence shows there's good reason. 'And a missed opportunity to provide much-needed certainty to two of our key growth industries – the creative and AI sectors – over how they can interact to promote their mutual growth and flourishing.'


North Wales Chronicle
22-05-2025
- North Wales Chronicle
Proposals to protect creatives' copyright from AI rejected by MPs
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle pledged to set up a series of expert working groups to find a 'workable way forward' for both industries, as he urged MPs to reject the Lords' amendment. Peers attempted to amend the Data (Use and Access) Bill by adding a commitment to introduce transparency requirements, aiming to ensure copyright holders are able to see when their work has been used and by who. MPs voted 195 to 124, majority 71, to disagree with Baroness Beeban Kidron's transparency amendment, in a bid to end the so-called ping-pong. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Kyle said: 'Pitting one against the other is unnecessarily divisive and damages both. 'The truth is that growing Britain's economy needs both sectors to succeed and to prosper. Britain has to be the place where the creative industries, and every bit as much as AI companies, can invest, grow, are confident in their future prosperity, that is assured. 'We have to become a country where our people can enjoy the benefits and the opportunities of both.' He added: 'It is time to tone down the unnecessary rhetoric and instead, recognise that the country needs to strike a balance between content and creativity, transparency and training, and recognition and reward. 'That can't be done by well-meaning, but ultimately imperfect amendments to a Bill that was never intended to do such a thing. 'The issue of AI copyright needs properly considered and enforceable legislation, drafted with the inclusion, the involvement, and the experience of both creatives and technologists. 'To that end, I can tell the House that I am now setting up a series of expert working groups to bring together people from both sectors, on transparency, on licensing and other technical standards to chart a workable way forward.' Intervening, Labour MP James Naish said many of his constituents in Rushcliffe feel 'AI development has already trampled over their rights', adding: 'This is a time-limited issue and action is required.' Mr Kyle said it is 'the truth that so much content has already been used and subsumed by AI models, usually from other territories and also under the current law'. Chairwoman of the culture, media and sport committee Dame Caroline Dinenage said: 'What rights holders need is what this amendment says – clear, relevant, accurate and accessible information about the use of their copyright works and the means by which they're assessed. 'That's exactly what it says here, a legislative vehicle in the future, however welcome, is going to be simply too late to protect the livelihoods of so many of the UK's 2.5 million creative workers.' The Conservative MP for Gosport added: 'Is the Government really committed to proactively enforcing our copyright and if not through this Bill and now, how and when?' Mr Kyle replied: 'We need to make sure that we can have a domestic legal system that is fit for the digital age.' He added that he wanted to 'give the certainty in words, but also, most importantly, to give the certainty in legislation in the most rapid fashion possible, so that creatives and the AI sector can move forward together'. Conservative MP Joe Robertson (Isle of Wight East) said: 'He talks about delivering certainty, but does he not see that the certainty he is giving is to large, multinational tech companies to get away with scraping original content that is copyrighted. 'But he is going to give them the certainty through this Bill to abuse the rights of creatives.' Mr Kyle replied: 'I am confused by his intervention. The Bill before us does not mention AI, it does not mention copyright, it has nothing to do with any of those items.' SNP MP Pete Wishart (Perth and Kinross-shire) accused the Government of offering creators 'nothing', adding: 'I've looked at this amendment the Lords presented, it seems a reasonable amendment, what is wrong with it as a way forward?' Mr Kyle said: 'It is my belief, and it is this Government's belief, that there is a better way forward to give the protections that creative sectors and creators need, and that will deliver them the certainties, protections and the ability to see transparency.' 'We need to take these issues in the round, not one part of it,' he added. Mr Kyle continued: 'Much of the creative content on the internet has already been scraped elsewhere in the world. We cannot turn back time nor should we kid ourselves that we can exercise extraterritorial reach that we simply do not have. 'My determination is to get this absolutely right, not just rush it right now to make ourselves feel better but make no real improvements to the status quo. So let me be absolutely clear to the House – I get it and I will get it right.' Shadow technology minister Ben Spencer said he welcomed the 'huge benefits' which the Bill would have on the economy and public services, but added: 'I fear this Bill will go down in the Government's record as the Bill of missed opportunities. 'A missed opportunity to fix our flawed public datasets which present a barrier to tracking and tackling inequalities in areas such as women's health, a missed opportunity to commit to a review of protections for children and their use of social media platforms, and to commit to taking action to increase those protections where the evidence shows there's good reason. 'And a missed opportunity to provide much-needed certainty to two of our key growth industries – the creative and AI sectors – over how they can interact to promote their mutual growth and flourishing.'