Historic new project could change the future of the world's largest tropical forest: 'Bold and ambitious'
A groundbreaking conservation initiative in the Democratic Republic of Congo is poised to reshape the future of the Congo Basin rainforest, offering a beacon of hope for communities and the planet.
In January, parliament passed new legislation that aims to protect an area of tropical forest spanning an area comparable to France, according to the World Economic Forum. The initiative represents a monumental step toward safeguarding one of Earth's most vital ecosystems.
The Green Corridor, as it's been dubbed, stretches across the Democratic Republic of Congo, connecting protected areas and creating a vast sanctuary for biodiversity. This interconnected network isn't just about protecting trees — it's about empowering local communities.
By promoting sustainable forestry, agriculture, and ecotourism, the Green Corridor initiative provides economic opportunities while preserving natural resources for generations to come. This holistic approach ensures that protecting the rainforest also means protecting the livelihoods of the people who call it home.
The plan to protect this forest is projected to lean on sustainable agricultural production and hydropower from the Congo River to create 500,000 new jobs and help with the transfer of food between cities.
According to the World Economic Forum, the Congo Basin is the world's largest tropical forest carbon sink. The organization notes that it is "sequestering 1.5 billion tonnes (1.7 billion tons) of carbon dioxide annually with a peat swamp that stores 29 billion tonnes (32 billion tons) of carbon." The organization also notes that the Congo Basin is home to 10,000 unique species.
By preserving this crucial tropical forest, conservationists are bolstering the planet's natural defenses against the overheating planet, safeguarding precious biodiversity, and creating a more sustainable future for all.
The Green Corridor initiative demonstrates how conservation can go hand in hand with community development, offering a model for similar projects around the world.
Gim Huay Neo, the managing director of the World Economic Forum, noted: "The World Economic Forum is delighted to support this bold and ambitious endeavour to protect and restore one of the Earth's last lungs. We call on all partners to support this joint collaboration between the DRC government, local and international business, as well as civil society, to create a sustainable economy that will regenerate and protect nature, while empowering local communities and creating jobs for long-term peace and prosperity."
Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty?
Definitely
Only in some areas
No way
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
This undertaking echoes other inspiring conservation efforts, such as the reintroduction of gray wolves to Colorado and the successful breeding programs for endangered California condors. These stories serve as a reminder that positive change is possible when people work together toward a common goal.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
What Major Should I Choose? How To Navigate Career Plot Twists
graduate's career choices Spoiler alert: No college major guarantees you a beachside office, dream salary, or a LinkedIn headline that sparks professional envy. No degree comes with a golden ticket, just the chance to build one, piece by piece, through skills, curiosity, and real-world hustle. But before you switch majors for the third time this year, know that the real path to a fulfilling career may not lie in what you are studying, but in how you are learning. Today's job market rewards lifelong learning, adaptability, and a mashup of skills more than any single academic track. In her Forbes article, Dr. Diane Hamilton identifies curiosity as the most valuable asset in today's workplace. As the World Economic Forum's 2025 Future of Jobs Report points out, employers are increasingly prioritizing skills like critical thinking, AI literacy, and flexibility over traditional credentials alone. So no, your major is not a magic spell. But it can be a powerful part of your toolkit, if you treat it as a launchpad, not a label. Today's job market is more like a group project, at times messy, unpredictable, and usually carried by that one person who somehow went from studying philosophy to working in cybersecurity. From College to Career: Navigating Your Educational Journey The truth is, your degree is just one piece of the puzzle. It can help you get in the door, but it is your ability to learn quickly, work well with others, and handle change that really helps you stick around. In fact, a report from the National Association of Colleges and Employers (2024) shows that most employers care more about things like communication, teamwork, and problem-solving than your exact major. The McKinsey & Company State of Organizations 2023 report found that transferable skills—like adaptability, digital fluency, and collaboration are key to career growth, especially as roles evolve and industries keep changing So no, your major does not lock you into one path. In fact, that is the exciting part. Many of today's most successful professionals started in one field and ended up thriving in another. What matters more than the title of your degree is how you build on it, through real-world experience, curiosity, and a willingness to keep learning as the world around you changes. While certain majors often grab the spotlight for their popularity, the reality of career paths is far less predictable. According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce (CEW), no single major guarantees a set career trajectory or income level. What truly shapes career outcomes is a mix of skills gained, ongoing learning, and adaptability in a shifting job market. Skills like critical thinking, effective communication, problem-solving, and ethical reasoning are increasingly prized by employers across industries, regardless of the field of study. In fact, a 2022 report from Burning Glass Technologies highlights how the modern job market increasingly demands hybrid skill sets that blend technical know-how with strong interpersonal and analytical abilities, skills that many college majors help develop. The four skills the report focuses on, Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning, Cloud Computing, Product Management, and Social Media are rapidly reshaping job requirements across many fields. These transferable skills equip graduates to tackle complex problems, adapt to a wide variety of industry challenges, and make valuable contributions across many professional settings. Young woman recording an audio podcast in a modern studio, wearing headphones and hipster glasses, ... More speaking to the microphone and holding a notepad WHAT'S NEXT? Your degree is not a guaranteed pass, but it lays an essential foundation. True success comes from combining classroom knowledge with hands-on experience and a continuous commitment to learning new skills, challenging yourself through projects across different fields. The most valuable asset is your ability to keep learning and adapting in an ever-changing world. Your major is a meaningful part of your journey, not a label that boxes you in. In today's fast-changing job market, those who thrive are not just degree holders but lifelong learners who embrace new challenges and develop a broad set of skills employers value. So whether your path feels traditional or unexpected, remember this: your education matters deeply because it equips you to think, solve problems, and grow. What truly sets you apart is how you build on that foundation throughout your career. The most important skill? Knowing that learning never stops.
Fast Company
11 hours ago
- Fast Company
How product companies can smartly navigate tariffs, supply chain pressure
The next wave of physical product innovation needs to go beyond new features and aesthetics. Technical products are large investments and must be designed for resilience in an unpredictable global trade environment. With the current political administration's sweeping global tariffs, officially announced on April 2, many manufacturers are revisiting design decisions made years ago. Factors like sourcing and factory location, previously largely unseen, can now determine which products will remain profitable, which will become liabilities, and which must be redesigned to maintain viability. The prior USMCA/CUSMA free trade agreements remain in place for North American product companies, meaning low or no tariffs on compliant products. However, products beyond the scope of the CUSMA will face tariffs of 25%, which includes hundreds of product types. Companies are already adjusting. According to the World Economic Forum, 40% of businesses are increasing US sourcing, and a third are cutting costs to offset tariffs. Based on recent sales calls, we see tariff concerns firsthand, and leads frequently ask how to mitigate tariff impacts. My company has guided hundreds of manufacturers through new product development challenges, and we are seeing a fundamental shift in how smart companies approach product design. If you or your clients are making products that cross the US border, it's time to get strategic. By following the principles and road map outlined below, you can make design resilience a competitive advantage. THE VULNERABILITY OF INFLEXIBLE DESIGN When trade policies shift, the greatest vulnerability isn't in your supply chain; it's in your product design. Who has design control? And what are your options when it comes to sourcing component parts? These questions are critical. A medical device manufacturer with high sales numbers in North America recently discovered this when 45% tariffs on Chinese electronics transformed their profitable monitoring system into a loss leader overnight. The culprit wasn't just sourcing strategy but design decisions that locked them into specific components from newly expensive locations. Due to the unprecedented nature of current US tariffs, manufacturers face design constraints they never anticipated. Products developed without consideration for manufacturing flexibility have little room to maneuver when tariffs suddenly alter the economics. That makes you and your profit margins vulnerable. Companies that can quickly adapt their designs for alternative sourcing will have a significant competitive advantage. Not only can companies protect their bottom line through flexibility, but tariff resilience is also becoming a procurement criterion. Major retailers and business-to-business (B2B) customers now evaluate suppliers on design flexibility and adaptability to changing trade conditions. From COVID-era supply chain disruptions to the US tariffs in 2025, product manufacturers have learned they can't take anything for granted. That's why forward-thinking companies are implementing new design requirements that build in resilience from the start: Keep your (sourcing) options open: Some electronics manufacturers now classify components based on availability across different tariff zones, with critical components requiring multiple sourcing options from different regions. I have spoken to several electronics manufacturers and component suppliers deploying this strategy, mainly in an ad hoc method, as tariff uncertainty continues. Choose materials wisely: Even subtle material choices on product components can dramatically affect tariff treatment. Certain plastics qualify for preferential treatment under trade agreements while nearly identical alternatives don't—a difference that can represent broad tariff swing percentages. Take care that your materials choices do not affect the entire tariff assessment for your product. Go modular—with care: Many products are increasingly made up of several modules, enabling companies to quickly shift production location of specific sub-assemblies if tariff conditions change. Care must be taken with margin-sensitive products, however, as I've found that modularity always increases product cost. In my experience, modular products require higher up-front investments in tooling and manufacturing setup. These can be offset if production volumes remain high, but when margins are tight, it increases risk for new products early on—so a shift to modularity to mitigate tariff and supply chain uncertainty will likely not pay off in the short term. Beyond principles, companies need practical tools for trade-resilient design. Three key approaches leading companies use: Simulators: Forward-thinking development teams can create simulations showing how trade disruptions might impact product designs. • Create two versions of your bill of materials (BOM) with different build locations, part costs and part suppliers. • Add additional info to track in-transit supply costs and calculate how tariff changes and factory location may affect total product cost in either scenario. Metrics: Traditional design metrics focus on acceptable product performance at the lowest cost. But the best companies now track additional metrics: • Geopolitical exposure index: What percentage of supply components come from politically sensitive regions? • Redeployment time and cost: How quickly can you shift production to a different region? Moving a physical product design involves setting up new suppliers, ensuring their quality, and transferring design files and custom tooling. Moving locations becomes cumbersome and expensive if your manufacturer controls design and the manufacturing process changes. Unless your yearly production volume is very high, this cost can far exceed simply paying a tariff. Cross-functional integration: Studies suggest companies with highly integrated design and supply chain teams experience fewer disruptions during volatile periods (like a trade war). Breaking down walls between design and supply teams to strategize on trade compliance is an essential tactic. DESIGN A RESILIENCE ROAD MAP For companies looking to enhance their design resilience, I recommend a phased approach: Assess: Evaluate your current products for tariff sensitivity and design inflexibility. Identify components and assemblies that could prevent manufacturing relocation. Prioritize: Focus initially on high-volume and high-impact products with significant tariff exposure before expanding to other product lines. Build cross-functional teams: Ensure design, supply chain, and trade compliance teams collaborate from the earliest concept stages, and ensure the product owner maintains design control of all product builds, engineering changes, and unique manufacturing processes. Measure: Create specific measurements for design flexibility and resilience, and incorporate them into product development gates. FROM DOWNSTREAM TO PRIMARY CONCERNS Integrating tariff and supply chain changes into product design represents a fundamental shift in development strategy. What was once considered a hidden downstream concern is now a critical design parameter that must be addressed from the earliest stages of conception. This new climate presents challenges, but it can also be a golden opportunity. Those who quickly adapt their design processes will gain significant cost stability, market responsiveness, and long-term competitiveness advantages. The new competitive edge is not just having the best product. It's designing the one that is most resilient to supply.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Anti-Anti-Feminist Election
Opposition to women's rights has helped fuel authoritarian movements in Russia, Hungary, Brazil, and the United States. That the same is true in South Korea, which is holding an early presidential election tomorrow, is perhaps less well known. There, the role of anti-feminists is particularly stark, helping to put women's issues at the very center of the country's fraught contest. To appreciate the stakes, recall that just a few months ago, South Korea nearly lost its democracy: On December 3, then-President Yoon Suk Yeol shut down the parliament, banned all political parties, and suspended the free press. His power grab was swiftly defeated by mass demonstrations and a heroic parliamentary effort—members climbed fences to reach the chamber, where they unanimously voted to lift martial law—but the shock remained. Why was a country known for technological prowess, slick horror films, and dreamy boy bands descending into chaos? The answer lies in part with the country's struggle over women's rights. Even as South Korea has raced ahead economically, gender equality has lagged behind other indicators. Out of 146 countries indexed by the World Economic Forum, South Korea comes 112th in women's economic participation and 100th in women's educational attainment (only slightly better than Iran). For longer than it has had a democracy, South Korea has had a women's-rights movement pressing to improve these conditions. In the late 1980s, a labor activist named Kwon In-sook filed charges against the government for sexual assault she allegedly suffered at a police station. Dozens of women's organizations came together to support her in a coalition known as the Korean Women's Associations United. KWAU wound up playing an important role in the country's democratic transition, and Kwon herself served as a member of parliament until last year. [Read: South Korea's crisis is nowhere near over] In recent decades, women's rights have advanced steadily, if slowly. Advocates successfully pushed for sexual- and domestic-violence legislation in the 1990s. In 1999, they managed to abolish a system that awarded extra points on civil-service exams to military veterans, who are overwhelmingly male due to South Korea's male-only conscription. They got rid of the hoju family-registration system, which automatically counted men as the heads of households. But legislative advocacy has not eradicated violent crime against women, a grim reality that has spurred a particularly dramatic upsurge in women's activism in the past 10 years. In 2016, a woman was murdered near the world-famous Gangnam metro station in Seoul by a man who complained about being 'ignored' by women. In 2019, a criminal network implicated K-pop stars, corrupt police officers, and elite businessmen in a slew of crimes—among them, administering date-rape drugs and nonconsensually filming sexual encounters to distribute online. South Korean feminists have demonstrated against gender violence and objected to its glorification in popular culture. In 2015, for example, Maxim Korea featured a 'bad guy' theme on its cover: A man was shown smoking by his car with a woman's legs, bound at the ankles, jutting out of his trunk. 'Girls like 'bad guys'?' the story demanded. 'This is a real bad guy. Are you dying to love it?' In recent years, some elements of the South Korean feminist movement have attracted attention for their radicalism; others, for their media-savvy tactics. Adherents to the 4B movement refuse to date, have sex with men, marry them, or have children (these tenets all start with bi, which roughly means 'no' in Korean). In 2018, in an action called Escape the Corset, women threw out cosmetic products and cut their hair—making headlines in a country where about a third of women in their 20s have had plastic surgery, largely to meet exacting beauty standards. That same year, a news anchor became the first woman in her field to wear eyeglasses on major-network TV. The ever-higher profile of the feminist movement has inspired right-wing forces to present themselves as the champions of disgruntled men. The story is a familiar one: South Korea has some of the classic problems of an industrialized society, including a housing crisis affecting young people, a declining birth rate, and a short supply of well-paying jobs. Anti-feminist forces have galvanized supporters by blaming these problems on women and feminists. The gambit has worked. In 2016, anti-feminists went after the actor Kim Jayeon, who voiced one of the characters in the popular Korean video game Closers, because she wore a T-shirt that read girls don't need a prince. A backlash among gamers led the company to fire her. The episode spoke to a broader phenomenon in South Korean society. According to one poll, a whopping 79 percent of men now believe they are being discriminated against because of their gender. Much as Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro did in 2016 and 2018, respectively, Yoon capitalized on men's grievances in his 2022 run for president, using anti-feminism as a cudgel against the outgoing center-left president. In his campaign, Yoon promised to abolish the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. He repeatedly claimed that South Korea did not have a misogyny or gender-violence problem. His wife, Kim Keon-hee, mocked victims of sexual assault in a highly circulated YouTube interview. Gender issues became central to the campaign, and the young male voters Yoon attracted formed a base of support as he swung toward authoritarianism. [Read: South Korea's warning for Washington] Yoon was impeached after his aborted December coup, but South Korea's political crisis did not end there. Only on April 4, when the constitutional court upheld his impeachment, was Yoon formally removed from office. His party is in turmoil over his legacy and only recently settled on its candidate for tomorrow's election. The Democratic Party is running Lee Jae-myung, the same candidate Yoon faced in 2022, and he is now the front-runner. Lee mostly shied away from women's issues when he ran against Yoon in 2022, but this year, he has promised to empower the gender-equality ministry. In the past, he has rebuked Yoon for claiming that there is no gender inequality in South Korea; he has also promised to reduce the gender-wage gap, strengthen laws against stalking and dating violence, offer free HPV vaccines to adolescents, and establish a system for reporting and monitoring businesses with discriminatory employment practices. Feminists will likely support him to prevent the right's return to power. Kim Jae-yeon of the Progressive Party ran to become 'South Korea's first feminist president,' but she ended her campaign on May 9, asserting that the priority should be to 'deter far-right insurrectionist power from seizing presidential authority again.' She has endorsed Lee. With the disarray on the right, Lee stands a good chance of winning the presidency. If he does, he would do well to remember that South Korean democracy will be preserved not by appeasing anti-feminists, but by devising solutions to real problems, such as the cost-of-living and urban-housing crises, that gave an opening to demagogues like Yoon in the first place. Article originally published at The Atlantic
