Mexico threatens to sue Musk's SpaceX over contamination from exploding rockets
Mexico City — A small Texas town just across the border from Mexico is the testing ground for Starship, the hulking spacecraft that Elon Musk hopes will one day ferry people to Mars.
In recent months, multiple test launches have ended in explosions, causing debris to rain down on both countries and in the Gulf of Mexico.
Mexican scientists say the wreckage is killing wildlife, including dolphins, sea turtles and fish.
Amid growing pressure from her constituents, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said this week that her government is investigating the 'security and environmental' impacts of Musk's rockets and has found that 'there is indeed contamination,' a charge Musk's company denies.
Sheinbaum said her government is trying to determine whether SpaceX has violated international laws and said Mexico will file 'necessary lawsuits.'
Her statements come amid hightened tensions between the U.S. and Mexico on security, migration and the economy. President Trump's new tariffs on Mexican imports and threats of U.S. drone strikes on cartel targets have sparked a surge of nationalism here.
Musk, a billionaire who is also the CEO of Tesla and the owner of X, is closely allied with the U.S. administration, having donated more than a quarter billion dollars to help elect Trump. For several months this year he was the informal head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency.
SpaceX said in a post on X that independent tests performed on the material used in Starships confirm that it 'does not present any chemical, biological or toxicological risks.'
The company said it attempts to recover all debris from exploded devices.
U.S. groups have also blamed SpaceX rockets for environmental degradation. The company's Starbase launch facility in South Texas abuts the Boca Chica Wildlife Refuge, an expanse of tidal flats, mangroves and sand dunes that is home to rare and endangered species including ocelots, sea turtles and northern aplomado falcons.
A coalition including the Sierra Club and a local Native American tribe sued the Federal Aviation Administration and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, alleging the agencies approved test launches without conducting thorough environmental reviews. They say failed rocket launches have spread concrete and metal debris across thousands of feets of surrounding lands — and once set off a fire that burned several acres of protected dunes.
In Mexico, environmentalists began raising alarm earlier this year after space debris was discovered in the border city of Matamoros, in the Río Bravo — as Mexico calls the Rio Grande — and in the Gulf of Mexico.
A local NGO in the state of Tamaulipas issued a report documenting animal deaths in a region known as a nesting ground for manatees, sharks, whales and other animals. It warned particularly about risks to sea turtles who ingest particles of space debris.
The group said it had collected more than a ton of debris scattered along an area more than 25 miles long.
The governor of Tamaulipas said authorities were also looking into the issue. Gov. Américo Villarreal Anaya said his government will verify whether 'the internationally required distances are being respected in order to have these types of facilities so that there is no risk to urban centers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bad value? Fair value? Still a bargain? Up 43% in weeks, here's how I see Tesla stock today
It has been a roller-coaster ride for shareholders in Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA). When? Take your pick! Tesla stock has soared 43% since late April alone. It is up 66% in a year and 413% in five years. But there have been some dizzying drops too. Even after its recent rise, the share price is a quarter below where it stood in December. Clearly, owning Tesla is not for the faint-hearted. But, as the share price has demonstrated over the long term, risks can sometimes come hand in hand with brilliant returns. So at its current price, could Tesla be a bargain for me to add to my portfolio? Only time will tell. A bargain is something that has been bought for less – ideally a lot less – than it turns out to be worth. There are two elements to that. One – what Tesla stock would cost me now – is crystal clear, not just to me but to everyone in the market. The second element – what it is actually worth – is far, far harder to gauge. Some shares actually trade for less than a sum of the parts. For example, Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust (itself a long-term Tesla shareholder) sells at a discount of around 10% to its net asset value. By contrast, at the end of the first quarter, Tesla's net asset value was well under 10% of its current market capitalisation. On that basis, the Tesla stock price certainly does not look like a bargain. However, that is only one way of valuing a company. A different approach than a hard, cold look at the balance sheet as it stands today is to consider what value those assets might help the company create for shareholders in future. I think it is fair to say this is how many investors have long valued Tesla stock. It has proven adept at growing sales and turning losses into profits over time. That is thanks to assets it still has, including its brand, proprietary technology, a vertically integrated manufacturing and marketing model, and some very talented employees. They could help propel the company even further in future. It has ambitions in high-potential, fast-growing business areas including artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. It also has ambitions to expand into both trucks and self-driving taxis at a commercial scale. If it can do well enough even in just some of those areas, while performing solidly in its existing business, today's Tesla stock price may yet come to be seen as a bargain. However, while the potential reward part of that storyline attracts me, the actual risks do not. For one thing, a lot of the potential businesses are little more than that. Tesla has yet to prove it can roll them out at scale, let alone profitably. Meanwhile, the base business is struggling. Tesla's power generation unit has been performing strongly and has ongoing growth potential. But the car business saw sales fall slightly last year, while in the first quarter of this year, they slumped. In a highly competitive electric vehicle (EV) market, there is a risk of a permanent shift. Meanwhile, competition could squeeze profit margins. I do not think the current Tesla stock price adequately reflects such risks, so I will not be investing. The post Bad value? Fair value? Still a bargain? Up 43% in weeks, here's how I see Tesla stock today appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool C Ruane has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Tesla. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
20 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
What we know so far about how Trump's deportation effort is unfolding in the Bay Area
As of last month, Carolina's quest for asylum from violence in her Indigenous Guatemalan community seemed to be on track. The mother of two, who speaks only her native K'iche' language, had recently completed a check-in with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and was living with her family in Contra Costa County. Then she received a surprise message on her ICE smartphone app. 'This is your ICE officer,' the June 2 message said, according to Carolina's attorney. 'We want you to come in for an appointment.' Carolina did as she was told, arriving at 630 Sansome St. in San Francisco the next day. It wasn't until after she was arrested that her attorney — who shared her story with the Chronicle and asked that only her first name be used for her protection — would learn the reason for the appointment: Carolina's asylum case had been set aside without a reason given, and an old removal order reinstated. Leaving behind her husband and two young children, Carolina was flown to an ICE detention center in Arizona that same day. Carolina is among dozens of people that local advocates estimate have been arrested in the Bay Area this month in stepped-up operations by federal immigration authorities, as the Trump administration seeks to fulfill a campaign promise by boosting deportation numbers. The effort has been both expansive and disjointed, advocates say, going beyond promises to deport 'the worst of the worst ' while splitting families apart and leaving state officials scrambling for answers. While federal authorities have long had discretionary power to reject asylum applications and other temporary protections that allow people to remain in the U.S., previous administrations have typically used the tactic on a case-by-case basis, said Carolina's attorney, Hayden Rodarte, who focuses on asylum applications for the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. 'But this is the first time we're seeing it in this systematic way,' Rodarte said, noting that Carolina has no criminal history and is the main caregiver for her 10-year-old daughter and 5-year-old son. 'This is the new reality now.' ICE officials have declined to release information about key aspects of recent Bay Area immigration operations, including how many people have been arrested, who they are and why certain people have been targeted for removal. ICE has posted videos on social media of arrests throughout Los Angeles at workplaces and elsewhere, and photos of those detained with alleged criminal histories, but immigration attorneys said the arrests in the Bay Area target those who are trying to follow the process and show up to court. 'They should be showing up to their court hearing. It's the right thing to do but it's so scary,' said Roujin Mozaffarimehr, a managing partner at ImmiCore Law, a Silicon Valley firm. 'It's just really nerve-racking.' Inside the information vacuum, local networks of immigration advocates, attorneys and courtroom observers have worked to piece together everything they know about the cases, in hopes of better understanding how ICE operations are unfolding in the Bay Area. Catherine Seitz, the legal director at the Immigration Institute of the Bay Area, said people have been arrested when they show up for a meeting with ICE during their removal proceedings, an often lengthy legal process. Those meetings typically happen once a year; ICE checks that the cases are still pending and people typically return home, Seitz said. In addition, ICE is detaining people, including those seeking asylum, who arrive to immigration courts in San Francisco and Concord for scheduled hearings. In some cases, government attorneys are attempting to remove people who have been here for less than two years by requesting their cases to be dismissed. Immigration officials then detain people and pursue expedited removal proceedings, a measure that is typically used at airports or at the border, Seitz said. 'The confusing part is, under the last administration, (a dismissed case) was a good thing,' Seitz said, adding that people could then move forward with their asylum petitions. Seitz said that by using expedited removals, the government can typically move forward with deporting someone without going before a judge. This was the case for Carolina, who arrived in the U.S. along with one of her children in January 2024, joining her husband and older child. Carolina, who is from an Indigenous rural area of Guatemala, applied for asylum while citing the violence and persecution from the government there. 'What hurts us most is seeing the children suffer through this,' Carolina's sister said in a statement translated from K'iche' and provided by immigration attorneys. 'Our country has so much violence and we fled to this country with the hopes of finding joy here. But now we're seeing things worsen here with family separations.' There is no removal order for Carolina's husband and children, and the rest of the family's asylum cases remain pending before immigration court in Concord, Rodarte said. Because federal agencies have not released information on the arrests, advocates and attorneys have sought to use their networks to keep an unreliable count of the number of people detained. Last weekend, hundreds of demonstrators gathered outside of an ICE facility in San Francisco after immigrants said they had received orders to check in with the federal agency — spurring concerns from advocates that officials were planning to detain people with detention circumstances similar to Carolina's. Though a handful of immigrants showed up Saturday and Sunday, the office remained closed and ICE officials did not detain anyone, later saying that the closure was due to protests. ICE enforcement in the Bay Area has differed from Los Angeles, where the agency has targeted car washes and other workplaces, as well as gathering spots for day laborers such as Home Depot parking lots, to take people into custody — sparking conservative support along with widespread protests and accusations of racial profiling. Trump has waffled on the tactics, at times saying migrant workers are dangerous and take jobs that could go to Americans, and at other times saying they are ' almost impossible to replace.' But with the Department of Homeland Security this week reversing instructions for ICE to pause raids on farms, meat packing plants, restaurants and hotels, advocates for immigrants worry that the more aggressive actions ICE has taken in Los Angeles and parts of the Central Valley could happen in the Bay Area. Jason Houser, a former ICE chief of staff under President Joe Biden, said the Trump administration appears intent on reaching arrest quotas of 3,000 people per day. To achieve those goals, ICE has begun targeting immigrants who have been vetted and given a legal status to stay in the country, versus focusing on only those with criminal histories. There aren't enough people with criminal backgrounds to meet the quotas that the White House has set, Houser said. 'When you set quotas at the White House of arrests,' he said, 'ICE is going to take the easiest path to get their hands on people that they can bring into detention.' Since Trump's second term started, ICE said it has arrested over 236,000 people who were in the country illegally and deported more than 207,000, below the administration's goals but a significant increase from recent years. In his first term, Trump deported 1.5 million people, while Biden had deported 1.1 million people as of February 2024, according to Migration Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank. The detainment of more people poses other challenges for immigration courts. There are currently roughly 700 federal immigration judges — a decrease after Trump fired judges in California, Louisiana and other states — and a backlog of nearly 3 million pending cases due in part to a spike in people seeking asylum since 2022, according to government data. In many cases, it can take someone going through a removal proceeding nearly 10 years to get ahead of a judge, said Carl Shusterman, a Los Angeles immigration attorney. 'If he's just going to put another million people a year in immigration court,' Shusterman said, 'it'll take 15 to 20 years to get a hearing.'
Washington Post
20 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Republican Rep. Don Bacon, a vocal Trump critic, won't seek reelection
Rep. Don Bacon (R-Nebraska), a vocal critic of President Donald Trump on a range of issues, will not seek reelection, according to a person familiar with his plans who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive information. His purple district is seen as a battleground, making the decision welcome news for Democrats as they attempt to retake the House in next year's midterms. The news of Bacon's plans was first reported by Punchbowl News and NOTUS.
