logo
A former top Meta exec says AI is doomed if artists want tech firms to ask for permission to train models on their work

A former top Meta exec says AI is doomed if artists want tech firms to ask for permission to train models on their work

Yahoo27-05-2025

Clegg was Meta's president of global affairs. He left the company in January.
Clegg said it would be tough for companies to ask artists before training models on their work.
He said this would "basically kill the AI industry" in the UK.
Former Meta executive Nick Clegg says the UK's AI industry will be killed if tech companies must ask artists for permission to use their work when training models.
Clegg was promoting his upcoming book "How to Save the Internet" at the Charleston Festival on Thursday when he was asked about artists' demands for tighter AI copyright laws.
Clegg said it would be reasonable to let artists "opt out of having their creativity, their products, what they've worked on indefinitely modeled."
However, he said it would be "somewhat implausible" if they expect companies to get permission before training models.
Clegg said this is because "these systems train on vast amounts of data."
"I just don't know how you go around, asking everyone first. I just don't see how that would work. And by the way, if you did it in Britain and no one else did it, you would basically kill the AI industry in this country overnight," Clegg continued.
Clegg was the UK's deputy prime minister from 2010 to 2015. He joined Meta in 2018 as its vice president for global affairs and communications and was promoted to president of global affairs in 2022. He announced his departure from Meta in January.
Clegg and representatives for Meta did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider.
In October, the UK government introduced the Data (Use and Access) Bill. The bill will allow companies to train AI on creative works such as books and music, unless the copyright holder opts out.
Earlier this month, the House of Lords voted to amend the bill to require tech companies to disclose and seek consent before using copyrighted material to train their models. The House of Commons rejected the change.
Singer Elton John said in an interview with the BBC on May 18 that he was "very angry" with the bill, as it would allow tech companies to engage in "theft, thievery on a high scale." He said he was prepared to take the government to court and "fight it all the way."
"It's criminal, in that I feel incredibly betrayed," John said.
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Goldman Sachs wants students to stop using ChatGPT in job interviews with the bank
Goldman Sachs wants students to stop using ChatGPT in job interviews with the bank

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Goldman Sachs wants students to stop using ChatGPT in job interviews with the bank

Goldman Sachs is cautioning its young job-seekers against using AI during the interview process. Instead, the $176 billion bank is encouraging applicants to study up on the firm in preparation. Other businesses like Anthropic and Amazon have also warned candidates against deploying AI—and if they're caught, they could be disqualified. While many companies are boasting about all the efficiencies that will come with AI, some are dissuading potential hires from using it to get a leg up in interviews with recruiters and hiring managers. Goldman Sachs' campus recruitment team for the bank's private investing academy in EMEA recently sent out an email to students reminding them of its expectations for interviews, as reported by eFinancialCareers. Goldman uses video interviewing platform HireVue to pre-assess candidates and maintains a set of best practices for job-seekers. Based on the best practices guidelines, the young applicants are encouraged to prepare for interviews by studying the $176 billion firm's financial results, business principles, and core values. But they can't bank on AI to help them out. 'As a reminder, Goldman Sachs prohibits the use of any external sources, including ChatGPT or Google search engine, during the interview process,' the email noted, according to someone who saw the message. HireVue is an AI-powered talent evaluation platform, known for asking behavioral questions that reveal applicants' skills. Gen Z job-seekers might be tempted to use ChatGPT or other chatbots to game the recruitment process—but it's discouraged, and isn't the most viable option. The typical Goldman Sachs virtual interview allows for 30 seconds of prep after the question, followed by a two-minute response time, according to research from eFinancialCareers. That makes it hard for job-seekers to quickly type a prompt into the chatbot, churn out an answer, and decide what the line of attack is. Plus, the responses aren't tailored and unique to the individual, potentially hurting the interviewee more than helping. Goldman's job-seeker AI policy could seem ironic, as half of the firm's 46,000 employees have access to the technology. But other companies are navigating that same paradox as they try to fully flesh out their AI strategies in an ever-changing technological environment. Goldman Sachs isn't the only major company warning its applicants not to use AI during recruitment. The $61.5 billion AI giant Anthropic went on a hiring spree last month, but told job-seekers that they can't use the advanced technology to fill out their applications. The company argued that it wants to test the communication skills of potential hires, and AI use clouds that assessment. 'Please do not use AI assistants during the application process,' Anthropic wrote in the description for its hundreds of job postings. 'We want to understand your personal interest in Anthropic without mediation through an AI system, and we also want to evaluate your non-AI-assisted communication skills.' Retail giant Amazon also doesn't like it when potential talent uses AI tools during the recruitment process. Earlier this year, the $2 trillion behemoth shared guidelines with internal recruiters, stressing that candidates who are caught using AI during job interviews should be disqualified. According to Amazon, the tools give an 'unfair advantage' that masks analysis of someone's 'authentic' capabilities. 'To ensure a fair and transparent recruitment process, please do not use gen Al tools during your interview unless explicitly permitted,' the guidelines, as reported by Business Insider, noted. 'Failure to adhere to these guidelines may result in disqualification from the recruitment process.' This story was originally featured on

Trump, Musk move to reconcile in same way they split up: On social media and interviews
Trump, Musk move to reconcile in same way they split up: On social media and interviews

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump, Musk move to reconcile in same way they split up: On social media and interviews

Maybe we will see Elon Musk back at Mar-a-Lago again after all. President Donald Trump said on June 11 that he looked favorably upon an apology Musk, the world's richest man, issued on his X social media platform on June 10. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Musk posted on social media after deleting his X missives. 'I thought it was very nice that he did that,' Trump told the New York Post. Musk issued the post following an ugly, public split with the U.S. president he helped to elect. The dispute began in early June with a sharp disagreement between the two over the "Big Beautiful Bill" currently before the U.S. Senate. Musk posted on X that the budget-reconciliation legislation is "massive, outrageous, pork-filled" and declared it a "disgusting abomination." Trump has dismissed what he said are "false statements are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' ' and has defended the measure as slashing "waste, fraud and abuse." From there, the back-and-forth descended into an abyss with Musk taking credit for Trump's and the Republicans' November victories and intimating Trump engaged in sex abuse with Jeffrey Epstein. Trump struck back stating Musk was "wearing thin" and said the Tesla CEO "just went CRAZY" when the administration "took away" the electric vehicle mandate. He then threatened to cancel U.S. federal contracts held by Musk's companies. After Trump's victory, Musk became a frequent sight here in Palm Beach County. He was a ubiquitous presence at Mar-a-Lago during the transition period, and there were reports Musk was scouting for a residence in the area. The DOGE chief was frequently seen deplaning with Trump on Air Force One at Palm Beach International Airport during several of the president's 10 trips to the Winter White House through early May. Along the way, Musk became one of the most unpopular and reviled political figures in America. Shares in Tesla tanked and polls showed him with high unpopularity ratings. Protests sprung up at Tesla showrooms, including one near West Palm Beach where a demonstration almost ended in tragedy when a car sought to ram protesters, according to eyewitnesses and a police report. Antonio Fins is a politics and business editor at The Palm Beach Post, part of the USA TODAY Florida Network. You can reach him at afins@ Help support our journalism. Subscribe today. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Musk apology to Trump on X social media

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store