
U.N. may get first female chief as Latin bloc unites
Latin American and Caribbean nations will seek to unite behind a single candidate in the contest to lead the United Nations, a decision that may put the global decision-making body on course to elect its first-ever female secretary general.
Thirty out of 33 nations in the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States agreed to seek a consensus candidate at their Wednesday leaders' summit in Honduras, according to government official familiar with the discussions. A joint statement signed by those nations will be published in the coming hours.
It's a significant step for a region that is widely expected to produce the next U.N. chief when current Secretary General Antonio Guterres leaves at the end of 2026 after two terms in charge. The position informally rotates around the world's regions, and Latin America and the Caribbean are next in line.
Forming that consensus, however, won't be easy. Argentina, Paraguay and Nicaragua didn't sign the document. And even as the letter doesn't explicitly say the countries will seek to back a female candidate, differing views of gender politics across the region, along with caution around choosing a candidate conservative governments may perceive as too far left, could push the talks in a different direction.
Guterres has indicated that he would like the 15-member U.N. Security Council, which elects the secretary-general, to choose a woman as his successor. It's a desire shared by Brazil — Latin America's largest nation — which has already begun pushing its neighbors to come together behind a history-making pick.
"We can contribute to restoring the credibility of the U.N. by electing the organization's first female secretary general,' President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said in a speech delivered at the summit.
Mia Mottley at the COP29 climate conference in Baku, Azerbaijan, in November 2024 |
Bloomberg
Brazil is working for a female U.N. secretary-general, Ambassador Gisela Padovan, the secretary for Latin American and Caribbean affairs at Brazil's foreign ministry, told reporters last week.
"There are candidates of political, intellectual and leadership weight, we know there are countries that have a slightly different view of gender issues but we will negotiate,' she said.
Discussions are still in the early stages, but here's a look at four names that have circulated among regional diplomats as potential candidates for the role, according to three people familiar with the situation who requested anonymity to discuss it.
Mia Mottley, Barbados Prime Minister
The longtime leader of the Barbados Labor Party, Mia Mottley became the island nation's first female prime minister when she oversaw its landslide election victory in 2018. Mottley, 59, won re-election in 2022.
On the world stage, she's become known as a champion of climate action: Earlier this year, she announced that Barbados has a plan to reach net zero emissions by 2035, a decade faster than Germany's ambitious plan. Mottley has also placed her nation at the forefront of innovative financial approaches to climate change, and has urged poor and developing nations to work together on solutions at a time when rich countries like the U.S. are pulling back.
Mottley has also served as a co-chair of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.
Michelle Bachelet, former Chile President
Michelle Bachelet, 73, served as Chile's first female president from 2006-2010, then returned for a second stint as its leader from 2014-2018. A member of the Socialist Party who led a center-left coalition, she guided the South American nation through the aftermath of the sub-prime crisis, created government-financed pensions for the poor, provided more students access to free higher education and promoted women's rights.
Former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet |
Bloomberg
She has served in positions at the United Nations, including as its first Executive Director of U.N. Women, where she supported work on gender equality, and later became the U.N.'s High Commissioner for Human Rights. She was widely considered a contender in this year's Chilean presidential election before closing the door on a run in March.
A trained doctor, Bachelet overcame intense hardship in her personal life. Her father was tortured and killed during the Augusto Pinochet dictatorship, while she was tortured and then exiled in Australia and East Germany.
Rebeca Grynspan, former Costa Rica Vice President
An economist who served as Costa Rica's second-in-command from 1994-1998, Rebeca Grynspan has held the position of U.N.'s secretary-general of trade and development. Grynspan, 69, is the first woman to hold that position, and has played a key role in talks between Russia and Ukraine over deals to keep hostilities from disrupting trade routes.
Grynspan has previously held numerous other positions at the U.N.. She was its under-secretary general and the associate administration of the U.N. Development Program, and before that the director of the UNDP's Latin America and Caribbean bureau.
Juan Manuel Santos, former Colombia President
If there's no consensus around a female leader, Brazil could push for former Colombia President Juan Manuel Santos as the region's candidate, according to the people familiar with the situation. Santos, 73, held numerous ministerial roles before becoming Colombia's leader. In 2016, he won the Nobel Peace Prize for negotiating a peace treaty between the government and the FARC guerrilla movement. But as Guterres and Brazil, Santos also proposed a woman to the job.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Kyodo News
an hour ago
- Kyodo News
North Korea refused to accept Trump's letter to Kim: report
KYODO NEWS - 8 hours ago - 21:26 | All, World North Korea has refused to accept U.S. President Donald Trump's letter to leader Kim Jong Un, a report said Wednesday, citing an informed high-level source. NK News, a website that provides news and analysis on North Korea, quoted the source as saying that Trump drafted the letter to Kim with the aim of resuming bilateral talks, which have been suspended for more than five years. The United States attempted to deliver the letter multiple times through North Korean diplomats stationed at the U.N. headquarters in New York, but they "bluntly" refused, the source was also quoted as saying. The timing remains unclear. The United States and North Korea remain technically in a state of war, as the 1950-1953 Korean War ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty. They have no official diplomatic relations. At their first-ever U.S.-North Korea summit in June 2018 in Singapore, Trump and Kim agreed that Washington would provide security guarantees to Pyongyang in exchange for the "complete" denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. Later, they fell short of bridging the gap between demands by the United States and North Korea's calls for sanctions relief at their second summit in Hanoi in February 2019. After Trump and Kim surprisingly met in June that year at the Demilitarized Zone dividing the two Koreas, the United States and North Korea held a working-level meeting in Stockholm in October 2019, but that ended without progress. Related coverage: Trump says U.S. communicating with North Korea North Korea raps U.S., Japan, South Korea for inflaming regional tensions


Kyodo News
9 hours ago
- Kyodo News
North Korea refused to accept Trump's letter to Kim: report
KYODO NEWS - 17 minutes ago - 21:26 | All, World North Korea has refused to accept U.S. President Donald Trump's letter to leader Kim Jong Un, a report said Wednesday, citing an informed high-level source. NK News, a website that provides news and analysis on North Korea, quoted the source as saying that Trump drafted the letter to Kim with the aim of resuming bilateral talks, which have been suspended for more than five years. The United States attempted to deliver the letter multiple times through North Korean diplomats stationed at the U.N. headquarters in New York, but they "bluntly" refused, the source was also quoted as saying. The timing remains unclear. The United States and North Korea remain technically in a state of war, as the 1950-1953 Korean War ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty. They have no official diplomatic relations. At their first-ever U.S.-North Korea summit in June 2018 in Singapore, Trump and Kim agreed that Washington would provide security guarantees to Pyongyang in exchange for the "complete" denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. Later, they fell short of bridging the gap between demands by the United States and North Korea's calls for sanctions relief at their second summit in Hanoi in February 2019. After Trump and Kim surprisingly met in June that year at the Demilitarized Zone dividing the two Koreas, the United States and North Korea held a working-level meeting in Stockholm in October 2019, but that ended without progress. Related coverage: Trump says U.S. communicating with North Korea North Korea raps U.S., Japan, South Korea for inflaming regional tensions


Yomiuri Shimbun
13 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Hiroshima's New Method Over Peace Ceremony Attendees to Be Tested; City Hopes to Avoid Past Criticisms on 80th Anniversary
Yomiuri Shimbun file photo People line up to offer prayers in front of the Cenotaph for the Victims of the Atomic Bomb at Peace Memorial Park in Naka Ward, Hiroshima, on Aug. 6, 2024. HIROSHIMA — The Hiroshima city government has changed its method of gathering foreign attendees for its annual peace memorial ceremony following criticisms over which countries are invited. However, whether the new method will be effective remains uncertain amid the complex international situation. For the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings this year, the city has sent letters — not invitations — to all countries and regions with which Japan has diplomatic ties or channels, informing them about the Aug.6 ceremony. Letter, not invitation 'We hope that the decision to attend is based on the understanding of 'the Spirit of Hiroshima,' [which is the idea of working] toward the abolition of nuclear weapons and lasting world peace,' Hiroshima Mayor Kazumi Matsui said at a press conference in April when the change was announced. The letters were sent to 196 countries and regions, as well as Delegation of the European Union to Japan, on May 23. The recipients were categorized into three groups: countries and regions with embassies or representative divisions in Japan; countries with no embassies but with permanent missions to the United Nations; and other countries and regions wishing to attend. Russia, Ukraine, Israel and Palestine are a part of the first group. Taiwan, which was not invited in previous years because Japan does not recognize it as a country, was included in the third group. Until last year, invitations had been sent, in principle, to all countries recognized by the Japanese government and to countries that have not signed or joined the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Last year, the city sent invitations to 166 countries. In previous years, the invitations were addressed to the heads of state or ambassadors of each country. This year, the letters did not specify the recipients and only expressed the thoughts of the atomic bomb survivors and the purpose of the event. 'Best possible way' The ceremony was first held in 1947 as Peace Festival, and the city began inviting countries to the event in 1998. Following nuclear tests conducted by India and Pakistan in May 1998, invitations were sent to the seven nuclear-armed countries, including those two nations. For the 60th anniversary in 2005, invitations were sent to countries other than nuclear-armed nations. Since 2006, all countries approved by the Japanese government were invited. However, in 2022, the city decided not to invite Russia — due to its aggression against Ukraine — and Belarus, which supports Russia. Hiroshima sought the Foreign Ministry's opinion and was told that '[inviting Russia and Belarus] is inappropriate as it could lead to misunderstandings about Japan's stance,' according to documents obtained by The Yomiuri Shimbun through a public records request to the city. As the ministry's position was unchanged in 2023 and 2024, and the city did not invite the two nations for three consecutive years. Last year's ceremony drew criticism, as the city invited Israel, which has been attacking Gaza since October 2023. Unlike Russia, whose diplomats in Japan were asked to leave by the Japanese government, Israeli diplomats remain in Japan. A city official claimed that the city's policy 'made sense' under the circumstances, but residents criticized the move as being a double standard. The backlash prompted Hiroshima to make the change. 'We must avoid what happened last year on the 80th anniversary,' a city official said. 'We chose the best possible way.' Each country's decision Given that it will be up to each country on whether to attend, ambassadors from warring areas may gather for the ceremony. At the April press conference, Matsui said the letter did 'not focus on whether they were warring parties but on how to convey our message.' At last year's Nagasaki Peace Memorial Ceremony on Aug. 9, ambassadors from the Group of Seven countries, except Japan, and others boycotted the ceremony to protest against Israel's exclusion from the invitation list. Some twists and turns may be expected depending on which countries decide to attend the ceremony this year. Mixed feedback Atomic bomb survivor Toshiyuki Mimaki, 83, who represents Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations (Nihon Hidankyo), which received last year's Nobel Peace Prize, praised the city's decision as a good solution to avoiding criticism over which countries are asked to attend. 'I hope countries and regions with different ideologies and beliefs gather to reflect on what occurred 80 years ago,' Mimaki said. On the other hand, Takashi Hiraoka, 97, who was the mayor of Hiroshima between 1991-99, said the decision 'lacks initiative.' 'Recipients might be confused about whether Hiroshima wants them to come,' Hiraoka said. '[The change] has made it difficult to convey the city's true intentions, as well as its seriousness, to other countries.'