Convicted anti-abortion campaigner ‘inviting consensual conversation'
An anti-abortion campaigner who was convicted of breaching a public spaces protection order outside an abortion clinic has claimed she was 'inviting consensual conversation', as her lawyer said he and his team were 'exploring all legal options'.
Livia Tossici-Bolt told BBC Radio 4's Today programme she was 'not there to make any woman unhappy'.
The 64-year-old was handed a two-year conditional discharge at Poole Magistrates' Court on Friday.
The case involved Tossici-Bolt, a retired medical scientist from Bournemouth, holding a sign saying 'Here to talk, if you want' on two days in March 2023.
Speaking about her conviction, she said: 'I was really disappointed because it's nothing to do with protesting.
'It was purely inviting consensual conversation and I think in a public space everybody can do that.
'I was not there to express my views.
'I was there to offer free conversation, consensual conversation, to anyone who wanted to speak to me and not on the topics I want to speak, I was there to listen.
'I was interested to listen to people and I think everyone should be allowed that.'
She added: 'I was there not to make any woman unhappy or distressed. I was there to speak to everyone in the community that wanted to have a conversation with me.
'Certainly anyone could have approached me, including, if they wanted to, women accessing the clinic. It was up to them and I was there to listen to them, not to try and convince them at all, to change (their) mind or not. I was just there for everyone just to talk to me.'
As well as the conditional discharge, District Judge Orla Austin ordered Tossici-Bolt to pay £20,000 towards court costs and a £26 victim surcharge.
Tossici-Bolt's lawyer Jeremiah Igunnubole said his client's case was 'unprecedented'.
He told the Today programme: 'We need to look very closely at the legal decision made yesterday and also the prosecution costs of £20,000 that has been imposed on Livia.
'This is unprecedented circumstances, never before have we seen entirely peaceful conduct criminalised for nothing other than offering a consensual conversation.
'It's the first time in modern British history that this happened.
'So, we, of course, have to go through the judgment and explore all our legal options.'
On Friday, a US government department criticised the decision to convict Tossici-Bolt.
In a statement on X, the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights & Labour (DRL), a bureau within the US Department of State said: 'We are disappointed with the UK court's conviction of Livia Tossici-Bolt for violating a designated 'buffer zone' at an abortion clinic. Freedom of expression must be protected for all.'
Mr Igunnubole said the US state department was 'quite right'.
He added: 'What I am disappointed with is the fact that no United Kingdom politician, or at least leader of any of the major parties, has also made similar comments to raise their concerns about the state of freedom of speech.'
The council-enacted buffer zone, which came into effect in 2022 and covers 10 streets, is aimed at protecting patients and staff from harassment and distress while accessing the clinic.
Sentencing her on Friday, District Judge Austin said that Tossici-Bolt had 'deeply-held' beliefs but her rights of freedom of expression under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) had to be balanced against the rights of the women attending the clinic and its staff.
She said: 'I accept that the defendant engaged in the conduct underlying this case as part of a sincerely motivated desire to attend that location and display her signage outside the clinic, encouraging conversation in relation to matters of particular importance to her.
'This does not mean that her conviction for failing to leave the area when required would be disproportionate, nor give rise to a reasonable excuse on the facts of this case.'
Asked what happens next, Tossici-Bolt said: 'There isn't much I can do, isn't it?
'I've been given this conditional discharge and I will continue my fight for freedom of speech.'
The British Pregnancy Advisory Service said the case was 'never about global politics' but instead women being able to 'access legal healthcare free from harassment'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
40 minutes ago
- North Wales Live
Two crucial groups 'forgotten' in DWP Winter Fuel Payment changes
Two key groups have been "forgotten" regarding the new criteria for the Winter Fuel Payment eligibility, an expert has warned. According to the UK Government, nine million pensioners will receive Winter Fuel Payments if they have an income of, or below, £35,000 a year. Tom MacInnes, director of Policy at Citizens Advice, said: "It's good news that the Government is returning winter fuel payments to low-income pensioners, without needing to access Pension Credit first. This will provide straightforward, vital support to nine million pensioners this winter." But he raised concerns that despite this move, additional assistance should be directed towards those most burdened by energy costs, such as households with children and the disabled. "These groups will continue to face significant financial stress unless further action is taken.", reports Birmingham Live. He added: "We hope the Government will now take stock of its other proposals and rethink the huge cuts to disability benefits, which will cause significant hardship for disabled people and have severe consequences for their children." Reacting to the reinstatement Scottish Greens Social Security spokesperson Maggie Chapman MSP said: "Cutting the Winter Fuel Payment was one of the first acts of this Labour government. Elected on a promise of 'change' they brought in sweeping austerity that harmed older people across the UK at a time when the cost of living remains sky high. "There is no doubt that the damage has already been done, families will have lost loved ones, and illnesses will have been caused over the winter months because of the brutal decision by Rachel Reeves and the Labour Government. "Labour's cutting of the Winter Fuel Payment, refusal to end the two-child benefit cap and regressive austerity measures are forcing people into poverty in Scotland and across the UK "The reinstatement of the Winter Fuel Payment for some is a welcome move, but we must go further, the Labour government must end the two-child benefit cap which hits working class families the hardest, and they must reverse their cruel austerity policies. "Poverty isn't inevitable; it's a political policy, a policy which Rachel Reeves has forced upon hundreds of thousands of people across the UK. If Keir Starmer has any shame, he would finally call an end to her disastrous time as Chancellor."
Metro
42 minutes ago
- Metro
Major update in Liam Payne death investigation with trial date set
Two men accused of supplying drugs to former One Direction singer Liam Payne just hours before his fatal fall from a hotel balcony will face trial, Argentinian prosecutors have confirmed. Braian Nahuel Paiz, 25, a restaurant waiter, and Ezequiel David Pereyra, 24, a former hotel employee, have been in custody since early January. They stand accused of selling cocaine to the British musician, who died on October 16, 2024, after falling from the third floor of the Casa Sur Hotel in Buenos Aires. The Little Things hitmaker was a beloved UK musician after rising to fame alongside his former bandmates Louis Tomlinson, Zayn Malik, Niall Horan, and Harry Styles on The X Factor in 2010. In a statement released by Argentina's public prosecution service, Prosecutor Andrés Esteban Madrea confirmed the pair would go to trial, facing potential prison sentences of up to 15 years if convicted of drug trafficking offenses. 'Braian Nahuel Paiz, who met Payne while working as a waiter in Puerto Madero, and Ezequiel David Pereyra, a former employee at the hotel where the incident occurred, are charged with the crime of selling drugs,' the statement read. Forensic investigations revealed Payne had consumed cocaine through both snorting and smoking shortly before his death. An autopsy showed he died from severe polytrauma and internal and external bleeding, and toxicology reports detected a combination of substances in his system, including cocaine, alcohol (at 2.7 grams per litre), methylecgonine, benzoylecgonine, cocaethylene, and the antidepressant sertraline. 'The toxicological analysis confirmed Liam Payne had ingested cocaine at least 72 hours before his death and possibly as recently as a few minutes before falling from the hotel balcony,' authorities said. Three other individuals initially charged in connection with Payne's death – his close friend Rogelio Nores, hotel receptionist Esteban Grassi, and head of hotel security Gilda Martin – were cleared of wrongdoing after an appeal overturned a lower court's manslaughter accusations. No date has been set for the trial of Paiz and Pereyra, but proceedings are expected to begin soon. More Trending Speaking from his Buenos Aires jail cell in an interview with local outlet Infobae, Paiz denied selling cocaine to Payne, though he admitted to having shared drugs with the pop star. 'I don't know what I'm doing here, I'm a good person,' he said. 'I shared drugs with Liam but I didn't sell them.' The young waiter described himself as a longtime marijuana user and expressed regret over the connection he formed with Payne. 'I regret giving Liam my Instagram because everything spiralled from there,' he said. 'If I hadn't, I'd probably be working or studying today. I miss my freedom, my family, my mom, and my sisters.' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Rita Ora reveals empowering way LGBTQ+ fans have 'inspired' her new music MORE: Liam Payne's girlfriend Kate Cassidy shares unseen picture of One Direction star
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Bangladesh leader says Tulip Siddiq should face court and declines to meet her
ITV News Political Correspondent Shehab Khan sat down with Bangladesh's interim leader, Muhammad Yunus Bangladesh's interim leader, Muhammad Yunus, has urged Labour MP Tulip Siddiq to return to the country and face trial over corruption allegations, rejecting her request for a meeting during his official visit to the UK. Yunus, a Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist currently heading a caretaker government in Dhaka, declined Siddiq's invitation to discuss the charges brought against her by Bangladesh's Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). He told ITV News that any allegations should be dealt with in court, not through political dialogue. 'If she has allegations against her, she should appear in court to face a trial,' Yunus said. He later added: 'I have not spoken to her. I took it as a legal process and it should be done in a legal way, I should not get involved.' An arrest warrant was recently issued for Siddiq by Bangladeshi authorities, following accusations that she illegally obtained a 7,200-square-foot plot of land in Dhaka. The investigation, according to Bangladeshi officials, is separate from an ongoing probe into a controversial nuclear power plant deal involving Siddiq's aunt, Sheikh Hasina, the former Prime Minister of Bangladesh. Siddiq, MP for Hampstead and Highgate and a former UK Treasury minister, has strongly denied the allegations. Her legal team described the charges as 'politically motivated' and claimed that attempts to engage with the Bangladeshi authorities had been ignored. She had written to Yunus ahead of his visit to the United Kingdom, asking to meet, so she could help to 'clear up the misunderstanding perpetuated by the Anti-Corruption Commission in Dhaka.' In a statement, Siddiq said she was disappointed by Yunus' refusal to meet and accused him of fueling a campaign of politically charged misinformation. She said: "He's been at the heart of a political vendetta based on fantasy accusations with no evidence relentlessly briefed to the media. "If this was a serious legal process they would engage with my lawyers rather than sending bogus correspondence to an address in Dhaka where I have never lived. Siddiq resigned from her ministerial role earlier this year after referring herself to the UK government's ethics adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, in light of the property allegations involving her family. While Magnus concluded she had not breached the ministerial code, he noted that she should have been 'more alert to the potential reputational risks' posed by her family's ties to Bangladeshi politics. From Westminster to Washington DC - our political experts are across all the latest key talking points. Listen to the latest episode below...
