
French lawmaker says he was denied entry into US
He was set to meet with progressive lawmakers, he said, including Senator Peter Welch, a Vermont Democrat, and Representative Maxine Dexter, an Oregon Democrat. But, he said, on Tuesday he was told that his visa application had been rejected.
Advertisement
'The door was shut in a rather abrupt and unexpected manner,' Amirshahi said in a telephone interview. 'This is a decision that we consider to be both hostile and unfriendly.'
A member of his team said later Thursday that the embassy was 'reconsidering the reasons for the refusal.'
A spokesperson for the US Embassy in Paris declined to comment and referred the matter to US Customs and Border Protection, which did not respond to a request for comment.
Advertisement
Increasing numbers of travelers to the United States have reported being denied entry and being subjected to tougher scrutiny, or 'enhanced vetting.' The Trump administration says it is enforcing immigration laws and protecting Americans. Critics argue that officials are targeting foreigners who have criticized President Trump's policies.
In March, the French government accused the United States of denying entry to a French scientist after the scientist expressed opposition to Trump. The Department for Homeland Security said it was because the academic had confidential information from a US laboratory on his phone.
Amirshahi said he applied for a visa on May 19 after his request for an Electronic System for Travel Authorization form, which foreign travelers to the United States are required to obtain before visiting the United States, was denied. The US Embassy in Paris asked for the reason for his trip and a referral letter from the French Foreign Ministry, which was supplied on June 4. Almost two weeks later, his application was denied.
Amirshahi said he hoped the administration would reverse its decision in the coming days. He had initially planned to travel to the United States on June 11.
'We are primarily concerned with promoting parliamentary diplomacy, and the right of lawmakers to travel abroad, in order to be better informed in their actions,' he said in the news conference. 'We do not live in a vacuum today; interconnection is a reality.'
Amirshahi, who was born in Iran in 1972 and whose family fled to France in 1976, said he did not believe his background was the cause of the refusal.
Advertisement
He became a French citizen in 1996, he said, and has publicly opposed the Iranian regime. 'My relationship with this theocratic regime is quite tenuous, since I hate them,' he said. 'I have fought them and will continue to fight them.'
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump: Iran Decision to Come Within Two Weeks
President Trump sees a 'substantial chance of negotiations' and will decide within two weeks whether the U.S. gets involved in the Israel-Iran conflict, says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.

USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump can retain control of California National Guard for now, appeals court rules
Trump can retain control of California National Guard for now, appeals court rules Show Caption Hide Caption LA mayor says Trump is 'usurping' Gavin Newsom's authority Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is asking the Trump admin to stop immigration raids in order to curb responses from protesters. A U.S. appeals court let Donald Trump retain control over California's National Guard while the state's Democratic governor proceeds with a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Republican president's use of the troops to quell protests and unrest in Los Angeles. A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 19 extended a pause it placed on U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's June 12 ruling that Trump had called the National Guard into federal service unlawfully. Breyer's ruling was issued in a lawsuit against Trump's action brought by Gov. Gavin Newsom. Breyer ruled that Trump violated the U.S. law governing a president's ability to take control of a state's National Guard by failing to coordinate with the governor, and also found that the conditions set out under the statute to allow this move, such as a rebellion against federal authority, did not exist. Breyer ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom. Hours after Breyer acted, the 9th Circuit panel put the judge's move on hold temporarily. Amid protests and turmoil in Los Angeles over Trump's immigration raids, the president on June 7 took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops against the wishes of Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard. Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marine Corps mobilization. At a court hearing earlier this week on whether to extend the pause on Breyer's decision, members of the 9th Circuit panel questioned lawyers for California and the Trump administration on what role, if any, courts should have in reviewing Trump's authority to deploy the troops. The law sets out three conditions under which a president can federalize state National Guard forces, including an invasion, a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" against the government or a situation in which the U.S. government is unable with regular forces to execute the country's laws. The Justice Department has said that once the president determines that an emergency that warrants the use of the National Guard exists, no court or state governor can review that decision. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in the second most-populous U.S. city. The protests in Los Angeles lasted for more than a week, but subsequently ebbed, leading Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to lift a curfew she had imposed. California argued in its June 9 lawsuit that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violated the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement. The lawsuit stated the situation in Los Angeles was nothing like a "rebellion." The protests involved sporadic acts of violence that state and local law enforcement were capable of handling without military involvement, according to the lawsuit. The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they are instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The 9th Circuit panel is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump during his first term and one appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York and Kanishka Singh in Washington, Editing by Will Dunham and Alexia Garamfalvi)

Wall Street Journal
37 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump: Iran Decision to Come Within Two Weeks
Trump: Iran Decision to Come Within Two Weeks President Trump sees a 'substantial chance of negotiations' and will decide within two weeks whether the U.S. gets involved in the Israel-Iran conflict, says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Photo: Mehmet Eser/Zuma Press