logo
Canada warns travelers of US border agents' authority to search electronic devices

Canada warns travelers of US border agents' authority to search electronic devices

Yahoo05-04-2025

The Canadian government is warning citizens visiting the United States that US border officials have the authority to search travelers' electronic devices – including phones, laptops, and tablets – without providing a reason.
In a revised travel advisory posted online, it urges Canadians to 'expect scrutiny' when crossing the border and warns that refusing to comply involves risks including device seizure, travel delays, or the denial of entry for non-US citizens.
Under US law, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents may demand passwords to unlock devices during inspections. Travelers who refuse the demand risk having their electronics confiscated and may face long delays.
The advisory recommends placing devices in airplane mode before crossing to prevent unintended downloads of remote files, which could complicate screenings.
The move follows recent incidents involving such searches. Last month, Dr. Rasha Alawieh, a Lebanese assistant professor and physician at Brown University, was deported to Lebanon after US agents at Boston Logan International Airport discovered deleted photos of the late Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on her phone.
The existence of the photos was outlined in a court filing obtained by CNN affiliate WCVB.
'In explaining why these multiple photos were deleted by her one to two days before she arrived at Logan Airport, Dr. Alawieh stated that she did not want to give authorities the perception that she supports Hezbollah and the Ayatollah politically or militarily,' the filing reads, per WCVB.
While US authorities maintain that device searches are critical for national security, civil liberties groups have long criticized the practice as invasive.
The US Supreme Court has upheld the authority of border agents to conduct warrantless device searches, citing the 'border search exception' to the Fourth Amendment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China strikes cautious tone after Trump claims trade deal is 'done'
China strikes cautious tone after Trump claims trade deal is 'done'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

China strikes cautious tone after Trump claims trade deal is 'done'

China will "always honour its commitments" when it comes to negotiating trade disagreements with the US, according to a spokesperson for the Chinese government. But when pushed by Sky News, he refrained from confirming what those commitments are. The reluctance is at odds with President Trump, who declared on his Truth Social account on Wednesday that "our deal with China is done", while also claiming that China has agreed to supply rare earth metals to the US "upfront", and to a 55% tariff rate on its goods. The comments follow high-stakes talks between delegations from the two countries in London aimed at stabilising the relationship amid an escalating trade and supply chain war. China's refusal to confirm these details has raised speculation that, contrary to what the US side is claiming, there may still be significant disagreements and some details yet to be worked out. The continued silence comes after two days of negotiations between delegations from the US and China in the UK. While both sides confirmed that they had agreed a "framework" to implement the "consensus" reached at previous talks in Geneva last month, as well as during a phone call between President Xi and President Trump on 5 June, the delegations were supposed to be taking the agreement to their respective leaders for sign-off. When asked by Sky News if any of the details in Trump's Truth Social post reflected what China understood to be in the deal, Lin Jian, China's foreign ministry spokesperson, said "the two sides achieved new progress in addressing the concerns on economic and trade issues". "We always honour our commitments. Since we've reached common understandings, the two sides need to follow them." 👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 When pushed by Sky News on whether China agrees with Trump's Truth Social assessment that the US-China relationship is "excellent", Lin declined to agree, saying simply: "Our position on relations with the United States has been consistent and clear." Such lukewarm language is not uncommon in China but there will likely be significant displeasure at the way Trump is unilaterally publishing details that may not yet have been officially signed off. It is in stark contrast to China's communication landscape which is highly scripted and controlled, and if it was designed to force China into an agreement it could well backfire. Indeed, if everything in Trump's Truth Social post is true it would represent quite a coup for the US, and that feels a little unlikely given the valuable bargaining chips China has, particularly over rare earth metals. This will likely have been a crunch point in negotiations. China has the vast majority of the world's rare earth metals which are vital in the production of everything from cars to weaponry, and recent export controls imposed in response to Trump's tariffs have brought some production lines to the brink of standstill. In response, the Trump administration imposed extra export controls on high-tech chips, chip development technology and parts needed to make jet engines, as well as moving to revoke student visas for Chinese nationals. Read more from Sky News: President Trump indicated in his Truth Social post that the measures to revoke visas will be rowed back. When pushed by Sky News, Lin refrained from commenting on whether Trump's communications on this matter have undermined the relationship more broadly, but the stakes remain enormously high, with the unfolding supply chain war set to do significant damage to the economies of both nations.

Canada invites United Arab Emirates to G7 summit, Brazil says Carney invited to COP30
Canada invites United Arab Emirates to G7 summit, Brazil says Carney invited to COP30

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Canada invites United Arab Emirates to G7 summit, Brazil says Carney invited to COP30

OTTAWA - Canada has invited the United Arab Emirates to attend the G7 summit in Alberta, The Canadian Press has learned. While UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan could end up attending the summit, which starts Sunday in Kananaskis, Abu Dhabi has not said whether it has accepted the invitation. A Canadian government official, who was not authorized to speak publicly about Canada's list of invitees, confirmed the invitation. The office of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva says Prime Minister Mark Carney will attend the COP30 summit in the Amazon region city of Belém this November. The Canadian Press has asked Carney's office to confirm his attendance. Canada also has invited Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to the G7 summit, and Riyadh has not indicated whether it has accepted the invitation. The confirmed list of leaders attending the G7 as guests includes the heads of government from Australia, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico, South Korea, South Africa and Ukraine, all of whom have said they will attend. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Israel ‘ready to strike Iran' as US evacuates bases and embassies
Israel ‘ready to strike Iran' as US evacuates bases and embassies

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Israel ‘ready to strike Iran' as US evacuates bases and embassies

Israel is considering launching a military strike against Iran in the coming days without American support, according to Western officials. The officials said fears of either no deal or a weak deal between Donald Trump, the president of the United States, and the Islamic Republic to curtail its nuclear programme had forced Israeli strategists to consider a unilateral attack against Tehran. It comes as the UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors found that Iran had broken its non-proliferation agreement for the first time in 20 years. The governors demanded Iran provide answers 'without delay' in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Iran is believed to have enriched uranium to at least 60 per cent, putting it within 'sprint' distance of a potential nuclear device. In response to the ruling, the Islamic Republic said it had no choice but to respond by establishing a new enrichment facility in a 'secure location' and 'significantly' increasing its production of enriched uranium. Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, said: 'We are replacing all of these first-generation machines with sixth-generation advanced machines' at the Fordow uranium enrichment plant south of Tehran. He added this means 'our production of enriched material will increase significantly'. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran will not abandon its right to uranium enrichment because of mounting frictions in the region, adding that a 'friendly' country had alerted Tehran over a potential military strike by Israel. The official said the tensions were aimed at influencing Tehran to 'change its position about its nuclear rights' during talks with the US on Sunday in Oman. US-Iran negotiations to curb Tehran's programme have been continuing for several weeks now. There had been indications in recent days that the two sides might be close to closing on a framework that includes provisions about uranium enrichment that Israel views as unacceptable. However, Mr Trump told a New York Post podcast on Wednesday he was 'less confident' about the prospects of a deal, having accused Tehran of adopting a hardline position. Israel, which is not a party to the discussions, has demanded a complete dismantling of Iran's nuclear programme. The US is now 'on alert' for the possibility of an Israeli strike, Western officials told US media outlets, with officials preparing to send home non-essential staff and families in its embassies in the Middle East, ahead of a potential Iranian retaliation. The embassy in Baghdad is currently planning an 'ordered evacuation', according to sources. The White House has also ordered its other missions within range of Iranian missiles to provide risk assessments. The United Kingdom Maritime and Trade Organisation has issued a warning urging vessels using the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz to exercise heightened caution. Military and intelligence chiefs have been concerned for several months that Mr Trump might strike a 'soft' deal with Iran that does not guarantee the Jewish state's long-term security – in order to establish his legacy as a peacemaker. The broad consensus in Israel has been that a unilateral strike on Iran would be unthinkable. Despite a slight cooling of relations with Mr Trump in recent weeks, it is thought unlikely Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, would be willing to embarrass his greatest ally in the middle of negotiations. Additionally, while Israel reportedly has the military capability to set Tehran back, it is thought that only with US support could they be sure of profoundly damaging the programme. The US alone has the capability to sustain an air campaign over several days; it has crucial refuelling aircraft, plus strategic bombers that can drop clusters of specialist munitions that have the best chance of punching through the thick rock that protects some of Iran's nuclear development sites. Iran also has large stockpiles of non-nuclear ballistic missiles which it would likely launch at Israel in retaliation. While Israel has a sophisticated missile defence system, this can be overwhelmed by a large barrage, and it would require active US support in protecting its cities. Despite the desirability of US support, Israeli military chiefs are understood to be frustrated that their ideal window for an attack is closing, while Mr Trump's talks force them to sit on their hands. Israel destroyed a key Iranian S-300 aerial defence system last year, while Hezbollah in Lebanon is all but defeated, reducing the chance of a meaningful retaliation against Israel's northern border communities. However, it is thought that neither advantage will last indefinitely. In April, The New York Times revealed that Mr Trump had, some weeks earlier, warned Mr Netanyahu off a unilateral strike as early as this spring. In his first term, he pulled the US out of a multinational agreement that relaxed economic sanctions on Iran in return for curbs on its enrichment process, brokered by Barack Obama. The aim of that deal was to keep Iran at least 12 months away from being able to build a nuclear warhead. Since Mr Trump upended the deal, Tehran has enriched uranium to about 60 per cent. Although it claims that this is for civilian purposes, numerous experts and watchdogs say there is no justifiable military purpose for such highly enriched uranium. US officials are reportedly concerned that, if pushed, Iran could engineer a 'crude' nuclear bomb in a matter of weeks. However, it would likely have to be delivered on a truck or a ship, as miniaturising it on to a ballistic missile would take longer and be more likely to be detected by the US and Israel. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store