Harvard Seeks End to US Funding Cuts, Says National Security, Public Health Research in Peril
REUTERS/Faith
Students walk on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S., May 23, 2025.
WILMINGTON, Delaware, June 2 (Reuters) – Harvard University asked a federal judge on Monday to issue a summary judgment ruling to unfreeze $2.5 billion in funding blocked by President Donald Trump's administration, which Harvard said was illegal.
Harvard's filing in the U.S. District Court in Boston said that it had received 957 orders since April 14 to freeze funding for research pertaining to national security threats, cancer and infectious diseases and more since the country's oldest and wealthiest school rejected a White House list of demands.
Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard – and other top-level universities across the U.S. – because in his view they have been captured by leftist 'woke' thought and become bastions of antisemitism.
The Trump administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs has set arguments for July 21 on Harvard's motion for summary judgment, which is a request for a judge to decide a dispute without a trial to determine material facts.
Harvard sued the Trump administration in April, alleging the funding freeze violated the school's right to free speech and was arbitrary and capricious.
In Monday's court filing, Harvard detailed the terminated grants, including $88 million for research into pediatric HIV, $12 million for increasing Defense Department awareness of emerging biological threats and $8 million to better understand dark energy. The school said ending the funding would destroy ongoing research into cancer treatments, infectious disease and Parkinson's.
The Trump administration has opened numerous investigations into Harvard. Some are looking at threats against Jewish students and faculty after pro-Palestinian protests broke out following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and subsequent Israeli military actions in Gaza.
Other investigations are probing whether Harvard discriminates based on sex and gender, along with the school's ties to foreign governments and international students.
The Trump administration revoked Harvard's ability to enroll international students last month, which a judge temporarily blocked after Harvard sued in a separate case.
Harvard and other universities say Trump's attacks are threats to freedom of speech and freedom of academics, as well as threats to the schools' very existence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
42 minutes ago
- Nikkei Asia
Australia and EU revive trade talks amid Trump turmoil
CANBERRA -- Australia and the European Union will resume stalled talks on a trade deal, as turmoil sparked by U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff blitz pushes countries to bolster trade alternatives to America. Australian Minister for Trade Don Farrell met with EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic in Paris on Wednesday. He told Australia's Sydney Morning Herald that both sides agreed to restart negotiations for a trade pact.
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
Japan to continue to seek tariff removal in latest negotiations ahead of G7
Japan will stick to its stance of seeking to have all U.S. tariffs be removed in what could be the final ministerial-level talks ahead of a leaders' summit this month, the nation's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said. "Japan will continue to strongly urge the U.S. to reconsider its series of tariff measures,' Akazawa said Thursday in Tokyo as he left for Washington. He added that he's not sure which U.S. officials will meet him for the fifth round of trade negotiations. Akazawa is set to return to Japan on Sunday, about a week before the Group of Seven gathering convenes in Canada. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and U.S. President Donald Trump are expected to meet on the sidelines, with anticipation mounting for an announcement of a trade deal. Earlier this week, Akazawa said Japan will continue to seek a full reversal of the U.S. tariffs, adding that he didn't plan to accompany Ishiba to the G7 summit. While he cited progress toward an agreement after the previous round of talks, the U.S. this week doubled a levy on steel and aluminum to 50%. "We are collecting and analyzing information on the impact,' Akazawa said about the metals tariff. "We will respond appropriately based on the results of that analysis.' As with many other nations, Japan also faces a 25% levy on cars and a 10% levy on all other goods. The across-the-board tariff is set to rise to 24% in early July barring a deal.
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Will ex-aide Musk leave a stink in the White House?
U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill has careened into an Elon Musk-shaped brick wall, complicating its passage into law and risking a schism between the most powerful man in the world and the wealthiest. Trump's "big, beautiful bill" — the centerpiece of his domestic agenda — could define his second term and make or break Republican prospects in the 2026 midterm elections. But the package is getting a rough ride in Congress over proposals to fund an extension of his 2017 tax cuts by piling on debt and cutting social welfare for the poorest Americans. Enter tech billionaire Musk, who dropped a nuclear bomb on the 1,100-page blueprint at a crucial stage in negotiations Tuesday, calling it a "disgusting abomination." And on Wednesday he called for Republicans to "kill the bill," and for an alternative plan that "doesn't massively grow the deficit." In its latest estimate released Wednesday, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the bill would add $2.4 trillion to U.S. debt by 2034. Musk, who last week ended his brief advisory tenure as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, tore into the bill in a prolonged denouncement. The South African-born tycoon has voiced concerns before, but his language was much more combative, coming across as a declaration of war on the Republican Party, if not Trump himself. The White House brushed off the criticism, saying Trump "already knows where Elon Musk stood," but the remarks will likely have gotten under the president's skin. 'Lennon and McCartney' The stakes could hardly be higher for Trump, who has made clear, with signature hyperbole, that he sees his bill as "arguably the most significant piece of legislation that will ever be signed." He has yet to respond personally to Musk's social media rant — sustained over six hours and 13 posts on Tuesday and still going well into Wednesday. But Washington watchers aren't necessarily expecting a public falling-out. Behind the scenes, a careful circling of the wagons is under way, with pro-Trump pundits under orders to refrain from trashing Musk and to instead frame his broadside as what Politico called "principled self-interest." Still, analysts say there may be choppier waters ahead. "It's the Lennon and McCartney of modern politics. Two egos, one spotlight, and a fragile alliance built on mutual benefits," said Evan Nierman, the founder and CEO of global crisis PR firm Red Banyan. "The moment either one sees more upside in conflict than cooperation, the breakup goes public." But political consultant and former Senate aide Andrew Koneschusky, a key player in negotiations over Trump's 2017 tax cuts, believes the Republican leader has nothing to gain by biting back. "Musk has more money. Musk's megaphone, X, is bigger than Trump's. And Musk was deeply embedded in the administration for months," he said. "There's no telling what Musk heard or saw that could be embarrassing or problematic for the administration if the two were to go to war." 'Bromance' Musk — who has cash to spare for his political adventures, including $280 million lavished on Trump's election campaign — slammed the Republicans who cleared the bill for Senate consideration and threatened to have their jobs in the midterms. And the de facto leader of America's "tech bro" community demonstrated his political firepower with a single tweet in December that blew up a government funding bill that had enjoyed bipartisan support. His take on the deficit implications of Trump's proposals is evidenced by copious independent research and he was immediately backed by some fiscal hawks in the Senate. Continued interventions by Musk could be an ongoing headache for Trump, as he bids to shepherd his policy priorities through razor-thin Republican majorities in Congress. But cheerleaders of the package — and independent analysts — believe the Tesla magnate may discover that his celebrity in Trumpworld relies on the say-so of its mercurial chieftain. "Musk may have had influence in December when his bromance with Trump was in full bloom," said Donald Nieman, a political analyst and professor at Binghamton University in New York state. "But his break with Trump and his massive unpopularity with voters makes it easy for lawmakers to ignore him. If anything, it helps Trump by distancing him from a man who has become a pariah."
