Police could search for stolen goods without warrant under new law
People who have tracked the location of their stolen mobile phones, laptops or bikes can expect swifter police action under new measures to be introduced to parliament today.
In a drive to tackle street crimes, officers will no longer need a warrant to enter a premises where stolen items have been electronically located, such as through a phone-tracking app or Bluetooth.
A police inspector will be able to sign off entry to a premises, rather than waiting for a judge or magistrate, in order to act during the "golden hour" just after a theft and increase the chances of a conviction, ministers said.
It is one of a number of new powers in the Crime and Policing Bill, set to become law later this year, to address what the home secretary has called an "extremely frustrating" situation for victims of crime.
"Snatch thefts" of mobile phones and bags have more than doubled in the past year, with more than 200 incidents a day in 2024, according to Home Office figures. Just 0.8% of these thefts led to a charge, despite some victims offering police evidence from tracking devices.
1:08
"For the last few years, our towns and cities have seen street theft shoot up, as organised gangs have been targeting mobile phones," Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said.
"But it is extremely frustrating for victims when they can see exactly where their stolen phone has gone but nothing is done. That is why we are determined to give the police the powers they need to move fast to crack down on these crimes that are blighting our communities."
The powers will also apply to police retrieving stolen vehicles, tools or tractors which are geolocated. It comes alongside tougher measures for people in possession of signal jammers used to steal keyless cars, which would be punishable by up to five years in prison
The bill is a major update to existing crime legislation, with new measures to tackle knife crime, violence against women and girls, cyber crime, child sexual abuse and terrorism.
However, there are questions about how officers will have the capacity to attend to thousands of cases of stolen phones, with the government still planning to recruit an extra 13,000 community police officers as promised at the election.
Ministers have also proposed specific new criminal offences in the bill, for assaulting a shopworker - carrying a maximum sentence of six months; "cuckooing", in which a vulnerable person's home is used for illegal activities such as drug dealing; and climbing on war memorials. Other new crimes include spiking and using AI to produce child sexual abuse material.
The bill enshrines respect orders, which are already being piloted, to restrict the movement of people who persistently cause harm in their communities - with those who breach them to be charged with a criminal offence.
They are similar to the anti-social behaviour orders (Asbos) introduced under the last Labour government but with requirements such as attending anger management courses as well as prohibitions.
An impact assessment of how these new offences will affect the overstretched prisons crisis will not be immediately published.
The home secretary said: "For too long communities have had to put up with rising town centre and street crime, and persistent antisocial behaviour, while neighbourhood police have been cut.
"And for years too little has been done to tackle the most serious violence of all including knife crime and violence against women and children.
"That is why the new Crime and Policing Bill is about taking back our streets and town centres, restoring respect for law and order, and giving the police and local communities the support and tools they need to tackle local crime."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Graziadaily
34 minutes ago
- Graziadaily
A History Making Vote On Abortion Is Happening Next Week – This Is What You Need To Know
On Tuesday 17th June, MPs will face a historic vote on amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill that seek to decriminalise abortion. There are two different amendments on the cards, the NC20 amendment proposed by Labour MP Stella Creasy and the NC1 amendment proposed by fellow Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi. MPs will only vote on one of these amendments, depending on which has most support ahead of the vote on Tuesday. If either of the amendments are passed it will mark the biggest overhaul to abortion law for 50 years. As MPs prepare to cast this historic vote, we've broken down the differences in the two amendments, and what they mean for women. Right now, abortions can take place in the first 24 weeks of pregnancy in England, Scotland and Wales. However, they have to be approved by two doctors, who must agree having the baby would pose a greater risk to the woman's physical or mental health than a termination. Abortions were illegal before the introduction of the 1967 Abortion Act, which initially allowed them to take place up to 28 weeks. This was reduced to 24 weeks in 1990. Abortions after 24 weeks are allowed only if: the woman's life is in danger there is a severe fetal abnormality the woman is at risk of grave physical and mental injury This is the amendment proposed by Stella Creasey, which would make accessing an abortion a human right. It seeks to decriminalise abortion up to 24 weeks. It would also ensure that late-term abortions outside the Abortion Act did not result in prison sentences. This topic made headlines last year when Bethany Cox, 22, was cleared over abortion charges when prosecutors offered no evidence against her. She was the sixth woman in Great Britain in a year to be tried for illegal abortion, ie, a termination after the 24-week legal limit. Creasy believes the amendment will bring the rest of the UK into line with Northern Ireland, where abortion was decriminalised in 2019. 'Our proposal explicitly leaves in place the well-established time limit under which you can access an abortion,' Creasy said. 'It removes the threat of criminal prosecution for abortion because it is a healthcare matter.' She added: 'Abortion law is incredibly complex. It governs 250,000 women's healthcare every single year. Because of that, it is essential that any huge change to abortion law is properly considered. That means involvement with providers, medical bodies, regulators – and proper debate time in parliament.' The amendment put forward by MP Tonia Antoniazzi also seeks to decriminalise abortion at any stage by a woman acting in relation to her own pregnancy, ending the threat of investigation or imprisonment. However, it does not seek to make abortion a human right. Rather than seeking to create a new framework, Antoniazzi's amendment retains the existing abortion law. This more cautious approach is backed by The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) who say the more wide-ranging changes laid out in the NC20 amendment need more time to be debated. Antoniazzi said: 'We've seen a sharp rise in the number of women and girls facing criminal investigations following pregnancy loss and abortion,' she said. 'It's just wrong to put women in this situation, to put them into the criminal justice system, because this is not a criminal law issue, this is essentially a healthcare matter.' She added: 'I find it unbelievable that in the last five years, around 100 women have been investigated by the police. It's just wrong. It's a waste of taxpayers' money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest. Therefore, the law has to change.' Only MPs can vote on the amendment but it is a free vote, so they are allowed to vote according to their 'personal conscience'. If you'd like to encourage your MP to support either of these amendments, you can find their contact details at
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Chef wins £20,000 payout after boss 'ranted about unreliable Mexicans'
The former head chef of a gastropub has been awarded £20,000 after his boss allegedly threatened to get him deported and made comments about 'unreliable Mexicans'. Cesar Omar Perez Vargas, who is of Mexican origin, walked out of the Pot Kiln in Thatcham, Berkshire, after things 'came to a head' during a busy shift in August 2022. A tribunal heard the kitchen had recently gone from four chefs to two and he was told to serve 60 diners one day after agreeing to cook for no more than 45. He told owner Francis Rockcliff the workload was 'unreasonable' and he 'could not bear the pressure anymore', walking out after Mr Rockcliff dismissed his concerns. Mr Perez Vargas said the owner followed him out of the premises and told him: 'I knew that you Mexicans were not reliable people. I will call the Home Office and make sure that they send you back to the country that you belong.' The chef, who has a husband, also claimed Mr Rockcliff threatened to tell officials he had been 'sexually harassing all the male staff'. Mr Rockcliff returned to the restaurant to see out the shift but later drove to Mr Perez Vargas' home to collect keys for the restaurant. Mr Perez Vargas' husband told the panel he went to the door to hand the keys over while his partner remained inside, saying Mr Rockcliff then screamed: 'He doesn't belong here. I will report to the Home Office and make sure he'll be deported back to his country,' Mr Rockcliff denied making racist comments, but admitted he told Mr Perez Vargas that if he 'was so unhappy, which was something that I did not understand, why didn't he go back to Mexico'. He also accepted saying 'something along the lines that he had heard the claimant had been sexually harassing staff', the panel heard. The tribunal found neither man was 'likely to be a reliable narrator of the events'. But the judges said they were 'satisfied that something along the lines of the things that the claimant complains about occurred' on the basis of Mr Rockcliff's responses to the panel. The panel heard he sent a text message to another member of staff the day after the fallout saying: 'I'm changing the kitchen culture. I finally lost all the dinosaurs/old brigade chefs to my great relief. 'I'm not sure that Eastern Europeans or Latin Americans have an innate understanding of English regional cookery and/or Mediterranean classic cuisine.' He also wrote a social media post saying classically-trained chefs were 'people with sautéed egos who have lost their mojo for the love of cooking and who have overcooked their wallets for fame over food'. More Trending While Mr Rockcliff denied the comments were 'directed' at Mr Perez Vargas, the tribunal found anyone who was familiar with the situation would know 'exactly who they were referring to'. The tribunal accepted Mr Rockcliff was not racist and did not discriminate against Mr Perez Vargas. But it said his behaviour was 'offensive' and 'problematic' and found it amounted to harassment related to race and sexual orientation. Mr Perez Vargas, who had worked at the Pot Kiln for nearly three yeras, was was awarded £20,444.24 in compensation. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page.
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Starmer under pressure to reveal migrant crime numbers
Sir Keir Starmer will come under pressure next week to reveal the 'hidden' scale of migrant crime. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, is to propose a law change that would force the Government to publish the data identifying the migrant nationalities with the highest crime rates. He is laying an amendment to Labour's Crime and Policing Bill that would require ministers to publish every quarter the nationality, country of birth, visa route, asylum status and method of entry of everyone convicted and sentenced to crimes in the Crown Court and magistrates court. Mr Jenrick plans to force it to a vote of MPs on the floor of the Commons and said that, if passed, it would end the 'shameful cover-up' by state authorities which has prevented the public from being told the scale of crime committed by foreign nationals. It would mirror an approach by some US states and Denmark, where league tables compiled from the government data show the crime rates of the top four nations – Kuwait, Tunisia, Lebanon and Somalia – are eight times those of Danish nationals. 'We need the full, unvarnished truth' The Telegraph has previously published data on migrant crime rates but only as a result of the figures being released by Government departments under freedom of information laws. That research suggested that foreign nationals were convicted of up to a quarter of sex crimes despite census data showing that they made up just 9.3 per cent of the population. Mr Jenrick said: 'We need to know the truth about who is committing crime in our country so we can protect the British public. 'Right now we are importing a crime wave. Data that has been dragged out of the authorities shows migrants from some countries are enormously more likely to commit violent and sexual offences. 'Indicative statistics suggest Albanians are 153 times more likely to be convicted of drug offences, while Eritreans are 20 times more likely to commit a sexual offence. We need the full, unvarnished truth. 'Keir Starmer has a choice. Will he release the data about migrant crime, as countries like Denmark do, and act on it? Or will he instigate yet another shameful cover-up?' Labour has proposed its own league tables of migrant crime rates based on the nationalities and foreign criminals living in communities while awaiting deportation. Albanians, Romanians and Poles are expected to be among the top nationalities for crimes including violence, robbery, theft and drug production and dealing. It is understood Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, overruled Home Office officials who have previously claimed it is too difficult to provide quality data on foreign criminals. She has told them she wants it published by the end of the year. Her immigration white paper also proposed that the Home Office should be informed of all crimes committed by foreign nationals in the UK as part of a deportation crackdown. At present, foreign criminals are only reported to the Home Office if they receive a jail sentence. A year behind bars is the automatic threshold for deportation from the UK, although those with prison terms under one year can still be considered for removal. It is thought unlikely, however, that Labour will back Mr Jenrick's proposal although it is likely to be backed by Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Data previously published by The Telegraph and obtained through FOI legislation by the Centre for Migration control revealed that foreign nationals accounted for between one in eight (12.5 per cent) and as many as one in six (16.4 per cent) of all convictions in England and Wales. According to the new data, 872,488 convictions were recorded on the police national computer between 2021 and 2023, of which 833,522 had identifiable nationality information. Foreign nationals accounted for 104,000, but there were a further 38,966 where the nationality was 'unknown'.
